The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCapital Improvement Program Adopted FY 1999-2000 . I'l' .. / D D C D . t . D '0 - ~ ~. C. C ~ ~ ~ ~ D . t r'I .. . - . City-of Mountain View California . Capital Improvemen~ ~rogram .' , Adopted 1999/2000 , Planned 2000/2004 - , Cover Picture: - - - , , . - . .t.- / a I m m I I I :J 'I I c. I I ~ I I I I 'I Stevens Creek Trail, Reach 3, completed in early 1999, is a one-iTIile trail section linking Landels School and Park to Whisman School and Park. It separates pedestrians and cyclists from motor vehicles with underpasses and pedestrian bridges across the creek and the large overcrossing structure as shown, The 1,200 foot overcrossing spans Central Expressway, Evelyn Avenue, the CalTrain tracks and the new light rail tracks, Its steel 'truss design and stone entry walls reflect the character of the smitller creek bridges, Ten differenfagencies cooperated on the design and permitting of the overcrossing~ Stevens Creek Trail, Reach 3 has received aspecial Award of Merit from the American Public Works Association. - , - .. .. .. City of Mountain View - .. Capital Improvement Program Adopted 1999/2000, Planned 2000/2004 .. - .. II .. City Council .. .. Mary Lou Zoglin, Mayor .. Rosemary Stasek, Vice-Mayor .. . Mario Ambra .. '. Ralph Faravelli .. . R. Michael Kasperzak, Jr. .. . Sally J. Lieber .. .. Nancy Noe .. . Submitted by: .. .. Kevin C. Duggan, City Manager Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director Tim Ko, Assistant Public Works Director .. - Prepared by: .. '* J. Michael Sartor, Capital Program Manager Fred Irwin, Senior Administrative Analyst Loo Ng, Administrative Analyst .... ... - ... !I"" 1M - JI1i!II CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .. - .., TABLE OF CONTENTS II ... .. fIIIIl . Subject Pages Transmittal Memo 1- Ongoing Active Proj ects 1-3 Adopted 1999-00 Projects 4-16 Planned 2000-01 Proj ects 17-26 Planned 2001-02 Projects 27-34 Planned 2002-03 Projects 35-41 Planned 2003-04 Projects 42-47 Projects Closed June 30, 1999 48 Unscheduled Proj ects 49-62 .. ,.. - .. ... .. iIIlf .. -- .. ". ~ .. - !Ill .... ... Appendix List - ,.. . - .. .- JIll \ - - ... - - .... - filii .... .. .. . JlIIIII ,JIll .. .... -- - - .. . .. .. .. .. .. ,. .. "" .. ..... .. - .. - ''- ",. - - lIlIIr ..... - ,. :s: 1;.... ..i CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: September 15, 1999 TO: City Council FROM: Kevin C. Duggan, City Manager Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director SUBJECT: ADOPTED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (1999-2000 THROUGH 2003-04) INTRODUCTION The adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (1999-2000 through 2003-04) is the blueprint to add, upgrade and expand City facilities and infrastructure. The plan was adopted by the City Council on May 25,1999 after months of review, including a study session on March 23,1999. Funding for the first year's projects was approved along with the 1999-2000 operating budget on June 8, 1999. Funding for subsequent years' projects will be considered in future budgets. Highlights of the adopted program include the following projects: . Approximately $12.3 million in the first year for the repair and replacement of City infrastructure, including streets, sidewalks, water mains, sewer mains and utilities. . $1.4 million to restore the historic Adobe Building at the corner of Moffett Boulevard and Central Expressway. . $7.8 million to construct a new community center at Rengstorff Park. . $600,000 to design and construct the long-awaited Mercy-Bush Park. . $70,000 for a water storage feasibility study to initiate evaluations of future reservoir sites. . $650,000 to design and construct a public plaza with transit serving uses immedi- ately adjacent to the new transit center scheduled to open in December 1999. -- City Council September 15, 1999 Page 2 - ~ - . $850,000 to construct a reconfigured San Antonio Loop to provide space for the Community School of Music and Arts and other uses to be determined by the City Council. iIlIiili - - BACKGROUND - The development of the five-year CIP is a collaborative process managed by the Public Works Department, involving virtually every other City department. The annual review of the CIP began last October with a focus on amending existing projects in the plan for required scope and budget changes and to add new projects. The annual review is not a "zero base" budgeting exercise but a "roll-forward" of the remaining four years of the program. New projects are added to "Year 1" and subsequent years on a priority exception basis, subject to the approval of the City Manager. - .. - - .. - To initiate the annual review, departments provided Public Works with the following information: - .... · Projects to be completed or closed by the end of the fiscal year. .-.. . Already approved and funded projects, which must be amended to reflect changes in scope or budget. ',.,- - . New project proposals not currently included in the five-year plan. (As a general rule, new projects are added on an exception basis-to meet urgent operational needs, health and safety requirements or City Council/ community priorities.) - -. Public Works staff then summarized the department proposals, refined the preliminary budget estimates and prepared a preliminary five-year program for review by the Capital Improvement Review Committee (CIRC) (CIRC: Assistant City Manager, Finance and Administrative Services Director, Public Works Director, Community Development Director, Community Services Director and Capital Program Manager). In a series of meetings conducted since October, CIRC and the City Manager reviewed the preliminary plan and further refined scope, budget and schedule for the projects in the five-year plan. In reviewing the proposed projects, the following factors were considered: - \:1i'~ ... - - - ~ · City criteria for selecting capital projects (Attachment 1). . Staff understanding of current City Council and community priorities. - - - - ,- - - .. .. - -- .. ... .. . "- ,~ .. ". .. ,. .. fill .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ,,. ... ... .. ... ... - .. ~ ... ,.... .. .... at City Council September 15, 1999 Page 3 . Workload and ability to begin working on projects in the year they are programmed in the CIP. . Funding availability. CIRC divided some projects into phases according to the amount of work that can be completed in a fiscal year and available funding (e.g., Senior Center and Evelyn Avenue). Project phasing also allows staff to refine project scope through preliminary studies or design so a better cost estimate can be developed for subsequent project phases. Projects were adjusted for inflation as they "rolled forward" into the first year of the CIP. From these reviews, a draft five-year CIP emerged that represents an ambi- tious but reasonably achievable list of projects and maintains a minimum ending balance of $5 million in the Capital Improvement Reserve Fund in each year of the plan consistent with City Council policy. The $5 million reserve provides a contingency fund for unspecified urgent capital improvements or can serve as an emergency pool of funds for unanticipated damage to City facilities. It also provides the City Council some flexibility to consider urgent unplanned projects that may arise during the plan period and/or those on the unscheduled list. The City Council reviewed the draft 1999-04 CIP at the March 23 study session after a tour of major CIP projects. The study session afforded Councilmembers an opportunity to discuss project priorities, funding and timing strategies, short- and long-term capital objectives and receive comments from the public about community priorities. Based upon the themes and priorities identified at the study session, Public Works staff revised the draft CIP to formally present to the City Council for public hearing and adoption in May. - City Council September 15, 1999 Page 4 ~<!;.H .... - _. CAP IT AL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDING - Funding sources for capital improvement projects range from restricted funds to finance specific projects (water, sewer and solid waste funds, North Bayshore Community Fund, recreation in-lieu fees and gas tax) and unrestricted funds to finance any type of project (Capital Improvement Reserve and Construction/Real Property Conveyance Tax). - - - - The adopted five-year 1999-04 Capital Improvement Program is summarized in the Appendix 1 spreadsheet which lists all projects, estimates of beginning and ending balances in each fund and funding sources for every project in the five-year program. Project budgets in the outer years are expressed in 1999 dollars. Estimated revenues available for CIPs in outer years are discounted by 5 percent per year to account for inflation and the lower buying power of future dollars. This allows the City Council to move projects without adjusting for inflation. - - .. .. - -- All projects in the five-year CIP include contingency funding in their budgets because of the inherent difficulty estimating costs before initiating design. The complexity of projects, level of involvement required by outside agencies, amount of information available regarding project scope and project duration determine the contingency allowance in each project. Only the first year of the five-year program is funded, and the projects remain active until completed or canceled. Assumptions for determining the availability of revenues for the adopted 1999-04 CIP are included in Attachment 2. - ft. ... - ..... - The available balance in the CIP Reserve to fund 1999-2000 projects is $11,960,000. As a result, the funding for the Community Center Project construction was reduced from the $8.6 million estimated for new building construction to $7.8 million to maintain a minimum balance of $5 million in the CIP Reserve Fund. ..... '.",~ ~ ~~ The $7.8 million for the Community Center Construction (Project 00-16) and the $650,000 for the "Cube" Site (Project 00-49) are placeholders. As these projects are further developed and move through design, staff will refine the project costs and develop funding strategies to cover total project costs for future City Council consideration. .... ,. - ... SIGNIFICANT ACTIVE PROJECTS ALREADY FUNDED - All active projects are listed in the Capital Improvement Program under the Active Projects tab. A number of significant projects (budgets generally totaling over $1 million) are ongoing and are in the midst of multi-year efforts requiring considerable staff time to complete. Attachment 3 contains brief descriptions of some of these projects. v ~ .. .... ... .. - ".. w - - ... .. .. .. .. - - ., ". .. - .. .. ... ... . ... .. - .. ,. .. .. ... ... w - ... JlIi' III' - - .... - City Council September IS, 1999 Page 5 ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS The five-year CIP includes any project with a budget of over $33,200. Typically these include major studies, utility, technology, other infrastructure and transportation projects, parks/recreation projects and building projects. A major portion of the program consists of capital maintenance or renovation projects. The adopted 1999-04 CIP groups projects in three categories: . Amended (active projects which require funding and/ or scope adjustment). . Annual (projects for recurring maintenance activities that can generally be accom- plished within one year). . Other (all other projects, including those which are either longer than one year in duration or are not specifically maintenance-related). Each year of the CIP includes a number of "annual projects" to fund ongoing infra- structure repair and replacement. The City of Mountain View places a high priority on preventive maintenance to preserve the City's investment in existing infrastructure and replacing infrastructure that has outlived its useful life. There are ongoing annual maintenance projects for streets, sidewalks, water mains, sewer mains, forestry mainte- nance, facilities and landfill postclosure maintenance systems. Of the $82 million planned for projects in the five-year CIP, approximately 83 percent ($68 million) is related to preserving/ replacing existing facilities, infrastructure, equipment and technology. A discussion of the adopted Capital Improvement Projects for each category (amended, annual and other major projects) is provided in Attachment 4. A brief description of each project is provided in this CIP document, along with its funding source. Unscheduled projects (those currently not programmed in this five-year CIP) are included in the CIP document in two lists: (1) projects with a higher probability of funding within five years; and (2) projects with a lower probability of funding within five years. The distinction is merely for communicating staff's evaluation of relative priority. .. City Council September 15, 1999 Page 6 - .... ~> CONCLUSION .. The projects in the 1999-04 CIP are scheduled to balance the availability of funding and staff resources and reflect priorities expressed by the City Council. Establishing priorities is often difficult because there are many worthy projects which cannot be funded within the five-year program. However, staff believes the CIP represents a list of recommended projects which balance the need to maintain and renovate the City's infrastructure as well as improve and add community facilities and amenities within available resources. JI.~ Kevin C. Duggan City Manager - - ~ .... .... ". .. - .. - .. Cathy R. Lazarus Public Works Director . ... KCD-CRL/9 / CIr-/,\~ ~ 936-09-10-99M^ ~" " - ..... Attachments .. - - "-l. '-Wi .. - .. .. - .. ~ ... ... "'*" ""'" - - .. - ... - .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - .. .. .. 11M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, . PLANNED 2000/2004 ., .... ~ THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ... - .. .. .... ... .. .. .... ... tfIt ... ,- -- - .. - .. IJA .. ",... .., ,..;;. .. - - Criteria for Selecting Capital Projects, August 1993 (not in priority order) .. .... """ D Effects on operating and maintenance costs/preservation of existing assets - D Health and safety effects .. - D Legally mandated .. D Economic development/ revitalization effects - .. D Enhances productivity / operational efficiency of basic City services .. D Elected officials priorities/preferences . - D Conformance to adopted plans, goals, objectives and policies or to correct an existing deficiency - '- D Availability of funds from State/Federal! outside sources .. D Equitable distribution of resources ... - D Implementation feasibility """" .... D Citizen and/ or neighborhood interest ... D Cost-effectiveness/ cost-benefit/return on investment/project life expectancy /implications of project deferral - .., D Environmental! aesthetic/ community identity effects ... *.4 D Extent of secondary benefits or spillovers/impact on water or energy conservation, traffic reduction, social implications - - D Interjurisdictional effects/ opportunity for joint project implementation (e.g., with other agencies) - - ... JMS/9/CIP 936-07-28-99 A ^ ~ ... .. UII Attachment 1 '- - .. .. ., .. - .. ... ,. .. .. - ... ... .. - .. ""., .. .... - ~ ,- -.l .. ,... .... .. .. - '. - .. IN - - - .. .. ASSUMPTIONS FOR DETERMINING AVAILABILITY OF REVENUES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Capital Improvement Reserve Fund The Capital Improvement Reserve is the primary unrestricted funding source for capital projects. The City has a policy to retain a minimum of $5 million in this reserve. The proposed 1999-2000 through 2003-04 Capital Improvement Program can be accom- plished while maintaining the Capital Improvement Reserve at this level. The Capital Improvement Reserve maintains a minimum annual ending balance during the five- year period of between approximately $5.0 million and $6.3 million. The $5 million minimum reserve provides a contingency fund for unanticipated urgent capital improvements or an emergency pool of funds for unanticipated damage to City facilities. Capital Improvement Reserve Fund Estimated Balance on July I, 1999 $13,460,000 Revenue Transfer from General Fund Carryover from Fiscal Year 1998-99 3,500,000 Subtotal Carryover /Revenue $16,960,000 Reserve for Minimum Balance (5,000,000) Capital Improvement Reserve Funds Available For 1999-2000 Projects $11,960,000 The total amount of General Fund carryover and other revenues to the Capital Improvement Reserve since the end of Fiscal Year 1998-99 has been estimated to be $16,960,000 as shown above. This leaves a balance of $11,960,000 for new projects over the $5 million minimum. Fiscal Years 2000-01 through 2002-03 have been estimated to include additional revenue from unallocated carryover of $3.2 million per year. Fiscal Year 2003-04 (fifth year of the plan) is estimated to include additional revenue from unallocated carryover of $2.5 million. There are usually some one-time refunds from closed, canceled and amended projects as well as other interest and loan repayments that accrue each year to the Capital Improvement Reserve. Because it is too early to project the amount of revenue which will flow back to the Capital Improvement Reserve at the end of Fiscal Year 1998-99 -1- Attachment 2 .... ..... from closed projects, the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 program does not anticipate any funding from that source. .. ~- Construction/Real Property Conveyance Tax Fund - Pursuant to City Code Section 29.84, the Construction/Real Property Conveyance Tax Fund funds expenses associated with capital improvements, including servicing bonds used to finance capital improvements. Along with the Capital Improvement Reserve, it is free of restrictions as to the type of capital improvement it may finance and is estimated to have a balance of $3,128,000 at the beginning of the 1999-2000 fiscal year. Annual revenue to the fund is estimated at between $1.7 million and $1.8 million per year in 1999 dollars. A portion of the $15 million Tasman Light Rail contribution is funded at $1 million per year for five years (which commenced in Fiscal Year 1996-97 and is shown in the first two years of the plan). It is anticipated that there will be $4,875,000 available in the Construction/Real Property Conveyance Tax Fund for capital improvements in 1999-2000, before subtracting the $1 million allocation to Tasman Corridor light rail, as shown on the following table. - ... - - - ~ .. .. .. - Construction/Real Property Conveyance Tax Fund ....... Balance on July I, 1999 $3,128,000 - Estimated Excess of Revenues over Expenses in 1999-2000 - 1,747,000 - Total 1999-2000 Conveyance/Real Property Construction Funds Available for Capital Improvements ... $4.875.000 - Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste Enterprise Funds ....... .. The reserves in the Water and Wastewater Fund are for emergencies, operating contin- gency, rate stabilization and routine replacement/maintenance of infrastructure. Since there is no reserve in these funds specifically dedicated to capital projects and consistent with past practice, this CIP does not show a beginning balance for these enterprise funds. It is assumed that rates will be established to provide sufficient funding for ongoing water, wastewater and solid waste projects. Each year, there are annual projects to repair the water and wastewater systems as well as planned water main and wastewater main replacements. N. ~ - .. .. In 1996-97, the City Council approved a funding plan to implement long-range improvements to the City's water system through Water Master Plan Projects (Appendix No.4), which are identified with "WMPP" in their titles in this CIP. - .... ... it4Brl' -2- - Attachment 2 .. - - - .. .. ... .. .. .. ,. - - .. - - - .. - .. " .../ .. ... " ,. - ",. .. ... ... .. .. .. .. ..." .. fIlA. .... - .. Appendix No.4 also contains a report on the status of the Water Master Plan Projects and the current implementation schedule. The design and construction of seven enclosures for common recycling in the down- town parking lots is proposed for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 at an estimated cost of $155,000 from the Solid Waste Management Fund. Storm Drain Construction Fund This fund receives revenues from fees collected from developers as they connect to the City's storm drain system and "Rights of Use" charges assessed as part of assessment districts. The revenues are used solely to finance new or replacement segments of the City's storm drainage system. Since the City is mostly developed and there are only a few properties that have not already paid the fees, it is not anticipated that significant additional revenues that will accrue to this fund. Staff is estimating approximately $50,000 to $60,000 per year in 1999-2000 dollars in revenue each year. Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax funds are restricted to improve or maintain roads, streets or other closely related transportation projects. Gas Tax revenues must be accounted for separately from other City funds and are apportioned to the City, depending on the category of gas taxes according to vehicle registration, assessed valuation and population. Approximately $726,000 in Gas Tax revenue is being allocated in 1999-2000 for street maintenance operating budget expenses, and $200,000 per year has been dedicated to the $15 million Tasman Light Rail contribution in the first two years of the CIP. Remaining Gas Tax revenues available for capital improvements in 1999-2000 are shown below: -3- Attachment 2 '~ Gas Tax Fund ~.i;:l Estimated Balance on July 1, 1999 $ 606,000 - - Revenue from interest Income and Sections 2106, 2107,2107.5 and Section 2105 (Proposition 111) Additional Gas Taxes - 1,497,000 Less Gas Taxes used for Street Section Operations -. 726,000 - Subtotal Available for 1999-2000 Projects 771,000 - Total 1999-2000 Gas Tax Revenues Available For Capital Improvements - $1.377.000 - .. Shoreline Regional Park Community (North Bayshore) Fund - Revenues for this fund come primarily from property tax collected within the district. Although the Shoreline Regional Park Community is in sound financial condition, increasing financial obligations will constrain the amount of funding available for capital projects. ~ - .. .~. After deducting operating expenses and debt service, about $4.7 million is available for capital projects in 1999-2000. The annual revenue available for capital improvements in outer years is approximately $4.1 million to $5.6 million per year (discounted in outer years). - ... "" In addition to known obligations, staff recommends maintaining contingency reserves in the North Bayshore Fund for landfill-related/environmental issues which would increase operating or capital costs or require issuance of additional debt. """" - .. North Bayshore Community Fund .. Estimated Balance on July 1, 1999 $ 6,198,000 - .. Estimated Revenues in Excess of Operating Expenses Available for Capital Improvements in 1999-2000 - 4.707.000 Mk Total 1999-2000 Shoreline Regional Park Community Funds Available - $10.905.000 - '" - -4- ..... Attachment 2 - - - - ",. .. ... .. .. - ". .. -- ..,. ... - - - - .. "'" .... ,IfIII14 ,.. ... - ,., .. - -- .",. .. ... - I"'" .. ,.... .. .. -- Land Sales Fund Revenues for this fund come from the sale of surplus City-owned property. Revenue from land sales during the first year of the proposed CIP is estimated to be approxi- mately $250,000, and these revenues are programmed for open space acquisition in tne Del Medio area. . Downtown Properties The City Council has expressed interest in possibly using revenue from the sale of some downtown properties to fund specific projects such as park land acquisition or development. Revenue from the sale of City-owned property at the corner of Bryant Street and Evelyn Avenue may generate $900,000, including approximately $300,000 of Revitalization District reimbursement. Other downtown properties have been identified (i.e., the former Fire Station No.1 property and the property on Bryant Street between Mercy and California Streets.) Shoreline Golf Links Fund The Shoreline Golf Links Fund is a revolving fund for the revenue generated from the golf course and is used for operations, maintenance and improvements to the course. The anticipated balance for capital projects in 1999-2000 is $3,309,000. Other Sources of Funds Some projects have all or a portion of their funding from sources such as grants, bond sales, special assessments, fees and other non-City funding. While these projects are recommended for approval, their implementation may be subject to the receipt of the designated funding. The anticipated funding sources for these projects are noted in the descriptions of the individual projects. Likewise, several projects are included in the plan with assessment district funding which is subject to future approvals and are not guaranteed at this time. . Transportation Development Act Grants Each year, there are Pedestrian Bicycle/TDA Projects funded from the City's annual guaranteed allocation of Transportation Development Act (IDA) funds. This year four projects are proposed for a total of $80,000. -5- Attachment 2 ~. ~ Occasionally, the City will also have projects which qualify for discretionary funds available from this source. So far, there are no projects in the proposed CIP which anticipate use of IDA discretionary funding. h>><lll - ..... . Outside Grants - In Fiscal Year 1999-2000 of the plan, the Stevens Creek Trail and Wildlife Corridor, Reach 4, Segment 1 (Lande Is School to Yuba Drive) is shown with proposed con- struction funds coming from grants and other sources. The City has already received approval for approximately $1.2 million of grant funding toward this segment of Reach 4. - - - - ~. . Recreation In-Lieu Funds - Recreation in-lieu funds are generated from development fees on new residential property which will add potential new users of City parks and recreation facilities but where no land is dedicated for park and recreation use as part of the project. The funds are used for the City to acquire land for parks or to fund improvements to parks and recreation areas. .. - :8f .. A City Council policy adopted in March 1997 establishes neighborhood projects for land acquisition and parks and recreation development within one-half mile of the new development as a priority for the expenditure of fees collected in lieu of land dedications. Any remaining funding from this source can be applied to a facility which has City-wide use. The Parks and Recreation Commission recom- mends annually to the City Council designations for the allocations and interest earnings. The latest designations approved by City Council, which include funds received in the second through fourth quarters (October 1997 through June 1998) of Fiscal Year 1997-98 totaling approximately $1,423,000 are reflected in the CIP plan. Appendix 2 contains the December 8,1998 staff report "Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fee Designations" which was approved by the City Council. ... ... - ... ""* - - - IoIIi . PG&E Rule 20A Undergrounding Program - .. Beginning in 1968, the California Public Utilities Commission established a program that required PG&E to annually allocate funds to cities and counties within its service area to underground overhead electric facilities (Rule 20A Undergrounding Program). Annual allocations are made to each community based on the number of total electric meters versus those served from overhead lines. The City receives about $420,000 a year from the program. At this time, the City's Rule 20A funds are fully committed to several active utility underground - - -, .. .. - -6- ~' Attachment 2 - - - .., - .. projects. A number of criteria must be met for a project to qualify under the Rule 20A program. When Rule 20A funds are used, Pacific Bell, under its companion Rule 32A.1, must also underground its overhead facilities at its cost at the same time. Likewise, under the City's franchising ordinance, cable television lines must also be converted to underground at their own cost. .. - ",. .. Rule 20A does not include undergrounding of high-voltage transmission lines or conversion of customer service panels to receive underground service, and it only includes undergrounding of up to 100 lineal feet of the customers' overhead service laterals. ",. -- _. .... . Measure B Pavement Management Funds ... In November 1996, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A/B to provide funds for transportation projects in the County. Measure B designated $10 million per year for nine years to the cities and county for pavement maintenance and repairs. To accelerate pavement maintenance projects, the Board of Supervisors approved allocating the funds over four years. Mountain View is expected to receive about $3 million in Measure B pavement maintenance funds. These funds must be used for new pavement projects and cannot replace funds c~rrently being spent on pavement repairs (Maintenance of Effort rule). Measure B pavement funds will be used on the Evelyn A venue improvement project. - ... .. "... ... - ... ... JMS/9/CIP .. 936-07-28-99A-1 ^ .. .. ". ., .... .. - .. ... .. ,. .. .... -7- - - Attachment 2 .. ~. - SIGNIFICANT ACTIVE PROJECTS ALREADY FUNDED ~ - All active projects are listed in the Capital Improvement Program under the Active Projects tab. A number of significant projects (budgets generally totaling over $1 million) are ongoing and are in the midst of multi-year efforts to complete. Below are brief descriptions of some of these projects. ...,. .. - . Municipal Operations Center (Project 93-22) ..... The Municipal Operations Center (MaC) project was funded in 1993-94 and consists of several phases: A new Fleet Service building completed in 1994; renovation of Buildings A, Band C for shop facilities completed in 1998, a new Administration Building is in construction, and Pavement Restoration is the last phase. The New Administration Building is about 17,000 square feet in size and will be occupied by Public Services and Community Services employees currently located in inadequate or temporary quarters at the Mac. The construction cost for the Administration Building, including contingencies, is $2,530,000. - - - .. - .. . Evelyn A venue Improvement (Project 99-42) .. .. This project in three phases will improve Evelyn Avenue between Castro Street and Bernardo Avenue (City limit) from a two-lane partially improved street to a fully improved street with two travel lanes and a bicycle lane in each direction separated by a raised landscape median between Highway 85 and Bernardo Avenue. Between Castro Street and Highway 85, Evelyn Avenue will be progressively widened to provide two through lanes beginning at Castro Street to four lanes east of Bush Street to Highway 85. Phase I (Castro Street to Stevens Creek, Project 99-42) is funded in the 1998-1999 CIP. Phase II (Stevens Creek to Pioneer Way, Project 00-36) is funded in the 1999-2000 CIP. Phase III (Pioneer Way to Bernardo Avenue) is programmed in the 2002-2003 CIP. The total project cost is about $9.2 million. Funding sources include City funds ($5 million), Measure A/B and grant funds ($3.2 million) and property owner assessments/fees ($1 million). In August 1998, the City Council approved the roadway geometrics for Evelyn Avenue improvements. Design is underway, and construction of Phase I will begin this fall. .. .... .. ..., - - .... ... - 111II' - ~ . Refurbish Median Landscape/Gateway Design on El Camino Real (Project 99-26) - This project will upgrade the median island landscaping on El Camino Real and design gateway features at City boundaries on EI Camino Real. Landscaping in the El Camino Real medians dates from the early 1980s and, except for routine ,- IIIIt> - -1- - Attachme~t 3 - .. - - ".. - -- .. .. .. IfI/IIII '* .. ar .... .. ..... ... .. ... - - .... .. - .. ". ., - .. - .. .. .. - - - .... - - maintenance, has not been upgraded. This project will grade and install new plant material and hardscape and upgrade the irrigation system in the median islands between Grant Road and Rengstorff A venue. This project is funded in the 1998-99 CIP. Design is underway, and construction is anticipated this summer. In October 1998, the City Council advanced funds from the EI Camino Gateway, Project 00-21, to develop concepts for gateways. Several significant constraints have been identified that may require a modified project approach. These constraints include staggered city boundaries, Caltrans requirements, right-of-way limitations and possible modifications by the VTA to improve bus operations. Evaluation is underway to determine the locations and levels at gateway improvements that could be considered within these constraints. . Fire Station No.2 Construction (Project 99-32) This project will replace the existing Fire Station No.2 on the corner of Grant Road and Cuesta Drive with a new building on the same site. The existing 1958 building is about 2,000 square feet with numerous structural and functional deficiencies. In 1992, minimal seismic retrofit reduced the risk of structural collapse in the event of an earthquake. In 1997, the City Council approved replacing the existing station with a new building of about 4,000 square feet on the same site. Funding for design was approved in the 1997-98 CIP, and construction funding was approved in the 1998-99 CIP. The project is currently in design, and construction is antici- pated this fall/winter. A project to modify the Grant Road/Cuesta Drive intersection to improve overall traffic operations is also funded in the 1998-99 CIP. The modification adds a second northbound left-turn lane and a southbound right-turn-only lane on Grant Road to improve the intersection operation and ingress/egress from Fire Station No.2. . Vista Slope and Amphitheatre Parkway Landscaping (Project 99-21) The Amphitheatre Parkway and Vista Slope Landscape project has three com- ponents: (1) landscaping the north side of Amphitheatre Parkway in front of Vista Slope; (2) installing sidewalks on the north side of Amphitheatre Parkway from North Shoreline Boulevard to Permanente Creek to provide continuous pedestrian access from North Shoreline Boulevard to the trails on Vista Slope, along Permanente Creek and in Shoreline at Mountain View; and (3) replace landscape screening (removed during landfill closure) on the Vista Slope along the rear of the Amphitheatre. This project is funded in the 1998-99 CIP. Design is currently in -2- Attachment 3 1\t1i!' - progress, and construction will be combined with the Crittenden Site Parking project this summer. ','.w ,~ . Crittenden Site Parking and Landscaping Improvement (Project 99-20) ~ The project will construct a 14-acre parking lot on the Crittenden Site to replace the Amphitheatre Parking Lots A/B on the Charleston Site as called for in the North Bayshore Precise Plan. The parking lot design implements the concept plan reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission, Bill Graham Presents and approved by the City Council in February 1998. The concept plan shows two parking areas with a center green space/pedestrian connection between Crittenden Lane and Shoreline at Mountain View. There is also a green space at the corner of Crittenden Lane and North Shoreline Boulevard that is partly occu- pied by the temporary Fire Station No.5. The parking lot improvements include lighting and basic site landscaping. As configured, the lot and green space can be used for other activities when it is not used for Amphitheatre parking. Funding is included in the 1998-99 CIP. Design is nearly complete, and construction will begin this summer to provide Amphitheatre parking for the year 2000 concert season. ~ ... ~ - - .. - .. - - - . Crittenden Storm Water Pump Station and Inlet Piping Construction (Project 96-55) - - - This project is in construction in partnership with SGI. The Crittenden Site lease agreement between the City and SGI authorizes SGI to build the pump station and inlet piping and obligates the City to reimburse SGI for the cost. The pump station will handle storm water runoff from about 160 acres, including the SGI site, the Crittenden Landfill, the 14-acre Amphitheatre parking lot and City landfill at the northeast quadrant of Shoreline at Mountain View. About 1,000' of inlet piping will collect and carry storm water to the pump station, where it will be pumped and discharged to Stevens Creek. This project has a total budget of $5,154,000. Construction is on schedule and within budget. - .. ~ ~~ -, .. - JMS/9/CIP 936-07- 28-99R ^ _. - ~j lJ!I!Itt,.- - - - -3- - .Wi Attachment 3 - - ..... - ". ... "... .. ",. .. ",. .. IfIIIa ... "... - .. .. .. ... - - ,. .. - .. ,. .' - ... .. ... ". - ,. - - - - .. ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Amended Projects Amended projects are active projects requiring funding andlor scope adjustment. Below are descriptions of four major projects proposed for amendments: . Community Center Remodel! Addition Design (Project 97-28) Funding of $350,000 was approved in 1997-98 to design a new wing and renovate the existing Community Center building. Of this amount, $260,000 is for archi- tectural services and $90,000 for project management and City administration. Since that time, the City Council asked for an evaluation of the option for a new building. The cost for the alternatives evaluation and design of a new building will exceed $350,000. The City Council indicated their interest in a new building at a study session on March 23. Additional funding to complete the design phase of a new building is estimated to be $500,000. The adopted amendment increased the design budget by $500,000. . Stevens Creek Trail, Reach 4, Segment 1 Construction (Project 99-25) The trail alignment of the section of trail from Landels Park to Highway 237 was relocated to the east side of Stevens Creek by the City Council on March 16, 1999. Construction costs will increase by approximately $975,000 with an east bank alignment. . Evelyn Avenue Improvements, Design (Project 95-35) This project involves the design of street improvements on Evelyn Avenue from Castro Street to Bernardo Avenue. Design services were funded for $700,000 from the CIP Reserve Fund in the 1995-96 CIP. In a recent meeting with the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) staff learned that design costs are reimbursable under Measure AIB ("pothole" money) in an amount proportional to the eligible construction costs. It is estimated that about 33 percent of the Evelyn Avenue improvements are eligible for Measure AIB funding; therefore, $230,000 of the design cost of this project will be replaced with Measure AIB funds and the same amount funded from the CIP Reserve will be applied to the Evelyn Avenue Improvements, Phase II. -1- Attachment 4 ~< .. . Evelyn Avenue Construction, Phase I (Castro Street to Stevens Creek), (Project 99-42) ilIl~ .. This project involves the reconstruction of the portion of Evelyn A venue between Castro Street and Stevens Creek. The project was funded for $2 million from the CIP Reserve Fund in the 1998-99 CIP. Staff has estimated the portions eligible for Measure A/B Funds in all three phases of the Evelyn Avenue Improvement Project based on current cost estimates and has determined that Phase I is eligible for 50 percent Measure A/B funding; $1 million of the construction cost of this project will be replaced with Measure A/B funds and the same amount from CIP Reserve will be applied to the Evelyn Avenue Improvements, Phase II. - ... - ... - .... - Annual Projects - Each year of the CIP includes a number of "annual projects" to fund ongoing infra- structure repair and replacement. The City of Mountain View places a high priority on preventive maintenance to preserve the City's investment in existing infrastructure and replacing infrastructure that has outlived its useful life. There are ongoing annual maintenance projects for streets, sidewalks, water mains, sewer mains, street trees, facilities and landfill postclosure maintenance systems. Of the $82 million planned for projects in the five-year CIP, approximately 83 percent ($68 million) is related to preserving/replacing existing facilities, infrastructure, equipment and technology. Funding levels for the annual projects are similar to last year with the exception of one project described below. - .. - - .. - '8> .... . Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements - This is an annual project for traffic studies and Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) demonstrations with funding of $100,000. This year (1999-2000), several prior demonstration projects have been or are anticipated to be approved by the City Council for permanent installation. These include the traffic circles on View and Farley Streets and curb reconstruction at the northeast corner of Ernestine Lane and Lloyd Way. Additional project funding of about $220,000 was added to do this work for a total budget of $320,000 in 1999-2000. ~ - - - ..... iIIIIlII - ~' - - ... - -2- - .'" Attachment 4 .. .. .. - JIIff1I .. ..... ... .. .. - ... .. - -- .. - - .. .. - - .. .. - - ". .' - .... - .. - .. .". .. "*' .. - .. Other Projects Major Projects . Mountain View Community Center Project The Mountain View Community Center, located in Rengstorff Park, was dedicated in 1964 and is about 35 years old. The Community Center is the main facility for the City's recreation programs and houses the business offices for the Recreation Division and Community Services Department administrative staff. In 1994, a feasibility study to renovate the Community Center was conducted. The study found a number of deficiencies with the facility, including: (1) ADA accessi- bility; (2) inadequate HV AC; (3) inadequate sprinklers for fire protection; (4) inadequate electrical and plumbing systems with operational problems; and (5) insufficient space to accommodate program staff and storage. The project goals are to improve the Community Center's overall functionality, provide an ADA- compliant facility, upgrade existing multi-purpose rooms, upgrade the assembly room, renovate the office areas and improve public counter access. In November 1994, the City Council approved the recommendations of the 1994 feasibility study, including the addition of a 7,200 square foot wing with additional multi-purpose rooms, a new lobby and entrance. The design phase for the Community Center remodel and addition was funded in the 1997-98 CIP from park and recreation in-lieu fees. In April 1998, during the annual CIP review, the City Council asked for cost estimates to design and con- struct a new Community Center building to compare with the proposal for renovation and addition. In November 1998, the architectural firm of Noll & Tam was selected to evaluate alternatives and develop cost estimates to compare renovation and a new wing to all-new construction. The results of this evaluation were presented to the City Council at its March 23, 1999 study session. At the study session, the City Council indicated a new Community Center building would be preferred to the renova- tion/ addition option. Council also requested staff to look at ways to maximize the useable space in a new building design to allow for both recreational and other uses (such as nonprofits and social services). The Council asked staff to evaluate a two-story building during design and consider future program needs along with current uses. With these directions, staff visited several community centers in the area to compare size, usage and program space and will provide the City Council an -3- Attachment 4 ~ ... opportunity to visit some of the centers that best represent what they may want to see in Mountain View. Several options for the new Community Center will be developed with various footprints and size ranges during the design phase and brought back to the City Council for review and comment. The $7.8 million in the adopted CIP for the Community Center Construction (Project 00-16) is a placeholder. Project cost estimates will be provided for each design option presented to the City Council for consideration, and a funding strategy will be developed for the option chosen .by the City Council. wifti .. ... - - - . Adobe Building Renovation Construction ~ - On January 13, 1998, the City Council acted to retain the Adobe Building and site and authorized staff take steps to renovate the building and add it to the City's Historical Resource List. During the 1998-99 CIP approval, the City Council funded the design phase, including the preparation of construction documents for bids. -- - IoiIt .. In November 1998, Page & Turnbull Architects were retained to develop renova- tion options and cost estimates for City Council review and selection. The architect then prepared design drawings and specifications for the selected scope of renovation. The results of the architect's work with options were presented to the City Council at the March 23,1999 study session. 'W - - - - The Council indicated a preference for the renovation option that restored the Adobe Building along with site improvements, including a perimeter adobe-style wall, parking and basic landscaping. Upgrades such as construction of a side building resembling the pump house that was once on the site or landscape upgrades such as a fountain will not be included in the project at this time. These upgrades may be considered in the event that a new City water supply well is proposed for the site or additional funding is identified for landscape upgrades. Construction funding of $1.4 million for restoration and site improvements is funded in the 1999-2000 CIP. -. - ~ -- .... .. ., . "Cube" Site Design and Construction W' The "Cube" Site is located at the corner of Evelyn Avenue and Castro Street and is a gateway to the downtown. The City-owned parcel is about 9,800 square feet and is adjacent to a remnant parcel owned by the Joint Powers Board (JPB) of about 9,600 square feet. - - - fi_ Three options for development of the "Cube" Site were presented at the March 23 study session. The City Council indicated a preference for the option that - *" -4- ~. Attachment 4 - litJM. - - - - .... .. - till .. - - - - - - - - .. - .. .. .. - - ".. .. - - .... .. - ... ... .. - - - ... provided space for a covered public waiting area, public rest rooms, space for transit-related concessions such as beverages, newspapers and magazines, an LRV operator facility and a landscaped open space area. The City Council also expressed an interest in including space in the project for a tenant such as the Mountain View Chamber of Commerce. Since the study session, the City has been informed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission that the project was not included in the first year of the Federal TEA-21 "Transportation for Livable Communities" (TLC) grant program. On April 6, the project was presented to the Downtown Committee. The Committee concurred with the City Council's preference as described above but had varied opinions on the architectural style. Staff will continue to research other grant sources for the project such as locally administered TEA-21 funds or next year's TLC grant program. In the meantime, staff has begun negotiations with the JPB for purchase of their 9,600 square foot parcel. Place holder" funding of $650,000 for the design and construction of the "Cube" Site is in the 1999-2000 CIP. . San Antonio Loop Reconfiguration and California Street Left Turn (Project 99-53) This project will reconfigure the San Antonio Loop Road with a smaller-radius curve that meets traffic safety and operations requirements. The reconfiguration will create two usable land parcels and will relocate the road to the exterior of the parcels. One parcel will be leased to the Community School of Music and Arts, and the other can be developed or used for open space. The project also reinstates the southbound left-turn at California Street. This left-turn movement plus the realigned loop road will provide adequate capacity for traffic from San Antonio Road heading eastbound. In January 1999, the City Council approved funding to begin project design ($200,000), and this work is underway. Funding for construc- tion of $825,000 is in the 1999-2000 CIP. . Senior Center Seismic Upgrade The Senior Center was built in the 1960s. In 1991, a new addition with independ- ent structural, mechanical and electrical systems was added. In September 1998, a structural evaluation of the building recommended strengthening the structure seismically to reduce the potential for major damage in an earthquake. In addi- tion, a number of interior systems (sumps, roof, HV AC, electrical, plumbing) are deteriorating, and the building is not fully compliant with ADA and other health and safety requirements. A three-year remediation program is proposed to correct the deficiencies. Phase I funding of $420,000 is in the 1999-2000 CIP to address seismic concerns by installing a roof diaphragm, anchoring perimeter walls, strengthening connections to concrete columns, installing additional bracing, -5- Attachment 4 .,,' - handling and disposing hazardous materials exposed during construction and restoring walls. Phase II funding of $300,000 is planned for 2000-2001 to upgrade sanitation, access, lighting and alarm systems. Work will include upgrading the sump pump system and ventilation to eliminate moisture and infestation; upgrading doorways, stairways and handrails; and upgrading lighting and the fire/smoke detection and alarm system. Phase III funding of $400,000 is planned for 2001-2002 to renovate the building's rooftop HVAC, replace end-of-life units and improve ventilation. It will also replace the roof and repair any wood members damaged by moisture. - -' - - - . Mercy-Bush Park Design and Construction iIll!IIII .. In January 1999, the City Council approved the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission to designate park land dedication in-lieu fees received the last three-quarters of Fiscal Year 1997-98. The approved designation fully funded the design and development of the Mercy-Bush Park. The City acquired the 0.66-acre Mercy-Bush Park site in August 1992 for a neighborhood serving mini- park. Design and construction funding of $600,000 is in the 1999-2000 CIP. - .. .. '... - . Miramonte Avenue/Cuesta Drive Intersection Modification ,,. Funding of $225,000 is in the 1999-2000 CIP to install left-turn lanes on Miramonte Avenue at Cuesta Drive and modify the traffic signal to provide a separate left- turn signal phase eliminating conflict with through traffic. The project will also modify the existing islands at the intersection corners to conform to ADA standards. The intersection will remove on-street parking on Miramonte Avenue near the intersection and may eliminate left-turn access onto Sladky Avenue. - - - - ""''1,,;, . New Miramonte Reservoir Construction-Water Master Plan Project Wf~ ~, A new 3 million gallon reservoir is programmed to meet domestic and fire flow requirements south of Cuesta Drive. A 1997 reservoir siting study identified the existing Miramonte Reservoir Site (located in Los Altos) as the best site for the new reservoir. Design funding was approved in the 1997-98 CIP and construction funding of approximately $2.8 million is in the 1999-2000 plan. The project is currently in design, and construction is anticipated in early 2000. Additional information on this project is included in Appendix 15. - - - - _. ,,'"" -6- - ..... Attachment 4 - ..... - - .. - ,... .. .. - ... .. - .. - - - - - ... - .. """. .. - .. ". .. .. ...., .. .. ,.. .. - ., ,fo'I!IIIM - - ... Parks/Recreation Projects Several parks/recreation projects are included in the CIP program. Most significant are the Community Center Renovation, Stevens Creek Trail, Reach 4, Segment 1, and Mercy /Bush Park Projects discussed above. Other projects include Pioneer Park Irrigation and Grounds Improvement (1999-2000); ADA Playground Improvements (three phases in 1999-2000 through 2001-02); Shoreline/Coast-Casey Rest Room (2000-01); and Hetch-Hetchy Right-of-Way Open Space Improvements Design (2001-02); Landels Park Rest Rooms (2001-02). . Open Space Acquisition Two open space acquisition projects are included for neighborhood parks in the first two years of the program: (1) Del Medio neighborhood for $401,000 (1999-2000); and (2)North California/Central Area for $587,000 (2000-01). Appendix No. 14 includes information on prioritization of open space development. . Shoreline Golf Links Two large projects are approved for Fiscal Year 1999-2000: (1) Front Nine renova- tions ($1,100,000); and (2) Shoreline Golf Links Well Construction ($450,000). These projects will be funded from the Shoreline Golf Links Fund (revenues generated by the golf course). Appendix No. 12 includes a description of proposed and unscheduled golf course projects. Technology . Information Services Computer Projects The Information Services Computer Projects are included in the five-year CIP. Appendix No. 11 provides an update and schedule for these projects. Facilities Several miscellaneous projects are in the adopted elP for ADA compliance and deferred and ongoing maintenance. Appendix No. 10 lists items planned for the coming year in the annual Facilities Maintenance Plan. -7- Attachment 4 ..... ~ . Fire Stations ."'" Temporary Fire Station No.5 was opened in January 1999 at the corner of North Shoreline Boulevard and Crittenden Lane. The design of a new permanent Fire Station No.5 in the North Bayshore Area is planned for Fiscal Year 2000-01 with construction planned for 2001-02. The renovation of Fire station No.4 is planned for Fiscal Year 2002-03 with the renovation of Fire Station No.3 planned for 2003-04 to house both male and female Firefighters. - .. - - - . Police/Fire Administration Building - Two projects are included in Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Remodeling the existing lobby ($90,000) will address security concerns by replacing the existing iron gates with electronically operated glass doors. This project includes remodeling the counter at the entrance to the Police/Fire administrative offices for ADA accessibility and a gate to control access. The second project proposed is a space needs study ($60,000) to address current and future staff space requirements. ~q- .. ., .. - Operations and Maintenance Costs - Operating and maintenance expenses have been evaluated for projects as some capital projects can result in increased ongoing annual expenses while others can result in long- term operating cost savings (through productivity and efficiency improvements). There is expected to be an increase of approximately $83,000 in annual operating and mainte- nance expenses associated with projects approved for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. .. .. - ... "iii, JMS/9/CIP 936-08-02-99R ^ ~ ~l; l\.@..J -, """ _. "hifii - - '11. -8- ~ ~ Attachment 4 .. 111I I!IIl - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .- .. - ONGOING ACTIVE PROJECTS - The ongoing active projects listed below are expected to remain active during the 1999-00 Fiscal ". Year. Balances shown are the actual balances as of April 22, 1999. .. .. -. Project Project Title Sponsorin~ Balance Remainin~ Number Department As of 4/22/99 ". ... 85-24 Shoreline Levee/Pipe Repair Public Works $63,829 - 89-31 Charleston Slough Restoration Public Works $44,519 91-26 Bryant Elevated Tank Removal Public Works $99,031 - 92-15 Stevens Crk Trail, Reach 3 Public Works $236,237 - 92-25 Shoreline Lake Creek Connection Public Works $166,265 92-34 Tasman Corridor Design Review Public Works $23,761 . 92-42 San Antonio Train Station Shelters Public Works $164,256 ... 92-47 Landfill Remediation of Soil Toxics Public Works $699,415 .. 93-15 Landfill Closure-544 Acre Site Public Works $600,556 93-16 Vista Slope Landfill Closure Public Works $1,287,997 - 93-17 Landfill Closure-Crittenden Site Public Works $189,700 - 93-22 MOC Bldg ABC Renovation Public Works $2,300,518 93-27 Shoreline Blvd Imp (In Park) Public Works $416,297 .... 93-44 Crittenden Lane & Utility Improvements .Public Works $1,076,889 .. 95-23 Well 9 Improvements Public Works $159,160 95-26 Miramonte Pump Station Imp Design Public Works $75,575 - 95-35 Evelyn A ven Improvements, Design Public Works $116,245 .. 95-50 Downtown Fa~ade Improvement Program Comm. Dev. $57,146 96-21 Crittenden Site Improvements Comm. Dev. $1,391,296 ". 96-24 Cuesta Playground Renovations Public Works $226,107 . 96-27 Whisman Park Bldg. Mod. For Veh. Storage Comm. Services $41,250 96-34 Lake Supply Pump and Access Port Public Works $188,501 .- 96-40 Shoreline Golf Pond Storm Relief Public Works $93,390 ... 96-42 Whisman Pump Station Imp. Phase 2 Public Works $199,993 96-48 Downtown Underground Utility Dist 35 Public Works $1,604,972 ". 96-49 Evelyn Ave Streetlights (HES) Public Works $15,050 - 96-50 Miramonte-Sonia to ECR Median Renovation Public Works $257,295 96-55 Crittenden Storm Pump Station Public Works $4,922,546 .. 96-56 NBS Parking and Circulation Public Works $1,904,344 IllIlf 96-57 Dtwn Parking Lot, St, S/W and St. light impr. Public Works $7,408 97-20 Shoreline & Moffett Blvd Median Landscape Public Works $18,240 fill' 97-24 Stevens Creek Trail Reach 4 Design Public Works $77,889 .. 97-25 Shoreline Golf Links Irrigation Renovations, Comm. Services $22,154 Ph.II - - - Ongoing Active Projects, Page 1 .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ,"'", - Balance Remainin~ -, Project Project Title Sponsorini: Number Department As of 4/22/99 - MtIW 97 - 26 Golf Links Play Improvements Comm. Services $22,737 97-27 Golf Links Pro Shop Design Update Comm. Dev. $33,283 .. 97-28 Community Center Design Public Works $187,281 ;~. 97-31 Crittenden PkinglVista Slope Landscape Design Public Works $14,766 97-34 97-98 Info. Services Computer Projects Fin. & Admin. Svcs. $363,441 - 97-36 Fire Station 2 Design (phase I) Public Works $2,736 - 97-37 Fire Station 3 & 4 Renovation Study Public Works $35,000 97-40 1997-98 Misc Water Main Replacement Public Works $222,610 .. 97-41 1997 -98 Sanitary/Storm system replacmt Public Works $56,528 97-43 Emergency Power Supply, Phase lIA Public Works $63,829 97 -44 Emergency Power Supply, Phase IIB Public Works $105,000 - 97-45 Miramonte Reservior Design (Phase I) Public Works $20,440 ... 97 -4 7 New Telemetry System (WMPP) Public Services $68,800 97-49 Internally Illuminated Street Name Signs Public Works $28,169 - 97-50 Undate Std Provision/City wide Benchmark Public Works $23,898 ~. 97-52 Downtown Transit Center Public Works $25,877 97-53 Cuesta Park Tennis Facility Restroom Public Works $10,459 .... Renovation - 99-03 98/98 Annual Slurry Seal Program Public Works $84,698 99-12 98/99 Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting Public Works $37,106 - 99-14 98/99 Facilities Maintenance Plan $318,282 - 99-15 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements Public Works $91,344 .... 99-16 City Hall First Floor Improvements Public Works $118,776 99-18 Charleston Slough Observation Structure Comm. Services $9,734 .... 99-19 Pioneer Park Irrig & Grounds Imp-Design Public Works $7,460 - 99-20 Crittenden Parking/Landscape Const. Public Works $2,558,965 99-21 VistaS lope/ Amp Landscp & Amp Pkwy Landscp. Public Works $1,077,916 - 99-22 Shoreline Play Structure Comm. Services $83,137 - 99-23 Shoreline Interpretive Center Study Comm. Services $50,000 99-24 Shoreline Golf Links RenovationslBack Nine Comm. Services $1,113,928 99-25 Stevens Creek Trail R-4 Const (to Yuba) Public Works $2,250,521 .. 99-26 ECR Landscp Refurbsh-Grant to Rengstorff Public Works $299,364 99-29 Performing Arts Ctr. 2nd. Stage Space Study Comm. Services $25,000 .. 99-30 98-99 Information Svcs. Computer Projects Fin. & Admin. Svcs. $1,299,560 - 99-32 Fire Station #2 Construction Public Works $2,687,031 - 99-33 Emergency Power Supply, Phase 3 Public Works $153,000 99-34 PolicelFire Admin. Bldg. HV AC Sys. Tier 3 Public Works $246,009 ... 99-35 Charleston Detention Pond, Ph. II (Const.) Public Works $530,231 .. 99-36 98-99 Misc Water Main Replacement Public Works $938,774 99-37 98-99 Sanitary/Storm Main Replacement Public Works $643,630 .. 99-38 Shoreline Infrastructure Maintenance Public Works $93,897 99-39 Shoreline Sailing Lake Water SupplylDischare """ Ongoing Active Projects, Page 2 .., .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - ,. .. - Project Number .. .. 99-40 99-41 99-42 99-43 99-44 99-45 99-46 99-47 99-48 99-49 99-50 99-51 99-52 99-55 99-56 99-57 99-58 99-59 'till - -- -- ... - - - - ... - - - "". .. - .. ,.. ... .. .. ",. .. ",. - .. .. - - - - Project Title Study Analysis Irrigation Pump Station Imps., Def. Maint. Central Exp Sidewalk TDA Project Evelyn Ave. Const Seg 1-Castro to Stevens Crk. Evelyn Ave. Underground Dist. No. 37 City Hall As-Built Drawings Rengstorff Ave (101/Middlf1d) UU Dist #36 Grant Road/Cuesta Dr. Intersection Modification Traffic Signal Preemption Systems Adobe Building Update Study/Renov. Design Charleston Rd Pathway conn to SCT (TDA) LED Traffic Signal Conversion Wyandotte/Reinert Neighborhood Park Water Fluoridation San Antonio Loop Design Moffet Blvd.lCypress Traffic Signal Down Town Committee Workplan Stevens Creek Trail, Reach 4, Segment 2 Study Acquisition of Cube Site Total of Ongoing Active Projects Sponsorin~ Department Balance Remainin~ As of 4/22/99 Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Services Public Works Public Works Comm. Dev. Public Works Public Works $66,000 $164,319 $55~399 $1,877,586 $818,938 $33,965 $1,234,321 $311,525 $241,230 $5,127 $135,861 $49,765 $54,262 $1,154,948 $148,264 $93,897 $197,000 $261,305 $222.000 $41.876.760 Ongoing Active Projects, Page 3 -, .. """", - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ..... - - ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, . PLANNED 2000/2004 .- ~ - THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY . BLANK ... - ,. -. - "'*'" - - - tIII!!J! - -. \;(.i;jl;f - ,.. - - ... l,!iM - ~. - 1M! 00-23 00-24 00-25 00-27 00-28 00-29 00-30 00-31 00-32 00-33 93-37 00-34 00-35 00-36 00-37 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 Shoreline Maintenance Facility Site and Program Study Biannual Parks Renovations/Improvements (Cuesta Park), Ph. I 99-00 Information Services Computer Projects 99-00 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement 99-00 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement New Wells No. 22 & 23 Design (WMPP) New Well- No.22 Construction (WMPP) Chloramine Conversion Study Miramonte Reservoir Construction, Phase II (WMPP) Miramonte Avenue Water Main Replacement, Phase I (WMPP) Tasman Corridor Light Rail Project Chip Seal Program North Shoreline Boulevard Traffic Signal Interconnect Evelyn A venue Impovements., Construction (Stvns. Creek to Pioneer) LED Traffic Signal Conversion 1999/2000 New Proiects 00-39 Adobe Building Renovation Construction, Phase I 00-40 Ellis/Fairchild Traffic Signal 00-41 North Shoreline Water Main Replacement (in Park) 00-42 TDA Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects 00-43 Shoreline Lake Supply Branch Line (@ Boat Launch Ramp) 00-44. Downtown Parking Lot Recycling Enclosures AD 00-64 Yardis Court Assessment District 00-45 Citywide Traffic Model Update 00-46 Monta Lorna Park Pathway Lighting Project 00-47 Shoreline Golf Links Well Construction 00-48 Oil/Water Separators at Fire Stations Nos. 3 and 4 00-49 Cube Site Design and Construction 00-50 San Antonio Loop, Construction 00-51 Senior Center Seismic Upgrade 00-52 Mercy-Bush Park Design and Construction 00-53 99-00 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts 00-54 MOC Bulk Storage Covered Facility 00-55 MOC Car Wash Relocation 00-56 CASC Start Up 00-57 Shoreline Blvd.lStierlin Road Intersection Reconfiguration 00-58 Evelyn Avenue Undergrounding District No. 38 00-59 City Hall Fourth Floor Restroom $50 $128 $400 $1,084 $1,000 $260 $838 $95 $2,800 $396 $1,200 $128 $400 $2,200 $53 $1,400 $125 $90 $85 $170 $155 $580 $75 $50 $450 $150 $650 $825 $420 $600 $100 $250 $308 $52 $12.5 $1,646 $100 ...." - 11 11 11 1l 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 - - - - ~~ - - .~~ - - - .. 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 - ... - .,.., - .. - - - - - j;OjI/' - - - - - - </IItt'! ~ Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, page 5 - - - - .. .. 00-60 00-61 - 00-62 - 00-63 .- .. ... 111 - .. - - .- .. ". .. - .. .. .. - - ". .. .- ... ".. .. ". - ... .. .. ... ... ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 PoliceIFire Admin. Bldg. Lobby Renovation PoliceIFire Admin. Bldg. Space Needs Study Miramonte/Cuesta Traffic Signal Intersection Modification Water Storage Reservoir Siting Study $90 $60 $225 $70 $35,113 TOTAL OF AMENDED, ANNUAL AND OTHER PROJECTS ..,-~ ~n 15 15 15 16 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, page 6 """I" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 """I Adopted Capital Improvement Projects. 1999/2000 ~jli NOTE: All costs are shown in thousands and 199912000 dollars. ..... Item Project Description Fundine 199912000 Source .... 1999/2000 Amended Projects - 99-35 Charleston Detention Pond Imprs., Phase II (Construction) North Bayshore ($300) Improve flow into basin, eliminate restrictions Fund - and restore capacity for 100-year storm. - 97-28 Community Center Design - Additional design fees for design for new C/C Tax $500 - building rather than renovation. - 99-25 Stevens Creek Trail Reach 4, Segment 1, 'IiiIIIiiJ Construction (to Yuba) C/C Tax $725 Additional construction costs to construct the North Bayshore 250 .. trail on the east side of Stevens Creek rather Fund .. than the west side. - 99-40 Irrigation Pump Station Improvements, Der. . Maint. Increase funding to complete scope of the North Bayshore $200 ... improvements. Fund . 90-38 Air/Space Center Exploration Start Up ... Currently on "hold", put funds into new project, North Bayshore ($31 ) .. "CASC Startup." Fund - 86-54 NASA Ames Space Center Study - Currently on "hold", move funds into new Other Funds ($21 ) project, "CASC Startup." - .. 95-35 Evelyn Avenue Design Revise funding to reflect portion of design for CIP Reserve ($230) - pavement charged to Measure A/B. Other (Meas. 230 - A/B) 99-42 Evelyn Avenue Construction Segment 1 - (Castro to Stevens Creek) - Revise funding to reflect pavement portion of CIP Reserve ($1,000) construction charged to Measure A/B. Other (Meas. 1,000 - A/B) ...... Please refer to Appendix 1 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 7 for Key to fund abbreviations. ~ ""'" .. ..,. ~_.____o...__."~~~-.~.,".._,.."_,~,..._....".""..",,,,,-.._~"",=_",.~,;,-=,~,-".", .. iln:lI'.." ... ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 "" . 96-56 North Bayshore Parking and Circulation Increase funding for US 101/Route 85 studies Other Funds $150 - and analyses oftraffic in the North Bayshore - Area. "" .. 1999/2000 Annual Projects !I!III 00-01 99-00 Street Resurfacing Program .. Install asphalt concrete and fog seal, overlays, CIP Reserve $530 raising fixed access and monuments. Also Gas Tax 122 - includes minor reconstruction of streets, and .. minor sidewalk and City facility parking lot resurfacing. - 00-02 99-00 Traffic Signal Replacements and .. Modifications - Replace traffic signal controllers, related Gas Tax $62 .. equipment and traffic detector loops, as necessary. Includes minor modifications to III existing traffic signals, as necessary, to improve ... traffic safety. .- 00-03 99-00 Slurry Seal Program Apply slurry seal to street surfaces and City CIP Reserve $7 ... facility parking lots as required. Gas Tax 90 .. 00-04 99-00 Water System Improvements .. Scheduled replacement of smaller water system Water $270 - components and minor unscheduled improvements to the City's water system. ... ,.. 00-05 99-00 Wastewater System Improvements Unscheduled minor improvements/repairs to Wastewater $125 .. the City's wastewater collection and pumping - system. .. 00-06 99-00 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs Replace sidewalks that are past their useful CIP Reserve $493 .- lives and repair concrete curbs, gutters, and C/C Tax 7 ... sidewalks displaced by street tree growth, ,.. and/or failure of City-owned utilities. - 00-07 99-00 Parks Pathway Resurfacing Renovate various park pathways within City C/C Tax $101 ..- parks. .. JI!III! ... Please refer to Appendix 1 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 8 ",. for Key to fund abbreviations. .. .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 200012004 w -, 00-08 99-00 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements -, Correct drainage problems and damage due to North Bayshore $150 - differential settlement. Includes regrading and - installation of new or modified drainage facilities. .... 00-09 99-00 Forestry Maintenance Program and it';;;f# Street Tree Replanting CIP Reserve $148 1Il!lJI' Contract for pruning, removing, stumping, purchasing, and replanting approximately 800 to 1,000 medium to large trees within - the City. Replace and maintain trees damaged by freezing, disease, drought, ~ other natural causes and accidents. - 00-10 99-00 Shoreline Landfill Cap - Maintenance and Repairs - Regulatory mandates of the Bay Area Air North Bayshore $300 Quality Management District and the - Regional Water Quality Control Board - require the City and protect the integrity of the landfill cap to prevent surface emissions -- by regrading, filling, recompacting, and - making other improvements. - 00-11 99-00 Developer Reimbursements - Construct street and utility improvements CIP Reserve $25 concurrent with private development. Water 25 - Adjacent properties benefiting from street Wastewater 25 and utility improvements will be required to Storm 25 - reimburse the City for the improvements. Construct. .. 00-12 99-00 Street Lane Line and Legend - Repainting - Annual repainting of lane lines and legends Gas Tax $200 on City streets and public and downtown - parking lots. - 00-13 99-00 Landfill Gas/Leachate System Repairs .- and Improvements -- Annual repairs and improvements of large North Bayshore $100 components of the landfill gas and leachate .- system. - - ... - Please refer to Appendix 1 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 199912000, Page 9 - for Key to fund abbreviations. - ... "..~"_",""~~',,-,,,,~..~',",,'~',,,,"-'~_"'---"-h,",,,,""""'_"" 1{ lJ~ - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .. .. 00-14 99-00 Facilities Maintenance Plan Repair, replacement, or maintenance of City CIP Reserve $300 - facilities or subcomponents (RV AC, roofs, .. carpets, plumbing, etc.) ... 00-15 99-00 Annual Traffic StudieslNTMP .. Improvements CIP Reserve $50 Annual contract with traffic consultants to C/C Tax 110 .. assist Traffic Section with neighborhood traffic Gas Tax 160 .. issues. This project also installs traffic control devices on neighborhood, local, residential - streets in conformance with the Neighborhood III Traffic Management Program. - - 1999/00 Other Projects ... 00-16 Community Center Construction .. Construct new Community Center, including .. landscaping, installing new lighting fixtures CIP Reserve $7,166 and additional parking. Other (Rec-in- 634 ... Lieu) .- 00-17 Open Space Acquisition (Del Medio Area) .. Acquire open space for park development in an .. area ofthe City identified as deficient in open Land Sales $250 space (potentially in the Del Medio Other(Rec.-in- 151 .... neighborhood). Lieu) - 00-18 Pioneer Park Irrigation and Grounds .. Improvement-Construction .. Renovate Pioneer Park's irrigation, pathways, CIP Reserve $450 lighting, drainage and landscape. .. 00-19 ADA Playground Improvements, Phase I .. Upgrade existing playgrounds to new ADA and CIP Reserve $159 .. CPSC guidelines by the year 2000. ",. 00-20 Shoreline Park Roadway Landscaping - (Permanente Creek to Terminal Blvd.) Landscape improvements along the North Bayshore $147 .. P. G. & E. energy trail between Permanente .. Creek and Terminal Blvd. - .. - - Please refer to Appendix 1 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 10 .- for Key to fund abbreviations. .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ...i - 00-21 EI Camino Real Gateways (Sylvan to Grant - Rd., San Antonio to Rengstorft) Design and construct El Camino Real gateways CIP Reserve $275 - into Mountain View. 00-22 Shoreline Golf Links Renovations/Front -, Nine Correct drainage and upgrade the irrigation Shoreline Golf $1,100 - system for the Shoreline Golf Links. Links - 00-23 Shoreline Maintenance Facility Site and Program Study - A study to determine space needed and siting of North Bayshore $30 a maintenance facility in Shoreline Park to Shoreline Golf -' replace temporary modulars. Links 20 ~ 00-24 Biannual Parks Renovations/Improvements - (Cuesta Park), Phase I - Renovate and upgrade existing barbeque area, CIP Reserve $128 replace lighting fixtures, Phase I. - - 00-25 99-00 Information Services Computer Projects -, GIS-Public Works/Public Services- $100,000 to CIP Reserve $83 .. continue 98/99 GIS project. Building C/C Tax 190 Inspection Permit System ($50,000) to tailor Water 51 .. system to City's needs. Library, Finance, and Wastewater 51 - Utility Billing Software Upgrades ($100,000) Solid Waste to add modules from original vendors to Mgmt. 13 .. increase functionality. E-Commerce North Bayshore 12 - Applications-($50,000) to implement small applications such as business licenses, on-line - utility bill payments and other City services - through the City's web site. Year 2000 Contingency ($100,000) Contingency funding ...... to deal with Y2K technology issues. - 00-27 99-00 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service \iF Line Replacement ..... Replace corroded and/or undersized cast iron Water $1,084 pipe water mains, including water services and - fire hydrants. - 00-28 99-00 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer ~;;jj4 Main Replacement Repair or replace about 4,000 linear feet of Wastewater $1,000 - broken lines and replace brick manholes. - - - Please refer to Appendix 1 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 11 for Key to fund abbreviations. .... - '.'""~__''''''.h<_''''_'''''''''"""""",~",,,_ .. liij - ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .. .. 00-29 New Wells No. 22 & 23 Design (WMPP) Design and prepare construction documents for Water $260 - new well construction. .. 00-30 New Well-No. 22 Construction (WMPP) ,. Construct new well No. 22. Water $838 .. 00-31 Chloramine Conversion Study !lIIII Perform an engineering study to determine Water $95 ... potential effects on water system facilities and operational consequences of converting from ... chlorine disinfection to chloramine disinfection. ... 00-32 Miramonte Reservoir Construction, Phase II ... (WMPP) Construct a new 3.0 million gallon drinking Water $2,800 .. water storage reservoir at the existing - Miramonte Reservoir site. .. 00-33 Miramonte Avenue Water Main Replacement ,. Phase I (WMPP) Design and prepare construction documents to Water $396 .. replace approximately 12,500' of existing 16" - transmission water main on Miramonte avenue, .. from the Miramonte Pump Station to Central Expressway, Castro Street and Bryant Street ... with 24" water transmission main. l1li 93-37 Tasman Corridor Light Rail Project - Annual allocation of a portion of $15 million C/CTax $1,000 local contribution to the light rail proj ect. Gas Tax 200 .. ,. 00-34 Chip Seal Program Apply chip seal to selected City streets that were Gas Tax $128 ... not constructed to City standards. - 00-35 North Shoreline Boulevard Traffic Signal .. Interconnect Install interconnected conduit and cable, and C/C Tax $100 ... interconnected equipment where necessary, North 300 .. along North Shoreline Boulevard between Bayshore ,. Wright A venue and Pear Avenue. .. 00-36 Evelyn Avenue Improvements, Construction - (Stevens Creek to Pioneer) Construct improvements on Evelyn Avenue CIP Reserve 1,300 .. between Stevens Creek and Pioneer Way. Other (Meas. $900 A&B) - .. Please refer to Appendix 1 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 12 - for Key to fund abbreviations. III - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - 00-37 LED Traffic Signal Conversion Convert red and green traffic signal indications Gas Tax $53 - at one-third of the City's traffic signals from - incandescent bulbs to LED lighting. -- - 1999/2000 New Projects - 00-39 Adobe Building Renovation Construction, - Phase I C/CTax $1,400 Basic renovation that includes return to original architecture, structural upgrades, interior - remodel, and site improvements. -' 00-40 Ellis/Fairchild Traffic Signal - Traffic from new development requires a new Gas Tax $55 traffic signal that will be interconnected with Other 70 - traffic signals at Ellis Street and US 101 freeway (Developer) .... ramps. ~ 00-41 North Shoreline Water Main Replacement (in - Park) North $90 Design and construct replacement water main Bayshore """, between the Shoreline Clubhouse and Rengstorff - House. - 00-42 TDA Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects - Four projects including grading and paving the CIP Reserve $5 trail along Permanente Creek, purchasing and Other (TDA 80 - installing bike lockers at downtown parking lots, Grant) - constructing wheelchair ramps and modifying curb returns at Route 85 offramps at Moffett - Blvd. - 00-43 Shoreline Lake Supply Branch Line 1Ii_ Install a water supply branch line and outlet to North $170 the Shoreline Lake boat launch area connecting Bayshore - the new line to the existing supply branch ..... system. -' 00-44 Downtown Parking Lot Recycling Enclosures lti.lIftjj! Design and construct seven enclosures in Solid Waste $155 downtown parking lots 2 through 8 to enclose Mgmt. - common recycling bins used by downtown - merchants. - ~ Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 13 k-~!- ... t~i <. .,~_..'~,~..c..~~_:ci;. lIIII .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ,.,. .. AD Yardis Court Assessment District 00-64 Design and construct standard street CIP Reserve $135 - improvements on dirt street that serves 6 Wastewater 105 - residences and a church. Other 340 (Assessments) - .. 00-45 Citywide Traffic Model Update Update 10-year old Traffic Model. CIP Reserve $75 .. - 00-46 Monta Lorna Park Pathway Lighting Project Replace light fixtures in conjunction with school CIP Reserve $50 - campus renovation. .. 00-47 Shoreline Golf Links Well Construction .- Design and construct water well for golf course Shoreline Golf $450 irrigation. Links .. ... 00-48 Oil/Water Separators at Fire Station Nos. 3 and 4 .. Install oiVwater separators to meet State permit Wastewater $150 III requirements for storm water discharge. .. 00-49 Cube Site Design and Construction .. Design and construct structure that includes light CIP Reserve $650 ... rail vehicle and bus operator rest facility, public restrooms, transit related commercial business, /!Ill and possibly MV Chamber of Commerce. .. 00-50 San Antonio Loop, Construction - Reconstruct loop and add left turn lane onto San CIP Reserve $550 Antonio Road and California Street to make the C/C Tax 275 .. site developable for Community School of "'" Music and Arts and other potential uses. .. 00-51 Senior Center Seismic Upgrade .- Construct seismic upgrades-Phase I oflarger CIP Reserve $420 project. .. 00-52 Mercy-Bush Park Design and Construction .. Design and construct improvements for Bush- Other (Rec-in- $600 .. Mercy Park. Lieu) ,.. 00-53 99-00 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts .. First year often-year program to reduce Wastewater $100 .- maintenance of sewer cleanouts by installing 2- way sewer cleanouts on 100-150 sewer 1M connections per year. lIIII .. Please refer to Appendix 1 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 14 "'" for Key to fund abbreviations. .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 iIiI4i - 00-54 MOC Bulk Storage Covered Facility Covered storage for stockpile and spoils area Water $125 - . and fueling pad to address non-point source Wastewater 125 - requirements. - 00-55 MOC Car Wash Relocation - Relocate facility to provide area for treating Water $308 carwash wastewater and wastewater from Vac ~ Con sewer trucks. tIIlJIIIIIlI!I; 00-56 CASC Start Up New project funded by two projects that are on North $31 - "Hold" (NASA Ames Space Center Study and Bayshore 21 Air & Space Center Exploration Startup). Other - - 00-57 Shoreline Blvd./Stierlin Road Intersection Reconfiguration - Close Stierlin Road merge onto Shoreline C/C Tax $125 - Boulevard where drivers have difficulty seeing on-coming Shoreline Boulevard traffic. - - 00-58 Evelyn Avenue Undergrounding District No. 38 (State Route 85 to Bernardo Avenue) CIP Reserve $15 - Underground utilities along Evelyn Avenue Other (Rule 1,631 .. before constructing new street sections. 20A) - 00-59 City Hall Fourth Floor Restroom .. Construct restroom for the public, volunteers CIP Reserve $100 and City staff using the fourth floor. - 00-60 Police/Fire Admin. Bldg. Lobby Renovation .. Replace iron gates with tinted glass and electric C/C Tax $90 1IiIt- doors to improve security. Remodel staff office - counter for ADA and possibly security gate. - 00-61 Police/Fire Admin. Bldg. Space Needs Study Study to assess space needs and recommend CIP Reserve $20 - alternatives. C/CTax 40 ., 00-62 Miramonte/Cuesta Traffic Signal Intersection - Modification - Modify intersection and traffic signal to provide C/C Tax $175 left turn pockets and protected left turns for Water 50 - Miramonte Ave. - - ~ - Please refer to Appendix 1 ... Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 15 for Key to fund abbreviations. - IDWt; .. 'llIli - .. - - - - !JIIIIl .. - .. ... .. - - .. .. .. .. .. .. - .. ... .. - .. ... .. ... - - .. .. - ... .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 00-63 Water Storage Reservoir Siting Study Study to determine potential sites for additional water storage reservoirs. Water $70 Total $35.113 FY99/00 PROJECTS FUNDING SUMMARY CIP Reserve Fund Construction/Conveyance Tax Fund Water Fund Wastewater Fund Storm Drain Fund Solid Waste Management Fund Gas Tax Fund North Bayshore Fund Shoreline Golf Links Fund Parking District Fund Land Sales Fund Other Funding $11 ,904 4,838 6,372 1,681 25 168 1,070 1,449 1,570 o 250 5,786 Total $35.113 Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Adopted Capital Improvement Projects, 1999/2000, Page 16 - lIB - - - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~~ - ~ - il4i;o' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, . PLANNED 2000/2004 .- .. - THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY . BLANK - - - - ... ,. .. .. - - - - ... - tiftIl!i - - - - - ..... - - - .. D ~" - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ... .. Planned Capital Improvement Proiects. 2000/2001 .... NOTE: All costs are shown in thousands and J 999/2000 dollars. .. .. Item Proiect Description Bude:et Pae:e No. .. 2000/2001 Annual Proiects - - 01-01 00-01 Street Resurfacing Program $652 19 o 1-02 00-01 Traffic Signal Replacements/Modifications $62 19 - 01-03 00-01 Slurry Seal Program $97 19 - 01-04 00-01 Water System Improvements $450 19 - 01-05 00-01 Wastewater System Improvements $125 19 01-06 00-01 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs $500 19 ... 01-07 00-01 Parks Pathway Resurfacing $77 20 - 01-08 00-01 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements $150 20 ... 01-09 00-01 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting $153 20 01-10 00-01 Shoreline Landfill tap Maintenance and Repairs $100 20 ... 01-11 00-01 Developer Reimbursements $100 20 .. 01-12 00-01 Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting $200 21 01-13 00-01 Landfill GasILeachate System Repairs & Improvements $100 21 - 01-14 00-01 Facilities Maintenance Plan $300 21 .. 01-15 00-01 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements $100 21 - 2000/2001 Other Proiects - - 01-16 ADA Playground Improvements, Phase II, Design/Construction $159 22 01-17 Shoreline Coast Casey Restroom $100 22 .. 01-18 Shoreline Pk. Roadway Lndscping. (PG&E ROW Stvns Cr. / Gatehse.) $75 22 ,.. 01-19 Resurface Tennis Courts-Cooper, Whisman, Stevenson, Sylvan Parks $83 22 .. 01-20 Shoreline Mitigation Channel Pedestrian Bridge $200 22 01-21 Shoreline Maintenance Facilities (Construction) $580 22 - 01-22 Information Services Computer Projects .$550 23 - 01-23 00-01 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement $1,084 23 01-24 00-01 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main and Replacement $1,000 23 - 01-25 New Well No. 23 Construction, Phase II (WMPP) $838 23 .. 01-26 Storm Drain Master Plan $93 23 01-27 Sewer Infiltration/Inflow Study (UDOIS) $130 23 .- 01-28 Miramonte Avenue Water Main Replacement, Construction (WMPP) $2,987 23 .. 93-37 Tasman Corridor Light Rail Project $1,200 24 .. .. - - - Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 17 .. 01-29 01-30 01-31 01-32 01-33 01-34 01-35 01-36 01-37 01-38 01-39 01-40 01-41 eAPIT AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 LED Traffic Signal Conversions Open Space Acquisition (North California-Central) Fire Station No.5, Design $53 $587 $385 2000/2001 New Proiects Shoreline Lake Supply Dual Pump/Structure Shoreline Lake Supply Main Line Replacement 00-01 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts Senior Center Health & Safety Renovations Easy St./Gladys Ave. Intersection Reconfiguration Old Middlefield/Independence Traffic Signal Cuesta Park Lighting Renovation, Phase II Charleston/lndependence Traffic Signal El Camino Real/Grant Road Right Turn Lane Construct New Bridge Over Permanente Creek $350 $325 $100 $300 $125 $125 $100 $125 $354 $230 TOTAL OF ANNUAL, NEW AND OTHER PROJECTS $15,404 -, w" - 24 24 24 - .. 'il:.!9'#,' ""'" 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 ~-~ - - - - IiiIIII .. .. .. .. ... - .. .. .. - - - - w,~' - ~:i - - - ;~i!ii" ~, i. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 18 .. - - tl_.._: c. -i1iI- ,- Hi - till CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ,. Planned Capital Improvement Projects. 2000/2001 - - NOTE: All costs are shown in thousands and 1999/2000 dollars. .. Item Project Description Fundin\: 2000/2001 - Source .. 2000/2001 Annual Projects .. 01-01 00-01 Street Resurfacing Program .. Install asphalt concrete and fog seal, CIP Reserve $102 - overlays, raising fixed access and Gas Tax 550 monuments. Also includes minor .. reconstruction of streets, and minor - sidewalk and City facility parking lot - resurfacing. - 01-02 00-01 Traffic Signal Replacements and ... Modifications Replace traffic signal controllers, related Gas Tax $62 - equipment and traffic detector loops, as .... necessary. Includes minor modifications to existing traffic signals, as necessary, to - improve traffic safety. .. 01-03 00-01 Slurry Seal Program - Apply slurry seal to street surfaces and City C/C Tax $7 .. facility parking lots as required. Gas Tax 90 - 01-04 00-01 Water System Improvements .. Scheduled replacement of smaller water Water $450 system components and minor unscheduled - improvements to the City's water system. .. 01-05 00-01 Wastewater System Improvements .. Unscheduled minor improvements/repairs Wastewater $125 .. to the City's wastewater collection and pumping system. .. . 01-06 00-01 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs Replace sidewalks that are past their useful C/CTax $500 .. lives and repair of concrete curbs, gutters, - and sidewalks displaced by street tree .. growth, and/or failure of City-owned utilities. .. .. ... Please refer to Appendix 1 Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 19 - For Key to fund abbreviations. 1M - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ~c Item Project Description Fundinl: 2000/2001 - Source - 01-07 00-01 Parks Pathway Resurfacing - Renovate various park pathways within CIP Reserve $77 City parks. "#~!l - 01-08 00-01 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements ib~ Correct drainage problems and damage due North $150 - to differential settlement. Regrade and Bayshore install new or modified drainage facilities. - - 01-09 00-01 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting Contract for pruning, removing, CIP Reserve $153 - stumping, purchasing, and replanting ..... approximately 800 to 1,000 medium to large trees within the City. Maintain - trees damaged by freezing, disease, - drought and other natural causes. .. 01-10 00-01 Shoreline Landfill Cap - Maintenance and Repairs Regulatory mandates of the Bay Area North $100 - Air Quality Management District and the Bayshore .. Regional Water Quality Control Board require the City to protect the integrity of - the landfill cap and prevent surface - emissions by regrading, filling, recompacting, and making other - improvements. .. 01-11 00-01 Developer Reimbursements - Construct street and utility CIP Reserve $25 .. improvements concurrent with private Water 25 development. Adjacent properties Wastewater 25 - benefiting from street and utility Storm 25 Will improvements will be required to Construct. reimburse the City for the improvements. - ..... - ~ - ..... Please refer to Appendix 1 For Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 20 ... W.M - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .. - 01-12 00-01 Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting CIP Reserve $150 Annual repainting of lane lines and Gas Tax 50 legends on City streets and public and downtown parking lots. 01-13 00-01 Landfill GaslLeachate System Repairs and Improvements Annual repairs and improvements of large North $100 components ofthe landfill gas and leachate Bayshore system. 01-14 00-01 Facilities Maintenance Plan Repair, replace, or maintain City facilities CIP Reserve $155 or subcomponents (HV AC, roofs, carpets, C/C Tax $145 plumbing, etc.) 01-15 00-01 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements Annual contract with traffic consultants to CIP Reserve $50 assist Traffic Section with neighborhood Gas Tax 50 traffic issues. This proj ect also installs traffic control devices on neighborhood, local, residential streets in conformance with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. - - .. - .. .. .. - - - - - .. .. ... - .. .. - .. - - - .. - .. - .. .. .. - .. Please refer to Appendix 1 For Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 21 - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ...., - 2000/2001 Other Projects 01-16 ADA Playground Improvements, Phase II, Design/Construction Upgrade existing playgrounds to new ADA CIP Reserve $159 and CPSC guidelines. 01-17 Shoreline Coast Casey Restroom Construct a public restroom adjacent to the North $100 Coast-Casey Pump Station. Bayshore 01-18 Shoreline Park Roadway Landscaping, P G & E Right-of-Way Stevens Creek to the Gatehouse Renovate and improve the landscaping on North $75 the utility corridor between Stevens Creek Bayshore and the Shoreline Gatehouse. 00-19 Resurface Tennis Courts at Cooper, Whisman, Stevenson and Sylvan Parks Part ofthe regularly scheduled 5-year CIP Reserve $83 resurfacing program. 01-20 Shoreline Mitigation Channel Pedestrian Bridge Construct an 8" wide prefabricated steel North $200 bridge across the south end of the Shoreline Bayshore Mitigation Channel connecting the Amphitheatre's E parking lot and the Stevens Creek Tidal Marsh pathways. 01-21 Shoreline Maintenance Facilities (Construction) Facility for staff and equipment used to North $300 support City maintenance of Shoreline Park Bayshore and Shoreline Golf Links. Shoreline 280 Golf Links ... - .. - - ~ - ~1 IIlIII - - ~-~; - - - ... - .. - ~ - .. - - - - - ... - ~ -- Please refer to Appendix 1 For Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 22 i>;M - ert n1 .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 01-22 Information Services Computer Projects Annual future computer automation CIP Reserve $250 projects for all City departments. Water 125 Wastewater 125 Solid Waste 25 Mgmt. North 25 Bayshore 01-23 00-01 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement Replace corroded and undersized cast iron Water $1,084 pipe water mains on miscellaneous streets, including water services and fire hydrants. 01-24 00-01 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main and Replacement Repair and replace storm and sanitary sewer Wastewater $1,000 pipes, manholes and systems identified by the City's annual line televising program. 01-25 New Well No. 23 Construction, Phase II (WMPP) Water $838 Construct new well No. 23. 01-26 Storm Drain Master Plan Evaluate the City's storm drain system and Wastewater $93 develop a 10-year master plan for improvements. 01-27 Sewer Infiltration/Inflow Study (UDOIS) Assess the nature and magnitude of Wastewater $130 infiltration/inflow within the Mountain View sewer system. 01-28 Miramonte Avenue Water Main Replacement, Construction (WMPP) Replace 12,500 feet of existing 16" Water $2,987 transmission water main on Miramonte A venue, from the Miramonte Pump Station to Central Expressway with a new 24" water transmission main (Pressure Zone one transmission line). _,-II I"' .-a ,. .. .. '- ... .. - - - .. - .. - .. - .. ... - .. - .. - .. - .. .. - - Please refer to Appendix 1 For Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 23 - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 93-37 Tasman Corridor Light Rail Project The last year of annual allocations of a C/CTax $1,000 portion of $15 million local contribution to Gas Tax 200 the light rail project. 01-29 LED Traffic Signal Conversions Last phase of converting red and green ClP Reserve $6 '" traffic signal lights at one-third of the City's Gas Tax 47 traffic signals from incandescent bulbs to ~ light emitting diode (LED) type oflights. 01-30 Open Space Acquisition (North fIIll!!!lI8, California-Central) Acquire property for open space uses in the Other (Rec-in $587 North California-Central area of the City. Lieu) - 01-31 Fire Station No.5 Design ~ Select site and design a new permanent fire North $385 - station that will be located in the Shoreline Bayshore Regional Park Community. ~~ - 2000/2001 New Projects .... - ...... 01-32 Shoreline Lake Supply Dual Pump/Structure North $350 Jl'IIi1l!IIIII Construct new water intake structure and Bayshore ~ install dual pumps to insure uninterruupted water supply for the Shoreline Lake. - ;~1iW 01-33 Shoreline Lake Supply Main Line Replacement North $325 - Replace the lake's main water supply Bayshore - pipeline out of Coast Casey Forebay where it is difficult to maintain. - ~ - ., - Nt' - Please refer to Appendix 1 For Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 24 "'" - M;.. - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - .. 01-34 00-01 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Clean outs Wastewater $100 Second year of 10-year program to reduce maintenance of sewer cleanouts by installing 2-way sewer cleanouts on 100- 150 sewer connections per year. 01-35 Senior Center Health & Safety Renovations CIP Reserve $300 Phase II of renovations including fire and alarm systems, improvements to the building sanitation, and ADA accessibility compliance items. 01-36 Easy St./Gladys Ave. Intersection Reconfiguration Revise curb return to make intersection at CIP Reserve $108 90 degree angle from Easy Street to Gladys. C/CTax $17 01-37 Old Middlefield/Independence Traffic Signal CIP Reserve $125 Install new traffic signal at intersection which meets warrants. 01-38 Cuesta Park Lighting Renovation, Ph. II Second phase of park lighting fixtures CIP Reserve $100 installations. 01-39 Charleston/Independence Traffic Signal Install new traffic signal at intersection CIP Reserve $125 which meets warrants. 01-40 EI Camino Real/Grant Road Right Turn Lane CIP Reserve $54 Construct right turn lane from eastbound EI Other (Grant 300 Camino Real to southbound Grant Road Funding) (right-of-way must be acquired). - - - .. .. - .. .. .. ... .. - .. - .. - .. .. .. - .. ... - .. - .. - - - .. - - Please refer to Appendix 1 For Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 25 - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 01-41 Construct New Bridge Over Permanente Creek Replace existing 6 foot wide pedestrian/golf cart bridge with a new 10 foot wide bridge. Relocate old bridge to provide crossing for pedestrians and golf carts going from the 18th green to the clubhouse. FY 2000/2001 PROJECTS FUNDING SUMMARY CIP Reserve Fund Construction/Conveyance Tax Fund Water Fund Wastewater Fund Storm Drain Fund Solid Waste Management Fund Gas Tax Fund North Bayshore Fund Shoreline Golf Links Fund Parking District Fund Land Sales Fund Other Funding Please refer to Appendix 1 For Key to fund abbreviations. ~ ""'" Shoreline Golf Links Fund $230 - ~,1' .. Total $15.404 it,~~i - ~ $2,022 1,669 5,509 1,598 25 25 1,049 2,110 510 o o 887 - - - ~ - .... - ~ ... Total $15.404 ~ - :iWiiU - &~ - ",,,,jja'. - .;.t<i!i .. ~ - ~~ ~ '~ Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2000/2001, Page 26 - .... - - .. - - ... - .. IlIIIIl . illIII .. - .. - .. - - - .. .. .. - .. - .. .... .. ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. - - .. "; 'J!{(~ ':"'- 'G~" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 Planned Capital Improvement Proiects. 200112002 NOTE: All costs are shown in thousands and 1999/2000 dollars. Item Proiect DescriDtion Budeet Paee No. 200112002 Annual Proiects 02-01 01-02 Street Resurfacing Program $652 29 02-02 01-02 Traffic Signal Replacements/Modifications $62 29 02-03 01-02 Slurry Seal Program $97 29 02-04 01-02 Water System Improvements $270 29 02-05 01-02 Wastewater System Improvements $125 29 02-06 01-02 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs $500 29 02-07 01-02 Parks Pathway Resurfacing $77 30 02-08 01-02 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements $150 30 02-09 01-02 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting $158 30 02-10 01-02 Shoreline Landfill Cap Maintenance and Repairs $100 30 02-11 01-02 Developer Reimbursements $100 30 02-12 01-02 Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting $280 31 02-13 01-02 Landfill GasILeachate System Repairs & Improvements $100 31 02-14 01-02 Facilities Maintenance Plan $300 31 02-15 01-02 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements $100 31 200112002 Other Proiects 02-16 Whisman Road Median, (New) Whisman Station Dr. to Fairchild Dr. $727 31 02-17 Resurfacing of Cuesta Park Tennis Courts $124 31 02-18 ADA Playground Improvements, Phase III, Design/Construction $159 32 02-19 Shoreline Pk. Roadway Lndscping. (S. Antonio Rd.to Coast-Casey) $75 32 02-20 Hetch-Hetchy Right-of-Way-Open Space Improvements, Design $50 32 02-21 Biannual Parks Renovations/Improvements $78 32 02-22 Information Services Computer Projects $800 32 02-23 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement (WMPP) $1,584 32 02-24 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement $1,000 32 02-25 Senior Ctr. HV AC/RoofPlanned Maintenance $400 33 02-26 Sewer System Master Plan $200 33 02-27 Fire Station No.5 Construction $3,200 33 Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 27 02-28 02-29 02-30 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 New Proiects Street Tree Re-inventory Landels Park Restrooms (New) 01-02 Install2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts $48 $220 $100 TOTAL OF ANNUAL, OTHER AND NEW PROJECTS $11,836 - \ioIlk, - - 33 33 33 IIIl!! .. - - - M: .. - - .. - IiIf - - - - .. .. - - - .... - .... - - - - .. .. - - Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 28 - .. 1Iii.ti::!i-: - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .. .. Planned Capital Improvement Projects~ 2001/2002 NOTE: All costs are shown in thousand in 199912000 dollars. Item Project Description Fundin~ 2001/2002 Source 2001/02 Annual Projects 02-01 01-02 Street Resurfacing Program Install asphalt concrete and fog seal, CIP Reserve $35 overlays, raising fixed access and C/C Tax $321 monuments. Also includes minor Gas Tax $296 reconstruction of streets, and minor sidewalk and City facility parking lot resurfacing. 02-02 01-02 Traffic Signal Replacements/Modifications Replace traffic signal controllers, related Gas Tax $62 equipment and traffic detector loops, as necessary. Includes minor modifications to existing traffic signals, as necessary, to improve traffic safety. 02-03 01-02 Slurry Seal Program Apply slurry seal to street surfaces and City C/C Tax $7 facility parking lots as required. Gas Tax $90 02-04 01-02 Water System Improvements Scheduled replacement of smaller water Water $270 system components and minor unscheduled improvements to the City's water system. 02-05 01-02 Wastewater System Improvements Unscheduled minor improvements/repairs Wastewater $125 to the City's wastewater collection and pumping system. 02-06 01-02 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs Replace sidewalks that are past their useful C/CTax $500 lives and repair of concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks displaced by street tree growth, and/or failure of City-owned utilities. .. - ... .. . ,. .. .... .. - .. - .. .. .... .. III till ., .. .. .. .. JIll .. .. .. .. ..... .. ,. .... - Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 29 .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 02-07 01-02 Parks Pathway Resurfacing Renovate various park pathways within C/C Tax $77 City parks. 02-08 01-02 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements Correct drainage problems and damage due North $150 to differential settlement. Regrade and Bayshore install new or modified drainage facilities. 02-09 01-02 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting Contract for pruning, removing, CIP Reserve $158 stumping, purchasing, and replanting approximately 800 to 1,000 medium to large trees within the City. Maintain trees damaged by freezing, disease drought and other natural causes 02-10 01-02 Shoreline Landfill Cap Maintenance and Repairs Regulatory mandates of the Bay Area North $100 Air Quality Management District and the Bayshore Regional Water Quality Control Board require the City to protect the integrity of the landfill cap and prevent surface emissions by regrading, filling, recompacting, and making other improvements. 02-11 01-02 Developer Reimbursements Construct street and utility CIP Reserve $25 improvements concurrent with private Water $25 development. Adjacent properties Wastewater $25 benefiting from street and utility Storm $25 improvements will be required to Construct. reimburse the City for the improvements. ~ - - - - - - - - .. - - .. .. - .. ... - - - "-lI!I! - .. .... .. - .. - - .. - "" ., - Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 30 '8i .. . - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - 02-12 01-02 Street Lane Line and Legend .... Repainting Annual repainting of lane lines and Gas Tax $250 .. legends on City streets and public and Parking $30 .. downtown parking lots. .. 02-13 01-02 Landfill Gas/Leachate System .. Repairs & Improvements . Annual repairs and improvements of large North $100 components ofthe landfill gas and leachate Bayshore .. system. - 02-14 01-02 Facilities Maintenance Plan .- Repair, replace, or maintain City facilities C/CTax $300 ... or subcomponents (HV AC, roofs, carpets, plumbing, etc.) ... - 02-15 01-02 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements - Annual contract with traffic consultants to C/C Tax $50 - assist Traffic Section with neighborhood Gas Tax $50 traffic issues. This project also installs - traffic control devices on neighborhood, .. local, residential streets in conformance with the Neighborhood Traffic Management .. Program. .. .. 2001/2002 Other Projects . 02-16 Whisman Road Median, (New) Whisman .. Station Drive to Fairchild Drive .. Design and construct a "residential arterial" CIP Reserve $727 on Whisman Road from Fairchild Dr. to .",. Whisman Station Dr. by constructing III landscaped medians. .. 02-17 Resurfacing of Cuesta Park Tennis .. Courts .. Resurface tennis courts based on periodic CIP Reserve $124 maintenance schedule. .. .. III ... ... Please refer to Appendix 1 Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 31 - for Key to fund abbreviations. .. "'1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 411~' - 02-18 ADA Playground Improvements, Phase III, Design/Construction . Upgrade existing playgrounds to new ADA CIP Reserve $159 - and CPSC guidelines by the Year 2000. .. 02-19 Shoreline Park Roadway Landscaping - (San Antonio Road to Coast-Casey) - Renovate and add new landscaping along North $75 the San Antonio corridor into the North Bayshore - Bayshore Area. - 02-20 Hetch-Hetchy Right-of-Way Open Sp,ace - Improvements, Design .. Design park and trail improvements in the Other (Rec-in $50 Hetch-Hetchy right-of-way from Whisman Lieu) - Road to Easy Street and connect Stevens .. Creek Trail through Whisman Park. - 02-21 Biannual Parks Renovations/ .. Improvements Replace and upgrade existing park and CIP Reserve $78 - landscaping components. - 02-22 Information Services Computer Projects - Annual future computer automation projects CIP Reserve $150 - for all City departments. C/C Tax 150 .. Water 200 Wastewater 200 ... Solid Waste - Mgt 50 North - Bayshore 50 - 02-23 Misc. Water Main/Service Line ~ Replacement (WMPP) ~ Replacement of corroded and undersized Water $1,584 cast iron pipe water mains on miscellaneous - streets, including water services and fire - hydrants iM 02-24 Misc. Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main .. Replacement - Repair and replace storm and sanitary sewer Wastewater $1,000 pipes, manholes and systems identified by .. annual line televising program. - .. Please refer to Appendix 1 Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 32 ,~* for Key to fund abbreviations. - .. - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 02-25 Senior Ctr. HV AClRoof Planned Maintenance Reroof the Senior Center. Replace HV AC CIP Reserve $400 systems, mansard roof, and waterproofing. Reseal building envelope and asbestos abatement. 02-26 Sewer System Master Plan Provide an updated 10-year sewer master Wastewater $200 plan. 02-27 Fire Station No.5 Construction Construct permanent Fire Station No.5 in North $3,200 the Shoreline Regional Park Community. Bayshore New Projects 02-28 Street Tree Re-inventory Update City's inventory for input to the GIS C/CTax $48 system and to account for additions/deletions since last inventory taken in 1993. 02-29 Landels Park Restrooms (New) Construct design/build restroom facility CIP Reserve $220 similar to the one constructed in Whisman Park. 02-30 01-02 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Clean outs Third year often-year program to install Wastewater $100 100-150 2-way sewer c1eanouts in order to reduce maintenance costs. Total $11.836 - !III - ..... .. .. .. .. .. ". - .. - - .. - .. .. ... .. .. .. - .. - .,. ... .. ... .. - - .. .... Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 33 - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 i<S.f': - .. FY 2001/2002 PROJECTS FUNDING SUMMARY .. - CIP Reserve Fund Construction/Conveyance Tax Fund Water Fund Wastewater Fund Storm Drain Fund Solid Waste Management Fund Gas Tax Fund North Bayshore Fund Shoreline Golf Links Fund Parking District Fund Land Sales Fund Other Funding $2,076 1,453 2,079 1,650 25 50 748 3,675 o 030 o 50 - - ... - ~. - ... - .. - Total $11.836 - 'IIiiiIi - - - - .. - - """ _c ~ - ... - illIIIi. - ... - Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2001/2002, Page 34 '* .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. - - - .. - .. .. .. - .. .. ... ... .. ". .. ... .. - - ,. .. .- - - - .. .. .. .. - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 Planned Capital Improvement Projects. 2002/2003 NOTE: All costs are shown in thousands and J 999/2000 dollars. Item Proiect Description Budeet Paee No. 2002/2003 Annual Proiects 03-01 02-03 Street Resurfacing Program $652 37 03-02 02-03 Traffic Signal Replacements/Modifications $62 37 03-03 02-03 Slurry Seal Program $97 37 03-04 02-03 Water System Improvements $270 37 03-05 02-03 Wastewater System Improvements $125 37 03-06 02-03 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs $500 37 03-07 02-03 Parks Pathway Resurfacing $77 38 03-08 02-03 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements $150 38 03-09 02-03 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting $163 38 03-10 02-03 Shoreline Landfill Cap Maintenance and Repairs $100 38 03-11 02-03 Developer Reimbursements $100 38 03-12 02-03 Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting $200 38 03-13 02-03 Facilities Maintenance Plan $300 39 03-14 02-03 Landfill GasILeachate System Repairs & Improvements $100 39 03-15 02-03 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements $100 39 2002/2003 Other Proiects 03-16 Rengstorff Park Tennis Court Resurfacing $56 39 03-17 Shoreline Park Roadway Lndscping. (No. Shoreline Blvd.) $75 39 03-18 Information Services Computer Projects $800 39 03-19 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement $1,000 40 03-20 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement $1,584 40 03-21 Water System Master Plan $200 40 03-22 Evelyn A venue Construction, Pioneer to Bernardo $5,000 40 Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2002/2003, Page 35 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 fI!!!WIt 03-23 Fire Station 4, Renovation $500 40 New Proiects 03-24 Whisman and Landels Parks Irrigation Renovation Design $37 40 03-25 02-03 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts $100 40 03-26 Middlefield Road/Logue A venue Traffic Signal $125 41 - - -i\1j;ij'A" - ~ ~ TOTAL OF ANNUAL, OTHER AND NEW PROJECTS $12,473 il>#H - ~ ~ - .. -- - .,. - .. - - - - ","" - - - - ~ - .. - Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2002/2003, Page 36 - - - - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 lit - Planned Capital Improvement Projects. 2002/2003 NOTE: All costs are shown in thousand in 199912000 dollars. Item Project Description Fundin~ 2002/2003 Source 2002-2003 Annual Projects 03-01 02-03 Street Resurfacing Program Install asphalt concrete and fog seal, CIP Reserve $306 overlays, raising fixed access and Gas Tax 346 monuments. Also includes minor reconstruction of streets, and minor sidewalk and City facility parking lot resurfacing. 03-02 02-03 Traffic Signal ReplacementslModifications Gas Tax $62 Replace traffic signal controllers, related equipment and traffic detector loops, as necessary. Includes minor modifications to existing traffic signals, as necessary, to improve traffic safety. 03-03 02-03 Slurry Seal Program Apply slurry seal to street surfaces and City CIP Reserve $7 facility parking lots as required. Gas Tax $90 03-04 02-03 Water System Improvements Scheduled replacement of smaller water Water $270 system components and minor unscheduled improvements to the City's water system. 03-05 02-03 Wastewater System Improvements Unscheduled minor improvements/repairs Wastewater $125 to the City's wastewater collection and pumping system. 03-06 02-03 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs Replace sidewalks that are past their useful C/C Tax $500 lives and repair concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks displaced by street tree growth, and/or failure of City-owned utilies. .. ... - - - .. .. 8 .- .. - . "., .. .. . .. .. .. .. ... .. ,. - ... ... .. - .... .. .. ... - Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2002/2003, Page 37 .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - 03-07 02-03 Parks Pathway Resurfacing - Renovate various park pathways within C/C Tax $77 ... City parks. "'-':'~ 03-08 02-03 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, ..... Parking Improvements Correct drainage problems and damage due North $150 to differential settlement, includes regrading Bayshore ~ and installation of new or modified drainage facilities. I!I!I!M- 03-09 02-03 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting Contract for pruning, removing, CIP Reserve $133 ~i stumping, purchasing, and replanting C/C Tax 30 approximately 800 to 1,000 medium to large trees within the City. Maintain - trees damaged by freezing, disease ~,r drought and other natural causes. 03-10 02-03 Shoreline Landfill Cap ,,,,:,ot,. Maintenance and Repairs Regulatory mandates of the Bay Area North $100 - Air Quality Management District and the Bayshore ... Regional Water Quality Control Board require the City to protect the integrity of - the landfill cap and prevent surface - emissions by regrading, filling, - recompacting, and making other improvements. - - 03-11 02-03 Developer Reimbursements Construction of street and utility CIP Reserve $25 "'... improvements concurrent with private Water 25 - development. Adjacent properties Wastewater 25 benefiting from street and utility Storm - improvements will be required to Construct. 25 ... reimburse the City for the improvements. - 03-12 02-03 Street Lane Line and Legend - Repainting Annual repainting City street lane lines and Gas Tax $200 legends. .- .. - Please refer to Appendix I .... Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2002/2003, Page 38 for Key to fund abbreviations. - .. - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - "'" 03-13 02-03 Facilities Maintenance Plan Repair, replace, or maintain City facilities C/CTax or subcomponents ( HV AC, roofs, carpets, plumbing, etc.) 03-14 02-03 Annual Landfill Gas/Leachate System Repairs and Improvements Annual repairs and improvements of large North components of the landfill gas and leachate Bayshore system. 03-15 02-03 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements Funding for annual contract with traffic CIP Reserve consultants to assist Traffic Section with Gas Tax neighborhood traffic issues. This project also installs traffic control devices on neighborhood, local, residential streets in conformance with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. 2002/2003 Other Projects 03-16 Rengstorff Park Tennis Court Resurfacing Routine 5-year scheduled resurfacing of the CIP Reserve eight tennis courts at RengstorffPark. 03-17 Shoreline Park Roadway Landscaping (No. Shoreline Boulevard) Renovate and landscape new areas along North North Shoreline Boulevard. Bayshore 03-18 Information Services Computer Projects Future computer automation projects for all City departments. CIP Reserve C/CTax Water Wastewater Solid Waste Mgt North Bayshore $300 .. .. - - $100 .. - .. ., ... $50 $50 - - .. -" - - .. - $56 - - - .. $75 .. - - $150 150 200 200 .. - - .. 50 - 50 - - .. - Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2002/2003, Page 39 .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 "WI - 03-19 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement Repair and replace storm and sanitary sewer Wastewater pipes, manholes and systems identified by the City's annual line televising program. 03-20 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement Replace corroded and/or undersized cast Water iron pipe water mains on various streets. The replacement will include water services and fire hydrants. 03-21 Water System Master Plan Update the Water System Study completed Water in May 1992. 03-22 Evelyn Avenue Construction Pioneer to Bernardo Construct improvements to Evelyn Avenue CIP Reserve between Pioneer Way and Bernardo C/C Tax Avenue. Other (Meas. A/B) 03-23 Fire Station 4, Renovation Renovate Fire Station 4 to update facility CIP Reserve and to accommodate female firefighters. New Projects 03-24 Whisman and Landels Parks Irrigation Renovation Design Design renovation of irrigation system CIP Reserve encompassing approximately 5.5 acres of . athletic areas at Whisman Park and Landels Park. 03-25 02-03 Install 2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts Fourth year of lO-year program to install Wastewater 100-150 2-way sewer cleanouts to reduce City maintenance expense - $1,000 ..... - - iHIit $1,584 - .. 't,,~ $200 - - - $2,400 600 2,000 ... - .. $500 - -, - - ... $37 - .~ ~,0, .... ... $100 '- .. '4;1;'1' - .. .. Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2002/2003, Page 40 .. - .. .IM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .. - .. 03-26 Middlefield Road/Logue Avenue Traffic Signal Install new traffic signal, to accommodate additional pedestrian crossings from light rail passengers making this traffic signal warranted. .. .. - - - .. ... .. FY 2002/2003 PROJECTS FUNDING SUMMARY CIP Reserve Fund Construction/Conveyance Tax Fund Water Fund Wastewater Fund Storm Drain Fund Solid Waste Management Fund Gas Tax Fund North Bayshore Fund Shoreline Golf Links Fund Parking District Fund Land Sales Fund Other Funding .. - ... .. ... - - .. ... .. - .. - .. - .. .. .. ... .. - ... - - Please refer to Appendix 1 for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2002/2003, Page 41 .. .. CIP Reserve Other (Dev. Contribution) $100 25 Total $12.473 $3,764 1,657 2,279 1,450 25 50 748 475 o o o 2,025 Total $12.473 -1M" "'" - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW .,. ~ ~ ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, . PLANNED 2000/2004 .. - - THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ,... - ... ... ..' - .. - .. .. - - ... .. - - - - ~SjI.;I; .. - ... - - - .. .. - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - .., ",.. - - - - - ... - ". .. ... - .. ., - ... .. - ". .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 200012004 Planned Capital Improvement Proiects~ 2003/2004 NOTE: All costs are shown in thousands and 1999/2000 dollars. Item Proiect Description Bude:et Pae:e No. 2003/2004 Annual Proiects 04-01 03-04 Street Resurfacing Program $652 43 04-02 03-04 Traffic Signal Replacements/Modifications $62 43 04-03 03-04 Slurry Seal Program $97 43 04-04 03-04 Water System Improvements $270 43 04-05 03-04 Wastewater System Improvements $125 43 04-06 03-04 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs $500 44 . 04-07 03-04 Parks Pathway Resurfacing $77 44 04-08 03-04 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements $150 44 04-09 03-04 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting $168 44 04-10 03-04 Shoreline Landfill Cap Maintenance and Repairs $100 44 04-11 03-04 Developer Reimbursements $100 45 04-12 03-04 Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting $200 45 04-13 03-04 Facilities Maintenance Plan $300 45 04-14 03-04 Landfill Gas/Leachate System Repairs & Improvements $100 45 04-15 03-04 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements $100 45 2003/2004 Other Proiects 04-16 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement $1,000 46 04-17 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement $1,584 46 04-18 Downtown Traffic Study $125 46 04-19 City Wide Gateway Study $85 46 04-20 San Antonio Rd. Landscape Design (ECR to Central Expwy.) $50 46 04- 21 Fire Station No.3, Renovation $500 46 04-22 Middlefield Road Median, (New) Whisman to Ellis $438 47 04-23 03-04 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts $100 47 04-24 Information Services Computer Projects $800 47 TOTAL OF ANNUAL AND OTHER PROJECTS $7,683 Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 200312004, Page 42 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 200012004 Planned Capital Improvement Projects4 2003/2004 NOTE: All costs are shown in thousand in 1999/2000 dollars. Item Project Description Fundin~ Source 2003/2004 Annual Projects 04-01 03-04 Street Resurfacing Program Install asphalt concrete and fog seal, CIP Reserve overlays, raising fixed access and C/CTax monuments. Also includes minor Gas Tax reconstruction of streets, and minor sidewalk and City facility parking lot resurfacing. 04-02 03-04 Traffic Signal Replacemen ts/Modifications Replace traffic signal controllers, related Gas Tax equipment and traffic detector loops, as necessary. Includes minor modifications to existing traffic signals, to improve traffic safety. 04-03 03-04 Slurry Seal Program Apply slurry seal to street surfaces and City CIP Reserve facility parking lots as required. Gas Tax 04-04 03-04 Water System Improvements Scheduled replacement of smaller water Water system components and minor unscheduled improvements to the City's water system. 04-05 03-04 Wastewater System Improvements Unscheduled minor improvements/repairs Wastewater to the City's wastewater collection and pumping system. Please refer to Appendix for Key to fund abbreviations. ~ - - - ~. 2003/2004 - - - .... $80 $266 $306 - - .- - - - $62 .. ... - - .. $7 $90 - - $270 - .. - - $125 - ...... - ~. ... - - - Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2003/20004 Page, 43 ... ... - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - - 04-06 03-04 Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Repairs Replace sidewalks that are past their useful lives and repair concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks displaced by street tree growth, and/or failure of City-owned utilities. - ., - .. 04-07 03-04 Parks Pathway Resurfacing Renovate various park pathways within City parks. - .. - 04-08 03-04 Shoreline Pathway, Roadway, Parking Improvements Correct drainage problems and damage due to differential settlement. Regrade and install of new or modified drainage facilities. ... - ., - - 04-09 03-04 Forestry Maintenance Program and Street Tree Replanting Contract for pruning, removing, stumping, purchasing, and replanting approximately 800 to 1,000 medium to large trees within the City. Maintain trees damaged by freezing, disease drought and other natural causes. - - - .. - - 04-10 03-04 Shoreline Landfill Cap Maintenance and Repairs Regulatory mandates of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the Regional Water Quality Control Board require the City to protect the integrity of the landfill cap and prevent surface emissions by regrading, filling, recompacting, and making other improvements. - .. - - - .. ",. - - .. - .. - - C/CTax $500 CIP Reserve $77 North Bayshore $150 C/C Tax $168 North Bayshore $100 Please refer to Appendix for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2003/20004 Page, 44 - .. M'l< CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - 04-11 03-04 Developer Reimbursements Construct street and utility improvements CIP Reserve concurrent with private development. Water Adjacent properties benefiting from street Wastewater and utility improvements will be required to Storm reimburse the City for the improvements. Construct. 04-12 03-04 Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting Annual repainting of lane lines and Gas Tax legends on City streets and public and downtown parking lots. 04-13 03-04 Facilities Maintenance Plan Repair, replace, or maintain City facilities C/C Tax or subcomponents ( HV AC, roofs, carpets, plumbing, etc.) 04-14 03-04 Annual Landfill Gas/Leachate System Repairs & Improvements North Annual repairs and improvements of large Bayshore components of the landfill gas and leachate system. 04-15 03-04 Annual Traffic Studies/NTMP Improvements Annual contract with traffic consultants to CIP Reserve assist Traffic Section with neighborhood Gas Tax traffic issues. This project also installs traffic control devices on neighborhood, local, residential streets in conformance with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. ,- $25 25 25 .. ~ M!N 25 o>,H';;.i- ... $200 _i - - .. $300 '"", - - $100 - .. - '- - $50 $50 - - - - - - - - - - W'i - - - Please refer to Appendix for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2003/20004 Page, 45 .... - ... """"'-^ ... - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - .. 2003/2004 Other Projects 04-16 Miscellaneous Storm/Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement Repair and replace storm and sanitary sewer Wastewater $1,000 pipes, manholes and systems identified by the City's annual line televising program. 04-17 Miscellaneous Water Main/Service Line Replacement Replace corroded and/or undersized cast Water $1,584 iron pipe water mains on various streets. The replacement will include water services and fire hydrants. 04-18 Downtown Traffic Study Conduct traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle CIP Reserve $125 counts at various locations downtown. Determine roadway improvements necessary to handle future traffic conditions. 04-19 City Wide Gateway Study Evaluate potential gateway locations, CIP Reserve $85 gateway design concepts and construction estimates for future implementation. 04-20 San Antonio Rd. Landscape Design (ECR to Central Expwy.) Design alternatives for landscaping median C/C Tax $50 on San Antonio Road, between EI Camino Real and Central Expressway. 04-21 Fire Station No.3, Renovation Renovate and update facility and to CIP Reserve $500 accommodate female firefighters. - .. - .. .. ... - .. - - - .. - .. - - - .. ... ., - .. - .. - ... .. .. .. - - - Please refer to Appendix for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2003/20004 Page, 46 - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ., - 04-22 Middlefield Rd. Median (New) Whisman to Ellis Install new landscaped median CIP Reserve improvements continuing from existing median east of Whisman to Ellis. - - $438 - - 04-23 03-04 Insta1l2-Way Sewer Lateral Cleanouts Fifth year of 1 O-year program to install 2- Wastewater way sewer lateral cleanouts on all laterals connecting to the City's main sewer lines. Intent is to install 100-150 cleanouts per year. ~ - $100 """ - 'lIiIP - 04-24 Information Services Computer Projects Future computer automation projects for all City Departments. CIP Reserve C/C Tax Water Wastewater Solid Waste North Bayshore - $150 150 200 200 50 - - - - 50 - Total $7.683 - - FY 2003/2004 PROJECTS FUNDING SUMMARY CIP Reserve Fund Construction/Conveyance Tax Fund Water Fund Wastewater Fund Storm Drain Fund Solid Waste Management Fund Gas Tax Fund North Bayshore Fund Shoreline Golf Links Fund Parking District Fund Land Sales Fund Other Funding .. $1,537 1,434 2,079 1,450 25 50 708 400 o o o - - - ... - - ~ - """ ~ Total $7.683 - .... - Please refer to Appendix for Key to fund abbreviations. Planned Capital Improvement Projects, 2003/20004 Page, 47 - ..... .. - .. - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 PROJECTS TO CLOSE AS OF JUNE 1999 - Projects listed below are scheduled to close on June 30, 1999. Balances shown are the actual balances at June 30, 1999. .. - .. Project Number - -- Project Title Sponsoring Department Remaining Balance - 92-21 92-23 93-33 95-22 95-29 96-19 96-20 96-23 96-28 96-53 96-59 97 -03 97 -06 97-12 97-32 97 -54 - ... .. - - - - - .. .. - - - - .. - IIIlII - - .. .. - .. .. - - - Shoreline GolfParking& Circulation Permanente Creek Bridge Whisman Pump Station Improvement Design Easy Street Park (Creekside Park) Police Parking Lot Expansion Water Main & Service Line Replacements Bryant Street Sewer Main Replacements Crittenden Landfill Landscape Concept Fire Station No.2 Conceptual Design Shoreline Entry Storm Drainage Center for Performing Arts Cafe Annual Slurry Seal Program 96-97 Concrete Sidewalk and Curb Repair Street Lane Line and Legend Repainting Golf Course Driving Range Lighting Miramonte Water Transmission Main Installation Source: Finance Department Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works $17,818 4,417 15,992 o 1 252,995 39,923 11,904 28,778 164,707 o 7,449 68,340 54,904 2,302 1 TOTAL $669.531 Projects to close as of June 30, 1999, Page 48 - - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ IIIII!I!I!!JJ ..... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ",". - THIS P AGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - ... - - - iil/i< - - .. """"" lii_ ~, ~...J<fi,t ~. ~ - iiib~ii. - .. ~if: - - "'"' ... - - - - .. ... - - - .. - .. - .., - .. - .. ,... .. - - .. .. - - - - - - - .. - ... - - Item US-1 US-2 US-3 US-4 US-5 US-6 US-7 US-8 US-9 US-10 US-11 US-12 US-13 US-14 US-15 US-16 US-17 US-18 US-19 US-20 US-21 US-22 US-23 US-24 US-25 US-26 US-27 US-28 US-29 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 Unscheduled Projects. 1999/2004 NOTE: Estimated costs relate to the particular year that the project was proposed and are not necessarily 1999/2000 dollars. Projects moving from the Unscheduled list to the Five-Year Plan would require updated cost estimates. Title PROJECT LIST 1 = ITEMS US- 1 TO US- 29 PROJECT LIST 2 = ITEMS US- 30 TO US- 72 Project Description Estimated Costs Adobe Building Renovation Construction, Phase II Shoreline/Stierlin Landscaping Refurbishment Whisman and Landels Park Irrigation Renovation Construction Calderon Avenue Median Island Bubb Park Restrooms (New) Middlefield Rd. Median Refurbishment (Moffett to Shoreline) Permanent Skateboard Park-Design and Development North Rengstorff Ave.lMiddlefield Rd. Park-Design & Development Del Medio Park-Design and Development North California/Central Area Park-Design & Development Shoreline Lake Supply W et Well Reconstruction Teen Services Center Permanente Creek Trail, Phase II Preparation of East End of Charleston Site (Farmer's Field) Second Stage Support Space Landscape Upgrades at Vista SlopelPermanente Crk. Const. Pro Shop Design and Construction Construct Shoreline Electric Golf Car Facilities(inc1udes design) Irrigation Pump Station-Ugrades and Additions Park Dr.lMiramonte Ave. Intersection Realignment Shoreline Blvd. Realignment (In Park) Charleston Road Detention Basin Pathway Crittenden Landscape Enhancements Crittenden ParklRec. Ammenities Crittenden Restroom Facility Crittenden Play Area Stevens Creek Trail Reach 4, Construction II (Yuba to Sleeper) Velarde Street Curb Replacement San Antonio Rd. Landscape Refurbishment (ECR to Central Expressway) $400 $268 $370 $150 $225 $350 $250 $500 $500 $500 $50 $500 $140 $1,000 $250 $2,600 $500 $570 $550 $122 $275 $294 $350 $475 $250 $280 $2,720 $145 $302 Sub-Total of Project List 1 $14,886 Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 49 Item US-30 US-31 US-32 US-33 US-34 US-35 US-36 US-37 US-38 US-39 US-40 US-41 US-42 US-43 US-44 US-45 US-46 US-47 US-48 US-49 US-50 US-51 US-52 US-53 US-54 US-55 US-56 US-57 US-58 US-59 US-60 US-61 US-62 US-63 US-64 US-65 US-66 US-67 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 Project Description AD-ADA Avenue Assessment District Improvements AD- Alice/Moorpark/Margo Assessment District Improvements AD-Brookdale/Isabelle/Starr/Marilyn Assessment District Improvements AD-Carmelita/Martens Assessment District Improvements AD-Carol Avenue Assessment District Improvements AD-CentraVOrchard Assessment District Improvements AD- Diericx Court Assessment District Improvements AD-Franklin Avenue Assessment District Improvements AD-Grant Road Half-Street Assessment District Improvements AD-Jardin Avenue Assessment District Improvements AD-Levin/Springer/Pilgrim Area Assessment District Improvements. AD-Marich Way Assessment District Improvements AD-Minaret Half-Street Assessment District Improvements AD-Ortega Avenue Assessment District Improvements. (@ Mora) AD-Pastel Lane Assessment District Improvements AD- Rose Avenue Assessment District Improvements AD-Sleeper/Eunice Assessment District Improvements AD-Sonia Way Assessment District Improvements AD-Sun-Mor Avenue Assessment District Improvements AD-Sunnyview Lane Assessment District Improvements AD- Yorkshire Way Assessment District Improvements Burgoyne Street Reconstruction Castro Street Modifications, EI Camino Real to Miramonte Ave. Castro Street Railroad Grade Separation Feasibility Study Charleston Rd. Retention Basin Interconnect Trail to Stvns. Cr.. Crittenden Park Ballfield Rest Room Renovation Cuesta and'Sylvan Park Dumpster Enclosures Emily Drive Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Reconstruction Fairchild Drive Sanitary Sewer Parallel Pipe Grant Road Sanitary Sewer Parallel Pipe Leong Drive Curb and Sidewalk Reconstruction North Shoreline Blvd.-Central Expressway Ramps Pear A venue/L'A venida Street Improvements Pedestrian Over/Undercross @ Moffett Blvd for Stevens Creek Trail Rengstorff Avenue Railroad Grade Separation Feasibility Study Rengstorff Avenue Traffic Signal Interconnect Rengstorff Park Barbeque Area Arbor Structures Replacement of Surface Drain Pipes .. - ..... .. Estimated Costs ... - $450 $1,540 $1,600 - - liiI!I $990 $450 $370 $360 $70 $1,100 $210 $530 $410 $240 $100 $300 $420 $2,375 $370 $880 $390 $350 $530 $260 $125 $450 $90 $58 $225 $275 $90 $320 $4,550 $2,250 $1,400 $125 $225 $110 $1,800 - - .. - .. - .. .. - - - - - - - - - "'"" ... - - E. .. - - ..... Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 50 - - - ... - ... US-68 - ... US-69 US-70 - ... US-71 - US-72 .. - ... - - - .. .. .. - ... - ... - ... .. .. - .. - .. .. - - .. - - - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 Upgrade Shoreline Boulevard Landscaping on Overpass over Central Expressway Shoreline Boulevard Sanitary Sewer Parallel Pipe Southern Pacific and Downtown Trailhead Improves. @ Stevens Creek Upgrade Whisman Blvd. Landscaping on Overpass Over Central Expressway Whisman Road Pressure-Reducing Station SUBTOTAL (List 2) TOTAL OF ALL UNSCHEDULED PROJECTS $560 $175 $290 $293 $105 $27,811 $42.697 Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 51 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 IlIli6 - Unscheduled Projects ... PROJECT LIST 1 = Items US-l to US-29 Projects with a HIGHER Probability of Requiring Funding Within the 5- Year Plan. PROJECT LIST 2 = Items US-30 to US-72 Projects with a LOWER Probability of Requiring Funding Within the 5- Year Plan. - - - ". NOTE: Estimated costs relate to the particular year that the project was proposed and are not necessarily 1999/2000 dollars. Projects moving from the Unscheduled Project list to the Five- Year Plan would require updated cost estimates. - 1Mii' Item Project Description Estimated Costs - - - PROJECT LIST 1 = Items US-l to US- 29 ... Projects with a HIGHER Probability of Requirin~ Fundin~ Within the 5- Year Plan - - US-l Adobe Building Renovation Construction, Phase II Construct small pumphouse building to match the one previously demolished. Construct addition to Adobe Building site to provide additional public restrooms and to upgrade landscaping. $400 - - - - US-2 Shoreline/Stierlin Landscaping Refurbishment Upgrade and renovation of irrigation and refurbishment of plant materials and hardscape. $268 - .. - US-3 Whisman and Landels Park Irrigation Renovation Construction Renovate the existing athletic field irrigation system to provide greater efficiency and to reduce maintenance. $370 ~ - - US-4 Calderon Avenue Median Island Install raised medians and left turn pockets to reduce pavement and provide landscaping. $150 - - ~ US-5 Bubb Park Restrooms (New) Construct a new restroom similar to other urban park facilities to meet standards, codes, and ADA requirements. $225 6ciol~' - .... - US-6 Middlefield Rd. Median Refurbishment (Moffett to Shoreline) Refurbish landscaping and irrigation. $350 .. - ~~, Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 52 "'" ~' .. .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 .. 11IIIII US-7 Permanent Skateboard Park-Design and Development Design and development of permanent skateboard site. $250 US-8 North Rengstorff Ave./Middlefield Rd. Park-Design and Development $500 Design and development of neighborhood park. US-9 Del Medio Park-Design and Development Design and development of neighborhood park. $500 US-tO North California/Central Area Park-Design and Development $500 Design and development of neighborhood park. US-ll Shoreline Lake Supply Wet Well Reconstruction $50 Design and construction of wet well for the Shoreline lake supply pump to remedy current cavitation problem. US-12 Teen Services Center $500 Provide a safe and secure location for middle school and high school youth programs. US-13 Permanente Creek Trail, Phase II $140 Construction of an AC pathway along Permanente Creek from Charleston to Highway 101. US-14 Preparation of East End of Charleston Site (Farmer's Field) $1,000 Fill the site to match adjacent grades US-IS Second Stage Support Space Construct additional dressing rooms, greenroom and $250 bathroom for performers at the Performing Arts Center. US-16 Landscape Upgrades at Vista Slope/Permanente Creek Construction Design and construct landscape at Vista $2,600 SlopelPermanente Creek as identified and approved in the site concept plan. US-17 Pro Shop Design and Construction Construct a new 3,000 square foot Shoreline Golf Links $500 pro shop and restroom facilities. .. - .. - .. - .. - .. - - .. - - - - - - - .. - .. - .. .. .. .. - - .. - - - Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 53 .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - US-IS Construct Shoreline Electric Golf Car Facilities (includes design) Upgrade electrical service to existing building that will be $570 renovated and construct 2,700 square foot golf car storage facility. US-19 Irrigation Pump Station-Upgrades and Additions Design and construct improvements for the irrigation $550 pump station to enhance reliability and efficiency. US-20 Park Drive/Miramonte Ave. Intersection Realignment Remove existing traffic island, realign Miramonte Ave., relocate sidewalk, streetlights, curb ramp and storm drain $122 modifications. US-21 Shoreline Blvd. Realignment (In Park) Construct improvements for the left turn into Michael's $275 restaurant (including change to roadway elevation). US-22 Charleston Road Detention Basin Pathway Construct improvements to drainage and install $294 headerboards and additional decomposed granite at the existing 5,000 linear foot, 10 foot wide pathway. US-23 Crittenden Landscape Enhancements Placeholder project adding trees, bushes, and plaza to the $350 basic landscape at the Crittenden Parking site. US-24 Crittenden Park/Rec. Ammenities Placeholder project for yet to be determined ammenities $475 within the site such as pathways and recreational facilities. US-25 Crittenden Rest Room Facility Placeholder project for design and construction of a rest $250 room facility. US-26 Crittenden Play Area Placeholder project to construct a play area and install $280 play equipment near the open space area. ""'" - - - ..... - - ~*' ..... .. - .~ - .. - - - - ..... ~ ..... .... - M'f """ .. - w - WI' - iIi,#e Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 54 ~ D ... - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - - US-27 Stevens Creek Trail Reach 4, Construction II (Yuba to Sleeper) Placeholder project for construction ofpedestrian/bike trail extension after public process. $2,720 - - - US-28 Velarde Street Curb Replacement Remove old curb and two surface cross culverts. Replace with new curb and gutter and median island curbs. $145 .. - - US-29 San Antonio Rd. Landscape Refurbishment (ECR to Central Expressway Refurbish median landscape plants and irrigation system. $302 .. - Sub-Total of Projects with a Higher Probability of Requiring Funding Within the 5- Year Plan fitems US- 1 to US-29) $14,886 - - .. Unscheduled Projects (Continued) - - PROJECT LIST 2 = Items US-30 to US-72 - .. Projects with a LOWER Probability of Requirin~ Fundin~ Within the 5- Year Plan - - US-30 Ada Avenue Assessment District Improvements Installation of standard street improvements pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding is included in this project. The City Council may delete undergrounding at its discretion. $450 - - - .. US-31 AlicelMoorpark/Margo Assessment District Improvements Installation of standard street improvements and undergrounding existing utilities (Moorpark Way not included in undergrounding) in Alice Avenue between Moorpark Way and Rainbow Drive, including Margo Court and in Moorpark Way from Dana Street southerly to the end of street (near Highway 85) pursuant to assessment district proceedings. $1,540 - - - .. - - - .. ... - - Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 55 .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 -- - US-32 BrookdalelIsabelle/Starr/Marilyn Assessment District $1,600 Improvements Construction comprised of overlaying the existing substandard paved roadway with 2" of asphalt concrete, installing rolled curbs and gutters, driveway conforms and planting street trees. Sewer services, and storm services and mains are included. California Water Company will continue to provide water service to the area. Street lights, sidewalks and undergrounding of telephone and electric lines are not included in the cost estimate but will be added to the project if requested by the property owners. US-33 Carmelita/Martens Assessment District Improvements $990 Construction comprised of overlaying the existing substandard paved roadway with 2" of asphalt concrete, installing rolled curbs and gutters, driveway conforms and plant street trees. Sewer services and storm services and mains are included. This area will continue to be served by California Water Company. Street lights, sidewalks and undergrounding of telephone and electric lines are not included in the cost estimate but will be added to the project subject to the property owners' desires. US-34 Carol Avenue Assessment District $450 Improvements Installation of standard street improvements pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding is included in this project. The City Council may delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-35 Central/Orchard Assessment District Improvements $370 Installation of standard street improvements and undergrounding of existing utilities in Central Avenue east of Orchard A venue and in Orchard A venue between Central A venue and Willowgate Street pursuant to an assessment district proceeding. US-36 Diericx Court Assessment District Improvements $360 Installation of standard improvements in Diericx Court pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding of utilities is included in this project. The City Council may decide to delete undergrounding at its discretion. - - -- - - w;w.> - - - - - - .. .. - ., .. .. .. .. - .. - .-1 - -, .... k" - """ - m~ Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 56 - - .. .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 jII!l!o, - US-37 Franklin A venue Assessment District Improvements $70 Installation of standard street improvements in Franklin A venue pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding of overhead utilities is not required. US-38 Grant Road Half-Street Assessment District $1,100 Improvements Installation of standard street improvements on the east side of Grant Road from Levin Avenue to Waverly Place pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding of utilities is included in this project. The City Council may delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-39 Jardin Avenue Assessment District $210 Improvements Installation of standard street improvements pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding is included in this project. The City Council may delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-40 Levin/Springer/Pilgrim Area Assessment District $530 Improvements Installation of standard improvements pursuant to assessment district proceedings to complete the construction of existing streets. Undergrounding of utilities is included in this project. The City Council may decide to delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-41 Marich Way Assessment District Improvements $410 Installation of standard street improvements from El Monte to Blackfield Way pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding of utilities is included. The City Council may delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-42 Minaret Half-Street Assessment District $240 Improvements Installation of standard street improvements pursuant to assessment district proceedings. Undergrounding of utilities is included in this project. The City Council may delete undergrounding at its discretion. - .... - - '... ... .. .. .. ... - .... - - - - .. - - - - - - - .. - - .. - .. - .. - Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 57 .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ... - US-43 Ortega Avenue Assessment District Improvements (at $100 Mora Drive) Installation of standard street improvements on the east side of Ortega A venue, just south of the intersection with Mora Drive pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911. US-44 Pastel Lane Assessment District Improvements $300 Installation of standard improvements in Pastel Lane pursuant to assessment district proceedings. The undergrounding of overhead utilities is included in this project. The City Council may decide to delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-45 Rose A venue Assessment District Improvements $420 Construction comprised of overlaying the existing substandard paved roadway on Rose A venue from Miramonte Avenue to Fordham Way with 2" of asphalt concrete, installing rolled curbs and gutters, driveway conforms and planting street trees. Sewer, storm services, and mains are included. Street lights, sidewalks and under-grounding oftelephone and electric lines are not included in the cost estimate but will be added to the project subject to the property owner's desires. US-46 Sleeper/Eunice Assessment District Improvements $2,375 Construction comprised of overlaying the existing substandard paved roadways with 2" of asphalt concrete, installing rolled curbs and gutters, driveway conforms and planting street trees between Grant Road and Stevens Creek within the former unincorporated area. Sewer services, and storm services and mains are included. A 12" water main connecting Eunice A venue and Katrina Way is also included. Cal Water Company will continue to serve this area. Street lights, sidewalks and undergrounding of telephone and electric lines is not included in the cost estimate, but will be added to the project subject to the property owners' desires. US-47 Sonia Way Assessment District Improvements $370 Reconstruction of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk on Sonia Way from Lane A venue to Miramonte Avenue. Improvements include AC pavement conforms and the installation of a new sidewalk on Sonia Way between Castro Street and Lane A venue, where none presently exists, should the need for a new sidewalk be justified. - - lIP .. ""'" .. .~~ - ... .. - - -~ - I11III - IiIIII .. - - ... - - - ~&'" - - - WII, - - - _. Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 58 - .. - ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ,. - US-48 Sun-Mor Avenue Assessment District Improvements $880 Installation of standard improvements in Sun-Mor A venue pursuant to assessment district proceedings. The undergrounding of overhead utilities is included in this project. The City Council may decide to delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-49 Sunnyview Lane Assessment District Improvements $390 Installation of standard improvements in Sunnyview Lane pursuant to assessment district proceedings. The undergrounding of overhead facilities is included in this project. The City Council may decide to delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-50 Yorkshire Way Assessment District Improvements $350 Installation of standard improvements in Yorkshire Way pursuant to assessment district proceedings. The undergrounding of overhead facilities is included in this project. The City Council may decide to delete undergrounding at its discretion. US-51 Burgoyne Street Reconstruction $530 Reconstruction of Burgoyne Street from Montecito A venue to Hackett A venue. Improvements consist of the installation of new AC pavement, replacement of the existing cast iron water main, and minor reconstruction of curb, gutter and sidewalk sections. US-52 Castro Street Modifications, EI Camino Real to $260 Miramonte Avenue Reduce travel lanes from two to one in each direction, widening the existing medians and adding bicycle lanes. US-53 Castro Street Railroad Grade Separation Feasibility $125 Study Study the feasibility of constructing a railroad separation at Castro Street. US-54 Charleston Road Retention Basin Interconnect Trail $450 to Stevens Creek Improvements to existing 3/4 mile path around Charleston Road retention basin to connect the East end ofthe path to the Stevens Creek Trail. Includes installation of pedestrian/observation crossing, a new parcourse cluster and adequate drainage. ... - .. ... .. - .... - ... - - - ... ... - .. - - - .. - - - - - - - .. - - - ... - Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 59 .. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 t;..i$' - US-55 Crittenden Park Ballfield Rest Room Renovation $90 Upgrading of Crittenden Park rest rooms to match other . parks' rest rooms. Include replacing all plumbing fixtures and partitions, painting the building, installing skylights and graffiti-resistant panels, and upgrading lighting. US-56 Cuesta and Sylvan Park Dumpster Enclosures $58 Construction of effective screening and security for the large dumpsters located at Cuesta and Sylvan Parks. US-57 Emily Drive Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk $225 Reconstruction Design and reconstruction of curb and sidewalk on Emily Drive. US-58 Fairchild Drive Sanitary Sewer Parallel Pipe $275 Installation of 330 linear feet of 12 inch sewer lines on Fairchild Drive between National Avenue and Whisman Road and 190 linear feet of parallel 21 inch sanitary sewer line between Whisman Road and Tyrella Avenue. US-59 Grant Road Sanitary Sewer Parallel Pipe $90 Install 270' of parallel 10" sewer line on Grant Road between Martens A venue and Bentley Square. US-60 Leong Drive Curb and Sidewalk $320 Reconstruction Design and reconstruction of curb and sidewalk on Leong Drive. ~i - """' - - - ..... - - - ... - ~li ." .. ~ - - .. - US-61 North Shoreline Blvd.-Central Expressway Ramps Completion ofthe "missing" ramps in the North Shoreline Boulevard-Central Expressway interchange. The construction ofthe North Shoreline Boulevard overcrossing in 1970 did not include the two ramps on the south side of Central Expressway, although they were incorporated into the original design. In their place, two sets of traffic signals were installed on Central Expressway as a cost-saving measure. These ramps will permit direct access to North Shoreline Boulevard southbound for eastbound motorists on Central Expressway and to Central Expressway eastbound for motorists travelling northbound on North Shoreline Boulevard. $4,550 .. - - - - - - - - - NJ - ~ Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 60 - """ - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ... - US-62 Pear Ave./L'Avenida Street Improvements $2,250 Design, property acquisition and construction of street improvements in the Pear A venue/L'A venida section of the North Bayshore Area. US-63 Pedestrian OvercrossinglUndercrossing at Moffett $1,400 Boulevard for the Stevens Creek Trail Replace the at grade level pedestrian crossing of the Stevens Creek Trail at Moffett Boulevard with an overcrossing or undercrossing. US-64 Rengstorff A venue Railroad Grade Separation $125 Feasibility Study Study the feasibility of constructing a railroad grade separation at Rengstorff Avenue. US-65 Rengstorff Avenue Traffic Signal Interconnect $225 Install interconnect conduit and cable along Rengstorff Avenue between the intersections of Rengstorff Avenue and Montecito Avenue and Old Middlefield Way. Also install necessary interconnect equipment at traffic signals and at the traffic signals between these intersections. US-66 Rengstorff Park Barbeque Area Arbor Structures $110 Construction of two arbors to shade entry into the renovated barbeque area from the parking lot. US-67 Replacement of Surface Drain Pipes $1,800 Replacement of City's surface drain pipes at intersections in the downtown area by installing catch basins, laterals and extending storm drain pipes, reconforming the street grade and constructing curb ramps. US-68 Upgrade Shoreline Blvd Landscaping on Overpass $560 over Central Expressway Renovation ofthe County-installed landscaping within the cloverleaf, upgrade the irrigation system and upgrade the pathway lighting along all four sides ofthe overpass. In addition, enhancements will be made to the overpass itself to further decrease the barren appearance along this major entrance to the downtown area. - - - - - - - - ... - - - _. .... - - - - - .. - - - .. - - - .. - .. - - - Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 61 ... ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ~; - US-69 Shoreline Boulevard Sanitary Sewer Parallel Pipe Installation of 490 linear feet of 18 inch diameter sewer pipe on Shoreline Boulevard between Space Park Way and Charleston Road and 15 linear feet of parallel 10 inch diameter sewer pipe on Shoreline Boulevard at Charleston Road. $175 -, - - - US-70 Southern Pacific and Downtown Trailhead Improvements at Stevens Creek Construct benches, bike racks, lighting, drinking fountains, signage, parking, and connections to planned sidewalks and bike lanes. Design for a new 1/2 acre site to integrate the Stevens Creek Trail with the widening of Evelyn Avenue and the construction of the new light rail line. $290 - - - - !IlIII> - .. US-71 Upgrade Whisman Blvd. Landscaping on Overpass over Central Expressway Renovate County-installed landscaping along the side slopes and in the islands, upgrade the irrigation system, and add landscaping to the overpass. $293 - .. - . US-72 Whisman Road Pressure-Reducing Station Installation of a pressure-reducing station on Whisman Road near Sherland Avenue complete with telemetry to control flow from Zone 4 pressure supply into Pressure Zone 1. $105 - - - - Sub-Total of Projects with a Lower Probability of Requiring Funding Within the 5- Year Plan Utems US- 30 to US-72. $27.811 - - - - TOTAL of all Unscheduled Projects $42.697 - ""'" - -.., I11III - - - . .. Unscheduled Projects, 1999-2004, Page 62 - .. m ~ . m I I i ~ I ~ C I ~ D I ~ m ~ ~ ~ . Q Z' ~ .,.....,c ~ = QJ ~ ~ -< - -- --- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ J D ~ o o U I ~ o ~ J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1"1 LJ ~ o J m I I - .. l1l'i ... r" III .. .. .. .. .. III .. II' .... ill l1l'i II .. . .. II .. II - .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..--, .. - ... KEY TO FUNDING ABBREVIATIONS Due to space limitations within certain sections of this document, fund titles are abbreviated. Please refer to the key l?elow for explanatjons.of those bb .. I a revlatIons. . CIP Reserve = Capital Improvement Reserve Fund CjC Tax or Constr. Conv. = Construction/Real Property Conveyance Tax Fund Water = Water Revenue Fund Waste-Water = Wastewater Revenue Fund Storm = Storm Drain Construction Fund Solid Waste Mgmt. = Solid Waste Management Fund Gas Tax = Gas Tax Fund North B~yshore = North Bayshore (Shoreline Regional Park) Community Fund Parking = Parking District Fund Land Sales = Land Sales Fund I Other = GI:,ants, Bond Sales, and Outside Funding frl riIil U Z < ..:l < = Q Z ~ ~ Q Z < frl riIil U Q::; ~ o frl "" Z S z ~ ~ Q riIil Eo- < ~ E:: frl ~ - ><: S z riIil ~ ~ < '" <<i "0 Eo- "'"0 ~ s "CO III ","0 III .- ca~ frl ;:l o "0"'"0 a ~ 3 ~frl"", gp.~ ~ J2 .b c ~i5& frl W U ~ ;:J o frl C ~ Cl 5 "'" Eo- U W ....., o ~ ~ ~ f1) <+-. CI1 o C:o"2 t5:::iC:::i blll"O ,~ .... c: co .8 ;:l ifrl"", co "0 ~~~c: C L.. III ;:l '"::E"'" :9~'E] O~Oll;:l frl~::E"'" Et;~ o c: 3 ~8"'" B $..0 "'0 gj ~ c ~~& ~"O 1;; c: ~& t1>)("'O c: S ~ 3 8uEo-"", _ ;> III .~ 8 t: "t:l 0.. 0.. III c: ~ E ~ ;:l u_~"'" -.. 0\ 0\ 0\ - Q riIil Eo- ~ o Q < ~ ~ "" o Q::; ~ E-o >- z~Q::; riIilg< ~!::!~ riIilo'" >gO!'; OM~ Q::;QriIil ~riIilQ::; ~z~ -ZE-o ~jS Eo-~Z - ~ riIil ~oi:\.; <0><: U~riIil M - - vi' M \0 00 l'- or. o I/"') N o o l'- III - 0\ '<t '<to o l'- O. 00 \0 - I/"') N - 00 \0. N l'- M 'li 00 M 00 '<to '<t o ~ CIl Eo- U W ....., o ~ A... Cl W Eo- A... o ~ o o o ~ 0\ 0\ 0\ - ~ ;:J f- ZS Z W A... ><: W '<t o '<t 1/"')' - l'- 00 00 o o o - I/"') o - - N 0\ '<t O. I/"') N I/"') N 00 0\ 1/"'). - 0\ o I/"') 1/"')' 0\ \0 \0. - N N o N' CIl f- U W ....., o ~ A... Cl W ~ ~ A... - o o ~ o o N ~ ;:J f- ZS ~ A... ><: W \0 M 00. - - o I/"') o o M o I/"') l'- \0. M 00 '<t l'- o I/"') I/"') N o I/"') \0. - 0\ l'- o N' M I/"') '<to - \0 l'- o N' CIl f- U W ....., o ~ A... Cl W ~ ~ A... N o o N -.. - o o N ~ ;:J f- ZS Z W A... ><: W M l'- '<t N' - I/"') N o N" o o o I/"') l'- '<t 00 '<t l'- o I/"') I/"') N o I/"') '<to 0\ l'- N N l'- I/"') \0. - '<t \0 l'- M CIl f- U W ....., o ~ A... Cl W ~ ~ A... M o o ~ N o o N ~ ;:J f- ZS Z W A... ><: W ~~ M 00 \0 r-: 0\ o III N QO 0\ 0\ -.. II'l -.. QO - - ~ < l'- o ""'t o QO ~ l'- ~ - - - o o III M - ..* o o l"'l - o o QO o N ~ - o o '<t 0\ o - ~ - ~ 00 o l'- l"'l M l"'l ...; ~ - o I/"') l"'l '<t l"'l ... I/"') N III M - - ... o I/"') '<t" - 0\ M QO r-: - 0\ l'- o N' QO - l"'l ~ - - - '<t M '<to - III ~ - - - - r- M III l"'l o "l - M CIl Q::; < ..:l ..:l o Q o o o M Q; 0\ 0\ - ... ... .. .. CIl f- U W ....., o ~ A... Cl W ~ ~ A... '<t o o N -.. M o o N frl Eo- U riIil ..., o Q::; ~ ~ o o M o 0\ 0\ 0\ - - .... Q Z < frl Q Z < frl ~ o = E-o Z - riIil Q::; < frl Eo- Z ~ o ~ < ... - frl riIil Q::; ~ Eo- - Q Z riIil ~ ~ riIil ..:l < Eo- o f- .. .. ~ ;:J f- ZS ~ A... ><: W .. .. ... - . ...~.~.,~~.""'~~'" - ... Q'I .. '" - 00 r- .,., M ~ 0\ 00 "'" r- OO In ta -- - - N. 0\ N r- OO 0 00 - M v:i o. .. E-< - N N N M ~ < ... ",. <1) Q'I -.::l cA'-.::l '? ~ I:: <1) .- e;~ 0 0 0 0 0 ... 0 ... .. .... CO c:; rFJO -.::l '" -.::l - N 'l:> - 1ii <1) I:: N I!lIIII ta r- M 0\ 'l:> :l N r- r- 'l:> 'l:> ....l rFJ ""- lit 0/)- I:: .~ -.::l 0 00 - M 0\ ~ .... I:: .,., "'" N M 0 - :l N. lrl 00. - "'" '" N. N. .. is ""- - - - p... .. <1) <1) ...... '" 0\ .,., 'l:> M r- .... '0 ~ M .,., r- oo 00 0 I:: I:: r-. r-. - "'" 'l:> ..r:= ;:J 0 ;:J N N N rFJ - - ... rFJ ~ U I 0\ M 0\ r- .. c:z::: ~ <1) -.::l 'l:> N r- 0 0\ rFJ .... .,., ::J CO 0 I:: o. M 'l:> M ~ ..r:= :l "'" N .,.,. 0\ U 0 :i rFJ ""- 0\ - Z rFJ - - - - ... < c:; ....l ~ ~ CO -.::l '" r- ... < Cl o:l cd I:: 0 - - - M =:I c:; E-< <1) :l M 5 ~ ""- ~ z ""- ... ;;J E-< :9 <1) E -.::l ~ u '0 ~ I:: 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0/) :l .. ~ ...... rFJ ~ ~ ""- z 0 < c:z::: till rFJ p... e .':: -.::l '" "'" M 0 'l:> N ~ I:: I:: N M "'" "'" .,., u 0 0 :l M M M M M .. ~ ci5 u ""- ;;J 0 <1) .... -.::l rFJ ~ <1) .- 1;j I:: 0 0 0 0 0 ~ :l Z ~ ~ ""- II - ~ .... z <1) -.::l ;;J 1;j I:: 0 0 0 0 0 :l ... ~ ~ ""- ~ .. ~ .':: > Eo-< -.::l N '" I:: ~ I:: r- - - < I:: 'l:> M 0 0 E-< :l M M - I ~ U U ""- ,.. - E-< rFJ '5 > <1) "'" 1: -.::l 'l:> - N .,., II. ~ 0 .,., N "'" 0 r- .~ .... <1) I:: 0.. '" :l 0 00 M 0 N rFJ ... .5 <1) ""- vi' vi' v:i vi' vi' ~ ~ u c:z::: < -- .- - Q'I ....l ~ Q'I ....l 0\ :z: - 0 .. ~ ~ ~ g. ~ c::> g. Eo-< c::> < g. c::> pi N 0 Q; ~ Q'I .. < Q'I ... ~ ~ ~ z .. < ~ rFJ rFJ 0 ~ ~ III ~ U Z Z 0 - N M "'" j:l., j 0 0 0 0 0 < Eo-< 0 0 0 0 0 rFJ N N N N N ;;J - z "'" < c::> 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ c::> =:I M M M M M == ~ N .. -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Eo-< ~ c::> c::> z 5 5 5 5 5 ;;.. c::> ;;J Z 0 M - ~ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j:l., ~ ~ ~ ~ z 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < .. - z ~ ....l ....l ....l ....l ....l rFJ ....l < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Eo-< < ....l < Z ... Eo-< j:l., ~ ....l ....l ....l ....l ....l ;;J - Q~ :;;: :;;: :;;: :;;: :;;: 0 j:l., ~ < C::>;;J ;;.. ~ ~ ~ > lit U ~rFJ -< -< -< f~ III ..,. o o ~ o o o N C W Z z :3 a. o o o ~ Q) Q) Q) .... c W I- a. o C <( :!: ~ C) o 0::: a. I- Z w :!: w > o 0::: a. ~ ...J ~ a: <( () .... >< :c s::: CII c. c. <( ::> ._2 U) 0 v.l "'0 :g .~ ~ ~ 8 e<: ] ~ ] ..::l Of) ~ gp 1:) "'0 ~ .~ c ~ a ~ a g ~ ~ t5 ;.:s Cl ;.:s ~ e "'0 o:l ] ,~ i Of) - Of) ~ u !5 o Of) Cl ~ 1'! ~ ;g ~ ~ ~ ] Cl f-o ~ ~ B .... "C ~ &, 3 ;;> ::E ~ f-o U ~ o e<: Q., E t; "0 o c:: 3 ci5 8 ~ ~ U "'0 ~ ~ ~ il "0 1;; c:: ~ & t;; > ~ "'0 s:: C t'I:3 3 8 8 f-o ~ "5 ~ 1: "0 'a a ~ 3 ll.E~~ ~ ~ >= o'/J !! o.sg, c '" '(; (I) ::E 8 ~ 8. s- Of) 0 '" "5 o f-o 00"'''' N r- 0 ... 00 '" r:--: V"l~ C"')" N N '" '" '" o~~ .,{'vl N N r-or- N N o a- '" 0'1 ~ N" '" a- ",... 0 '" '" '" Nr-...~ 00 r- '" 0\00 0 r- a- 0 \li "<:1''' 0" ~ r- @ ~::;;" 00 00 0"'''' ~;;:;~ o~.. ~" N N o ::;; ~ ..0...0 00 r- '" N'" r- r-{ ('.. :.. 000 "'0'" ... '" a- MM'..o a- 00. g: '" ~....: ~ U >< '6 " e;~!j ~O<(.." ~,,~.~~ tl=--~il:; .~ Q ~ 2" < d:Q>o] Q <(" '" M 0 ~.g O\~~~ ~ ~ ~ 'f""4 t; e<: ~ *- tl 's d: 00'00 0 ~~~~~~oo"" 000 ~ ~ go. ~ o 0 ~~~ 0'" o N '" r- o 8 ~ ~.. ~~~Q~~~~8 Q.,Q.,Q.,g;uuQ.,Q.,u ~ c:: .2 tl ~ c:: o 8 " '" '" ..c:: Q., c ~ " Of) ..,: ].~ ~ Q., '" " c:: 0 e<: .2 C " 'i> o c:: ~ " ~ ..c:: U ej 0. .E '" ..c:: ::> >< g c:: .2 tl ~ .~ 5 ::E u'<j ....:0 il 'f! c f-o ~~ o !! 'c u ::> '" ~ ~ 8b5 '" c:: " ;> " ci5 2 ~ '" u c:: r.Il 0. '-' .9: C ~ - ~ ~~~ 5] ~V5] ~u e C en 0 "0 E"'~2 ~~ - .... c 0 ~ 5 -a 0 a'~.5 .~ &j 8 .~ € i rZiu8.oa~ Q.cCfJOoe ~~~5~~ .g g ~ < < & g',,~~ 1-1-"€ :5 ~ :LLL~ V"lOOV"lOOO"<:f'V"lN>.Q ~~~~d:b~~:b 0\0'10\0\0\000\0\0\ I :;< " " u '" r- ::- N 0 '" 0 0 00 8 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" N r- r- ~ 0 8 ~ ;:!; 8 0 8 0 N N '" '" a- N '" '" N '" '" .... '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 8 '" '" '" N N 0 0 0 ... ~ '" a- 0 ~ '" N '" 0 '" '" N N '" '" 0 ~ N '" - 0 '" '" r- N 0-- N N 8 0 00 r- N 0 '" 00 0 '" '" 0 '" '" r- a- ;:!; N 0 '" "'. '" ... '" 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 Q Q 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ Of) Of) Of) Of) Of) Of) Of) Of) Of) Of) Q., Q., Q., Q., Q., Q., u u u Q., Q., Q., Q., Q., Q., .. .5 '" '" ~ c " c 'C. e en " " ~ e e<: ~ '" ~ 5. f-o c:: ~ .~ '" u 0 8 ~ '.; 0. f-o " .s c _ e<: " 0 u .E " "0 .. o'/J e e<: l+:: g '6 .. ;j .5 ~ ~ Q., c:: Of) c 8 ~ 0 ~ " '(;j ::E '" "0 u '(;j 0. 0. "0 C '" ;j ;j 0. " .E ~ " - Q., " e<: ;j e '(;j ~ ij !! e<: e ~ '" '" " fr I;b .5 '" "0 " e c Ii ;> e<: .. ~ c:: ~ ;j 0 c:: o '" C " ~ " e ~ ~ 'r; "0 ~~ " .. s: ~ ~ e '" j Of) J: " ~ .E ~ 0 e " " u ~ e<: ~ u " f-o '" ij 8 e iil ~ u "0 1;; ;j '6 0 .. 'C. 0. ~ ::> ;j ..c:: ::> e .2 ~ " .0 u c:: f-o .5 " I;b e<: c:: 12 " '" .2 ci5 ~ u e<: 0 S ~ " "0 e c:: ~ ~ ..c:: c 'OJ c:: u ] -;; Ii: " j ;.:s '(;j ~ - "0 ~ 1;; '(;j e<: ::E IE Of) @,- " rii ..c:: Q., ::E - " '" '" " V3 ~ ;>, 1;; .2 1;; " " " j Cl '" ~ e<: Of) ~ .5 ~ .5 0. ~ u - ~ !! Q., 1! 1! 0 12 -;; 'i> IE ~ .2 u ~ ~ 'i> "0 ::> g '" ~ '" c 0 !! 0 g ;j 'r; ~ ~ ~ 0 ..c:: 0 ..c:: " '" Of) Vi u Q., Of) ~ Of) 0 Of) ..J ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'i' 'i' 0 'i' 0 0 0 'i' 'i' 0 'i' 0 'i' 0.. 0.. a- a- 0.. a- 0.. 0.. 0.. a- a- 0.. a- 0.. a- a- a- a- 0-- a- a- a- a- a- a- a- a- 0-- a- a- N '" ... '" '" r- oo a- 0 N '" ;:!; '" 0 'i' 0 0 0 0 0 'i' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a- '" "'. o o o ~ o o o o o '" N "'.. o '" N. '-;' Of) f-o U ~ o IS: o ~ I ~ o ~ f-o o f-o 00 I- U e:; o ~ ~ ...:l <: ;;;J z z <: => ~ C"I C"I C"I - o ~ <5 ,.:.... OO\f'V"lg ~~:!~- ... '" '" '" o '" N r- ;:!; '" '" ,.: o a- '" '" ... N '" 00 o 000 0 0 0 CI) en en CI) CI) CI) CI) uuuuuuu '""'Q ~ a co gj, ] c .~ ~ ,." ~ S \#.J, ~ 0 I- 5 2'8 u y ~ ~ e:; '5~;j ~ 5 Ii Of) " ~ ~e ;j~i ~ ]]"i]og ~ 0 fI1..c t;;;;; .s "-' == '6]Q.,.~;j~ ~ .! ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ .f __gEB]~j",g :g = cIj 0 .~ ~ 11.'1 ~ 0 .9 6 l5.. cIj ~ tx: ~~:~'~.5~~~ ~ g. ."E "0 ~ Cl ;.:s " ~ _ 3 e<: -;; ... u~~o .u'O o8~1;b~~Cl .~ ~ ~ l~ .~ .~ e5g<"Eu] 88"P:~~iilt5 "'OI~o:'~~N~ 000000 o 0 000 0 0 """ ~ '" '" ;-. ~ f.. :>1 '" III ':'4 " . ~ c oc Q., - o 8. \!<I*i' - - .. .. - Iiit>'#!i - - - l1li '" r- N ~ e ,~ ~- - - ... l1li - ~- ...l ...l o Q o o o .... 0-. 0'1 0'1 - ... .. - Q Z -< I;/j Q Z ~ - ;;l o ::.: E-o z .... - .. ~ .. -< I;/j E-o Z ;;;J o ::; -< .. ... .. - ,." .. .. ." ,. III ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. III ~ CI CI ~ CI CI CI N C W Z z :5 ll. o CI CI N C;; en en .... C W l- ll. o C c( :E ~ Cl o I:t: ll. I- Z w :E w > o I:t: ll. ~ ..J ~ ii: c( o - .. .. . ... - -.I .. "" IIW .. .. .. III .. .. .... >< :g C QI 0. 0. c( .. .. .' .. .. till .. .. .. .. -aoooo~8ooo",g'-Og ~'" ~ ~ o..o..~ ~ 01 ~..~ N.. " .!:!" u ]~1] u Cl c:l <5 ~ ] ~ ~ ~ 13 "'0 :.;;; .~ !3 ~ is ~ ~ ~~~o cJij ;:l ;; ;:l N ~ u "'0 ~ ] a ~ i '" ~ ~ '" B c:l ~ ~ 1l .; ffi oClI-<~- '" ~~~~~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ tJ ~ o 8: E tl "0 o c !3 V5 8 ~ ~ ~ "'0 ~ ~ & :;; II "0 1ij C ~ &: ..,. ~ ~.. ~ 1: 1,1 11 8 8 I-< &: o a- '3 e ~ "'0 'g. Co ~ 6 u ..5 ~ ~ ::E ~ >: ~ ~ u o ~ c. 00 '" ~ 00 o .,., C u> 'C; 1il ~ 8 o o o. o 00 0 \0 \0 t'f') ~ ~ 0'1 ('100 N"'M ~ s o 00 o N N o o o. 00 0 N 0 ..,. gt'f')~ N",C""'). N N o o a- o o '" "'00 .,., '" o o o o "1. ~ &fr@@~@@@@@@@~ ~~ ~~ ",Quu~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ii C 5 " " ~ i g ~ ] P-. ~ fr Q5~ &~ 5" ~';a ~~~~~ HUHn I Vi "- E .~ '5 C C g ~ 8 ~ ~ .~ .9 "g 6 ~ B l 0 ! l.1. .- (J cu 0 ('fj ... " ~ .~ ~ V5 N S ~g~~~~u 5~6flfl~~ cu>..,!ijlijejej ';a ~ g =n =n z z ~ P-. cS .~ .~ ~ 13 .5 1i .5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ]~qg~~~ ~ as ~ ~ ~ z z f o ZM-.:t Vi f'OO 0'\0 ~d~dddd~ loooaooo [! " ~ Ii f g cfru .g ~ .~ 2: U ';a J: ] ~ ~ .- cn5~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ E .~ g ~ g ~ u .g U ~ ~ 'E .5 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ :2 .= .= ~ u ::E ~ I-< N '" .... M ~ M ~ 000 M 000 01 [ 'C' " " C o p: .9 '" I-< U ~ ~ ~ :;;! 25 Cl C2 o ~o :' S ~ .~ ~ " " I-< 51:0 ~ 8 I-< "-- ~ ~ .~ '" " '" ii U <~ ~~ ~ [il ~....l "'" " ~ u u ~ ~ ~ ~ ! .~ "is U ~ i U 0 IE u '" ~ 1 " "3 ~ d5 ~ .5 J: e ea j ~ '" "-"E :.E 0 u Z ~ lIi \0 r-.. t'f') ('f') f"'1 ("l') <6 0 0 0 o 0 00 8"'0",,0'" 0 ~~O\oor-..~~~s;~S;:g~~ .,., 00 "'. o .... o 00 o ..,. '" o .,., N o o ~. a- 00 ..,. o ~ o a- .,., .,., ~ .,., .,., - o .,., o. .,., o ..,. N .,., .n o a- N. - o o ..,.. :0 .,., ,,; "".,.,0 ~r---V'l N 00 '" ~ ~ " o ~ =- :!l ,;; .. "0 .. C .;:: =- o .,., ..,. o .,., .,., .... N s;s;~ '" .,., ..,. N 41 OJ) ... ll. ~~~~~~~~@@~~B@ ~~~~~~~~uu~~uu 11 ~ ..c ~i ~ ~u> i Us: g -;;u '0 ~ e; r:f = ~ ~ .~ vi O 0 " I eEl' 0 0 c ZO 'il 51;:::<; !t.g e: ~ g !! ~^ .~ U -.."S. ~-- 'BE ;,c u:a;.::scu ~CI) '-'8 ~H..c~'~';~6 ~ c - c '0' ~ >,.- "&. ~ u Z 0 ~~!t r:~e;:J "'_ .~ Vi w " ':: - e -;; ~ ~ ouB~-E.sS"O", ii IE ~ .!l e OIl l:l .g =- J.l ~!'I;>~"C"""ol<C bD~u~~:.!.'2~uca;.::s ~ ;g .5 .~ j ~ '9 ! ~ ~ ~~l] g ~8.g~~ ~ ~ ..c ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ co ~ ~~~~~8~81~ u> S c .~ .9 c ~ ~.~ i ~s~.e -;; u 5 ~ ~]U~~ ~ @, go'u Q. 'ti) .s ~ u llJ 0 llJ ~ ~ '2 e ~ ,~ .9 U ~ ~ ~ Ci ~ .g ~ '5 ou",,,, ~ ~ ~ o ~ '" '" '" ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ '" ;:J o == Eo< ~ ~ '" Eo< Z ;:J o ~ -< .. "'o~ sro ~o ~o "0'" ~o :$ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Vl 00000000 00000000000000 ~ ";OOOOONlI'\~OOOll'\Oll'\ ~@:::~~lI'\~\O,,:::O\\O~r-:.. '" ~~~:90 .~ S ~ ~ @ !>:: "0 '" "0 5 ~ :3 oJ '" ~ Ol) - ] '5 "0 ... .:a ,~ ~ Cl - ~ g ~ ~ 6i :.:l " :.:l -.r o o ~ o o o N C W Z z :5 e.. o o o N en Q') Q') ... ~ ~ "'d III 0 :3 ;i6i~ '" W U !5 o '" " 2S :5! ~ ~ III "0 1(1 ~ .; :3 " I-< ~ ~ ~ i] ~ :::E ..e I-:: p.., E ~ ""0 0== tiS 8 ~ ~ ~ ] ~ ~ ..e c W l- e.. o c <l: ::E i:! Cl o ~ e.. I- z w ::E w > o ~ e.. ::E ...J ~ a: <l: (J ... > "0 ~ g ~ 3 8 U I-< ~ '3 e ~ ""0 '5. Q. ~ 3 8 .s ~ ~ ~ ~ >= cid ~ ~ o ..s 0. II "0 0; = ~ ..e c '" .ca ~ :::E U o '" o N '" 00 NO M N ;;:: '" N M "'. - ~ 8 00'" a- ..,. r- o 0 M lnr-~ o N ~ 8.~Sl~HH3~~~~~~~~ ",ClUp..,p..,p..,Up..,p..,p..,p..,~p..,p.., ... >< :c c CIl Q. Q. <l: '" u c :; ~ .g ~ o ~ cJ 5 c ~ 6: ~ ~ Iii ... " ,~ ~ " '" Cl ~ ~ ~ p.., N ~ ~ ~J3 ~ g ~ gi: g 'u '" ~ "0 = e .9 !! co o u U 0 " U Ol)!>:: ~ ~ ~ tiS~-- ~ ~ ~ lllU'" UU~ 00-< :::E:::Eu = 'I "" = o 00 <J M " ci ~Z .g "0 II .~ ~ is ~ ~ ""0;;3 ~ :3 .5 ~ ;:: " .~ ""0 ~ :5 ~ g ii5 = u ~ ,5 1! ~ ~] E o ~ " !>:: ... o o ti: c c ~~~ 0-<-< ~ e e -;; g: g: ::x:: " " C.~ .~ .- 0 0 Up..,p.., = ~ .~ ~ > '" o "0 = " " " !>:: Z >, " .<:J u :3~ .g>.g ii5 ii5 .2 0; '" u I-< "" U "8 ~ :::E 0 .g ~ u ~ 1;l ~ ~ ~ ~ ..s E! 0 -;;~:o! 6b = I-< en :... 0 u '" I-< !E .1= III ~ ~ ~ t:! ~ l'J !>:: '" ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ !! ~ ~ ci ZN("fj"l:tV)\Or-OOO\O~N("fj OH,,~dddddd~dodd =000000000000 6: N r- ..,. N r- ..,. t"'i' ~ o o '" N o o '" ..,. ;; N '" '" '" '" o o 00 ..,. '" ~ '" o N o '" '" N o M o o r- '" o 00 r- '" M ..,. 00 '" o - M '" r- r- o -6 '" a- M M 00 '" N 00 00 Iu:; I-:: p.., ~ ~ + '" I-:: gj I-< Ie !>:: g:j I-< o :o! I-< o E-;' @3 '" .~ ::l - ",.. .... - ~ ~ '" QO .... ",.. '" '" ~ .., " ~ ::!: '" ~ .... 1; = = III .... .... .... = = III ::1 1iorf" 0; 'C '" - o .... ~ a- S ~ - '" ..,. ~ '" III ..,. cr:- - = .... 5- .... = .... .. - QO ~ = - III .... .... .... .... - - QO ~ .. = - .... .... .... ':: '" !>:: \.01 ::x:: I-< o Q :z <( ...l <( ;:J :z :z <( Q \.01 Q :z \.01 ::!: <( ~ o ...l <( I-< o I-< - ~.. ...l ...l o Q .. <::> <::> <::> ~ ... Cl'I Cl'I Cl'I - = = = .... " = '" ... '" \.01 U :z <( ...l <( =:l \.01 ...l =:l <( ...l ~ <( Q \.01 I-< <( ::!: 1= '" \.01 Q - :z <( en Q :z <( en ;:J o :z:: I-< 15 - ,.. . ~- <( en ti!IIII I-< :z ;:J 0_ ~ <( .. - - .... .. ... ,. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. ~ Q Q .- N (5 Q .. Q N C W .. Z Z ... :3 e.. 0 - Q Q N (;j - en en .... C ... W l- e.. - 0 C < .w ::E ~ III C) 0 a:: .. e.. I- Z III w ::E w > .... 0 a:: e.. - ~ ..J .- ~ ii: .. < 0 .... .. )( :c c .. GI Co Co < .- - .. .. ~ .. - .. ... .. ! ;;;; '" :;;: '" '" '0 ~ ~ ..c .... " ~ ! {j " .5 ~ .... .... g ~ 0 00 00 " l%l 00 00 " J>:: ] .. "'Cl 0 " & N ;:: '" '" en .... .... bIl tl 00 00 ~ "'Cl .~ !3 00 0 .... '0 "'. ; Ci ~ .... p., e " ... ~ '" :::l '" ..2 c "0 '" '0 ::l Cl ::l '0. '0 '" en N ~ 5 "'Cl .... '0 '" !3 00 '" .... l%l .c '" :i i en ~ .c ..,: en ~ l%l U ~ '"'Cl 0 !5 gj .; !3 '" 00 '" '" '" S Cl .... ~ ~ '" .... 0 en Cl 2:i ~ " ..: "'Cl 1;; ~ !3 '" '" ~ "0 '" 0 '" '" en ~ ::E ~ ~ .... E ~ "'Cl U 00 0 00 ~ 0 g !3 0 '" '" en ~ .... .... 0 u g: * ... "'Cl 00 00 .!:! c 0 '" '" '" '" ;:l "'- ~ ~ ~ ~ ... "'Cl '" '" " 0; c 0 0 0 " '" '" ~ ~ vi vi ~ i; 1;1 "'Cl '" 0 c !3 '" '0 0 0 0 .... .... '0. :::- u u ~ ~ > " e t "'Cl .... 0 .... Og. 1;l !3 0 .... .... "- 00 0 00 .E " ~ ..,: M ..... U J>:: ::E 1;l ~ '" Oll e 8- " 0 ..s c .. 1;; 'c;j 0 ::E u ~ 15- c 8- " en Cl '" o " rJ18~ ~ N.. u U ;: ~" ~ ~ :l] ~.... B '" ,.!,10<('g~ ~~:s ~~ tl~:i!~~ '0' ~ ~ .13 <( d:Q>~1l Q<(8'~ ~ ~...'~ Q"" 0 ~ Q ~ ~ Q.... :l ~en ;:l ~ ii > " J>:: .,; z " " l '" '" .... 0 '" 0 .... 0 .... 0 0 0 0 88 ~ '" '0 '" '" ~ 0 .... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '0 .... '" '" .... - M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ '" .... 0 '" 0 0 0 '" '" '0 '" '" '" 0 '" 00 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 ~ '" '" - 0 '" '" '" '" .... .... .... .... 0 '" '" 0 :!: '" '" '0 '" .... .... '" 0 '" 0 '" ~ .... ~ '" ~ ~ '" .... 0 0 ~ ~ ~ Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl ~ Cl Cl Cl ~ en en en en en en en en en en p., p., p., p., p., p., u u u p., p., p., p., p., bIl ,5 .. .. ~ c " E fr e ~ " !I e J>:: el !I " 0 .... e '~ l5.. .. u .. e .... .E E ~ "- J>:: " ~ c .E tJ .9 "'Cl bIl Oll e 0; bIl ,g [ij ,5 .. " p., > " c en ,~ ... .~ ~ "" ~ "'Cl " ! '6 ~ " el [ij [ij "- .E ~ [1 p., " ~ 'c;j ~ ~ .~ J>:: !j ~ :!l "- "'Cl " bIl .. C [ij C 0 J>:: c ~ o '" E ~ 1;; e e ~ '" d: ::E " ,., ii: ~ ..3 en o !j ~ ~ ] 0 " g ! " " d: g ~ J>:: ] 0; ~ " [ ... e ~ u '6 ~ bIl is. "- " " ~ .c il ,5 " .E :@ '" J>:: ii t2 .0 g c .5 " ~ en ~ i J>:: ~ .5 i J: " ~ ~ .~ "'Cl ~ '" e en [ij " ....l 'c;j "'Cl J>:: Eb * ... fi5 p., ....l " ::E en '" " ~ ::E ... " fi5 " ,., 0; .!:! " " " j Cl .. J>:: en en ~ ,5 € .5 g. ~ tJ " ~ ... " e e e ~ tJ t2 '" IE " ~ " ~ "'Cl " ,g '" 0; c 0 e 0 ,g [ij '" ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .c 0 .c " '" en Vi U p., en ~ en Cl en ....l ~ ::; ::; 0 ::; ::; 9 ::; 9 q ::; 9 ::; q ::; "i' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q '" .... .... '" '0 .... 00 '" ~ - '" ~ :; '" 9 "i' "i' 9 "i' "i' "i' "i' , , , 0 ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; V1 f-; U ~ o ~ ~ ..:l < ;;;J Z Z < .... se => => => M '" 0 '" .... ~ ~ .... 00 0 '" ~ .... '" .... ~ 00 '" ~ '" '0 Cl Cl Cl Cl en en en en U U U U ~ 1;i ~ .c .!:! '" p., g Cl ~ ''fi - 2 d ;;, 1;; .. en g E d' Ii: l en c ~ !I ~ 0 " ~ en ~ fi - Oll ~ 1;l Cl '" e:- ~ if oJ> .. g c ..: i '5, g. ~ " .. "'Cl 0 ~ " ..5 'i ~ .. ~ ~ li r 0 '" a: u "'Cl U 0 .. !3 ~ J>:: .~ ~ 0 ~ " u .... ~ " " " " ii: .5 ,5 ~ <( e e ~ ~ 0 0 .c .c " en en ~ '0 .... 00 '" , , , 0 0 ::; 0 '" ~ - .. " " :::;] Do :!l .-; - .. "CI .. ;; 'C Do ~ ., ~ ... ~ ~ o-l o-l o Q .;> .;> .;> N I 0:1'> 0:1'> 0:1'> ... V1 f-; U ~ o ~ ~ ~ !il f-; o Q ~ rJ:J Q Z -< rJ:J ;:J o ::c: !- Z .... .... se => => => M ~ -< rJ:J !- Z ;:J o :; -< .. = ~ t) ,5 C;~ ] ~ o :; il i:Q 0 P:: ] ~ ] ....l CIl ..... ~ t) "0 :.;;; '~ !3 ~ is ..... ~ j 8 ~ ~ '3 0 o 0 !-< N o ~ ~ "1:1 0 0 V'\ i:Q.c!3~gN :i CIl ..... ~ Q Q N o Q Q N C W Z z :5 e.. o Q Q t:! (7) (7) (7) ... c W l- e.. o c <( ~ ~ Cl o 0::: e.. I- z W ~ W > o 0::: e.. ~ ...J ~ ii: <( o CIl ~ u !3 o CIl t:I 2; ::2 ~ ~ ..... !-= o'/J I! 0.58. ~ .", ~ ~ ;:: ~ on; rJ) ::E 8 oo~8oot""l ~~S5-~~ o 00 N '" N '" ~ o o o. - o&;8f'1")f"'-V'l tf'l~N..""~~ M 0 a- M 00 M 00 r-- 00 a- N r-- 00 '" o r-- ~ ... o o o. "" !t~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ... >< :c c III Co Co <( ]>C" =g .g ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 5 l.g~ ~ ~ ~ '~ .c ..... U " c i! ~ ,_2 ~ 8 " '<;: ,~,5 l; .~ ~ r.I:I ::E ::E c " " 0 .S .5 .~ ] ] E o 0 ~ t5~.s o Z 0 t) ~ " 0 l '" ;;l; N O. - o '" N o M c " 5 " " " c. ~ .", ~ 6: ~ ~ ~ ::- " - CIl ~ ~f .~ co' CIl ,_ ] tl o 5 - ~ CIl C ~ ~ 0 s 3 ~ ~ ] ';; ] ] z ::E ::E ~ 9 9 ~ g g z ;:: " E " " " c. " P:: " c ;.:s " 13 .~ .~ ~ d: :s ~ " ~ ::E s- M 8 ~ N M ~:1:1 000 ~ ( c ,9 tl ~ c o U ;:: " fil g O-a ~ ~ ~ oS ,~ l ,~ b5 ~ ';; u &i ~ B P:: 1: ~~~~~ ~ 0 c C5 2: ::E .- ~ "0 .~ c 1J <( 'E ~ ';; i:i3 iJ 8 IE o ~ 0 ;3 ~ ~ ~ J ~ @ r/i CIl "'" !-< ....l ~I.f"l\Or-....oor-...O'\o_ :1~t"";l~~~~~~ 00000 ~ 0 0 0 '" 00 M ~ ~ y " 'e ~ .. U .c '5 ba c ,_ o ~ ,- " .~ Cl '3 vi CT , " 0 <( Z ~ .~ c. - CIl 5 c CIl ~~ ... o ~. 0"'00",11')0 ~~~~~~~ r-- 00 '" o o o 00 N '" 00 o. o '" '" N M M r-- ... N '" N o 00 ... M. o ~ ... M o or{ o o o. 00 a- ... ~~~?3~~ tf'lNN..ti~ o o M or--.... 00000 MOO 00 000 o 0 Q ~ ~ 0 ~ N N It'''I .,., Vi g s ~~;r '" r-- .... O~5- o ~ ~ o 0 ~ o ~ ~ o "l:T.. :} ... '" o 8 ~ v)'.,; ~ r-- '" <::: "" ~ 0" ~ ~~~8~~ N ~ ~ oo~;; r-- .... "" '" "" '" ~~~~~~~~~~ CIl !-< U g; ~ "" ~ 2; t:I ~ g !-< gs CIl c o ) ~ ,~ j %]~8 ~ u g ~ g ~ ~ .9 ;.:sjctl .~ - ~ ~ ~~~.5 c.~-= ~ go cu ~ 0( c:; ~ :x: ~ ~N ~-6 , Bc.!! -~ t:I ""c"U"-' .5 := .s .... r/j ~ ~ 0 .~ ~ .c ..c 0 ll) CU tl'Jtl'JOr.l:l~ rI:J Eo- ~ ~ o 5 ~sa ~ ~ ~ - Z 1:1 o ;., c. c. = CIl ~ CIl ... U fool .., CIl 0 !-< =: wc;)=- ..I<g;o!-<=: " U fool 1:::: sf!P::g;::c ,- ~ r-;; ~ 0 ... ~jl~I~~~ ~~~~E""~<( "OIE-"<Z~ " 'il> E i:>:: "" 5 ~ fool 5 0 !-< .", ll!-< Z -g5u~>~ "c.p::i!P::o=>c.:...i "~.gCll~;3 ..g .~_ -g - :I: Z c _ 8. t:I 'I: !-< ~~,,~~ Q.~ ;g::J]~u ~'- ~ ~ 1 ,~: 5 ~ ::E~,,~~5 !-<<( '" U ~ i:Q'" 58o~8 ~~ Nr<i~V\\Or-OOO\O ~ ~"?:2:Z~~:1"" o 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 00 :l- N Q '" ~ =- <<: ... .... .... ~ ~ "'" :!l ;;""~ - .. r:,...... C "I: "'" ~ 00 .... ~ III III ::: 'i;,i~ '" N ~ ... - - - .. Q .. ... ... ... ..,. - Q - Q - - ;;; ... N 00 ori ~...'" c . ~'- - - - .. .. ... Q Q N " C = .., '" fool U Z <( ....l <( = fool .... = <( .... ~ <( Q fool !-< <( ::E 1= '" fool ~ -<- '"' '"' o Q 0:> 0:> 0:> ~ C7\ C7\ C7\ - - .. Q- ;z -< '" Q ~ '" => o ::r:: ... ~ .... ~ ~... -< ",- ... ;z => 0- ~ -< ok - - ... - ... ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ,. .. .. ., - .. - - .. .. .. III .. - .. . .. '. - .' .. - - .. - .. "It o o N o o o N C W Z z :5 0. o o o ~ 0) 0) 0) .... C W I- 0. o C c:( :E ~ C) o 0:: 0. I- Z w :E w > o 0:: 0. ~ ..J ~ ii: ..:( o .... >< :s c GI 0. 0. c:( ~ '~ J i>:: 11 ~ ] ..:l en "" ~ t) "'d ~ '~ S ~ is "" ,L~ 8 ~ ~ ~ "'0 ~ ,g S :i en "" en eJ ~ "" o~~~& en o 2; :s! ~ ] " ..; ij ~ ] ~ ::E "" f-o U ~ o g: E tl "" B,S S en U "" u ~ "'C '" 1;; " ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ] 8 8 f-o & 1 [ ~ ] uJ3~~ ::E ~ >= ~ ~ U o,sQ. .~ ~ ::E u ... 5l C a 8. " en 0 '" ]j ~ ~"'''' '" '" 00 "''''..... 0' vi ",'" '" - '" '" " "" "" S '~ ~ 0 OS:~ '" '" '" 0 '" ..... ..... o ~.. ~~.. [g.. g ~ "'M" 00000 !;:f;;~ ~.. 11")" ~ o~~ ~~~ o 0 '" '" o 1rO.. \0.. iJ "" 1;; S ~ "" "'''' 088 ~.. NO. on on 000 ('l') ~.. \0.. 00000 :;: gg ~ .n N" 00 " -= f:: u " '0' d: * ~ "" " o E o " r.n. ~ 8 ~ ~!!! U>- e." ~ :; ~ e;~~~ O ~ e..!! ....l ~~ ~~~:: ~ ~ ,N~ N > e! 1l Q <( & ~ ....... 00,_ .....~...1;5 Q f-o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en " ~ e ;> " i>:: o z u " '0' d: 00 '" ~ ~ .... .... '" '" .... 0 on 0 ..... 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;:: on '0 '" ..... ~ 0 .... ~ ~ 8 8 00 8 0 8 0 '0 '" '" '" '" ",' 0 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 g 0 0 ~ 8 on '" '0 ~ 0 0 0 00 '" '" ~ '" '" '" on ..... 0 on on '" '" '" on 0 ~ on '" - 0 on on ..... '" '" '" '" 0 0 on ;::; ..... 0 on ..... 0 ..... 0 on "'. '" on '" '" 00 on 00 '" ~ '" ;::; 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ en en en en en en en en g; en "- "- to.. "- to.. to.. U U U "- to.. "- to.. to.. ... ,5 lJ '" ~ " " E c.. e " " ~ e i>:: ~ ~ ~ '~ e Q. '" Ul : ~ .5 E " ! ~ 0 ~ "" "" "<l - "" fa .,S ~ ~ .. u " en " " .~ e t::: ~ '8 '" ." u ';j Q. 5 '" lij fa IT .5 iil ~ 'lij to.. " i>:: i>:: '" ~ IT ~ ~ ,~ ." E ~ ~ a ! E "" .. '" Ii " fij " 0 i>:: " ~ " ~ E S. ~ 'u a: ~ ~ " "" a: ..3 en 0 " ~ .5 ] 0 E .!:! ~ i>:: d: u ~ i>:: 1:1 .. " "" " to.. .. a ~ 5 lij U ~ .. '6 "" fr ~ ~ fij ..0: E ~ " .5 ] ";j Ii il3 .a " ~ .!:! en ~ i>:: ~ ~ ~ ~ E "" E " " u I~ 1 E en " j '0 ;.:s ." ~ ~ i>:: ';j I:E " ... <Ii " ::E ";j - " 8 ~ '" '" - iJ j " <Ii " ;>, .. E OJ " " '" i>:: en en ~ ,5 .s- ,S Q. ~ u to.. 0 il3 ";j ~ ~ ... " ] ] - u ~ " 1Q u ~ '" 1 " "" " ~ ~ g 0 ~ ,g ~ lij .~ ~ ~ ..0: 0 en f-o i:ii U en "" en 0 '" ....l "" f-o '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 9 '" '" 9 on '0 ..... 00 '" 0 '" '" :; '" 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 'i' 0 , , '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" N '" '" N '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rI'J E-o U a ~ .... ~ z z -( N ~ ... C> C> N .... ~ '" g ~ 0 0 g 0 .... on 0 00 00 0 0 '" '" ~ ~ ..... on ..... on. S 0 '" '" ..... 00 ~ '" ",' 00 0 0 on on 0 0 0 0 on on 0 0 '" ..... on '" '" ",' '" 0 0 0 on on 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 o. 0 ~ '" '" - 0 ~ ... 00 00 0 "'. .... '" - 0 0 ~ ~ .... ~ '" 0 g 00 00 '" '" ~ ~ .... .,., '0 .... - ~ - '" 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ '" 0 0 55 0 '" '" '" '" '" <( '" '" '" U U U U U U "" to.. to.. to.. to.. to.. cs ~ :s! " .. ,~ ~ :E ,9 ~ ~ u ~ ';j E "" .. '" :g 0 '" - f-o B U C " U 0 " cs l B " C E III .,; E " " ..... i>:: ~ E u ~ " " ~ 0 0 e 1;l to.. .~ " '2 j " 0 c.. i>:: u ...l en 0 " fij g ~ '" " lij '" - 8 c i>:: ~ Ii '9 " '" " E :l ~ & E U " C ~ ~ 0 .. ~ " ;.:s ... ';j U ..0: I " ::E '" to.. oil ~ e " ~ 0 'g '" " Q. '~ " "" "" I E 's. E ... i " " 0 " ~ " " ~ .g f-o " ';;i 8- '" ...l e. E "" l: u <( ~ " ..5 ~ " E '~ a: lij ~ K ,9 0 ';j ... a: f-o g to.. ;>, <o!. g U ::E ~ 0 " ~ '6 .. .. 'i' ... ~ ... 0 1;5 .5 ~ '" * ~ ~ " " " U " " 1;; ::E " .. " '~ 0 .. on U "" 0 i>:: ~ en ::E III "" ... S i>:: i>:: '" " > ~ .. .s ~ '" '" E 0 0 ~ ~ en " " :I: i>:: "" 2 " 0 0 * " " ~ to.. 0 " " J:i ,9 fij 'u " ~ - '-; ~ ~ ;>, ~ a: ,S .. U '" OJ ~ ] " E u u 0; ... en <( ..0: ~ u ~ " ~ ~ 0 2 <8 '" '2 ~ e " ..c:: ~ i:i3 ,s ~ ~ " " i.i: i>:: '" '" '" ~ ..... 00 2:: 0 '" '" ~ on '0 ..... , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rI'J E-o U a ~ P: !i3 E-o o 1'\ ~ ... C> C> 1'\ ~ :;a .. Q ~ :!l ,;; - .. ... .. c "C A.o \C .. ClI) 01 j:l., ~ o ~ Q o o "to S: ~ ~ ~ en ~ Z -< en ~ o ::= E- z ... ~ -< en E- Z ~ o :; -< .. ..,. o o ~ o o o N C W Z z :5 a.. o o o ~ 0) 0) 0) ... ell W u f3 o ell ~ ~ ~ ~ t:l :s! B '0 ~ ell E 2 ell f-o U !::1 o ~ 0.. c W I- a.. o c ~ :!! ~ ~ o 0:: a.. I- Z w :!! ~ o 0:: a.. ! -oJ ~ ii: (3 ~ ~ ~ o 0 :!. u u 3 > ~ 0 "g. Is:. < :c c Q) Co Co ~ " .!! ~ '" 3 00 0 0 00 .,., IC .... ~ .... '" ~ '0 ;e S :. '" ,., oC ..; - .... II '" <U "'" "'" ~ 5 .;;; 8 0 0 ~ il:l on 0 '" "'" <U & (;j 0 0 :;l ell 0 .... .N "'" - '" !l 0 0 i5 "'" 0 .... ... ~ ..... '" '0 ~ IC t:l ~ 0 0 0 !:; .... e ." on 0 3 on ~ ..c:: 0 '" .... ell "'" ..... IC ... ..; ..; :i il:l "'" ~ & 0 0 ... ;! - ..; ." &. 3 0 0 co ::E "'" on OIl 0 1;; ." " 5 0 0 0 on 0 "'" .... .... ..... .. ." " .. 0 0 0 " ~ ~ 0 OIl "'" '" ~ .. ." .... " '" " 0 00 .... "'" "'. .. co - .... "'" " 00 00 00 ... " .... on .... .... .... ~ ~ ~ ." .. 00 " .. Ie .... .z ..... on ..... ..... 00. .. ... ..... ... - .... .... >= .. '" .... <U Co '" 8 0 .. a Cl Cl Cl <U ell ell g; U U ell 13 .... r.l .. ~ .., .. 0 .... ~ u 'v; cc: <U W ll. c 1-< " U '" (3 f-o ~ .., f:; s ~ ~ r.l '" 0 0.. ;z: r.l 0 [ij :s Q u <U g; 2: ~ 0 ~ ;z: <e .... ~ :s <e -l ~ ....l ~ cc: <e ---. " ~ r.l = ~ - ~ " j 0 ~ =: r.l :z: e t f-o ... ....l ~ '" ~ ~ 0 il:l e <u ~ ..f j i 8 ell tI.l ~ f !@ ~ ~ .!f3 f-o ~ <u ~ ' Ie <e '" ~ -g ~ <! Q <u '" r.l ~ 0.. '" f-o 0 .... '" .s ~ ...l <e ;; "0 ..... ~ ::E "'" ~ ~ [ij 9 ;::: ell -l :0 0 '" ell .... r.l 00 c- o '" ~ ";' N ..... ..... 0 0 0 Q ... ~ ..... en Q ~ .... ;g 0 :I: - Eo< ~ ~ .. <( '" - Eo< Z ;J 0 - ~ <( .. .. .. ,,. ~ t:l '" ~ ~ 01: c ~ ll. OIl ;.. ." ~ .., c ;Q ~ ~ .. 2- c ;e - e '" ~. - - ....: ~ c o ~Cl - ... ~ E::: """ ~ 'W ...l ...l 0 Q .... "" "" "" N . .;., '" ~ U o 0:: 0.. ~ ..J ~ D: < (J .. .."4 .. .. ., - .. .. .. ",. ... .. .. - - .. .... >< :s c: CII Q, Q, < - .. .. - .. .... .. - .. ... .. :::l ~ U) fI) -8 ,5 i] ';;; g <,;) al 8 l>:: ]~] ..::l CIl '" .., - ,5 '.5 ] ~ ,~ '" ~ Cl ~ ~ ::g ~ ~ ;:l " ;:l ~ e "0 Q:l a S :i ~ '" CIl III U 8 CIl " 2S :s! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 " f-o ~ '" U .; "0 ~ ~ s ::: ::E '" f-o U f!:! o l>:: ~ e t; ." a " S Vi 8 '" {; b "0 ~ ~ ~ il ." (Q 5 ::: '" ~ ~ 1;1 ] a a f-o ," U U - '3 e t "0 'g. Q, 1;l S u .5 ~ '" ::E ~ >= Qd ~ b o ~ Q. C '" "; VI ::E 8 i a f-o oa-oo '" a- ... r- a- r- gf :d' ~ '" '" oS g N ("f '" '" a-oa- '" '" ~ ~ B t-.. ~ N ~ ~ 5 NV N ~ 0 ~ f'.. ~ 0 ~ ~.. 00 a- ... ... r- r- o ~ S; "'00 ~ v ~ o 0 '" '" o v" ..q-.. a- a- o ~ ~ N N" v ~ ~ tr) '0.. \0.. '" ... a- N'" '" or-r- \0" N 00" ... 5l " C. a " ~Cl ~ E= 1:) " I * :.0 N " g ]I 00.:8 ~ ,~ U>-e." ~ '" ~ e;~j~ O III e " ~ 0-3 e- ~ ~~i] f'f'l > e! il Q <" 1'il - Cl 8' ,~ M III '- '" Q f-o ~ III ~ ~ ~ f-o " CIl :::l III e .. " l>:: ci Z 1:) " I N N :g '" r;~~~~~~~~~~ o '" '" N 0 ~ \0 0'\ '" N o r- N o o r- ~ r- o '" '" o '" '" '" r- o ~ '" N '" N '" N '" N o o N o o '" ~~~@@@@@@Cl~ClClCl~ ~~~~~~uuu~~~~~~ .., ,5 '" ~ rJ1 5 fr E- 5 l>:: i!l U ~ e '~ =:; cg aE-~ o ,$2 .5 il ." ~ 1'il .., l:: !ii ~ (,) .5 tI) 0 ~ t.+: Ul i-clo < '8 5i!l ~!ii~ ;:l::E e 'l1 >: ~ ~ Z j:: ~ ~!! 4.) ,S'" ~ aSh'~ tI1 ZiO" e~l>::_." ::Ec <~~ "e~~l3d:g.e f"ld:~",~-~~l>::8uf;! so:..,-aiO!5.~-"~>:!ii ~ N '8 ~ ~.5 .% ~ l>:: ~ e ~ " g~..d: eCll~ ~~,5j~ M ~ .~ ~ i ~ fi5 ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ tI) tI) ~ ~ ~ ] t.5 ~ o~~~~g~~~]o ~~tIi::::::8~~&~~ ("f) ("Ij ("f) ('OJ M ("Ij M f'O"'I ("I') ("Ij ('fj ~~~~~~~~~~:5: 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .., " ':;: " 'a go l>:: ." " !ii ~s:: :l " ." ~ !ii " " " j ,~ ~ ~ ~ .~ CIl '" '" '" q q N N o 0 ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ("Ij("f)('fit"')C"'it'f"lf'l")("f'l("f)("Ij("fj("l"'l('l"\("f)("t') o 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~.. o ~ o 00 '" ;:!: o N '" '" '" c " I Q, '" e c - " olj ~ .~ ~ '" ... Q, Q, ~.5Vl ~ ~ t; 1;; !; f!:! ~'ii 0 ~ .~ 8: .<: ." .... ~ E 00 CIl o 0 g ... 0 8 0 '" '" '" 00 N '" r- 0 5- ~ 0 0 0 00 N on '" ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 '" 0 '" r- '" ~ 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. N. N 0 ... 0 ... 00 00 0 "'. 0 a-. N N 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 '" '" r- 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 '" ~ ... 0 N '" ",' Cl Cl Cl Cl ~ ~ CIl Cl Cl CIl CIl < CIl CIl CIl U U '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ c CIl iii " c t; e " " " f!:! ,5 al e a ] " ." ~ -a 0 l;i 0 " .g E ~ .<: l>:: CIl " " " ~ .., ci 'a l>:: Q:l " '" " .9 2S '0 e 1:) ::E " ] " ... ;:l ... " oil " '0' " " " ~ " d: ~ 0 " " '5. '~ 0 l>:: ~ ... CIl ~ ~ " ~ " t:: ." :; CIl ,,' g " Q, l: ,$2 f-o ....l !ii " u '" 5 '~ 'a 1:) a 0 lS: f-o '" '" u CIl ::E ~ .~ ~ '~ ~ '" -e ... ... .. " " ~ " 0 CIl " 0 ~ 0 " f-o ~ a '" '~ Vi ::E u ~ ~ " ~ " '" '" e :::l ..; CIl = g " ~ ~ " 0 ~ " " te a " " .. a " .~ ] ] "'< .~ ~ ,5 CIl .E ] e u u ... Vi .., ~ ~ " " a <E 1'il & e " .<: ~ ~ ::: l>:: CIl .5 ii: ~ r- oo ~ 0 N '" , , ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ < "-l E- Z ::> o ~ < .. o '" ~ iiil " o :; a. :!l .:; - .. "CI .. C .C a. o o o '" '" o '" N o '" - '" a- N r- o a- 00 .. till o:u ~ o o "-l a:: < ..:i ..:i o Q Q Q Q ~ CI\ CI\ CI\ .... rJ:J E- U a ~ ~ ~ ~ E- o Q Z < "-l Q ~ "-l ::> o := E- ~ f"l so: N Q Q N ., .... '" Vl ~ ~ .... ~ '" N .... .... ..... '" ~ "" .... .... ... N ~ ::! ... ... - = '" ~ ., ] :2 '" Vl ~ .5 ~ ~ '" '" N ... '= ~ N N 0 '= u "'l N .... ~ .. ow ~ =- .", ., ] III j " "" -;; 0 '= '= '" ~ '" "" ,,: ~ .. lOll U J"" c .~ .", '" ~ ~ 0 '= '= :::l c Ci .... 'C tl. =- - e " ..... ~ '" 0 c 0 0 0 0 00 ..c ;.:s Cl ;.:s .... .... '" .... ::.. e .", '" - '" '" III 0 "'l 0 ~ ..c 0 ~ ..... "" .., :i '" .... :!i (;) - (;) '" ~ W "'l U ., ] "'" (;) is '" .; !3 0 0 00 (;) Cl ... ... - (;) 0 f- ~ "" ..... N '" 0 Cl - W ~ :;; " ....; "'" z ~ 0 gj ~ !3 0 0 0 '= z '" ~ ~ "" '" Vl :5 ..... f- E ~ a.. u "'" "" f:!; 0 c ~ 0 0 III ... - 0 0 ... 0 Vi u '" (;) (;) ~ .... N 2 " .", 0 0 '= C;; ~ ~ !3 0 0 Vl -. en "" ::; ::; "'. 3 0 en ... - 0 .... "'" .... '" " w 0; c 0 00 ..... = "'. ... 0 I- ~ "" .... a.. '"" 0 ~ 0 ;> ~ .", .... <C c c c 0 0 III - 0 0 f- = '" :. '" :E u u "" .... ~ ] ;> ~ .", > :2 0 .... '" ... III Cl . is. ~ !3 .... .... "" '= lO. '" 0. '" ::; :; N ..... 0 .. 0 .5 " "" u ..: rrl rrl .".. ~ 0::: a.. ::E ~ :>:: I- '" o'd e ~ - ... z u - W 0 ..5 :E c ., w '<;j ., 0 '= - > ::E 0 0 u 0::: ~ .- a.. ~ c a 0 0 0 0 ~ 0. " '" '" ..J '" 0 U tl. tl. .. ~ 0:: - <C (.) ~ ... '" -< 'we f- ...:J >< .~ u '" ...:J :s '" Iol 8 0 " ..... c: 0 f- 0 ... Q .. CIl c u ..: " <= Q, f:!; in =- c <= rJ) 0 = Q, f-< .~ -;; ~ ~ ..... <= f- ~ .. <C u ;> l!l So U '" ~ c:; 0 = i:Ii tl. f:!; Iol Iol Cl'I c ;z Cl'I " 0 ~ u Cl'I E:: ..: ~ u 0 Q 0 IE ~ ..: ;z ... u c " ;z ,. ~ 0 u ~ tl. -< -< Q " 'i ~ ~ ...l ;z '0' ~ - ~ -< P:: t: " ~ -< ~ ] " = ~ Iol = .- j c ::: Iol r.n ~ " ~ f- Q ., ;> ...l Z ~ ~ ..: 0 0 = ~ ~ f- ..l -< tl. ~ ..: ...l r.n -- ., Jl~ ~ -< :;;: ;;;l u 10' '" ;;J 0 .", ;z ~ ~ ~ '" f- ::r: - e. ;z -< ...l N 0 -< Q Eo< .", p:: ~ ~ ~ ." r.. Iol ~ U 0 f- ~ ..5 t;: 0 ...l -< ~ .. ~ " f- -< ::E '" :g ~ f- [:: -< ~ 9 N ~ 0 '" r.n .- 0 '" f- Iol Eo< 0 ;z z ;;;l .... '" "" 0 - u ";' ";' ";' ~ " '" '" M l 0 0 0 -< .. iIilIII - .... - ... ",. .. ~ .. .,.. .. ... .. - .. .. - .... .. - - .. - .. ... - - - - - .. .. .. - '. .. till ... .. ... .. ~ o o ~ o o o N C W Z z :3 Q. o o o N C;; en en ..... C w .... Q. o C c:( :E ~ C) o a:: Q. .... Z w :E w > o a:: Q. ;! ..J ~ ii: c:( (J ..... >< :c c CI) Co Co c:( " J! .'i ~ ~ ,~ :; 0 - -cS;8 ~ "1:1 ~ "0 j ~ & 00 - ,5 ,1; g ~ ,l!J ~ p.. CI J j 8 ~ ~ u "0 I:ll ,g ,~ :i '" - '" t3 !5 o '" C) 25 :g ~ ~ ~ ] ~ g C) .... ~ ~ v ..... "0 gj ~ 9 ~ :::E ~ t> ~ o IS: E t; ." o c 9 Vi 8 ~ ~ B "0 N C':I !3 ~ ~ ~ i; ." OJ 9 ~ ~ ~ i: 1.1 "'8 o 0 .... .? u u - ]e~"O "g. Q. ~ 53 u.5~~ ~ ~ >= Q'6 t i) o ..s 0. .~ ~ :::E u ~ c 15- 8. " '" CI ! N ... '0 '00'0 '" on ... ~~ ~ ~ o 0 0 ~ 0 ::0 '0 '0 '0",'" S 00 ~ N'f<"'IN '" 00 ..... ~ N ~ N r"'1 N" '" 00 ..... N '0 '" 00 '" ..... :! ~.. ~.. ..... ..... o ~ ~ '" 00 ..... ~ oo:t" ~ o 0 on on o "II:f".. ~.. '" '" o 8 8 N NO. '" '" '" N ~.. oo::t.. ... ..... on on ..... 0 00 ""3'"' N-..&I '" " c " o ~ e. " g ~ "" OJ '6 I:ll Ii " e-~ ~] ':;: ." ! ,j ... 1;\ o t.t:I U Z '" o o 00: E-i >- U ~ ~ .!! ~ ~ ,.. 0 ~ ~ ~ :i! 'S ~ ~ d: 'O!:t' > C <( -. CI ~~ g ~ N i=: ~ '" El t.t:I !I " ~ o z " .~ d: NNr-....OV'lOr-OOOOOOOOOO ::a1000\~~~r-....~~~:=~~:=:=~ '0 N 0 ~ \0 0'\ '" '0 N o 00 ..... o on on N o ..... N o o on ..... ..... o o on N on N on N 00 '0 on N o := o o N o 00 on g o o '" o '" on ~ ~~~C1C1C155555555~C1C1C1~ p..p..p..g;g;g;UUUp..p..g;g;g;p.. rn E- U ~ "' o g cr: '~ ~ " ..J ~ ~ ~EiOE E~ Z ti, - ~ ~ .(l~ ~.5 ~0Ilc..~a5 t"l ,~ ~ ~.5 ~ g]],d:~~ N~<i5]~j U15~Bt; ~~u;~~ oo::t "'d" "'d" "'I::t oo::t q q c:r q q ("t') ("Ii r"'1 ("fj M o 0 0 0 0 OIl ,5 "' ~ ~ -a l ~ 'I .5~:; gp 1l fa :;;I '" " ~ ~ 1 ~ 'OJ . I' Ii Q. ~ Cij c ~ gp ~ tb 'OJ .0 ,- ." ~ :::E !3 ~ '" ""... u~~8~ :>I ~ >. fa U t\i ~ C':I c: IE ~~~~"O :g ~ OJ 'OJ fa c:; ~ ~ :::E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .S r.J ..:ac 1-0 eo S a .,g ~ ..c Up..", ~ '" oo::t 'l::t "'It "'d" "'d" q c:r c::r q c:r tI"I ("t') ("Ii M f<"'I o 000 0 OIl 'B c 'OJ 0. ~ ~ "5 a o eo is: E .3 " ~ "0 CJ !3 fa ~ ~ .5 E ~ ~ ~ 8. fa "' .2 ~ .,8 ~ u ;.: o ~ ~ ... ... ... 'i' 'i' 'i' '" '" '" 000 "' c " E ~ 0. "' .5 Ii ~ E ~ !t .; e 0. 0. ~.5lcn 5 ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ .!! ft ii]~ i ~ ~ C) ~ 3 12 ] ~ ] ~ b .... ...... ' ~ ~ gJ 00'" N ("fj "'d" VI 100 r- 00 0'\ 0 N ~ ~o on ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g~V"lV"lOOOOOON 5-:--~OOV"l~~~~:~ o o o o o on '" o on N o on o o o. on '" N ... '" N. o o ... 00 ~ on on N 00 o on o 0 on on o 0 on on o 0 g ~ ~ :~ ... o 00 ~ ......~ o 0 on 0 N o 00 o '" on ... 00 o '" on N. - C155~55~~g55~ ~p..p..Up..~Up..~ ~ ij u 5 ij e; ~ 5 oc..~ cr: " c.. llo. ~ ~ cr:~~ ~ i; ~ ::::: ~ " E- ~ '~ o ~ ~ .". ';::l ~ ~~:::E~ g e ~ ~ M~:;U "' "' ~ 6 6 ~ ] ] ~ "8 ] ~ ~ ~ 8 fa ~ F.i &l -, ] ~ ,- ~ C1~ c u o b ~ .~ ~ ~ > Ii t5~j~ ~ j ... ~ ~-ol"""i~ OJ ~ ~ 0 C)OC:; :2 'g .~ ~ ~~Vi~ .e ~ ~ ~ u '" ti: ... ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo::t 000000 i &j ] c ~ ,g '" E-< ~"' ~ s p.. o ~ fa "' ~ " tl o " elo ~ t ~ .....l ~ r- .... 0. 0 ~ !5 ~ ~ u ;:J >- "' '" '" 1l ~ '~ N '" ~ c tii .2 c " :;; E ~ ~ o _ N '" ... ~ ~ ~ ... ... ... 000 o o o o o o '" 00 '0 ...... o o o o o o ... 00 o ..... o on on N o on "'. '" ..... o N. ... '" "'. ..... M "1. - rn E- U ~ o cr: ~ cr: ~ E- o ~ z .( ...:i .( ~ :z z .( "" o ...:i ~ o ~ '" 00 ..... o. '" o :0 '0 '" o ... N ..... 00 '0 N ..... '" '" ~ '" o N on '" o o "7 ... ..... N .,{ .". e e N .. " = ... rn ~ u :z .( ...:i .( = ~ ...:i = .( ...:i ... .( > .( ~ '-'l E- ~ ... E- rn '-'l ~ - .. " o :!: llo :!l .;.; - .. ." !l c 'i: llo o ... .. ~ = ~ Q r"l ...:l ;l Q ~ = U /JJ Z ;l o Eo< Q ~ :>- o ~ /JJ Eo< U e; o = ~ en ~ ..J ..J o Q o o o ~ co- '" '" .... Q ~ en Q ~ en ;;;l o ::c: !-< ~ ~ <( en !-< :z: ;;;l o ~ 00( .. 111II - - 0IIIIil ....~ CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - _c - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - .... THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK lIi4iIi .... - .. - - .. - 11IIII - ... - ""'" - lilt .. 8\t - - .. - - ..... .. - ,.. - '" c C M . C 0 Z ~ ~ .- L "'0 = QJ C ~ ~ C -< C C C C ~ C C C C ~ ~ --- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW J J 'l 101 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK J ~ D 3 J J J J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 ., u J J J J ~ J 3 .. lit ". .. "". - - - .... - - .. ",.. - - ., - .. .. - fill .. .. - .. - .. ... .. ... ... .. ... - - - .. - ~._" ., AGENDA: January 12, 1999 7.2 CATEGORY: Unfinished Business DEPT.: Community Services CITY or MOUNTAIN VIEW TITLE: Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fee Designations RECOMMENDATION Approve the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission and designate park land dedication in-lieu fees received during the second through fourth quarters of Fiscal Year 1997-98 in the amount of $1,423,005 to the Capital Improvement projects highlighted on Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the recommendation would designate $1,423,005 of park land dedication in-lieu fees for specific park projects and will allow certain projects to proceed at a more accelerated pace. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS This item was continued from the City Council meeting of December 8, 1998. In-Lieu Fee Designations On March 25, 1997, the City Council adopted a resolution establishing a policy for prioritizing the use of park land dedication in-lieu fees and a process for the appropriation of such fees. The resolution established neighborhood projects as a priority for receiving fees collected from developments in lieu of land dedications. Additionally, it included the Parks and Recreation Commission in the review process by providing the Commission with the responsibility of forwarding an annual recommendation to the City Council concerning where the in-lieu fees should be'designated. Since adoption of this new process, the Council has designated fees received in Fiscal Year 1996-97 and fees received in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1997-98. With this report, the Parks and Recreation Commission is forwarding recommendations for the remainder of Fiscal Year 1997-98 (Quarters 2 through 4). rill' AGENDA: January 12, 1999 PAGE: 2 - - .... - Parks and Recreation Commission Action - The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed staff recommendations regarding fee designations on November 18, 1998 (see Attachments A and B of staff report to Commission dated November 18, 1998). The Commission made a change to the staff recommendation for the fees received from 650 Castro Street. Staff had recommended that the $878,170 fee be designated to the following three projects: - - - - $298,620 to Pioneer Park Renovation Construction; -. .. $414,410 to Mercy-Bush Mini-Park Development; and .. $165,140 to Open Space Acquisition-North California/Central Planning Area. - - On a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Bryant abstained from this item due to the proximity of the Mercy-Bush site to her residence), the Commission chose not to fund the Pioneer Park Renovation project and, instead, designate an additional $100,000 to the design and development of a park at Mercy-Bush. This amount ($414,410 plus $100,000), when added to the $85,590 in park land dedication in-lieu fees previously applied to the Mercy-Bush project, would raise the project amount from $500,000 to $600,000. Staff concurs with the Commission's recommendation as the $600,000 better reflects the funds that would be needed in today's dollars to fully design and construct the park. - *",. ~ - - Following this action, the Commission voted to allocate the remaining balance of the $298,620 (or $198,620) to the Open Space Acquisition Fund for the purchase of park land in the neighborhood bounded by Shoreline Boulevard, Central Expressway, Escuela Avenue and California Street. This neighborhood is located in the Central planning area and is identified in the 1997-98 Parks and Open Space Plan as deficient in open space. The Commission indicated that their preference in this instance was to use park land dedication in-lieu fees to help acquire new park lands in neighborhoods which are still deemed deficient in open space, rather than to the renovation of an existing park. ~ ..... - ~~ - - - Prior In-Lieu Fee Designations """ For information purposes, the table in Attachment 4 provides a summary of all park land dedication in-lieu fees received beginning in Fiscal Year 1995-96 and the projects to which those funds have been designated. The table reflects all recommendations included in this report. - ... .. - - - fIIIlI ... .. .. .. .,.... .. ",. .. ,. .. - .. ". - ... .. .. ... AGENDA: January 12, 1999 PAGE: 3 SUMMARY Park land dedication in-lieu fees are collected from developers and subdividers as a mechanism to offset impacts from new developments on existing parks and open space facilities in the community. The funds are used to acquire land for parks and to fund improvements to park, recreation and open space areas. The in-lieu fees collected at the time of final map approval are to be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission at least annually for the purpose of recommending to the City Council how the fees should be designated. ALTERNATIVES The Council may choose to designate fees to projects other than those recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission. All projects located within 1/2 and 1 mile of the. development project from which fees were received are indicated on the table in Attachment 1. PUBLIC NOTICING-Agenda posting. ~rep~d~\ I ~0JM~ ... .. ... .. JII ... .. .. .. - David A. Muela Community Services Director Kevin C. D City Manager DAM/9/CAM 218-01-12-99M-E^ Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fee Recommendation Staff Report to Commission dated November 18, 1998 Excerpt-Unofficial Meeting Minutes-November 18, 1998 Summary-Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fees Applied to CIP Projects, Fiscal Year 1995-96 through Fiscal Year 1997-98 1997-98 Parks and Open Space Plan 5. .. ... cc: FASD, CPM (A), SAA-Ansted .... .. """ - M .. en Q) Q) LL =s Q) ::i , c T""" c o = .... ro 0 00 :0- Q) en o Q) "Ot C ro ro =s -.JO oC..c ro- a..'<t CX)..c 0)0l I =s r-.... 0 0> ..... 0):5 I- Z W ~ :r: o ~ <( T""" ....."0 ro C Q)C\J >- rn o en u:: (j) C =s J 10.. CI) ~ ':; J~l,~~~::~. C'a . g "?1~: ::s ;}Hf ~ ..,;;c"-~ 0 .!~;~t~ ~ Q; C c.2 ClIO o 2 >.iil :gg ::JO E I E c: o 02 Oia cO 1; ..- c: o al 00: - .. ClI c: a; 0:: -C/I ClI_ - c: - ClI .g E c ClI lQ > >'0 ::a .5 ,.. It) CII '- g:(ij o It) ,... 10 '<t 10 <0 C') C') ~ c 02 ia > .:.: 0 .. c: as CII a. a: c: E ClI 0 "ge al_ :::: C/I "i:: Q) 00: (..j~ 1.0;: ch~ ::lm <0 ,.. 10 M co '<t (b o o o o <0 (b <0 ..- 10 C') co '<t (b t:: ClI c: oQi 0: ,... C') co ,... Ol - ,... C\l - Ol o ~ ..- C1 10 ..- 10 ..- C') C\l ~ .. .E CII i:: t:~~ lQ ClI CII a.-go::c CII::sa.~ :2 !::. <3 u ~co.5 CII0-C/I e;::cc og.28 .. ~~ia'l5 cb 0 a..Q OlOe< :: o 0::6, ~iij 2~ CII J: C/I 1:.- u c _ CII CII E J:C11 o ~ N .. ,a. S.5 ClI OlCii C\l"C ;:::~ C\l > W ,... Ol - ..- C\l - o o ,.. ,.. Ol N 10 ~ o o o o o o 10 (b N co Ol Ol Ol Ol ~ o co N o o M '<t * .. o - .:.:~c .. "C lQ .f~.S!c c CII 0 CII::Si::- "CII..CIIu iij--C/l::S ':':CCII::; CII00::C/I CII;::a. c ou_o 200 Ii; 'lil ia' l5 c:' c a..Q g:8e< C\l Ol o Ol C\l 10 ..... (b o ~ o o o o o o C\l C\l ~ C/I E o e iil ClI 0: .:.: Iii a. C/I m "C c: j cO ch ::l o Ol co o ,... '<t '<t * o o o o o o 10 ~ o Ol co o ,... '<t '<t ~ Jg al ~ o M ,... Ol - Ol C\l - o $: o 0:5, >. Oin .r::. ClI Bo ClI J:C/I -fiE a; ClI J: ~ o 1; C\lo. N E o ATTACHt1ENT 1 01 ~I o ~ Q; c: "E .2 ClIO 02 ~~ .~ 8 E I E c: 002 Oia cO 1; ..- c: o al 00: 01 o o o o M '<t o co C\l o o C') '<t U7 .:.: c .. Cl lQiij a. CII Q;C CII ' C C o 0 ii:~ 0; ~ ,.. c: , CII g:o:: o co o co C') '<t '<t U7 ClI .!;; C\lm co 0 ~ii5 ~cri ,... Ol - ..- - C\l o 10 r-: 10 '<t 10 <0 C') C') U7 .:.: Iii a. .r::. Ul ::J 9 >. - o c: .. ClI ClI E ::Eo. .. 0 co - '<t ClI . > en CII ::l0 U7 o o o o o M '<t * c .2 u ::s .:.: ... ...iij lQ C 0. 0 Q;O CII ' C c: o 0 ii:~ cO ~ ,.. C , CII cO:: ~ .... o * - o * co 0> 0> T- ..... Q) .c E Q) > o Z lIIlI!: """ .. C') o o o o o o ..- ..- .. ..- ..- '<t '<t ..- 10 U7 - U7 .. o m m .:.: Iii a. tC/l o ~ iil ::J ~t) ClI 2 0:(i5 M co (; en€. ::l<: .. - ... x .s "C (5 .c .E: .... ... o co o co C') ... <ilI!iIP ... ... ,.. - * - o o o o o o 10 '<t T""" * c: :c c: al E E o o ~ .!!l c: o Oin Ul oE E o o c: 02 ia ClI (:; al 0: "C c: as Ul .:.: Iii 0. ClI oS o CII e .... .... - ~ - . 'Ai .. - - - ClI oS -0 ClI > oQi U ~ al .l!! .r::. o as ClI .. o II.. - - ~ """ ...... liliiii ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. - .. .. - - .. - .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ,.. ..' - .. - III - III ~ - - - M - CD 0 CO W N .". CO N N w O'l (") .... .... .". O'l CO w en E o ~ ~ - ia ~ Cl. a:: ,r: .'III! en .. ::> ~ D? >-- .c e c: .c CD CD ::J ::E E m a. co!2 ~.,.~ (/) (/) CD :;) ::> 0 CD CO C\I .". CO C\I C\I w Jg >. .s::. Cl. .... (") .... .... co O'l -- O'l C\I -- .... o w o o o o o o 10 .". w c: .Q U ::> ~~ ia c: Cl. 0 ..U ~ ' c: c: o 0 a::~ CO ~ .... c: o CD 00: 'E CD J:1E ... CD CO>~ Cl.~O - o.m ~Em 2~~ CO 0 CO .- _ Cl. mitjco ;;~'Iii C\I c: CD . CD ::> go:2. (") .... ,... .". .". 10 w o w o o o o o CO ,... w o w o o o o o o C\I C\I w en E o ~ 'Iii CD 0: ~ ... CO Cl. en Qj "0 c: CO -I cO en ::> o w o o o o o o C\I ,... N w c: o oe ~ ~2 'Iii ~ c: ~8 u= en CD c: en CD CO >.s::. 2Cl. (/) en c: CD > CD US E~"O g;.smcn ::>C:J:'E o ~ == CD eno~~ ,,"'Or- > {;; := ~ 00.... en:;l~ ::>Cl.UE ..f Ii;.s::. C}l 0 eng) ::>0: o w o o o o o o O'l C\I w c: o U ::> ~~ ia c: Cl. 0 ...U ~ . c: c: 0!2 a::itj CO ~ ,... c: , CD go: ~ .c ::> E E o o. =E .~ Bai 1Il > 0I0C: 16 16 .Q O:O:U U):u~ "'-Cc: OCDO oUO E ,... CO co.s::. ,...itj ,...-1 CO O'l -- CD ,... -- (") o w o o o o o o 10 .". w ~ ia Cl. .s::. 1Il ::> D? fi'- .... c: CD CD ::E E a. ..0 CO _ '<t CD , > en CD ::>0 o w o 10 ,... 10 '<t 10 <0 (") (") w . :t: iij U C1>,r: "t:: ca 0 ~Z c c :g Q) 0 .. gE< en- .,...:;~ MtTc: . U Q) O E E o u. c: =Eg .9 CO en > 0I0C: c: c: .Q ~~U <o(;j~ '75la guu N ,... o ,... ,... 10 o o o o o o o o 10 o o w o 10 r-: 10 '<t 10 <0 (") (") W ~ .c ::> E E o u. =E a .9~ 1Il > 010 c: c: CD CD 0:0: c: !2 U 2 a:iCii;,;; "'-cc: o CD 0 oUO o w o o o o o o w o m m ~ ca Cl. =E I/) o ~ 'Iii ::> ~u CD 2 a: US M _ <0 0 ch-e ::>< c .Q U 2 ~'Iii ia c: Cl. 0 li)u CD 5 c: ^' .Q ...itj co ~ ,... c: o CD 00: 10 ,... CO I/) o a. 10 ia m::E co O'l -- 10 C\I -- (") ATTACHMENT 1 o w o w o 10 r-: 10 '<t 10 <0 (") (") w O'l ~ ,... .... -.:: O'l co w I/) E o ~ e :a 'Iii Cl. CD .s::. 0: 1Il ~ ::> ~ CIt Cl. fi' 'E .c .... CD .g~[ m co!2 Ii; "'i ~ en en CD ::> ::> 0 o w 10 ,... CO '<t ,... CO CD o o o o o o o 10 '<t o o o o o o o 10 w w I :t: iij Q)O ".s::. cat:: 0.0 (/)z ~ c g) 0.0" OE< eniij .....:;:: M tT C . " Q) o 0> ?- .... Q) .c E Q) > o Z (") o o o o o o ,... ,... ,... ,... '<t '<t ,... 10 w w o m m ~ co Cl. tl/) o ~ 'Iii ::> ~u ...; CD::> x a: ~ S M... ~ <0 0 .c ~ ~ .5 "0 CD E N c: '5 c: CD E E o o ~ .!!l c: o .iii I/) .e E o o c: .Q itj CD 13 Q) 0: "0 c: co ~ co Cl. CD = U CD ~ Q) = -c CD > Qi o ~ CD .l!! .s::. o co CD ... o u. c: .2 (3 2 ~(;j ro c: 0.. 0 Qju Q) c: c: o .2 a:C;; co ~ ..... c: 6 Q) oa: '<l' co It) M ID r-- M a- CI) ~ ca ::s C .c:: ~ ::s o LL ~2: 0.0 ~.s c ; '-,210 .!1Il- :;~.g-;; O,'CCI ~g5-g c::;::u..D ::J ca ::J E > II) Eg::i o II) , oa:'s o fh o o o o o o It) "<t fh ~ ro 0.. .s:;:. 1Il ::J D? ~c Q) Q) ~ E 0. .. 0 co - "<t Q) . > enQ) ::>0 w '<l' co It) M ID r-- M fh - u II) '0 '- 0. ~ '2 :::l E E o u. :C:5 B~ 1Il > 010 c: c: Q) Q) a: a: c: .2 (3 ::J cDGi~ ....cc: 6 Q) 0 oUU ID It) It) C1 It) ID ..... fh .s:;:. o 'iii ~ Q) ...J ID C\l r-- co 0> -. C\l C\l -. It) o fh C') ~ ..... ..... '<l' '<l' ..... It) fh o fh o It) r-- LO "<t LO co C1 C') fh , ~ ia 11)0 O.s:;:. cat:: 0.0 (/)z c: , ca II) C Gl 0.0 OE< lIlia ,...:i.:: M C" C , U II) octU o fh C\I M 0> ..... r-- r-- C\I .... w o o o o o o o It) fh o fh c: Gl 1Il E ~Gl ro > 0..00 0. co ~ECO ~~~ ~ .2 0.. ~c;<<s ~~(;j ~ ~ ~ oa:~ o 0 fh fh o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 LO '<l' ~ ~ o co co ~ ro 0.. :c: III o ~ fij :::l g>>'O Gl ::J a:cj) Cw:i ..... ID 0 cb-e ::><( c: .2 (3 2 ~fij ro c: 0.. 0 ~U al . C C 0.2 a:C;; co ~ ..... C 6 Gl oa: o co 0> co .... o fh o o o o o co r-- ~ ~ '- ca 0.. .s:;:. III ::J ~ >>- u C '- II) II) E ~ 8"1 co - "'tGl (/) ii ~o co r-- co ~ e (;j ell U o LO co co 0> -. co C\l -. LO ~I I ~I ~I il ~I 1Il E o e ~I ~I ~I ~\ (')1 ":\ ~i '<l'~1 '<l'. .....1 It) 1 i wi M, ..... .-; ..... ~; ~I I wi I :0::: ia 11)0 U.s:;:. cat:: 0.0 enZ C . ca Gl C Gl 0.0'- oEct Ill'; ';":-S.:: C1 g ~ octO o fh o o o o o o C\l C\l ~ 1Il E o o .... fij Gl a: ~ ro 0.. !!1 Q) "0 c: j cO en ::> r-- '<l' co It) r-- M ID M III .c Q) > Q) Ci5 c: C Qj;:"glll .c.EQ) 'Sc:x:c: 0~=Q) eno~t ,:.::2~> co:=Q)e ch~~o. ::>o..UE fh o o o o o o o It) w o fh o o o o o o 0> C\l ~ .?;- '2 :::l E E o u. :c: .~ .em 1Il > 010 c: c: Q) Q) a: a: C .2 (3 2 iciG;(;i T""cc 6 Q) 0 oUU ATTACHMENT 1 o ~ o o C') '<l' co LO '<l' (') ~ o co co ~ ro 0.. :c: 1Il o ~ (;j ::J ~o Q) ::J a:t> (oj co 0 ch-e ::><( 01 ~ C .2 (3 2 ~u; ro c: 0.. 0 Qju Q) c: c: o .2 a:c;; co ~ ..... c: 6 Q) oa: C') '<l' '<l' co ..... C\l C\l fh ~ ~ 0.. r-- ..... C\l co 0> -. co ..... -. co o fh o o o o o o ..... ..... ~ ~ ro 0.. .s:;:. 1Il :::l '9 >>- o c: ~ Q) Q) E ~o. .. 0 co - '<l' Q) . > en Q) ::>0 ~I oi 0, 01 ~I I ~! I , ~ '; II)U U.s:;:. cat:: 0.0 (/)z C ' ca Gl C II) 0.0 OE< Ill'; .....:i,:: M C" C , U II) octO - o fh co 0> lIIij" 0> ..... (') 0;- .0 E Q) > a Z -, ~ - ~ '<l' ..... LO - fh .. - .. - 1!!II!ii> M '<l' '<l' ID .... ,-4 - - ~ C\I C\I fh ... o o o o o o o It) """" ~ w - Ii Q) '- ct o :0 II) Gl ~:E 0.- (/)~ c-- Gl C 0.0 o ii ! ,:.:-:; .....C" 6 U oct '- - .... - """', - - 0>-' .c - iil ~ Q) c: "0 Q) > '(j) o Q) .... .. .. Q) Q) -- ~ .c o <<l Q) - .... a L1- ~;4<It ., -'I .^~ - - ATTACHt1ENT 2 .. - .".. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM .. - .. DATE: November 18, 1998 - TO: Parks and Recreation Commission .. - FROM: David A. Muela, Community Services Director .. SUBJECT: Designation of FY 97-98 Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fees .. .... * ., RECOMMENDATION ... 1. Recommend that the City Council designate park land dedication in-lieu fees received during the 3rd and 4th quarters of FY 1997-98 in the amount of $1,313,790 and revise the Capital Improvement Program as follows: III - .. A. $878,170 received from 650 Castro (Central Planning Area) as follows: ... .. i) $298,620 to Pioneer Park Renovation Construction (00-18); ... ii) $414,410 to Mercy-Bush Mini-Park Development (US-48); and, ... .. iii) $165,140 to Open Space Acquisition - North California- Central Area (01-31); ... - B. $165,360 received from 726 Leksich (Central Planning Area) as follows: - ,.. i) $127,720 to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31); .. - ii) $37,640 to the Community Center Renovation Design Project (97-28); .. ~ C. $151,400 interest funds to Open Space Acquisition - Del Medio Area (00-17); .. - D. $68)50 received from 695 Mariposa (Central Planning Area) to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31); .. .. ... - - E. $22,840 received from 1131 Phyllis (Grant Planning Area) to Bubb Park Restrooms (US-5); .... - F. $22,160 from 217 Pettis (Central Planning Area) to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31); - - G. $5,710 received from 1787 Latham (Central Planning Area) to Open Space Acquisition - North Califo:rnia-Central Area (01-31). .. .. 2. Revise the designation for $10,000 of the $15,290 park land dedication in- lieu fee received from 127/129 Evandale from Creekside Park construction (96-25) to Hetch-Hetchy ROW Improvements - Design (02-20) ... - - FISCAL IMPACT IilI Approval of these recommendations would designate $1,313,790 of park land dedication in-lieu fees for specific park projects and will allow certain projects to proceed at a more accelerated pace. . ..... - - BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS ~ On March 25, 1997, the City Council adopted a resolution establishing a policy for prioritizing the use of park land dedication in-lieu fees and a process for the appropriation of such fees. The resolution established neighborhood projects as a priority for receiving fees collected from developments in lieu of land dedications. Additionally, it included the Parks and Recreation Commission in the review process by providing the Commission with the responsibility of forwarding an annual recommendation to the City Council concerning where the in-lieu fees should be designated. - - - 4di$: .. - - To date, the Commission has made recommendations on .fees received in fiscal year 1996-97 and on fees received in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1997- 98. The City Council adopted these recommendations without changes on December 9, 1997. The Commission also made recommendations on fees received in the second quarter of FY 1997-98, however, these recommendations have not yet been forwarded to the City Council. ..... .. - ... 4,.- With this report, the Commission is requested to not only make recommendations to the City Council for fees received in the third and fourth quarters of FY 97-98, but also to reconsider one recommended designation for second quarter fees, as explained below. - - Please note that due to the City's switch to a new financial system, all CIP project numbers from FY 98/99 and forward have been changed. The new numbering system uses the second year of the budgeting period for identification purposes. For example all projects included in the current FY ... - .... - 2 .. - .. ... - ...- - 98/99 adopted CIP were previously numbered 98-1, 98-2, 98-3, etc. These projects are now numbered 99-1, 99-2, 99-3, etc. ... In-Lieu Fees Received 3rd and 4th Quarters of FY 97-98 .. - The table in Attachment A identifies projects within a 1/2 mile and 1 mile radius of each subdivision for which fees were collected in the 3rd and 4th quarters of Fiscal Year 1997-98. A total of $1,313,790 in park land dedication in-lieu fees were paid during this time. For each fee received, the CIP project staff is recommending receive the funds is highlighted in the table. - .., .. - Please note that the design portion of the Community Center Renovation project (97-26) .was funded in the 1997-98 CIP from the In-Lieu Fund. The amount funded ($350,000) was greater than what was available at the time ($312,364) and was done so with the understanding that in-lieu fees to cover the difference ($37,636) would be applied at a later date (refer to recommendation 2.D.ii). ... - ... !III .. In-Lieu Fees Received 2nd Quarter of FY 97-98 .. The PRC made recommendations regarding the designation of in-lieu fees in the amount of $109,216 received in the 2nd quarter of FY 97-98 on March 11, 1998. However, these recoII:lmendations were preliminary in nature and were to be confirmed by the PRC before being transmitted to the Council along with the recommendations for quarters 3 and 4. Since the March II, 1998 Commission actions were taken, staff learned that the Creekside Park project is fully funded and does not need any additional in-lieu fees. Therefore, staff is recommending that the PRC revise a portion of their recommendation for the $15,290 fee received from 127/129 Evandale. Of this amount, $5,290 would remain designated to Creekside Park to pay back the CIP reserve for additional arbor construction (see discussion below). Staff is recommending that the remaining $10,000 go to the Hetch-Hetchy Right-of- Way Improvement project. In the future, staff will only recommend that in- lieu fees be applied to projects in out years or on the Unscheduled List. All recommendations for 2nd quarter fees are shown on the table in Attachment B. ... - ;. - - .. .. .. .. """. - - Please also note the following: - - · The developer of the California Crossings project (TPG Development), recently received a refund of in.,lieu fees as provided in the City's Credit for Private Open Space Policy. This refund had been anticipated as a possibility pending submittal of the Final Map for the project. The most recent fees assessed were paid by the developer and accepted by the City with the knowledge that a refund at a future date was likely. The refund amount of $244,306 consisted of the return of a $115,521 fee paid in - .. .. ... - 3 December 1997 (that had been designated by the PRC in March 1998 to the community center construction project, but not by the Council) and a refund of $128,785 from the in-lieu fund previously designated by the PRC and approv:ed by Council to the community center construction project. The total amount, therefore, designated to the Community Center Construction project has been reduced by $128,875 to $634,540. . On January 27, 1998, the City Council approved the construction bid for Creekside Park. At that time, they authorized additional arbor construction in the amount of $50,000, to be paid by in-lieu fees. At the time, this amount represented more than was available in the in-lieu fund for the Creekside Park project. Therefore, it was recognized that future in-lieu fees paid from projects in the vicinity of the park would be designated to the arbor construction. As indicated in Attachment B, fees in the amount of $50,000 received in the second quarter of FY 97-98 from 127/129 Evandale and 310 Tyrella, have been designated to Creekside Park to pay for the arbor construction. Prior In-Lieu Fee Designations For information purposes, the table in Attachment C provides a summary of all park land dedication in-lieu fees received beginning in FY 95-9.6 and the CIP projects to which those funds have been designated. The table reflects all recommendations made in this report. SUMMARY Park land dedication in-lieu fees are collected from developers and subdividers as a mechanism t<? offset impacts from new developments on existing parks and open space facilities in the community. The funds are used to acquire land for parks and to fund improvements to park, recreation and open space areas. The in-lieu fees collected at the time of final map approval are to be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission at least annually for the purpose of recommending to the City Council how the fees should be designated. The Commission's recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council in December 1998. At that time, the City Council will be requested to make a final recommendation for all fees received in the last three quarters of FY 1997-98. Funds must be allocated to a park or recreation facility within five years after receipt. 4 .' .t~ - ".,4liJl .... - - - ....,. <ilftjt. .. - - """ ... "'" ,,'-\lijt - ,~ .,;: ~~t - - - ... - .... IHi - .... - .. - - """ - - .. - - - ... - ... - ... - .. - .. - .., ... - _. - ,. .. - .. .. - - .. ",.. .. - .., - - - .. .. - ALTERNATIVES The Commission may choose to designate fees to projects other than those. recommended by staff. All projects located within 1/2 and 1 mile of the development project from which fees were received are indicated on the tables in Attachments A and B. - Approved by: .K~'^- "-- David A. Muela Community Services Director Kevin C. Duggan Ci ty Manager Attachments A - Fiscal Year 1997-98 Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fees, 3rd and 4th Quarters B- C- cc: F ASD - Locke CPM(A) - Sartor Fiscal Year 1997-98 Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fees, 2nd Quarter Summary - Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fees Applied to ClP Projects, FY 95-96 through FY 97-98 5 (/) Q) Q) LL :J Q) ::J ... I C - Q) C C :J 0 J +:; CCl o , <( :0 c f- Q)'CCl z 02- w "'0 ~ 2 c CCl Q) J: ....I t 0 ~ CCl ~ :J ..... 0 CCl a.. .r: <( 00 - 0) '<;t I "'0 f"o.. 0) c 0) CCl T- "'0 ..... ..... CCl CI') Q) >- (ij 0 (/) iI ~"::.:'~i o '~<::.,f;t c II)'-C ::Ju..!! O::J:-: E~':~ c:( ~.-<, )~r~~~~ .",(;::11)' ~~~l 'j~~i; 'g~' OJ'E 'D:,:'~..' , ."J~~~; :'~'f~' .{~'i~\ ;...5:-- . .:""'4o,~;;..J ;[1 . '0'- 'c~:g, .g1;'g . '::J 'm . o * o C'! en ..... (0 co en C\l * '- (1) ...- '- ca ::s o "0 .: c C ,2 0 Q) 2 CIl E ~ oX Q) t? ... iO co >~ c 0.. 00 0.. 0 Cim ... 0 < ;.; >- 0 o CIl .,... c: C\l c: Q) 6 Q) 6 Q) :J 0 0: 0 0:2. (0 0 co fI7 N '<t co N N (It en CO) C':! .,... ..... ..... ..... '<t '<t en '<t co .,... .,... '<t (It fI7 CIl E 0 0 ~ ... - iO II) II) 0.. II: .r:. .:.: en ... ::J ca m 0.. >. .c ~'E .c Q) Cl) ::J ~E m a. co 0 Iii "r ai . > tJl tJl Cl) ::I ::10 (0 co C\l '<t co C\l C\l * ~ >. .r:. 0.. .,... CO) .,... .,... co en -- 'en C\l -- .,... o * o o o o o co ..... * o * o C! o o C!. o C\l C\l * CIl E o E t? Q) 0: ~ iO 0.. CIl ai '0 c: ca -l cO en ::> 01 * o o o o o o C\l ": C\l * c: ,2 ~~ ~~ ~8 0= CIl c: CIl > CIl Ci5 CIl C CIl > Q) Ci5 E C Cl)::'O .r:..9men g~:Cc eno'lae 0'" CIl ':'::2~~ <9=Q)'- en~~o. ::>o..OE CIl CIl ca .r:. 0.. .; Iii.r:. C\l 0 . ca en Q) ::>0: o * o o o o o o en C\l fI7 z- 'c :J E E o o. c: =t:g .9 ca CIl > 010 c: c: CIl CIl 0:0: C .2 o _2 cO ~ CIl ~'Ec: o CIl 0 000 E .....~ ~a; .......J co en -.: (0 ~I o 10 ..... 10 '<t 10 (0 CO) CO) fI7 . 0 _ co m m o .x Co ~ .r:. 0.. cat: a. 0 t en enZ o~ c.ra<n::J III c Cl) Olu 0.0'" c:J o ::: -< .~ ~ .!!! iii .:.:. en ..... ::J'::: ".... '- MtTC(OO 'ucuth€ C; c:( 0 ::> c:( C\l ": o .,... ..... 10 * ..... -- CO) Oi *1 0: fI7 o C\l en ..... (0 co en C\l CO): ::~ .,.... '<ti ~. .,...1 ~l * ~; C .2 o 2 ~t? ia C 0.. 0 ....0 ~ . C C 0.2 ~Cti co ~ ..... C o Q) 00: i 'Z- l.c !:J IE .x ;E Co I 0 0.. !e) .r:. 1_ c: !::l ''t: g C9 i.Eca ~clgj,~c: ~ECIlISS.2 ~ 0.1 II: 0: 0 co~icO~~ '<t>,.,...cc en CIlI 6 CIl 0 ::>0:000 , O' fI7: N ..... o .,... ..... ~i J o o o o o o o Il) 01 C!, 0; 0' OJ 0: , .,..., .,...! fI7 fl71 ! ,~' ~ o * ~ co 01 01 ..- - o 10 ..... 10 "<t 10 (0 CO) CO) * ... Q) .0 o U o - ~ - - - - .. .. .. ~'ii#' - .... ..,. >i ~ '0 o .c ~ '0 Cl) 1: - T""" -.' .... .. ~ - - .. C '0 c: Cl) E E o o CIl ... .!!l .- - uftil! - co in o CIl E - Q) :5 '0' Q) > OQi o l!! Q) ~ .r:. o ca Q) o u. .. .. .. - - iiiiiiif# - .. ,.. .. - ... ,- - - ... ... .. ~ ... - .. - .. <1: ... r- z .. w ~ J: ,.. () <1: .. ~ ... .. -- ... - ... ... ... - - - .. - ... - ... en Q) Q) u... :J Q) ::i .. I C ......... Q) c C :J 0 "'J :;:; ~ 0 :.a c Q) tU 0 "'J --- "0 ~ C ~ Q) ....J 't ~ ~ :J .... 0 ~ a.. .c co ..- m '<;t I "0 ....... m c m ~ T- "E .... ~ (I') Q) >-' -a 0 en u: , :,JE:,"a. _. .>o~Q, .,:~:~~i~~ii!-~ ::5'.f; ~~~W' 11 ';;;;5 ttll. 1~~f~ ~ c ~ E E o o. :e ~ .9~ ell > O)OC: ~ ~ .2 a: a: '0 cD:U~ ";"~~ goo c: o :g 2 ~Cii 0. ~ :uO CU . ~ c: ~ .2 "'Cii eXii; ..... c: o6cu oa: co ell o 0- \.0 'c: cnCO <o::E CXl cn - \.0 C\I - (') o ~ o \.0 r-: \.0 ~ \.0 CD (') cO ()~ cot:: ~O c: ::0;: ca 8.5~ 0:;:< eIl- ~:i.s M tr c · () ell ~<o \.0 ..... CXl ~ "":. CXl <0 ~ o ... o ~ (') Ll"! CXl <0 It!. <0 <0 (') ,... .... '<to '<t ..... ~ ~ ~ ell 0 E co 0.:.: co e ~ x 7i5 D.. (ij tt~ 0. .:.: gj ;: ell (ij '9 0 ~ a.. ~- u; ::J ~ ~ ~ ~~ cil ::E 0. a: en eXi.2 M lO,.~t92 chencuen~ ::> ::> 0 ::> < it) .... co '<t .... co CD ... o ~I gl o o it) ... o ~ o C? o o o. o ..... ..... ~ c .2 '0 2 :.t.U; ~ c 0.0 Qio Q) c c 0.2 ii:c; eXi i; ..... c 6 cu oa: ... C1) t= C'tl ::s " .s::. t= ::s o u. ~~ Q,O ~E ~ fij ....E1o ~(I)- CGJi~..: cuo,2 cu o . 'tl tIl >-cc'tl ~ 0 ~ ~ c;::u..Q :Jco:J- E~.!!g ~ ~ i: "21 OCC_ 0. 01 ..., o C'! cn ..... co ceil ~I ... ..,. co it) M co r.: M1 ... ..,. co it) M co r-. M ... ?:- 'c ~ E E o o. _ c 't: .2 B'CU ell > 0)0 c c cu cu a: a: c ,2 '0 ~ .. ~ ~ COCU" _ell ..... C C . Q) 0 goo co Il) Il) (') Il) co ... ~ o ~ cu -' co C\I r-. CXl en - C\I C\I - Il) .:.: ~ 0. ~ ell ~ co ~.. Cii 5i ::E[ eXio "'fa; en~ ::>0 o ... (') "": ..... ..... ~. '<t ..... '<t ... o ... o Il) r-: Il) '<t Il) CD (') (') ... . ~ iii cuO ()~ cat:: 0.0 enZ c: . ca cu c: ell 0.0'" 0:;:< 1II'f! ,....:i.. M tr c · () ell ~<o 01 ~ C'o/ M 21 ..... ... o o o o o 01 ~I ut o 0 ... ~ co 0> r ... Q) .0 o '0 o o ~ g ~ o .s o '0 o '0 o .D ,... .5 ,... '0 cu :E C\J ~ o co co .:.: Iii Cl.. :e ell ~~ ~o cu ::l a:t; Cri... COo ch-e ::>< c '6 c cu E E o o l!! .!!l == co u; U cu e Q) -= 't:i Q) ~ Q) o l!! Q) .2! ~ o co Q) ... o u. Vl Q) Q) LL :J Q) ::J ... I .E - Q) C C :J 0 -:l ".p ct1 0 ~ :0 c J- Q) ct1 0 -:l Z ........ W "'C Vl :E c ~ ct1 Q) :I: ....J t 0 ct1 ~ ~ :J ~ a ct1 a.. .c ~ ct:) .... 0) '<:t I "'C f'... 0) C 0) ro ,... "'C ~ ~ ro C') Q) >- ca 0 Vl IT: ~j~~~ ~.::-: ::;rj' ::slL.'lU o ,,::s',:;[ E.'lU i:;Q. <,:Jr<, ~il :~fl '." .~t~:~~J~i~ '\s,g; '0< ':: ~>~,;/:.~QI- ';5'~' '~1_~ ";~. :,:\':j~t:;~~rt, '>i'U~'i 8l~1 ~\l::.~~i ;,,','c:';,::s '(J :>>:m 'E Q) ,!2E (ij ~ n..OO ....CD ~ ~CD 2~~ co.2n.. iIiiiico :.il;in C}la;~ ga:~ o '" en r- 10 co en '" c: o ;:; o ::s Jo:" "'Ui co c: n.. 0 ~~ c: c: 0,2 E:- ~ G:j 0 .... c , lU go: o 10 en 10 o ~ o o ci o o co r-. ~ fo't o '" en r- 10 co en '" ff) .:.:: ... ell n.. .r:. III ::s III . ~c .. 'lU ~[ G:j0 "i~ Vl~ :>>0 co r-. co ~ ~ in co () o I() 10 co en ..... co C\I ..... I() o ~ C') I() co CD I() CD CD ..- ~ III E o ~ in Q) a: Jo: Cii n.. .D .D ::s co an en :J M .,.... ~I '<t .... '<t ~ M .... ... ..- '<t '<t .... '<t ff) I == Iii lUO O.r:. lOt:: 0.0 VlZ C . co lU C lU 0.0" 02< III Iii .....:i.t: M tT c · 0 lU 0<0 o ~ o o o o c:: o '" C\I ~ III E o ~ in Q) a: Jo: Cii n.. III a; "0 c: j cO en :J III -c: Q) > Q) en Es;-o Q) ;> co =.8(1) ::sC:J: o~::: Vloe r:.:~~ (0::<1) chg~ :In..0 r-. '" en M .... It) 10 ... ff) o o o o o o o It) fo't o 0 ~ ~ b 0 o 0 o C') o '<t o o CD en I() C\I '<to C') ~ ~ III 'E CD E CD l; cO c.."- E 0 o ~ 'c ::s E E o o t~ .sea III > ClO c: c: CIl CIl a: a: c: .9 ti 2 CDC;; 'E c: Q) 0 00 o CD CO Jo: Cii n.. till o l!! in ::s g>ti Q) ::s a:t3 M "- CD 0 chi: :J<C c: .2 ti 2 ~ii\ Cii c: n.. 0 mO Q) . 5 c: 0:.2 ~ ci:io ..- c: o Q) oa: C') ~ '<t CD ..- C\I C\I ~ Jg a; n.. r-. N co en ..... CD ..- ..... CD o ~ o o o o o o ..... ..- ~ ~ Cii n.. .c: III ::s CD ~'E ... Q) ~K ci:i~ "i cn~ :JO o ~ o C\I en ...... co co en C\I ~ . == Iii alO O.r:. ellt:: 0.0 CIlZ ; c : 0.0" 02< III Iii ,....::ib M tT c I 0 al 0<0 - .... o ~ ~'/;1 II it\ I ~! ~ m ,?fj. ''fi ~~ ~ ~i: ~~-~~~- ~ fJtJ .~ il4~ oj;j o :.~ ~co ....; c:.:~ 2 .... .... "0 e :t;'.. "0 :~" ..0 <<It.~ .S -~w ...,., )/;\ .... o fV' $ o ;\Pi! .c. o :<:!.::t;.' g ~t~,> ~~ <<It~ ~~~,~ ~f ~ ;i[~~ o }~z - ii":" t! ~ .~ ~- f;."(. :g CIl 13 ~it ~ c .......J.:t, Q) 8.5~~ ~ ~1..~.7"~" 8 t; g.'~'~ . ~ g ~, .!!? M-ifJ ~ o~ in cO \tcO _ en fO? ~ C') .~!> '0 ; lti .... Lt) ;~ ~L~Q) ~ t:f,<) :E ~ .~ ,.~ > U; .w& .~ ~I ~ I~ .~~ 0 '.0 U. :~ . ~!.ji## co en en - - C') .... Q) .c ..- o (3 o -. "": ..- ..... '<t '<t ..... '<t ~ .. ~ .~;t!i .... - .. - - ~i$f M '<t '<t co :NIt '" '" ~ ~ - o o o o o o o It) cry - - <<It .. - .... ... - ..... .. ~i - -: .. .. .. - - - .... - .... h. ~,E;:~~ 3 If.:i o ::J=ai E .!!!o. < ..J:<" - .. - _:~::. . :':.~~~~ ';~:::;&: ,':.'C, :>;t',~i1 :"::S~ :'.. '.~'E 'te~ , ::;)'a..~ .. ... - ... '" ~'~:li!" ", '~,",',itj,' r}'::iE~I' C;c;1 . tj'.,.., .r ClJ ..I.!!? :J';~~ .. .. .. l/) C1l C1l LL :J C1l ::; . c: c: .-... .2 0 7ii C1l 0 0 m:o ... C1l ..; ZO 0 0 W-o ...... :E c: .... :I: ro C1l o-l t:: ~~ ro :J 0 <co -0 0) c: I 0 "- 0 0) C1l 0) CI) T- .... ro C1l >- (ij 0 l/) u:: . ':'~?;:-g;~ ~,jl o!tCiJ' 'Efm: -::J 110~ O:S' E Yell: 1.0 <,,:;: Cl) t 'il ~ :'2',~a ::~ a..~~ 't'J ,". ' "D 'D.~~ s::: .':.g "!1 0 "c;llell. ,_'"r:>> 0 ',' - ~'C, Cl) 'g?~~ en ... .. - ... .. - ". "i ... ... ... - - ... - .. ... .. - .. .... - JIll - o ~ 0 ": ... en C'I III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III 0 ... 0 - o III ,-: III "':. III <0 ~ C') ~ o o o o o o III C\l ~ Q; c c .2 III '0 o,S .?;-:g .~ 8 E I E c o 0 o~ cO~ ... c o III oa: c .2 iij > .:s: 0 ro c a..~ ~ E "0 0 ~,g ::: VI 'C Q) oa: N~ l{);: ch~ ::>co III ..c: .lI::~1Il ..."OCI) III III III c.'ga:c 1Il::JC..2 'Cu.-ti -.....0 ::J J:!co'" 1110"'0 lIl;:;cc ... U III 0 02..20 .ri '0 i;' ~ ~ C 0..Q ~8~< <0 C'I ... co III en CO) en co en '<t en 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 C'I 0 0 CD 0 0 CO) '<t ut .. ... 3: III C 0 'ii a: C a: C) >.- - CI) s::. CI) .! .. ~~ C - III III I 0 E :J: 'C , CI) C III .r:. .. III > U C >'0 .. III 3: ... III E 0. :J: III E 0 > ... - 2 Itl III C'I 0. I.. I en - C'I .5 enCIJ 0 CD C\l ... Ol u) 0 C') Ol co C'!. "'" III .... ~ ~ t:: III C III 'Qj Ol'iii a: C\l"O ,... ;:::15 C') C\ldj co ,... ,... Ol Ol - - ,... .... C\l C\l - - Ol 0 ... o - ;'::'C .:s:'C1ll ... III 0 1ll"O-C C.CIIlO ~::JC:;:; in !!:. :Jl g .:s:CIIl:' 1Il0a:CI) ~t;~5 0200 .ri '0 i;' ~ ~ C 0..Q ~8~< o Ol co o ,... "'" "'" ~ o ~ o o o o o o C\l C\l ~ VI E o e ii) III a: ~ ro c. VI Cii '0 C III ..J cO ch :J o en co o ,... "'" "'" ~ o o o o o o III ut ~ Cii ~ o M ,... Ol - Ol C\l - o ~ Oc a:C) ~'iii B~ III J: CI) i:.'E Bill J:1Il E III .. > 00 C}Jo. ~ E Q; c co2 III '0 o 2 ~~ .~ 8 E I E c o .2 Oiij cO ~ .... c . III 8a: o ~ o co C\l o o (I) "'" ~ CI) '0 C ::J o ... C ClC) .lI::in ... III ~c ... I Ill.. III C C III ~~ > 0; 0 ... ... ,0. Sl.5 o co o co C') '<t "'" ~ III .5 C\l~ co 0 ~~ ,... . C\lC/) ,... Ol - ..... - C\l 01 ~ o l{) ,... l{) "'". l{) CD C') C') ~ o o o o o CO) "'" .:s: ro c. s::. VI :J C? ~c ... III ~ E ""'0. cXio2 Y ~ C/)1Il ::>0 0, il .... o o o o o o CO) '<t ut CI) C 'Co c;:; :J U o :J (;:. CI) .lI::c ... 0 ~o ... , 111_ III C C III ~~ C:i ~ ... ... ,0. 0.5 o ~ o ~ o co (J) 0- T .... 0) C\l u)' .... Q) .c o t> o ~ o o o o o o o III o o o o o o ..... ..... ~I ~ o CD CD ~ ro 0- t VI ~ ~ ~o III :J a:-= , CIJ M <00 ch€ =>< co <0 '<t C\l 0) (I) o ~ ~ o o o o o o o CO) >i .S! "0 '0 .c .5 "0 III E .,... ~ Summary - Park Land In-Lieu Fees Applied to CIP Projects FY 95-96 through FY 97-98 ATTACHMENTC - - Development I CIP# I Project Budget I In-Lieu Fees Applied I Unfunded Balance Closed Projects Cuesta Park Acquisition $ 266,550.14 N/A Stevens Creek Trail Reach 3, Construction 92-15 $ 6,252,000.00 $ 290,000.00 $0 McKelvey Park Restroom 95-28 $ 172,000.00 $ 79,152.48 $0 Open Space Acquisition 97 ~ 18 $ 1,000,000.00 $ 43,085.00 $0 Current Projects Creekside Park Construction 96-25 $ 479,000.00 $ 60,713.93 $0 Creekside Park Arbor - Loan from CIP Reserve 96-25 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $0 Rengstorff Community Center - Design 97-28 $ 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $0 ,,"" Pioneer Park Renovation - Design 99-19 $ 43,000.00 $ 43,000.00 $0 Wyandotte/Reinert Mini- Park Development 99-51 $ 60,000.00 $ 4,835.16 $0 Pending Projects Steven's Creek Trail Reach 4 - Phase I Construction 99-25 $ 2,400,000.00 I $ 56,806.60 $0 ..., Rengstorff Community """ ":;enter Renovation - Construction 00-16 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 634,542.53 $ 3,365,457.47 .- Open Space Acquisition 348,601.97 (- (DeI Medio Area) 00-17 $ 500,000.00 $ 151,398.03 $ Pioneer Park Renovation - Construction 00-18 $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $0 Open Space Acquisition 111,118.11 r (N. Calif.-Central Area) 2001-31 $ - 500,000.00 $ 388,881.89 $ -- Hetch-Hetchy R-O-W Improvements - Design 2002-20 $ 50,000.00 $ 16,997.02 $ 33,002.98 Unscheduled Projects Bubb Park Restroom - Renovation US-5 $ 225,000.00 $ 58,431.47 $ 166,568.53 Crittenden Park Ballfield 231,515.31-1 Restroom Renovation US-23 $ 250,000.00 $ 18,484.69 $ Mercy-Bush Park - $01 Development US-48 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 . -- TOTAL $ 10,707,000.00 $ 3,312,878.94 $4,256,264.371'1' .., ., ~ - .. _. - - ~, - - - ,.q - - - "<It i', - Page 1 """ - ... - ... - ... - ... - - - .. - .. - .. - .. - - .. .. - .. - .. - .. ",.. .. - - - .. ... .. .. - ^TTACH~1ENT 3 MINUTES (EXCERPT) r10UNTMN VIEH PARKS AND RECREATION cormIssIoN WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1998 Laura Brown, resident asked what are the mitigating procedures. Shoreline .Manager stated that whenever an owl(s) is impacted, that the requirement is that it be passively relocated to anoter next area. Unidentified speaker asked if the habitats are disturbed during the breeding .season. Shoreline Manager stated no. On a motion made by Commissioner Noel, seconded by Commissioner Knipe, Commission voted 5-0 to approve the Burrowing Owl Management Plan and recommend it's adoption to City Council. C. Designation of FY 97-98 Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fees (Commissioner Bryant excused herself from discussion of this item due. to a possible conflict of interest.) Community Services Director. stated that on March 25, 1997, the City Council adopted a resolution establishing a policy for prioritizing the use of park land dedication in-lieu fees and a process for the appropriation of such fees. The resolution established neighborhood projects as a priority for receiving fees collected from developments in lieu of land dedications. If no such neighborhood project exists in the area, then fees could be applied to City- wide projects (Le. Community Center renovation, Stevens Creek Trail, etc.) Additionally, it included the Parks and Recreation Commission in the review process by providing the Commission with the responsibility of forwarding an annual recommendation to the City Council concerning where the in-lieu fees should be designated. Community Services Director stated that as of to date, the Commission has made recommendations on fees received in fiscal year 1996-97 and on fees received in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1997-98. The City Council adopted these recommendations without changes on December 9, 1997. The . Commission also made recommendations on fees received in the second quarter of FY 1997-98, however, these recommendations have not yet been forwarded to the City Council. As such, staff recommended one change, applying $10,000 of the second quarter fees to the Hetch-Hetchy right-of-way improvement design instead of the Creekside Park construction, as Creekside Park was not in need of additional funding. Ms. Topley, Senior Administrative Analyst reviewed the staff report which outlined the various in-lieu fee recommendations. 8 Parks and Recreation Conunission Meeting Minutes November 18, 1998 Commissioner Noel asked how the amount to be applied to a particular project was determined. Community Services Director stated that part of it is based on the unfunded balance remaining to complete a particul~r project. Commissioner Macias asked for clarification regarding the Pioneer Park renovation project. Community Services Director stated the project would be done in two phases: design and construction. The current recommended funding of $454,070 is for the construction phase. Commissioner Knipe stated she supports applying $298,620 to the Open Space Acquisition fund rather than to the Pioneer Park renovation construction. Commissioner Noel stated he -is supportive of the alternative funding proposal which would allocate additional in-lieu funds towards the development of Mercy fBush as well as to the renovation of Pioneer Park. Commissioner Macias stated acquisition of open space should be a priority. Commissioner Lesti asked what items are included in the Pioneer Park construction. Community Services Director stated they are mostly infrastructure items such as lighting, pathway improvements, upgraded irrigation, etc. Commissioner Macias stated support of applying $298,620 towards open space acquisition and to fund the Pioneer Park project with general fund monies instead. Maarten Korringa, resident stated he support the open sp"ace development of the Mercy fBush property. Unidentified speaker stated there is not enough funding to complete the Mercy fBush property and suggested considering applying in-lieu monies to complete the project. Ronit Bryant, resident, stated the City should not use in-lieu fees to fund projects which are already planned and likely to be funded with general fund monies. The in-lieu fees should be used for new projects. Bob Bartlett, resident, stated his support of funding the open space development of the Mercy fBush property. There are many children in the area who are in need of additional open space. The land was purchased in 1992 and should now be developed. . 9 Parks and Recreation Conurussion Meeting Minutes November 18, 1998 .'lIJIII .. .... .. - - .... .... - - "'Ili .... - ... ..... - ~ - .~ - '~j. - ... - 1;~~ """ W;:iil.j,~ - - .. - """ - ~ - - - ., ,- .... "". .. - .. - - ". - - .... - .. - ... .. .. - .. - ., - ... .... .. .... - - .. - ... - - >,.",.<,..~"~~~,~-~.""",~.,",,j,.,,,,~,,,, Commissioner Macias asked if the $22,840 funding of the Bubb Park restroom project can be applied towards open space acquisition. Community Services Director stated no as (according to the adopted Council Policy) in-lieu fees are to be applied to projects in the neighborhood or planning area where the fee is generated. If there is no project in the area, then the fees can be applied to a City-wide project such as the Stevens Creek Trail or the Community Center renovation project. In his view, acquisition of land to construct a neighborhood mini-park would not meet the criteria. unless the in-lieu fee(s) were from that same neighborhood. In this instance, this would not be the case. Commissioner Macias asked for clarification regarding the $37,640 which is being applied to the Community Center design project which is likely to be funded by the General Fund Ms. Topley stated that the design phase is funded for this year (1998-99) and that these ftinds will be used to repay a loan that was made earlier from the in-lieu fee fund. Commissioner Knipe asked if there would be "a problem in funding the Mercy /Bush development since it's only in Tier 2 of the Parks and Open Space Plan rather than in Tier 1. Community Services Director stated no, that the adopted in-lieu fee policy recognizes that the availability of in-lieu fees may allow certain projects to be taken out of order or that mayor not be listed as a priority in the Open Space Plan. Mercy/Bush falls into the first category. Commissioner Noel made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Knipe to recommend the alternative recommendation below with the following changes: $298,619 be applied to the acquisitio~ of open space in the Central/North California Planning Area and $100,000 applied to the Mercy /Bush property to fully fund the project. Commissioner Knipe requested clarification regarding where the $100,000 for Mercy /Bush , development would be generated. Ms. Topley stated the monies would be taken from the Pioneer Park renovation construction. Commissioner Noel amended his motion to indicate that $198,619 is to be applied to the acquisition of open space in the North Central Planning Area with the balance ($100,000) to Mercy/Bush. Commissioner Knipe accepted the amendment. Commission voted 4-0 (Commissioner Bryant abstained) to recommend the following: 1. Recommend that the City Council designate park land dedication in-lieu fees received during the 3rd and 4th quarters of FY 1997-98 in the amount of $1,313,790 and revise the Capital Improvement Program as follows: A. $878,170 received from 650 Castro (Central Planning Area) as follows: 10 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes November 18, 1998 i) $0 to Pioneer Park Renovation Construction (00-18); ii) $514,410 to Mercy-Bush Mini-Park Development (US-48); and, iii) $363,760 to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31); B. $165,360 received from 726 Leksich (Central Planning Area) as follows: i) $127,720 to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31); ii) $37,640 to repay Recreation In-Lieu Fund for an amount designated to the Community Center Renovation Design Project (97-28) in the adopted FY 98/99 CIP; . C. $151,400 interest funds to Open Space Acquisition - Del Medio Area (00-17); D. $68,150 received from 695 Mariposa (Central Planning Area) to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31); E. $22,840 received from 1131 Phyllis (Grant Planning Area) to Bubb Park Restrooms (US-5); F. $22,160 from 217 Pettis (Central Planning Area) to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31); G. $5,710 received frorri' 1787 Latham (Central Planning Area) to Open Space Acquisition - North California-Central Area (01-31). 2. Revise the designation for $10,000 of the $15,290 park land dedication in- lieu fee received from 127/129 Evandale from Creekside Park construction (96-25) to Hetch-Hetchy ROW Improvements - Design (02-20). D. Prioritization of Open Space Development (Commissioner Bryant excused herself from discussion of this item due to a possible conflict of interest.) Community Services Director stated that with each review of the Park and Open Space Plan, the Commission and City Council have sought to address 11 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes November 18, 1998 ~ -- - - .. - .. .. ~ """'" '!\,;~ ~'!! 'i-,,~ - 1t.~ ""'" iol.>. - ~ - - ~... ""'" ...... ""'" "* - 'lit4';,: .. .... - - .. .. ""'" - .."..,__"~~~.......c..~"..,~.~."~~......",..,",.~~,,,,,,,,,,,,c<~-,._.,,,-,,~~.~...~.~,,,,,,,,,-",~~''''''''''''''-''-~''^"~-_.'- - ~ !'Ill Summary - Park Land In-Lieu Fees Applied to crp Projects FY 95-96 through FY 97-98 ATTACHMENT 4 .. - Development I CIP# I Project Budget I In-Lieu Fees Applied I Unfunded Balance Closed Projects Cuesta Park Acquisition $ 266,550.14 N/A Stevens Creek Trail Reach 3, Construction 92-15 $ 6,252,000.00 $ 290,000.00 $0 McKelvey Park Restroom 95-28 $ 172,000.00 $ 79,152.48 $0 Open Space Acquisition 97 -18 $ 1,000,000.00 $ 43,085.00 $0 Current Projects Creekside Park Construction 96-25 $ 479,000.00 $ 60,713.93 $0 Creekside Park Arbor - Loan from CIP Reserve 96-25 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $0 Rengstorff Community Center - Design 97 -28 $ 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $0 Pioneer Park Renovation - Design 99-19 $ 43,000.00 $ 43,000:00 $0 Wyandotte/Reinert Mini- Park Development 99-51 $ 60,000.00 $ 4,835.16 $0 Pending Projects Steven's Creek Trail Reach 1$ 4 - Phase I Construction 99-25 2,400,000.00 $ 56,806.60 $0 Rengstorff Community I Center Renovation - i$ Construction 00-16 4,000,000.00 $ 634,542.53 $ 3,365,457.47 Open Space Acquisition 1$ (Del Medio Area) 00-17 500,000.00 $ 151,398.03 $ 348,601.97 Pioneer Park Renovation - Construction 00-18 $ 450,000.00 $ l' ,380.80 $ 448,619.20 Open Space Acquisition (N. Calif.-Central Area) 2001-31 $ 500,000.00 $ 587,501.09 $ (87,501.09) Hetch-Hetchy R-Q-W Improvements - Design 2002-20 $ 50,000.00 $ 16,997.02 $ 33,002.98 Unscheduled Projects Bubb Park Restroom Renovation US-5 $ 225,000.00 $ 58,431.47 $ 166,568.53 Crittenden Park Ballfield Restroom Renovation US-23 $ 250,000.00 $ 18,484.69 $ 231,515.31 Mercy-Bush Park Development US-48 $ 600,000.00 $ 600,000.00 $0 TOTAL $ 10,957,000.00 $ 3,312,878.94 $4,506,264.37 ! i I ... .. - .. ... ... - .. ".. - .... .. - .. - .. ... ... .. .. .... .. .... .. ... .. .. .. .. - ... I11III Page 1 .. ~ - ~&- - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ...- -, - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - .. !Ill THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK .. .. - - .. - - - .. - .. - .. .. "* - ... - - - .. - .... ""'" - C D C C C ~ C C ~ C C C C C C C C C ~ ~ . Q Z ~ .~ "'C = (JJ ~ ~ < - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ J 8 ~ '1 IJ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ~ J 3 J ~ 8 J J 8 J o ~ a J ,- ... ... .. - .. - .. - - - ... - ... - .. - .. - .. ~ ... - .. ... .. - ... ... ... ... .. - ... - .. - ... -r_ M~~ _"'''.' '"TC."i-;<.i.":". -- .< , CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: Apri130, 1999 TO: City Council FROM: J. Michael Sartor, Capital Program Manager SUBJECT: COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT UPDATE This memorandum is an update of the Community Center Project. Following is the report presented to the City Council at a study session on March 23,1999. In November 1998, the architectural firm of Noll & Tam was selected to evaluate alternatives and develop cost estimates to compare renovation and a new wing to all- new construction. The results of this evaluation were presented to the City Council at its March 23,1999 study session. At the study session, the City Council indicated a new Community Center building would be preferred to the renovation/addition option. Council also requested staff to look at ways to maximize the useable space in a new building design to allow for both recreational and other uses (such as nonprofits and social services). The Council asked staff to evaluate a two-story building during design and consider future program needs along with current uses. With these directions, staff visited several community centers in the area to compare size, usage and program space and will provide Council an opportunity to visit some of the centers that best represent what they may want to see in Mountain View. Several options for the new Community Center will be developed with various footprints and size ranges during the design phase and brought back to the Council for review and comment. The $7.8 million in the proposed CIP for the Community Center Construction (Project 00-16) is a placeholder. Project cost estimates will be provided for each design option presented to the Council for consideration, and a funding strategy will be developed for the option chosen by the Council. ~!;.h J. Michael Sartor Capital Program Manager / JMS/7/PWK 936-04-26-99M ^ - ~!j;1i - - - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - - ... - 1999/2004 PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - .. .. THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY I BLANK - .. .. - .. - .. .. ". - - .WIj - "1iiii - - - - - .. .. ,. - .. - 1II11l" - - - ,. - ... .. .. - ... - ... CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March 18, 1999 TO: City Council FROM: Rey S. Rodriguez, Project Manager SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION, MARCH 23, 1999-COMMUNlTY CENTER, PROJECT 97-28 - ""'" PURPOSE - .. - .. - '1M' - - - .. - - - .. - .. .. .. - .. - .. - .. The purpose of this City Council study session is to review renovation options for the Community Center project and associated cost estimates. The currently approved- project is for renovation and addition of a new wing. The City Council requested staff to provide cost estimates comparing renovation of the existing building to construction of a new building. for their review and consideration. These options will be further developed after comments from the study session and brought back to the City Council with a recommendation at a lateI; date. BACKGROUND The Mountain View Community Center, located in Rengstorff Park, was dedicated in 1964 and has served the community continuously for the past 35 years. The Community Center is the primary facility for many of the City's recreation programs and houses the business offices for both the Community Services Department admini- stration and the Recreation Division. The current size and configuration of the building is insufficient to meet current needs and limits desirable activities. The building is also deficient in several standard features, such as a complete fire protection system, that are now considered standard for public facilities. Many of the building's mechanical and electrical systems are at or near the end of their normal service life, where replacement becomes more cost-effective than repair. - ,~; City Council March 18, 1999 Page 2 - - - A study to analyze the cost and feasibility of renovating of the Community Center was conducted in 1994. In addition to correcting building deficiencies, four main compo- nents of the renovation to address deficiencies that affect programs were identified in the study: - - 1. Upgrading Multi-Use Rooms 1, 2 and 3 (including flooring, walls, ceiling and equipment) and enlarging (90 square feet) Multi-Use Room 1 for a teacher's office and a toddlers' toilet; ... - - 2. Upgrading the Assembly Room (accessibility, finishes and equipment) and adding a small (900 square foot) kitchen; .. .. 3. Renovating administration offices, including improved public counters and expanded clerical areas; and - Wf; 4. Adding additional space for multipurpose rooms, rest rooms, lobby and a new entrance. - .. The 1994 feasibility study focused on an economic renovation project and identified the need for modest expansion to address functional deficiencies and unmet program requirements. The study found several building and f~ctional deficiencies. - .. .. Existing Building Deficiencies .. 1. Fire Protection - .. . Building needs a fire sprinkler system. (Basement has fire sprinkler system.) - 2. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HV AC) .. - . Existing HV AC units are due for replacement. - . Portions of the building need air conditioning or have inadequate air conditioning. - - 3. Electrical - - . Electrical wiring in the building is brittle and may pose hazards for long-term maintenance. - ..... . Existing wiring is inadequate to handle service loading. - .. .... - ... .. Ji"_lllf .. City Council March 18, 1999 Page 3 .. - .. - . Lighting fixtures are not energy-efficient. .. 4. Plumbing - ... . Sanitary lateral becomes blocked frequently. 5. Accessibility-Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) - ... - IIIIlIII - . Basement is not ADA-accessible. Rest rooms are not ADA-accessible. Doors and hardware are not ADA-compliant. . . 6. Window Glazing .. - .. ..... . Exterior glass is not double-pane, energy-efficient. . Interior glass does not meet Uniform Building Code for safety. Existing Functional Deficiencies .. - 7. No kitchen for Assembly Room. ... 8. Poor acoustics and sound insulation between multi-purpose rooms. - - 9. Needs appropriate suspended hardwood flooring for dance classes. - - 10. Amount of usable area and efficient configuration of areas: - ... ... ... . Need additional multi-purpose room. Need additional rest rooms. Staff office area is inadequate and inefficient. Need storage space adjacent to program areas. . . . - 11. Inadequate buffer between Community Center and adjacent residences. - - 12. Traffic Circulation and Parking .. - .. - .. . Insufficient parking. Needs drop-off zone. . .. City Council March 18, 1999 Page 4 - - - .. Project goals were established to improve the Community Center's overall functionality and correct the identified deficiencies. In November 1994, the City Council approved the recommendations of the 1994 feasibility study, including a new 7,200 square foot addition for multi-purpose rooms, rest rooms a new lobby and a new entrance. ..... - - The design phase for the Community Center renovation and addition was funded in the 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program from park and recreation in-lieu fees. In April 1998, during the annual Capital Improvement Program review, the City Council requested cost estimates for design and construction of a new Community Center building to compare to the cost for renovation and addition to the existing building. The approved Five-Year Capital Improvement Program includes a placeholder budget of $4 million for the Community Center renovations for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Th~ project scope and budget will be adjusted to reflect the option and associated cost estimate selected by the City Council. - 'IIIo! ... - - .. - .. REFINEMENT TO 1994 FEASIBILITY STUDY - In November 1998, the City Council approved a contract with the architectural firm of Noll & Tam to develop alternative plans and prepare cost estimates to compare renova- tion and new construction. The Noll & Tam alternatives evaluation confirmed essen- tially the same deficiencies that were discussed in the 1994 study. However, the 1994 cost estimate to correct those deficiencies was based upon very preliminary concepts and did not include the amount of work required to comply with current standards and regulations. The architect reevaluated the existing building systems and identified the following items of work to be added to the 1994 renovation/ addition plan: - .. .. - - - - · Additional seismic strengthening work to comply with building codes. - .. . Seismic design for new addition to comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. - . Replacement of all exterior glass with energy-efficient, double-pane windows to comply with Title 24 energy requirements. - .. . Replacement of existing interior windows to meet the 1997 Uniform Building Code. .. - .. . Addition of an elevator to the basement level in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act. .. .. . New roof. .. .. .. - - .... ... - - ..... - ... - .. .... .. - .... - ... - .. - ... - ... - .. ... .... - ... - ... ... - ... .. - .. - - City Council March 18, 1999 Page 5 . More extensive work on HV AC and electrical systems. . Additional parking. New Building Evaluation The architect incorporated the current needs of the Community Center in a plan for new construction that also satisfies operational and functional needs and eliminates existing deficiencies without the constraints of the existing building. Both the renovation and the new building plan eliminate building deficiencies an~ improve functional deficiencies. The renovation plan is confined to the existing building layout, which limits the ability to improve building function and spatial relationships. A new building carries a higher project cost but is not confined by the footprint of the existing building and architectural style. Both plans achieve an improved and updated Community Center. Their costs and benefits are described below and in Attachment "A "-Alternatives Evaluation. RENOV A TION/ADDITION PLAN The renovation/ addition plan meets the goals of the 1994 study to eliminate building deficiencies and improve program space deficiencies, as previously outlined. The multi-purpose room addition, including rest rooms, administrative space and entry remodeling, would occur at the front of the building. A kitchen is added along the southern wall of the assembly room. (See Attachment "B"-Renovation/ Addition Plan.) The renovation replaces outdated furnishings with new lobby furniture, ergonomic tables and chairs for the ~ew addition and ergonomic staff workstations. The life span of the renovation/ addition plan is estimated at 25 to 30 years. The total area of the renovation/ addition plan is 28,800 square feet, including 6,800 square feet in the existing basement, an increase of7,200 square feet over the existing building. Noll & Tam prepared a cost estimate for renovation that reflects the 1994 feasibility study recommendations with a revised scope to reflect current code requirements. In addition to increased sc-ope to meet current regulations, construction costs were adjusted to account for inflation. The estimated project cost for the renovation is $6.1 million. The increase of $2.1 million over the previous budget figure of $4.0 million is due to the additional code compliance requirements, cost rise and a more detailed City Council March 18, 1999 Page 6 construction cost estimate, based on current plans and construction costs. (See Attachment "D"-Cost Comparison.) The cost for the renovation scheme can be reduced by about $1 million by eliminating or postponing the construction of the new addition recommended in the study. Elimi- nating the addition reduces the project cost to about $5.1 million. However the cost of doing the addition at a later date would rise due to inflation and additional contractor startup costs. NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN New construction is unconstrained by the building footprint or characteristics of an existing structure. New construction provides the opportunity for more efficient opera- tions, a viewing area for parents to observe their children at recreational classes, more flexible assembly space and attractive entries and lobbies. The new construction plan has the added advantages of additional parking, an enhanced landscape buffer along the south and west park boundary and a new parkside plaza area adjacent to the assembly area. These enhancements could be added to the renovation/addition plan as discussed below and shown in Attachment D. The entire area is on one level with no basement. (See Attachment "C"-New Construction Plan.) The total area of the new building is 26,800 square feet, nearly twice the area of the existing building ground-floor area of 14,800 square feet. It is approximately the same area as would be provided in the renovation project, including the existing basement and new addition area. The existing building's basement area of 6,800 square feet plus the proposed area of the new wing of 7,200 square feet are better utilized in the new building wIth all at-grade space. Below is a comparison of space in the existing building, the renovation/ addition plan and the new building: Building Size Existing Renovation New (Gross Area) Building with Addition Construction Ground Floor 14,800 22,000 26,800 Basement 6,800 6,800 -0- Total Building Size 21,600 28,800 26,800 The project cost for a new building is $8.6 million, approximately $2.5 million more than the renovation/ addition plan. (See Attachment "D"-Cost Comparison.) The addi- tional cost covers demolition and new construction, temporary facilities for operations during construction and some additional site improvements. - ... - .. .. .. .. 114 - - .. - .. - .. - - ., - .. - - - .. - - - 11III - - - .. - - - - - """ - ... - - - .... - .... .. ... - .. - ... - .. ... .. .. ... """ - - .. - .. - .. - .. - ... - .. - .. - 1iIIII City Council March 18, 1999 Page 7 RENOVATION ENHANCEMENTS Several favorable elements of the new construction plan could be implemented as enhancements to the renovation plan at additional cost. These include: . Removal of the stage area in the assembly hall to provide additional usable floor space. The stage is rarely used now and could be accommodated with portable risers when needed. . Additional parking and landscaping to improve overall site appearance and to buffer along the south boundary to address noise along adjacent residential property . . A new parkside plaza adjacent to the assembly area to orient users toward the park. . Installation of new lighting fixtures. The renovation enhancements and associated costs are shown in Attachment "D". The total cost to include all the enhancements in the renovation/ addition plan adds $525,000 for a total enhanced renovation project cost of $6.6 million. CONCLUSION Renovation or replacement of the Community Center will address current needs and long-term operational efficiencies. Each option provides an updated facility that meets current codes and regulations and provides a significant improvement to the ...- - City Council March 18, 1999 Page 8 - - .. community. Based on the above evaluation, staff believes that the renovation/addition plan with enhancements will meet the project goals in a cost effective manner. wII - Prepared by: ~~Md..~ Rey Rodriguez Project Manager Approved by: 'IIIIiIt - ""'" Cathy R. Lazarus Public Works Director .... - ~ 1U~-rL.. David A. Muela Community Services Director .. .. - J{~ Kevin C. Duggan City Manager - .. - - .. RSR/2/PWK 999-03-23-99M-E^ - - Attachments: - "A "-Alternatives Evaluation "B"-Renovation/ Addition Plan "C"-New Construction Plan "D"-Community Center Cost Comparison '~ - .. - cc: Ms. Janet Tam-Noll & Tam, Architects ldW Department Heads, APWD, RM, CPM, SCE-Rogge, PM-Rodriguez, File-97-28 - ...., - -, .. - - .. .. .. - ... .... .. - .. - .. Item - Project Cost .. - Building Size .. - - Building Deficiencies - .. Structural/Seismic ... - .- .. Building Floor Plan - ... Building Appearance - .. Basement - .. .... ~S/4/PVVK .. 936-03-17-99A^ ... ... .... .. - .. - .. - - i-l'itr COMMUNITY CENTER, PROJECT 97-28 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION Renovation! Addition $6.6 million w / enhancements 28,800 sJ. (including 6,800 sJ.- basement) Alteration or replacement to correct deficiencies Upgrade only affected structure to meet 1997 UBC (existing building was seismically upgraded in 1993) Remains similar to existing Update exterior and interior finish surfaces Height clearance restrictions, no windows or natural light New Construction $8.6 million 26,800 sJ.-ground level; no basement level New products to eliminate deficiencies Entire structure will meet 1997 UBe Not constrained by existing building New architectural and finish elements All floor space is at groood level Attachment A Key' 1. Drop/offPar~g . 2. ' , Entry Lobby 3. Receptio~ 4. Administrative Offices 5. Assembly Room 6. Kitchen 7. PreSchool 8. Multi-Pwpose 2 9. Multi-Purpose Room, 3 10. Multi-Pwpose Room 4/ Dance 11. M1J,!.ti-Pwpose Room 5 . 12. Tot Lot 13. Restrooms 14. Elevato~/ Stair 1~. Outdoor Terrace 16. Future Expansion 17. Parking 170 Spaces . Area Summary (Gross AIea) Existing First Floor New Addition Total First floor . 14,778 sf ' . . 7,200 sf 21,978 sf EXisting Basement 6,800 sf Total Gross Bldg. Area 28,778 sf ,- ",+i;\l.,' - .. - ~,W - - 1iIi4t: 17 - .. .. .. .. .. - - - - - - - - - - w..' - - - ~ I r. .. '* __ ~engstorff ;A venu.c:. \: .. - _.ATTACHMENT B" Renovation/ Addition Plan Mountain View Community Center - Conceptual Site Plan r:--t---J----, - North 8 d .. 1. Drop/off Parking 2. Entry Lobby 3. Reception 4. Administrative Offices 5. Assembly Room 6. Kitchen 7. PreSchool 8. Multi-Purpose 2 9. Multi-Purpose Room 3 10. Multi-Purpose Room 4/ Dance l1.:Multi-Purpose Room 5 12. Tot Lot 13. Restrooms 14. Storage/ Mechanical 15. Outdoor Terrace 16. Future Expansion 1.7. Parking. . 170 Spaces ... . Key - - - - .- - .. .. .. - -. .. - Total Gross Building Area 26,757 sf - - :./ - .. - .... - - - - - .. .. - ~~ I j r .. .. Rengstorff Avenue - - ATTACHMENT C New Building Plan Mountain View Community Center - Conceptual Site Plan .. ~ March 17. 1999 Noll .. North E) & Tam Architects .. 3/18/99/RR ,~ - Community Center, Project 97-28 Cost Comparison .... - """ .. Renovation New Building wi Addition Construction Estimate $4,364,000 $5,890,000 Design Contingency $350,000 $580,000 Construction Contingency $300,000 $400,000 Cost Rise $220,000 $300,000 Subtotal Construction $5,234,000 $7,170,000 Furnishings, Furniture & Equipment $225,000 $375,000 Art Allowance (1 %) $50,000 $70,000 Temporary Quarters $150,000 $250,000 Project Management $50,000 $60,000 Construction Inspection & Testing $30,000 $45,000 Construction Management $250,000 $500,000 Permits $25,000 $35,000 City Admin. Fee (Fixed) $100,000 $100,000 Subtotal Non-Construction $880,000 $1,435,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST .$6,114,000 $8,605,000 .. - - .. ."i .. ...., .. .. - - - .. - - - - - - Enhancements Remove Assembly Room Stage Additional Parking (60 spaces) Plaza off Assembly Room (park side) New Interior Lighting Fixtures Subtotal Enhancements - $100,000 $180,000 $160,000 $85,000 $525,000 incl. incl. incl. incl. incl. - - WI - TOTAL PROJECT COST WITH ENHANCEMENTS $6,639,000 WIll,',} $8,605,000 - .. - - .. .. ATTACHMENT D .. - ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ c c c c c ~ ~ ~ . o Z ~ .......,c ~ = ~ ~ ~ < - ......-- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW J ~ 8 ;) 3 J J a a n J ~ :J :J J J ~ J J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - - - .... .. - - - .. - .. - ... - .. .... ... - .. - ... - - ... - - - - ... - ... - "". .lC'': CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: April 30, 1999 TO: City Council FROM: J. Michael Sartor, Capital Program Manager SUBJECT: ADOBE BUILDING RENOVATION PROJECT UPDATE This memorandum is an update of the Adobe Building Renovation Construction Project. Following is the report presented to the City Council at a study session on March 23, 1999. On January 13, 1998, the City Council acted to retain the Adobe Building and site and authorized staff take steps to renovate the building and add it to the City's Historical Resource List. During the 1998-99 CIP approval, the City Council funded the design phase, including the preparation of construction documents for bids. In November 1998, Page & Turnbull Architects were retained to develop renovation options and cost estimates for City Council review and selection. The architect then prepared design drawings and specifications for the selected scope of renovation. The results of the architect's work with options were presented to the City Council at the March 23,1999 study session. The Council indicated a preference for the renovation option that restored the Adobe Building along with site improvements, including a perimeter adobe-style wall, parking and basic landscaping. Upgrades such as construction of a side building resembling the pump house that was once on the site or landscape upgrades such as a fountain will not be included in the project at this time. These upgrades may be considered in the event that a new City water supply well is proposed for the site or additional funding is identified for landscape upgrades. Construction funding of $1.4 million for restoration and site improvements is requested in the 1999-2000 CIP. ~{~~ J. Michael Sartor Capital Program Manager - JMS/7/PVVK 936-04-26-99M-1 ^ - - .. ... ~ - \i\iiii!!il.. - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ... "'" 1999/2004 PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM "j;i."-"~ - ;";"41 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY I BLANK ... .. - - ... .. - .. - UlI - ~ - .. iIIJlJI!I .. - ~~. - - ... ilofl ... ti, ... .... - .. .. .. - .. ,.. - ... - ... .. - .. ,.. Will - - - .. - .. - .. - .. - - - .. - .. - .. - .. - - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March 18, 1999 TO: City Council FROM: Mark Rogge, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION, MARCH 23, 1999-ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 PURPOSE The purpose of this City Council Study Session is to review the restoration plans and options for Adobe Building Restoration, Project 99-48, and associated cost estimates. The plans provide for three levels of restoration of the Adobe Building and related site work. Level "A" is the base project that will provide a fully operational building and functional site. Level "B" is an enhanced project that includes all of the work in Level "A" and a small utility building of similar size and character as the "Pump House" building, which once occupied the site. Level "B" also includes site enhancements such as a fountain. Level"C" includes all work in Levels "A" and "B" and adds a new building to increase assembly space on the site. BACKGROUND The Adobe Building was built in 1934 and served as a community meeting place with a wide variety of uses for 53 years. The building was closed to the public in 1987 until structural work could be done to comply with the Unreinforced Masonry Building Ordinance. The.building sustained minor damage in the 1989 Lorna Prieta Earthquake. On January 13,1998, the City Council acted to: retain the Adobe Building and the site at 157 Moffett Boulevard; take steps to add the building to the City's Historical Resources List; and prepare a renovation strategy and cost estimate for various levels of renova- tion. During the five-year 1998-99 to 2002-03 Capital Improvement Program approval in June 1998, the City Council funded Project 99-48 for the design of the Adobe Building Restoration and directed staff to return to the City Council with several levels of restoration for consideration. On November 10, 1998, the City Council added the Adobe Building to the City's Historical Resources List and authorized staff to hire Page & Turnbull for project architectural design services. Page & Turnbull has expertise and experience in historic .!li~! City Council March 18, 1999 Page 2 - .... - restoration, including adobe buildings. The architectural team considered improve- ments indicated in the prior studies of the Adobe Building, coordinating each element of the last site plan prepared by Gilbert "Gil" Sanchez in 1990 into the current options. A foundation and geotechnical investigation, a hazardous material investigation and a termite/infestation investigation were also conducted and coordinated into the current plans. ,,";#I - ~,ii - ~f Cost estimates for three levels of restoration, based upon the prior site plan and current information, were prepared. (See Attachment "D," Preliminary Cost Estimate.) The restoration plan is intended to be flexible enough to serve a wide range of potential uses, as discussed in Attachment "E," Adobe Building Use Study. Potential uses could impact ongoing operations and maintenance costs. Depending upon the use, City operations and maintenance costs could be offset by revenues. -, - .. ... .. The Adobe Building site was listed as a potential location for a new potable water well. A future well in this location would provide backup water supply in the event of unusually high water usage or emergency. The plans accommodate a future well by situating it within a utility vault in the parking lot, with associated electrical and mechanical support systems housed in a suitable "pump house" structure. .. .. .. .. Once the City Council determines the desired scope of work, staff will initiate detailed' design and" construction plans and specifications. Staff will also return to the City Council to approve associated California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) docu- ments and approve the plans and specifications and authorize advertising for bids. - .. - - SITE CONSTRAINTS .. The site has several constraints that were considered in the scope of work and cost estimates. The most significant potential impacts are traffic circulation and parking, noise and historic preservation. - - - Traffic circulation and parking impacts are directly related to the number of people expected to use the site. Smaller events, up to 30 people, would not have a significant traffic and parking impact, whereas the largest events permitted under code regula- tions, up to 200 people, could impact the nearby residential neighborhoods and com- mercial districts. Vehicular access is limited to a driveway on Santa Rosa Avenue as the site is too near the intersection of Moffett Boulevard and Central Expressway to have a driveway on Moffett Boulevard. Therefore, vehicles arriving at or departing from the site must use Santa Rosa Avenue, which lies between a strip commercial district and a residential neighborhood. ""'" - - - ... . iii! - .. .. ., - .., - - - - - .. - .. - ... -- lilt - .. - ... - .. - - - ... .. .. - .. - ... .. .. - - .... .. - .. - ~~"i~"""",;",_"",-",,-",~,_,,,""oi#",,,",'~,__,=,, 'Ut' --il City Council March 18, 1999 Page 3 The potential for noise, generated on-site or from people approaching or leaving, could . impact the residential neighborhood east of Santa Rosa Avenue. The site plans include perimeter walls and planting to blockor muffle on-site noise and also reduce ambient noise in the residential neighborhood by attenuating noise generated along Moffett Boulevard, Central Expressway and the two railways. Historic preservation is advanced by any of the three restoration levels proposed. The degree of historic restoration may affect the ultimate standing that may be achieved on State and national historic designations. PROJECT SCOPE Several options for the general scope of the project are presented, ranging from relocating the building, which is not recommended, to three levels of restoration. If the City Council desires to build all of the proposed elements, the levels could also be considered as phases over the five-year Capital Improvement Program or over a longer period. The plans were prepared to allow sufficient information to address a wide range of potential uses and to estimate construction costs. The selected level will be developed and refined with consideration to comments made at the study session. Relocation The City Council requested information about the feasibility of relocating the Adobe Building to the "Cube Site." Relocating a heavy, relatively brittle structure is technically feasible but expensive. The process for moving the Adobe Building includes undermin- ing the building as well as constructing a foundation support system. This assembly would then be relocated by railway to avoid flexing, which could damage the rigid structure. Constructing new temporary railroad tracks from the present location to the new location and transporting the building by locomotive add costs not normally associated with a lighter, more flexible structure. Costs to relocate the Adobe Building across Central Expressway to the "Cube Site" would be close to the $1 million range. Costs to obtain and comply with encroachment permit requirements from the County, for Central Expressway and from the Joint Powers Board for the CalTrain and light rail lines are included. The moving cost would be in addition to restoration costs, which could also rise due to damage that may occur during the move. By comparison, reloca- tion of the Rengstorff House, a relatively lightweight, flexible wood frame structure, was accomplished by rubber-tired transport on surface streets at a cost less than $100,000 in 1999 dollars. Relocation of this type of building and removing it from its historically significant location would diminish its historic value and probably disqualify it for a possible higher designation from the State Historic Preservation Office or listing on the National Register of Historic Places of Local Interest. The ~ City Council March 18, 1999 Page 4 - ~ -- highest historic designation for the Adobe Building is likely in the category of "Patterns of Usage," relating to how the building was built and used as a community resource. -, Level "A"-Basic Restoration The basic Level "A" plan will restore the Adobe Building as close as possible to its original condition (see Attachments "A" and "A2"). Restoration would use current methods and materials rather than authentic historic means and would result in similar visual and textural surfaces to the original. An authentic historic restoration, using the same methods, tools and materials as the original construction, would be far more expensive and require a longer schedule for procurement of labor and materials, as well as actual construction. .. ""'" - - .. .. The Level "A" project includes site improvements to replace certain historic elements and to add parking spaces and landscaping to provide a fully functional building and site. - - ... The restoration will provide structural and seismic strengthening to comply with the Unreinforced Masonry Building Ordinance and the Historical Building Code or Uniform Building Code for Building Conservation. Restoration would remove modifications and additions made in the 1950s, revealing the original open front porch and the sheltered rear building recess to restore the original appearance. The building would have a new concealed heating and ventilation system, new electrical and lighting suitable to the period, modern rest room fixtures and a modern kitchen suitable for supporting catered food service. Wood and tile floors will be replaced with materials similar in appearance to the original historic materials. The walls, ceilings, roof and other finishes would be restored to their original appearance. Damaged doors and windows will be replaced with reproductions of the originals. .. .. .. - IWIIJ - ""'" .. - The site work planned for Level "A" will restore historic elements and provide suitable landscaping. On-site parking for 18 vehicles will be provided near Central Expressway, where the water reservoir originally stood from 1930 to 1998. A perimeter wall will be built, similar in appearance to the original adobe wall that was removed for the widening of Central Expressway. The wall provides visual screening and sound attenuation to the site and to the residential neighborhood east of Santa Rosa Avenue while restoring an historic site element. Three existing Heritage trees will be preserved and mcorporated into the landscaping. Walkways, lighting, drainage and utility improvements will also be included. - .... IfI!Ift - - - - Level "A" restoration is estimated to have a project cost of about $1.4 million (see Attachment "D"). - .. ~, - ~ - .. - - - C.. --jj{fi .""...i1 City Council March 18, 1999 Page 5 - 'lIIIIIII Level "B"-Enhanced Project .. - .. - - - - - - .. .. - .. - - - - - - - .. ... - ... .. - .. ... .. .. .. Restoration Level "B" combines the work of Level "A" with additional elements (see Attachments "B" and."B2").. These include a small utility building that replicates the original"Pump House" on the site and the addition of a fountain. The "Pump House" building, built in 1930, housed equipment for the City's water system for many years. This building was originally a wood frame structure with an incomplete foundation system. Adobe brick facing was added to some of the walls when the Adobe Building was constructed in 1934. Later, stucco was added to remain- ing wood walls to blend with and give the appearance of adobe. The building was demolished with the reservoir when it was no longer needed for water distribution purposes and was beyond salvage value having suffered earthquake damage. - Although the "Pump House" was not of significant historic construction, its profile is prominent in historic photographs of the site and provides historic balance to the building elevations. Restoration Level "B" would include a building of similar size and shape to the original "Pump House" to house utility panels and provide storage for the Adobe Building. Providing adequate storage space in the Adobe Building may require additions or modifications that would degrade the historic value of the building. If this site is chosen for a backup water well location, the pump house building could once again house the electrical and mechanical support for the well. Level "B" also includes a fountain to enhance the site. Although a fountain was not part of the historic site, it would add an appropriate and attractive focal point to the outdoor garden area. The fountain was indicated on the last site study done by Gil Sanchez in 1990. Level "B" would require an additional appropriation of $160,000 to cover the increased project cost and design fees (see Attachment "D"). Level "C"-New Building Addition Restoration Level "C" combines the work of Levels "A" and "B" and adds approximately 1,000 square feet of building depicted in the 1990 Adobe Building renovation study. (See Attachments "C" and "C2.") The new building would be designed with a similar appearance to the Adobe Building to provide additional indoor space, reducing the outdoor space. A new building could take several forms that would be further developed if this option is selected. A new building can reduce the historic value of an historic site, but may also accommodate specific uses that might not fit in the historic Adobe Building. If the Council selects Level "C," staff could undertake a specific use study and design the .. '....." City Council March 18,1999 Page 6 - - - building in a later phase. Underground utilities and site work would be designed in the first phase to accommodate future new construction with minimal impact on the rest of the site. - - ...... The architect advises that if the City intends to have events or meetings at the Adobe Building for more than 30-50 people, the existing rest rooms would be inadequate. One consideration for a new building would be a separate rest room building to increase rest room capacity without altering and changing the character of the historic building. - W$ - ,.. Level "C" would require an additional appropriation of $340,000 to cover construction costs and design fees (see Attachment "D"). The relatively high cost of construction hikes into consideration 1997 Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic fOU}lda- tion design for a habitable building on the expansive clay underlying the site. Addi- tional storm drainage improvements are also necessary to accommodate the new building. - - - - - HISTORIC BUILDING DESIGNATION - The Adobe Building is currently listed on the City's Historical Building Resources List, on the Santa Clara County's Historic Property Data File and on the State of California's" Historic Resources Inventory. Staff will confer with the State Office of Historic Preservation (SHiPO) to upgrade the historic designation of the Adobe Building based upon the scope selected by the City Council. Properly restored, the building and site are of particular historic importance under the category of "Patterns of Usage." The sensitivity of the restoration has impact on the potential for higher historic classifica- tion. Restoration Level "A" would not diminish the historic value. Level "B" could enhance the historic value. Level "c" would diminish the historic value. Relocation would make the building ineligible for several classifications. Staff will also pursue having the building considered for the National Register of Historic Places of local significance. - .' - .. - - - - - 'tiiF' POSSIBLE USES - The Adobe Building was used for various social and community functions throughout its history, serving as a hall for meetings, social gatherings and dances. The City has identified several potential community uses such as a general meeting place, space for a local nonprofit organization, or a City historic cultural facility or similar public use. Operation of the Adobe Building could be a function of the City of Mountain View Community Services Department with support from the Facilities Section of the City's Public Works Department. Alternatively, the building could be leased to an anchor tenant, responsible for operations and maintenance costs, obligated to schedule other ""'" - - - - - - - ii11i!!i;i - .. ".. - - .. - .. - .. - .. - - - .. - .. - - .. .. - - - .. - ... .. - - .. - - - .. - .. T' City Council March 18, 1999 Page 7 groups for meetings at the great room. Potential uses that lack revenues to offset operating costs will impact the City's General Fund. Small public meetings, such as service organizations, homeowners associations and other local social groups or clubs and ad-hoc committees could use the Adobe Building for regularly scheduled meetings of up to 30 people. The City could lease the building to an anchor tenant/ user that would be obligated to maintain the building and to permit uses by others on a regular basis as appropriate. The Adobe Building could be used to house cultural resources on a permanent or rotating basis. The ongoing cost of a cultural facility would have to be carefully considered along with possible funding sources and competing priorities. . CONCLUSION Each of the three levels of the restoration scope for the Adobe Building Restoration will provide a historically sensitive, flexible, functional facility for community use. Restoration of the Adobe Building is another significant event in the historic time line of this facility, which began with community involvement in 1934 and continued in its serviCe to the community until 1987. - City Council March 18, 1999 Page 8 - - .. - The base restoration, Level "A," can move forward independently of Levels "B" and "c." Decisions about enhancements can be deferred to the future when there is a need for these elements. - - ~i Prepared by: ~r Senior Civil Engineer Approved by: - ~ - Cathy R. Lazarus Public Works Director - -IL~ Kevin C. Duggan City Manager - .. - - MR/2/PWK/913-03-03-99M-E^ - .. Attachments: A. Restoration Plan-Level "A" A2. Elevation-Level "A" B. Restoration Plan-Level "B" B2. Elevation-Level "B" C. Restoration Plan-Level "C" C2. Elevation-Level "C" D Adobe Building Restoration, Preliminary Cost Estimate E. Adobe Building Use Study - .. - - - - cc: Mountain View Historical Center-Ms. Barbara Kinchen, City Historian - - Mountain View Historical Society-Councilmember Ralph Faravelli, President - Friends of "R" House-Ms. Mary Boudrias, President ~~ - Page & Turnbull, Inc., Architecture, Historic Preservation 724 Pine Street San Francisco, CA 94108 .. CM, PWD, CSD, CDD, LSD, APWD, DE, CE, ZA, EDM, AEDM, RM, SCE-Rogge, File-99-48 . .,., - .., - IliIil "'" ~ ... .................. . .. ~ ~~ E ~ >t.J s~ ~~ i~~~ ii~l~ 51 ~ 21 ,;;3 ~ ~ ~ o .. I I .. - .. - - 00 - - - - .'..,.." - .. i ~ - - A ~ : I .. ... II ~ I, III It, .' - .. - ... i I J ,[C----- Jd'(;'~' t I t~.;"," l.~ ",,\, ./,~ ,~~, /" .' ..,i'- ....... - ~ ~ .. ... ... o :I - - .. ... .. - .. IIll .. .. - o I ~ - .. - .. - .. I ~ --r- . - II I ! J z< ~ I ~W j> < G.::i J I W~ > ~ to lIIl1l ~ . ! i ~I affi ~ I . { . " " , .. (r~'::i ,'l' , III ~ ,,4:~:...'" 1'". ...... I II II, I j ~ J ------~---\- ;. .~. 00 ::s z .. ~ ~~ C :1: ~ 1) c ( III O. III c .. Z C III I II \..._------ ! ----------- ~ I J .' .' \ \".... -----i-?------i---i---?i---~: ,.,1. .:;~,.... I I r (/'\ -,"~' ,.#1 ~.~ ... ( ..,..,.,... . 'VH~NI:l 1;1'-': .... ..--- fr....... .. J II ,. J 0 f I III; ! i q! ~ f II ~ II . . 0' ~ ~ , - ~ ~iS ~ ~ I ~ >c.:I ~~ Z;~ I I I iJ.~8IiJ.~~ ~< t;1 ~ I (, ~ - ~ I ~ ~. H ,&Y ~:i ",' :!~ I~ U U N ... <In Z . wO . ::u= I 5~ Inw - ~ .. *,. - IIIll!' - - - .. - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - .. ... '. I !.. I . \ 1_ ~'::.. -_...-- - .., .. .~ ~ t iO 5 ~.. ig ~i J i~~~ i~~1 I ~ ~I ~ . t; 0 ~ - ~ zm ~ I :SW , ~ 1m lI..::t " I w~ . !::u ~ lI'llll ~ t I ~ I I .. iIIIII ... .. .. ;r ~ ~ii "wf '" II ---- , --t ~ - '......,.... ..... ill-i=1 r:r CI I I --t: - . . c:l III I C I ... .. .s JI ~ II a III a, ....-:;, i I ... ! i .. N .. ... , : D :II " { . .. .. .. .. - .. .. - .... .. ... .. .... ... - ill - -:.: . ..." . ." . Jo \ '.:)/ /i In i \~,..,., V ...~ ,./ i f i 1 \ \ ~;:::. I I, Ii "~'":::;,,,,;: 1 \ t..;.j i ":'~.l_!../"N'~ 1 sf ... ... .. - iIII - iiiI( o I ~ .1VaSSIKdxa 1VlI.LN3:l "K . .~.... ............ .......1.1.... ... . .. -"'~ ,< .. !JIIIII' .. .. .. ~I .,EB ~. III :3 lIE .. l>- e c .. o III e .. lI: .. .. ~-:: --..-- - .......... .'. II ~ - ~ . .s ~ ,;. 31 - ~ >tzJ i~ ~~ I t mll'l 0 Z IN I 1J.~8 i;J.U z ~~ ..... I I ~~ s~ 1m ~~)li ~3 a U..J lI'lw - ~ ~ ~ I I - 5\, 1~ ~~ IS c Dlo I~ lJ~ !i f'!) (II - -.......................................... - -............ - -.. - -.. -- ." - - - _. _......at- - - : . -.--.... ' T - r T - I } 1 ... - J1 J - .. Zu ~ l 5w e 0 0.;2 I w~ .' ~ cu S III III - .. .. M Po. Po. o :ll ~ I~ ~ . - ~ J 0 I ~~ ~ l;i d I il~h I .t <0 ~~ E! ~ ( ~ ~ ~ii I I ~ ~d I ~I ... .. .. .. .. .. I ! I I I r t I ~ : I It I I I II i I l;- I .-.-I~-~: 111 I !JI =... ~i "EB \ .. !II' I'l lie ~ > '" ..I :3 C III i..........i IlIII IiIII - IlIII !II' .. I I .. :3 ~ II ;0- ~ I c 111 C lie C .. ~ C II - . . .. IlIII - ........... ...... IlIII . - - "{ " . ~ ., ... .. , /' I .. . '..:" , ...t "ql" / j J ! i, \ \ , '-....1" "\.( /' i : ~ \ 1 ;.r. ~"''-:J...,i.1...I';),.;_# IlIII - .. - .. - III !!Ill o D, ~~ II ~ ...~ ~. .1 .. - AYJlSBlIUd:XZ 'lYllJ.Nll:J III ... llII ....,. L __..... -. .:.....- '. ~ .- p I N - i S I 0 - ~ ~ ""'" - - ~ . - ... ~ ~cS ~ ' - ;I li S;tsl!2~ 2i~ I I Olll 0 2 i J wO i~~8 i~~~~ ::;;:; I I ~~ ~< I !3 0..... lIlL.! ~ o ~ ~ I ~ ~ u .. lIII1 .. lIII1 - .. - - .. lIIlIl .. lIIlIl """ .. .. ... .... ... ,- ... h ", n ~. ~{ !~ I- n !~ <" N t:~ 1l~ . . .,~ ii III - ... .. .M I ,. I i- f .. ~.._..~..;: .. - ... ... ... ~)l III CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Attachment "D" 3/1/99 Adobe Building Restoration, Project 99-48 lJIIII Preliminary Cost Estimate - lJIIII II fill III .. .. .. III III!I III ... III ... ill-. ..... ... - .. .... - - ... - .. ... ill 11IIIII - .. .. Level "A" BASIC Level "B" ENHANCED Level e" NEW BLDG. Construction Estimate Construction Contingency Construction Subtotal $ 985,000 $ 147,750 $ 1,132,750 $ 1,085,000 $ 162,750 $ 1,247,750 $ 1,290,000 $ 193,500 $ 1,483,500 15% Design & Inspection, Other Project Contingency Subtotal $ 68,000 $ 113,275 $ 1,314,025 $ 93,000 $ 124,775 $ 1 ,465,525 $ 151,000 $ 148,350 $ 1,782,850 10% City Admin. 6.5% $ 85,412 $ 95,259 $ 115,885 Project Subtotal PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,399,437 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,560,784 $ 1,560,000 $ 1,898,735 $ 1,900,000 Incremental Difference $ 160,000 $ 340,000 Level "A" Restore the Adobe Building to a fully functioning meeting hall, flexible enough to accommodate many other uses. Site work includes parking for approximately 18 vehicles, landscaping, lighting, utilities, and perimeter wall. Level "B" Includes all Level "A" work plus enhanced site work, including replication of the pump station building, approximately 500 square feet, built with modem construction methods, similar in form and appearance to the historic building. Enhanced site work includes a fountain. Level "c" Includes all work described in Level "A" and Level "B" plus addition of a new building. The new building would be approximately 1 000 square feet, built with modem construction methods with similar style to the existing historic structures. - Attachment "E" ~) - - ~;J6 -MiIifi CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - - ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION PROJECT 99-48 - - - - USE STUDY !fIlI!lI! IjwAi~ - Public Works Department Community Services Department - - '~ - March 1999 .. - .. INTRODUCTION The City of Mountain View is considering restoration of the "Adobe Building" located at 157 Moffett Boulevard. The Adobe Building served the community from 1934 until 1987 as a meeting space for a host of social activities. The building was closed in 1987 to comply with the Unreinforced Masonry Building Ordinance. Thispaper explores several possible uses for the building once it has been restored and is ready for occupancy. The community has shown interest in the restoration of the Adobe Building since its closure. The building could continue in its role as a community meeting hall, similar to past uses, or adopt a new role, to respond to changing needs of the City. The restora- tion-design process has been initiated with a keen eye toward keeping the facility flexible enough to not preclude any reasonable use, while not favoring any particular function. w 11III'\; - .. """ ... - - ~ - .. .. - ~ ~ .. .. .. .. . ~ ill .. .. ... .. ... .. .. till <JiIa .. - .. .. .. ... .. ""'" .. .. .. .. - ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 This study examines uses and their potential impacts to help guide the design and review process. As desired uses are identified, the design and construction can focus on supporting the most probable range of uses. Ongoing operational costs and liabilities must be considered along with potential benefits of particular uses so as not to create an additional ongoing commitment of General Fund revenues. BACKGROUND The site contains the Adobe Building (originally referred to as the Community Center), built in 1934 during the Great Depression as a Civil Works Association (CWA) public assistance program project. The building is made of concrete slab, columns and perimeter lintel beams with adobe infill walls; and a clay tile roof over an open wood truss and paneled ceiling. The City Council approved a budget for design to restore the building in 1998 and indicated its intent to review documents and cost estimates leading to approval of funding for the construction of City Council-approved plans, specifications and cost estimates for the Adobe Building. Adobe Building The Adobe Building was built in 1934 by local laborers. The building is approximately 53' x 53' or 2,500 square feet, containing a great room with a fireplace, kitchen, rest rooms and recent additions and modifications. The building is in the Spanish Colonial Revival style, characterized by rough plastered walls, plank doors, dark wood exposed beams supporting stained wood ceiling and clay tile roof; clay tile vent details; and a covered porch or portal supported by large adobe columns. The building has several unique, handcrafted features, including sculpted detailing on the fireplace and chimney, decorative column capitals, wood carvings and remaining evidence of local craftsmanship. The walls generally consist of 18" thick adobe, plastered with approximately I" of Portland cement concrete plaster on the exterior. Reinforced concrete columns con- nected at the top of the walls with a bond beam and to the concrete subfloor slab help support the structure. The interior has hardwood floors in the great ~oom, with tile at entries, and concrete or tile in the kitchen and rest rooms. Originally in 1934, a temporary composition roof was employed until local money was later raised for a proper clay tile roof, which was installed in 1935. The existing tile roof Page 2 ~JM CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 .. HIli appears to be the original tile, with supporting documentation indicating that the tiles were removed and replaced during one of the previous renovations. The richness of color and texture of the roof tiles contribute a significant design feature that may not be easily reproduced. ... - - .. Pump House Building - The original pump house was approximately 21' x 21' or 371 square feet, consisting of an adobe wall mixed with wood frame and stucco walls and a tile roof. The Pump House, built in 1930, along with a concrete water storage tank, served as a principal municipal water system facility. The pump house and concrete water tank were demolished and removed from the site in 1997. The City water pump works are no longer in service on the site. However, the site has been identified as a possible lo<:ation for a new water well, which may need to be incorporated into the site design. Replace- ment of the pump house with a code-compliant masonry building finished to resemble adobe could house facilities for a future water well and storage for portable chairs, tables or equipment. '~ - - .. .. ... .. - Site .. ... The site, approximately 23,660 square feet or 0.54 acre, fronting on Moffett Boulevard, has been owned by the City of Mountain View since 1929. The site is in a commercial business district, north of the downtown business district and beside historic neighbor- hoods (See Exhibit "A"). The Adobe site is bounded by Moffett Boulevard on the west, Central Expressway and the CalTrain and new light rail lines to the south, Santa Rosa Avenue to the east and commercial enterprises to the north. Current access to the site is from a driveway on Santa Rosa Avenue. .. .. .. ... - Part of the historic significance of the site lies with the changes that relate to the patterns of usage that occurred with the development of the surrounding community. Originally, there was no connection between Moffett Boulevard and Castro Street (Castro Street connected to Stierlin Road to the northeast), and Central Expressway lies over what was once Main Street (east of Moffett Boulevard) and Railroad Avenue (west of Moffett Boulevard). The construction of the Adobe Building was part of the evolution that linked Moffett Boulevard, along with Moffett Field (Moffett Naval Air Station) to the City of Mountain View's downtown. -- .. .. loll --. - .. - - - Jf!I'I!!IJf - Page 3 -- - .. - .. .. .- .. .. .. .. -- .. - - - ~ .. .. .. ~ .. .. .. - .. .. .. .. - ,. - .. .. .. ... 11II 11II - .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 RESTORED BUILDING AND SITE FEATURES AdDbe Building (See Exhibit "B") The restDratiDn gDal fDr the AdDbe Building is to, bring the building back to, its Driginal cDnditiDn as clDsely as pDssible while upgrading the structural integrity and strength Df the building to, cDmply with applicable cDdes. MDdern methDds may be used in the restDratiDn prDvided that the IDDk and feel Df the finished wDrk resemble the Driginal periDd cDnditiDn. The AdDbe Building has a central"great rDDm" apprDximately 50' x 29' Dr 1,450 square feet. The great rDDm has a large fireplace Dn the sDuthern wall, centered Dn the majDr axis Df the rDDm. The Dpen truss rDDf structure and decDrative WDDd cathedral ceiling lend spaciDusness to, the great rDDm and allDw DppDrtunity fDr dramatic lighting. - The great rDDm has generDus exteriDr access from dDDrs Dn the west, east and nDrth walls. Main frDnt access is frDm a small plaza and cDvered pDrtal Dn MDffett BDulevard through a pair Df dDuble dDDrs. A secDnd pair Df dDuble dDDrs leads frDm the east wall Df the great rDDm thrDugh a building recess to, a large Dpen area between the AdDbe Building and Santa RDsa Avenue. A single set Df dDuble dDDrs prDvides access Dn the nDrth wall Df the great roDm to, a small DutdoDr area between the AdDbe Building and an adjacent CDncrete building. The nDrthern dDDrs can be Dpened to, provide sunlight and natural ventilatiDn, to, facilitate a special VIP entrance at an event Dr merely to, prDvide an intimate DutdDDr deck. The kitchen, apprDximately 10' x IS' Dr 150 square feet, is directly cDnnected to, the great rDDm thrDugh a single dDDr. An appropriate vanity panel may be included in the restDratiDn to, screen direct line Df sight into, the kitchen. The kitchen has a secDnd dDDr leading Dutside to, the east. The kitchen is suitable fDr keeping and serving catered fDad that has been prepared Dff-site. The kitchen suppDrts fDad heating, cDDling and serving functians but nat cDDking, baking ar majDr faad preparatian. The kitchen has two, windDWS. . Rest raam daDrs lead directly fram the great raam. ApprDpriate vanity panels may be included in the restDratian plans to, screen direct line Df sight into, the rest raams frDm the great rDDm. The rest rDDms can accDmmDdate two, stalls each fDr men and WDmen. The: men's rest rDDm has two, small windDWS. The wDmen's rest roDm has Dne large windDW. An anterDDm Dr frDnt Dffice rDDm lies adjacent to, the cDvered frDnt pDrtal with direct exteriDr access to, the pDrtal and a cDmmunicating dDDr leading to, the great raDm. The Page 4 ~ CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 .... .~ office space is approximately 10' x IS' or 150 square feet. The office has three windows, each with decorative tile "screens." ""'" - The covered front portal is open on the west and south elevations of the building, with three columns and a pilaster supporting the roof. The covered area is approximately 10' x 30' or 300 square feet. The restoration plan calls for a plaza surrounding the east and south sides of the covered front portal, extending from the building to the sidewalk on Moffett Boulevard. - -- ..... ~ The building will be served with a concealed heating and ventilation system, housed in a new cabinet attached to the north elevation of the building, with subfloor ducts feeding floor registers. Air conditioning could be added or retrofitted to the heating and ventilation system but is not included in the restoration. Due to the insulating properties of the adobe walls and insulated tile roof, natural ventilation and cooling should be sufficient for most uses. - - .. ~lIiI' .. Lighting will be adjustable in the front portal and the great room from mood lighting settings to illumination suitable for reading or maintenance. Two cast iron chandeliers will be recreated for the Great Room. Kitchens, bathrooms and the office will have standard lighting suitable for the period. - """ ~ ... Site Improvements (See Exhibit "C") - The site amenities include perimeter walls and gates, parking, walkways, seating, light- ing, plaza and lawn areas, gardens and other landscaping. The landscaping palette is selected to be compatible for use near adobe construction and to blend appropriately with established landscape hardscape and plantings in the adjacent residential neighborhood. .. .. ... ..... - A perimeter wall designed to replicate the historic perimeter adobe wall could be provided to generally surround the site. The wall restores one of the original site features, provides a sound barrier, visual screening and on-site privacy. Major sound generators include Central Expressway, two rail lines and Moffett Boulevard. The walls will reduce ambient sound currently impacting the residential neighborhood to the east. The walls will also minimize the potential noise impacts on the residential neighborhood from on-site uses. - .... - .. - Pergolas planted with vines and other plantings along walls will provide an attractive screening of roadways to the site and to the residential neighBorhood. These sound- absorbing and sound attenuating materials will also help reduce potential noise impacts. Three existing Heritage trees will be retained and augmented with additional tree and shrub planting. - .. .. .. 111I .. Page 5 .. . - .. 11II .. .... .. - .. - - - .. ... ... .... .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. ... - ~ .. .. - - . ... .. .. .. ... .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW . ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 On-site parking can accommodate 18 spaces, including 2 handicap-accessible spaces. A drop-off zone along Moffett Boulevard connected to a plaza leading to the front portal and entrance of the Adobe Building can accommodate larger events. Valet parking or a shuttle could be established to prevent traffic and parking impacts on the local resi- dential neighborhoods and commercial districts. A refuse enclosure will screen refuse and recycling bins. Wooden gates will provide access control to the site. Site improvements will include upgrades to the public area between the "adobe walls" and the curb line. Improved sidewalks, landscaping and lighting will enhance the area. A potential location for public art, visible from many vantages, will be established at the comer of Central Expressway and Moffett Boulevard. POTENTIAL USES General Operations The City has identified several potential community uses such as a general meeting place, space for a local nonprofit organization, or a City historic cultural facility or similar public use. The flexibility of the restoration plan to adapt to several optional uses will be a key to the success of the project. The Adobe Building was used for various social and community functions throughout its history, serving as a hall for meetings, social gatherings and dances. The Adobe Building was associated with several names through its history relating to the wide variety of functions held at the site. These included the Junior Chamber of Commerce (1934); the American Legion Post No. 248 (1943-1986); Soldiers Lounge, USO and Peninsula Hospitality House (1941-1944); Eagles Shack for High School dances (1944); Chamber of Commerce and Youth Meetings sponsored by the Chamber (1946); the Dana Street PTA (1946); Fleet Reserve Association (1950); Native Sons (1950); Mountain View Pioneer and Historic Association (1960) and others. Later uses included the City's recreation center and senior nutritional programs. Operation of the Adobe Building could be a function of the City of Mountain View Community Services Department with support from the Facilities Section of the City's Public Works Department. Alternatively, the building could be leased to an anchor tenant, responsible for operations and maintenance costs, obligated to schedule other groups for meetings at the great room. Potential uses that lack revenues to offset operating costs will impact the City's General Fund. Page 6 /IIII!IIl CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 ~. - ~ 1. General Meeting Place - Small public meetings, such as service organizations, homeowners associations and other local social groups or clubs and ad-hoc committees could use the Adobe Building for regularly scheduled meetings of up to 30 people. - ~, ~ Large public meetings, groups of 30 people or more, could generate traffic circula- tion and parking impacts and would, therefore, need to have valet parking, shuttles or other specific programs that restrict vehicular traffic and parking to prevent impacts on local residential neighborhoods and commercial districts. The building occupancy would allow up to 100 people for a sit-down dinner or as many as 200 people for a dance or assembly. 81ft - .. .tOlf - Scheduling meetings could be handled as part of the Community Services Department reservation and permit process. General building maintenance would be similar to other City buildings, with support from the Facilities Section of the Public Works Department and the Parks Section of the Community Services Department. ~ '. - ..... 2. Nonprofit Organization Space ~ The City could lease the building to an anchor tenant/user that would be obligated to maintain the building and to permit uses by others on a regular basis as appro- priate. A nonexclusive, public organization or nonprofit organization serving the community would be an ideal lessee for such a prograIfl. .. .. .. .. Office space would need to respect the historic character of the building while providing desired functional aspects to the user. The degree of public access and opportunity for historic programs would depend upon the particular tenant's operation and interest in community service. - - .. 3. City Historic Cultural Facility ~. .... The Adobe Building could be used to house cultural resources on a permanent or rotating basis. A cultural center could take the form of an historic center, museum or educational facility. The ongoing cost of a cultural facility would have to be carefully considered along with possible funding sources and competing priorities. - .. - POTENTIAL IMPACTS ,.,.. ... Impacts to the community will vary depending upon the frequency and attendance of permitted uses at the Adobe Building. Smaller gatherings, up to 30 people, would not - - lii/ii Page 7 .. .. !III - ". .. .,.. .. ,.. .. !III - !III - .. ... - .. . III .. ... ... .. - .. .. - \11II - !III .. ... .. - .. - .. - .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 be expected to have a significant impact upon the nearby residents or local community. Larger events, from 30 to 200 people, although allowable under general occupancy conditions, could have a significant impact on local residential neighborhoods and commercial districts. The potential impacts coul~ be sufficiently reduced through mitigation measures, which may depend upon the particular type of use and number of attendees. Parking and traffic impacts are directly related to the number of people that an event would attract. Through permit requirements for valet parking, shuttles or other pro- grams, which limit the number of vehicles entering the area, this impact can be reduced to an acceptable level. The nearest public parking (46 spaces) is available north of the Police/Fire Administration Building on Evelyn Avenue. Other parking spaces within the Downtown Parking District (Exhibit "0") should not be considered without pur- chasing the rights to use those spaces. Cooperative agreements with the County for use of the Social Services Agency parking, directly across Moffett Boulevard, could provide 45 to 70 spaces during nonbusiness hours. During noncommute hours, the transit park- ing near the train station could also provide shared-use parking. Parking District occu- pancy data from 1996' (Exhibit "E") indicates that during the peak lunch hour time, there is no available parking capacity in the downtown area. At other times studied, parking space usage runs from 54 percent to 77 percent full. Noise impacts would not be expected to be noticeable for small groups or events that are contained within the Adobe Building. Events with outdoor activities or predomi- nant outdoor use, including congregating prior to or after a meeting, would be most likely to impact neighbors. Restrictions or prohibitions on amplified music or public address systems would be appropriate outside of the building. The frequency range and noise patterns of people talking and laughing could be effectively controlled with walls, pergolas and landscaping to reduce the potential impacts on the neighborhood. Long-term financial and budgetary impacts would depend upon the use and offsetting revenues. Benefits such as service to the community and historic preservation need to be weighed with associated costs. The restoration project will have beneficial impacts on the community. Restoring an historic community landmark will promote the area and provide an attractive "gateway" to the City as well as an identifiable milestone along the railway and expressway. The Adobe Building represents a particularly significant building style that incorporated ancient adobe methods with contemporaneous concrete design during an era where material and capital resources were scarce but innovative spirit was high. Improvements to the site will block or reduce noise from the rail lines, expressways and commercial streets to the residential neighborhood northeast of Santa Page 8 . CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ADOBE BUILDING RESTORATION, PROJECT 99-48 USE STUDY MARCH 1999 ~ Rosa Avenue. Visual screening of the roadways along with attractive landscaping will provide a green relief in contrast to the concrete thoroughfares. The community will be served with a public meeting place, originally built by the community, of the community and for the community. - ~, ~ ~r Senior Civil Engineer ~ ~ .. MR/2/PWK 913-03-08-99R-E^ - .. Attachments: ... "A" Adobe Building Location Map "B" Adobe Building Plan "C" Adobe Building Site Plan "D" Downtown Mountain View Parking Lot Map "E" Parking District Occupancy Data, 1996 - f'I~~~ ~ ... - . . .. - .... - - - - 'i.M - ."" .. - - .. Page 9 - - '" .. EXHIBIT "A" 1M _. .. ~ .. / - - .. ~ ... LOCATION MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY .J 4IIIl ... - - ~ .... I' - ":_"M'" "... ... I. '\ ~. .:". ""'. i ~ ~ ~ ....;. H ~ P CQ (/) ~ 0:: W ~ .CQ a.. w -1 0 I- ~ -< -1 -1 ~ Wo ~o <:>0 :J 01- Otf} Oz ~- '-"-'- '--- ..I z o ~ 0:: o l- (/) W 0:: w' W -1 0... ::E o () (/) 0:: W ~ a.. w -1 i= ~ :.; ~ -1 ~ EXHIBIT liE."" I: L:" ',. IIiIiIIi .. ,. - - ... - .. - .... - ... ,... - ... - .. .. - '.wi ... .. ~... - - .f .. .. .. """ .. .. .. - .. [1~ ~ .. .. .fIIII .. .... .. ",. - - - !!!III ~ .... Cl: /. ~ I r.l M U ~ Ii o h ltl 1:3 ~~ r.l roc roc o - ,. .. oM .. .. .. ,.. .. - "" - .. - ... ... - ... .. ",. .. ,. .. ... ... L - .. .. .. I ....,. ~ ' EXHIBIT "C" ~ / .'} ~ .--. . ( ... I i ~ ~ i oS ~ _ ';":::.' ; , ~ ~ '-- ./ 1 r \. r;; f - -"':':. I ~ I---t~-- .. kAt (fl:'~ ~.)' l'-..-.. ./~ 5\... . 'lID-' " ~ i ;~u ... r "-+-" l to' t '~f" i)) .- ... ! ~ T to' ~ ... ll""'" I .I g:~ . ~ ~ - ~ -I' ~ - - ~ -u~ e + I,' ll~~ Ip I ~ i I; .~~ h .: Ii : r:.. ... A ~ ll" Q\~------i -i-+-~~i-+!- . ,{-- :; ji : Xi i ltl r ~~ I i ~ '" \ !~f. + ~i I · ~ ---H -- r-tEl r I',li!'i!! I - ~::r',,,: ~ ~"I ul y" ~ ~ : I~+ .~i. . ~ I' I . ~ - Li~J-- - - - L ~ - - \\'J'I',~ -...:.. :1- iAi~ I I IS . ~:{~ . : --- ----------r---l BI.I ~ ~ I >\ {1 [/11 . 'i~ . ~. ,e gj I . u u to' , .; 7 I} . ~.. I: .~~~ I; i; ll" '..\. i l . .' Y E ~ elt. I. e ~" ~ p. . I"e ~. -" .... ~ _~oI . : ~~. i i I ~. ~ [f-:r--'i~ --. i;t 1----1rl---I~~f1i--f.{iif ri'~f'::~" .~.. : \ 81 ~, ~ '-! I ~~ II i ~~ ,! ~I! 8~ II i! ~~ 8~ ~ II 8.'= / 'f:~ . ,"ji t '1 ElJ i \ ..,:. -....... ~.. t~.....ia .---.f; . w~ .. i.:!-...-.... tt! i~ i= ... i~~ \(1 . + . :.!) \. r . \ ~ _..,\~. ,'... .-......,' I ,'''''1 ~,\~:-.I K\("YNJ-': . ..,:: \ I. .. '. ..I ( '. '. .' 1 . 'h'] ~.' , , \. -1/ { ~\, ! " .~ >-(f"";'> J' .!....~ ;:<;SiP"" .+....---~.I'.... ~.... T -'. ....+. .. -'j ~;::.. 1"-... : , 11.= I' ~ ' .~~ -'I \. ), f" '\.. (\. . "( .r ~ f : ' . --....j. ~<-'_. >>'/K':' """ . ...~- - -- __~,i ")J ';\'- !fn! 'y y'. l( I . \ \ ......-. .... .'. "'~ 0_ _ 1'..' 1"-: \ · \ !.J' I ~ -, ,- ~ N "\ ~. !..--- ~' \ ~.. ~j.i ID/ U'l .. ,.., ) n N - ' "-- .., <:::: c ,.+- '. .:P :.:..-' ~~" A~' . ~IN t "::: . '--.7k i.---~ 1 ire .~~ .ot.ll .O-.OL i(V)L' [IDJ)V ~ .~ I~ i 0 I~i I" ii ~( ,~ ii Ii 1 ~ ill $' J !: Ii ~ 1 ;;y:b..~--"'\-... .// ,o-'sf~" .'~t.~~~,,". · I (I/J~~:.)\ ./ (- r--+'-'" \ \\ (i~ r) irz\~ __ ~~: r "'+~' I,{ ( .~ { \ i!! H-11 r'~1 . " to J U') ..,. r') N Ii j - 0 ..I -i . ). ,I ..., ~ "7'/ - - _ _ ,~ _ I~ Ol COlI.. ; .-,.1 I) J ~"', ,< '.>00, I !q~ ~ "" ~-'N. (fUST 1.1... "'''\"!:. I . ":\1>' ../.:, I'~:::-\.::., / . r.. '.";:0.. 'f ._' 1.-::-,'.;: . '-_~ .. ..... ... \\ .' .. ....\ ,:~ \ ~ \ "',". / .... 00 \' .. .. -l'~'" "j,l~ .0 're'" '.' "'1):'1, t..-- + -\~rk__ '01- Je ~:":""~I J :li)',' ,.' ~"..Jd:\'ifj-.:' --.~.- d! ~:M . .,! . ~.j . .....;.,.. :.=:f ~~.. '.1_ :~r ~ ~~l~. ~:.=_ ~l;W ~ AYJ.\.SS:iI~cIX:iI ill tll~g ---jlt - '~ ,..,... ..,...~.. --\f 'IY~.LN:iI:> ----------- EXHIBIT "D" DOWNTOWN MOUNTAIN VIEW PARKING LOT MAP CUSTOMER-ONLY LOrS: Free 2-hour parking for customers only (lots, 2, 4, & 5). PERMIT LOTS AND STRUClURE: Free 2-hour customer parking and permit parking (lots 1,3, 6, 7, 8, & 9). TEMPORARY LOrS: Lot 10: free all-day parking in the gravel area, 2-hour customer-only parking in the asphalt/ concrete area. Lot 11: 3-hour customer parking and permit parking. TIME LIMITS: There are no time limits in the parking lots after 5:00 p.m. weekdays or on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. On Sundays,'Lot 4 is dosed from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. for the Farmers' Market. No parking is ,available in the structure between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. every day. For more information, please call 415- 903-6306. Thankyou. WEST EVELYN AVENUE illfllllll". LOT 10 CUSTOMER ONLY 11 :n > z ^ r Z LOT 11 PARKING STRUCTURE 1 VILLA Cij ~ LOT 2 ~ CU~.?J" DANA Published December 1995 CALTRAIN PARKING ~ WEST EVELYN AVENUE LOT A CllSTOMER ONLY STREET () :D en -4 :0 o LOT 9 < m ~ CD c en :r: :r: o v m STREET CIl CIl en lOT 6 (f) en en -{ -{ -1 -{ -l -l :n :0 LOT 3 :0 :n :0 :n m m m m m m m m m m m m -I -{ -l -{ -l -I CALIFORNIA MERCY STREET LOT 7 STREET I I ~ - - "lI!\ - - .. - . 'Mt - ... - ,# - .. - - &, - - .. - .... . - ..... - ~ ;J,~ - .. .. .. - - - ..... ... EXHIBIT "E" ... ",. III :If!" Parking District Occupancy Data Source: 1992 Wilbur Smith Study and 1996 staff/volunteer update All numbers are percentages - !fila - 10:30 A.M. - 1992 1996 Permanent Facilities 36 54 Temporary Facilities 38 55 TOTAL 37% 54% .. .. .. - 12:30 P.M. - ... 1992 1996 Permanent Facilities 86 . 96 Temporary Facilities 80 99 TOTAL 85% 97% - .. .. ... 2:30 P.M. - .. 1992 1996 Permanent Facilities 44 59 Temporary Facilities 55 59 TOTAL 46% 59% .. - .. ... 7:00 P.M. - 1992 1996 Permanent Facilities 75 -- Temporary Facilities 91 -- TOTAL 77% No Data Collected .. .. - ... JII" At the time ofthe above parking counts, there were 1,082 permanent and 215 temporary spaces for a total of 1,297 spaces. At the conclusion ofthe parking lot renovation project, there will be about 100 more spaces downtown, some of which are on-street and some in the surface lots. .. - - bb 1/99 - - .. a. ~ - 0i@14 ~~.'-\ CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ M" - - 'IIifIi; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - - THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK .. .. """" - - - - iIiiIi - - ... - .. - - - .. .. .. ,.. - - .. .. c c ~ ~ c c r. c c c c c c c c ~ c c ~ tn . Q z. ~ . ,.... ~ = (JJ ~ ~ -< --- -. - - - - - - --- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW J J J J J J J J J J :J ~ 3 :J ~ 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK '1 u J J .. - ". .. .... .. .. .. ... - .. .. ,. - .. .. .. .. .. .. ". ... "". .. ,... .. ..... .. .. - ,.. - ... .. ... ... ... .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: April 28, 1999 TO: City Council FROM: J. Michael Sartor, Capital Program Manager SUBJECT: "CUBE" SITE PROJECT UPDATE This memorandum is an update of the "Cube" Site Design and Construction Project. Following is the report presented to the City Council at a study session on March 23, 1999. The "Cube" Site is located at the corner of Evelyn Avenue and Castro Street and is a gateway to the downtown. The City-owned parcel of about 9,800 square feet is adjacent to a remnant parcel owned by the Joint Powers Board aPB) of about 9,600 square feet. Three options for development of the "Cube" Site were presented at the March 23 study session. The Council indicated a preference for the option that provided space for a covered public waiting area, public rest rooms, space for transit-related concessions such as beverages, newspapers and magazines, an LRV operator facility and a landscaped open space area. The Council also expressed an interest in including space in the project for a tenant such as the Mountain View Chamber of Commerce. Since the study session, the City has been informed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission that the project was not included in the first year of the Federal TEA-21 "Transportation for Livable Communities" (TLC) grant program. On April 6, the project was presented to the Downtown Committee. The Committee concurred with Council's preference as described above but had varied opinions on the architectural style. Staff will continue looking at other grant sources for the project such as locally administered TEA-21 funds or next year's TLC grant program. In the meantime, staff has begun negotiations with the JPB for purchase of their 9,600 square foot parcel. Place holder funding of $650,000 for the design and construction of the "Cube" Site is proposed in the 1999-2000 CIP. J. !~;!: Capital Program Manager JMS/7/PWK/936-04-26-99M-2 - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM ...., DATE: March 19,1999 ... ~-~ TO: City Council - FROM: Gail S. Seeds, Senior Project Manager - - SUBJECT: STIJDY SESSION, MARCH 23, 1999-"CUBE SITE" DESIGN - - PURPOSE ... Review and comment on the conceptual designs for the "Cube Site" prQperty at the northeast comer of Castro Street and Evelyn Avenue before they are brought to the Downtown Committee for further development. The recommendations of the - Downtown Committee regarding site design will then be forwarded to the City Council for formal action. .... .. ,. -- .. BACKGROUND .... The "Cube Site" property located on the north side of Evelyn Avenue at Castro Street is composed of two parcels. The City owns approximately 9,800 square feet of land on the corner facing both streets, which contains a turf area, retaining wall and a large concrete tube. The adjacent parcel on Evelyn Avenue is owned by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board OPB). After the new Downtown Transit Center is completed, a remnant parcel of approximately 9,600 square feet owned by the JPB will remain. If the two parcels are merged, about 19,500 square feet would be available (see Exhibit A). - .. .. - - .. At the October 6, 1998 stu9.y session meeting, the City Council considered a conceptual proposal to develop the Cube Site. The staff proposal included a 28,000 square foot, two-story commercial building with approximately 40 parking spaces. .. - - At that meeting, the City Council expressed concerns that the level of development allowed in the Precise Plan is not consistent with the Council's current views regarding the best use of the site (see Exhibit B, City Council Meeting Minutes). There was consensus that the proposed 28,000 square foot commercial building was not desired at that location. Councilmembers suggested that the Cube Site should be used instead to provide: ... - - .. .. . Amenities for transit passengers using the adjacent CalTrain and Light Rail stations and Transit Center bus crescent. - - .. - ~ ... - .. III ,.. .. .. - .... ... - .. - - - .... - - .- ... ".. - - ... ... - - ... - - - - ... ... .. ... - -- City Council March 19,1999 Page 2 . Public rest rooms. . Covered shelter for transit users. . Sales of coffee, beverages and other items of convenience to transit users. . Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) operator break room. . A small building to house the above functions. . A plaza area plus open green space and park-type setting. The Precise Plan contains additional specific elements recommended for the Cube Site: . Walkways connecting downtown to the transit stations. . An attractive, station-related building. . Landmark feature(s) or special architectural treatment tolink the station area to downtown. . Pedestrian open space adjacent to the corner of Castro Street and Evelyn Avenue. . Treatment of the site as a gateway to welcome visitors to the City. In response to the City Council's direction in October, staff retained SBA Architects of Santa Clara to develop conceptual alternatives for the Cube Site. A placeholder of $650,000 is in the first year of the proposed 1999-2004 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for project design and construction. Recently, staff identified a promising grant opportunity-the newly reauthorized Federal "Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act" (ISTEA), locally administered as "Transportation for Livable Communities" (TLC) grants. Staff prepared a grant application requesting $465,000 for construction of improvements on the Cube Site. A "placeholder" conceptual design was submitted with the application, but the application noted that no specific design for the site has been approved. The application was submitted on the February 23,1999 due date. .P~ City Council March 19,1999 Page 3 "'~'l:t .... - DESIGN ALTERNATIVES -, Staff and the design consultant have begun preparing conceptual designs for the Cube Site. The consultant prepared three preliminary concepts that show a minimal approach, a midrange level of improvements and a plan with a larger structure which could accommodate additional uses (see Exhibits C, D and E). The improvements for the site will be designed for a useful life of 50 years. Staff will present these preliminary concepts for review at the City .council study session meeting on March 23, 1999. _. - - - - After receiving comments from the Council, concepts will be defined ,and then presented to various stakeholders. The Downtown Committee will participate in refining concepts for the site in accordance with the Downtown Committee work plan approved by the Council on March 17. Groups such as the Chamber of Commerce, the Central Business Association, the Old Mountain View Neighborhood residents, the JPB and the VTA may have opportunities to review the alternatives as well. After input is received from interested groups, the concepts will be refined further and returned to the City Council for final review and selection of a design concept. - - liifW - "IIIilI' .' - SUMMARY - The Cube Site can be developed in a range of ways to meet the City's objectives. The City Council's direction regarding the desired scope of improvements, as well as particular considerations which might affect conceptual design solutions, will be used to guide the development of design alternatives. - ... .. -, Prepared by: - /) .J{ f-- ~.Seeas Senior Project Manager ~: Cathy R. Laz~ PUb~i Works Dir, ector ~"".~ ~~ Kevin C. Duggan City Manager '~ ,~I<t, '~ ~ *"- - JiI,liliii, GSS /2/PWK/917 -03-23-99M-E^ .... Attachments - cc: Mr. Gregory Montgomery-SBA Architects - - CM, CC, APWD, DE/SCE, CPM, SPM-Seeds, TP, CDD, ED~, P;P /SP-Melena, ZA/DZA-McNair, CSD, FRLM, File' . ... - - ~ .. Oi. Irl' "'"1:1 c IJI~ 8lUJoJII8J '''~l^ U!81uno)'l :l~ol .: 15 OJ1S8J 71 ,ay U.cI~A3 :l3S ~ :;0 Ci: ~l,: Jcq uaJ l!SU'BJ.L }'l.a!A 'UWl ~ol ill: ~i I: ._ _ fJ .cC~ . ~~CI) i < 'm: ~~::.; U )<:::0 -' -'U::;: J.!..!. -,^Ia:: ~~n ~lll~ ~...t.-- .. '1 II'" , ,I If . . - ..,:; tI S g -5 ... ~1:'" ~ -I; ~ ~ l g .. vi ~ '1 I. ~ g 0'" !~ 0" ~~ .. .. II. ".=.,,~ . ~y ~..... ! . -\ I I :\i.. ~ J .,~ .....,.-~. .. X B .. .. ...i I ! !! ~ . t: r I . ~- :I . I! a ~ ?i .=: ~.. ~ .. ' x .. s ~i i i . ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~3 e ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ x w ~.~IO~G"OI r."lr."l ~H u~ '. < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " ftII!! .. ~ .. EXHmIT B .. ,.~, - -'iNfi.' -" 3.3 DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR CITY /TOINT POWERS BOARD PROPERTY-CASTRO STREET AND EVELYN A VENUE-"CUBE SITE" - - The Economic Development Manager stated that the purpose of this meet- ing is to review the findings of the feasibility study, identify the issues associated with the development of the site, provide an update on the status of the Memorandum of Understanding, outline what the next steps arein terms of deyelopment alternatives and to get direction from Council on how to proceed. - - - .. .. The Economic Development Manager outlined the findings of the feasibility study that included a conceptual site plan and parking alternatives for development on the Cube Site. - .. - A Councilmember asked if the 20 parking spaces in the JPB parking lot are for the people working in the building or for visitors. .The Economic Development Manager responded that they would primarily be for visitors. .. .. III . A Councilmember asked if there was any consideration for adding a lane for the additional traffic on Evelyn Avenue. The Assistant Public Works Director responded that there is potential for adding a lane for a double right-turn lane. - .. .. The Economic Development Manager noted that the following actions would be scheduled for a future City Council meeting: (1) authorize the City Manager to initiate negotiations with the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board OPB) to acquire the ]pB-owned land; (2) authorize staff to proceed with Alternative 1 to.issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) to long- term ground lease the Cube Site to a private developer; (3) appropriate $20,000 from City General Fund Reserves to appraise the JPB property and prepare material for an RFP to market the property. . .. - - .. - - .. He suggested that one way to offset the cost for acquiring the land is that some of th.e maintenance costs for the JPB parking lot be used to offset this .. .. - - Special Meeting - October 6, 1998 Page 11 - - - - ~ ... - .... ... - "". .... - - - - - ... .. ... - .. ,. .. "". .. f"" .. ... .. ... - ".. ... .. - .. ... .. ... .,,~ - - ~... i \\a '1-' expense. More detailed discussion of the level of maintenance and costs would be brought back to the City Council. A Councilmember asked if staff is looking at parking lot maintenance in order to have control over the physical site. A staff member stated that they think it would be very difficult to develop the site with two public agencies owning it. He added that they think the best solution is to convince the JPB to sell them the property so that they can take control of it while meeting the objectives of JPB. A Councilmember asked how many employees of light rail space who actu- ally take the train to get there and how much parking is realistically needed. The Transportation Planner responded that the typical reduction in parking that is allowed for transit-oriented, commercial-type developments is about 30 percent. She added that surveys have shown there is an approximate 30 percent reduction in people driving to the station. A Councilmember asked if the 40 parking spaces being proposed take that 30 percent reduction into consideration. Staff responded that they do not. A Councilmember asked if any thought has been given to doing something with all four corners as an entrance into the City. Staff responded that two out of the four corners have projects that are being worked on. The item was opened for public input. Jerry David, Mountain View, talked about traffic lights connected to the train. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, the public input was closed. A Councilmember stated that she opposes development on this site because the site is in a very congested location. She added that she does think they should buy the land, but it should be made an open pedestrian green space with a small building for bathrooms and possibly a coffee kiosk. Another Councilmember concurred that less is better and asked Council to consider buying the land and look at parking lot maintenance. A Councilmember stated that there should be some type of building, especially for people to sit in when there is bad weather. She noted, Special Meeting - October 6, 1998 Page 12 however, that it .should be something small and possibly with some kind of a coffee house. One Councilmember also supported having an open green space with a small building, possibly something very airy. He added that he is in no hurry to build anything on it and, although he would support buying the land, a building could wait for a great idea in the future. \i!Mi - _. - we ... All of the rest of the Councilmembers agreed that there should be a minimal - structure built, housing only bathrooms and a.small coffee house. COUNCIL RECESSED TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR THE REMAINDER MEETING. 4. 4.1 ANNED COMMUNITY PERMIT AND TENTATIVE MAP---= 23 SIDENTIAL UNITS AND 2 140 S UARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPA -933 VILLA STREET The Zoni Administrator (Acting) stated that this application is for a Planned Co unity Permit for a mix-use development at 933 Villa Street. The Planned munity Permit and Tentative Map are being forwarded to the Council to p. ide the opportunity to review and take action on the entire developmen roposal. The project site is located on a 22,738 square foot lot on the north t corner of Villa and Bryant Streets in Area 2 o~ the Downtown Precise Plan. She continued that the propo d project consists of 23 residential units, at a density of 44 units per acre, clu red around a central courtyard area, and an additional 2,140 square feet of mmercial space that would front on Bryant Street. Of the 23 residential its, 10 are townhouse-type walk-up units that are accessed from a central c rtyard area. The remaining 13 units are one- and two-story stacked .ts that are accessed by interior stairs or an elevator. The applicant is prop . g 5 one-bedroom units, 17 two-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom .. Vehicular access to the site is provided off of Bryant Street to an underg und parking garage. She noted that the proposed project requires 60 parkin aces, and the appli- cant has provided 48 spaces on-site with a request to . into the parking in-lieu fee for the remaining 12 spaces. Of these spaces, . e plan shows two for handicap use although only one is required. The appli t is proposing 65 percent open space, primarily in the open courtyard area, ere the Special Meeting - October 6, 1998 Page 13 "'" ... - ... - ... -- .. - - .. ""' .... 'iiiIItij - - ~ - - - ... lllII - - -- - - ~ ~..,,:@~9 ~~~~~. ~~~. ....,. ~"""-./. ~/xx' , "''.~~ ...., ~> . >(/'V !. ~ _ ~ ~ g, .~ ,~?< /. ~'-f<~'" t:l g :V/>Q(, ~/ ~/ X'" '-.>'"'~ ~ Ul <.I' "'-';. /~:J.' 'v ~', lLl (j => .X> x: ;(/.?' """ . ~'...:'~." ~ ~ ~ $~" " "-1'~-"":"/ rr v R-,.v .... ~'>5Zv">-1:' '>tV ')i 'SO >' ">.. '.,L........ J r::-r 1..,. ~. /.'>< >(.'/'. .'-1 ~.)" :).~.' v~. ~~ ~>. >x< ~ ". "-..." '. .. ". ..~.<_ .AJ!J-.........~ /~. --r "$X/,V.. V' ' '>0:\ '~~~>'v I~'" '77.......t ,,," ^j,~~., /"nfl.~. / ~^-..X(,> 'v); y '~. ~><<: . < ~ . :.(,.1it. -- .LI' ". .~~J~~, ~ '.<~~ :&.)i~. \!::lr .~~~ ~ ;'~~/~..>' '~<~r.\X(,. (/)iI(,'. .''>; ,........ .~ Q7 .< .~>;~~:/ ~ ~ ~ t*~ fti-'-! !~:.- ... ~ ).~,. :~?!!::A" ~v~,);Z^'-0~~)~~>xv*O~<>~~1 ~ -,' ( /~K'x ~.... . 3<<."--- ; ~. ..... ---;:.. . '.'- " ;-;, ~" u.. ~ :?;".. .~ ~~ r--'" ....'\ .:.:_ . ,.... .... i. )... 'x ~II~~ 1 :6...: r. ): ..') .;.t.t . ./,j\..i:"'~ "j . i:i: ~ .>(-~, ;: Cl ',' ....., 'So ~ I, . ii I- Z ? . ~ ' . . ~ I ~ i:; w is > ') .... '" / : '\) ~ ." ;, >" p ~ z . < (~, ~ .:\,...,. /(~' ",,,<>Ul 1, 0d:~~w \ : "';',J ~'~ "'/. \~.ii ".Q!k:?~Yx~~~ - '. ,f'..' .,/-',.........' if >;~lg~~~r0 '_,.,."r Y_'.':~f;', I~ . ,// r.-Yf>~.~o/>~~jO~ _ ~ <. i '. : fl: J; i K,)?~/\6, 0..), '9x<;./'~' >-.,..". 2 ((..:)) _ _ .....' ~Ij('~ ~:~~ ~J~~~~,Y~~~O~~~:' ~;t ,;:.~ ~ -....:.;- ...."..,.)..i': ~ ! w ~, :~~~~'j cr '<>'2h. ,~: w ~ .,.J 0 '~'- iii cr I ...,. I~/ 1-, >' .'. . 00. I Z Z {" , ""'-"'\, ," > ~ ! ~ ;> f.<;i!!- _ ~~4x ~ ~;' :; ;:l i:. . '< f::!: ,,,,,~,:,w"J'.ll""i~ r.c-- 'I/;?<!~., .r' p:;~ ...........,'; ...,.:\., ,.: z ~ ! ~;> ~<}~(i R:)~I '....r t; ~ (' '....~..( .~ y.......'...'.... -, ~ zT'" ~!z~ . mc5~1 f\.1 tl~ ~~. ~1 ... ~ ~ : ~~fu ~ :~-~' '1)0' .10 ~ ~ :s ~ t .:/.-;:'-, \.. ) , ") I ~ ). ~ IS::!! ~ 0::,. ~ ". ( . ;'..' I I /'>- >( 'j. ~ x~ is IU i5 ~ !I::. .... .-.... 'S,~" r-il'~...f' ~ ILl ') (' """"_"_' ..j \' ': "~" ),(1< ~'.~ .. . 1 (;;::~. .. ,...._ I'~ ~}t :11;~~~~~ J.~>~~ ...-:..i'...-,....J9.oI'-...1~. '; '- .( I~ >)< > (' ~x ~~ ..~~. r.....; "., II' ~~::. ,i ;l>K~ y3&;x,,~/-(!) :::"~,. -~, -'.....-.,... ~'j'>) ~ t X' )<:x(~.+~. " -I-- (' -' -r- ~ . <, .(:, i. 1\ ')( ('X'. ". <: : \ j r) i II....... h I i v/ v/.,;<. 7x ...m;';~'-"-'-"-<~,1.-'~-'~ . I !.. ~~" . ~l?" >so /0x"j~r2.,-.~:..:t.":':-.l::":"."L:.~....i-" y ~ :' , >...:..!- - ; ~-;;-~""'''''~?r:7.~'~'''''''''''''''''~~'~ ,---------- ~-"j .......,~: 'r ~ I '. flit.. .".....' , .......r-..J -" ...J'''''\\.J~I I i - i ,.... . :- /-~ ;,.. s .. .-:- . 7 {'} . f2 "...( u. ~ I I I .L33H.LS OHJ.SYO ~ ;g....~,,-~~=: o ~ I cr 0 V <--.._.__ bOwer Ull- i !;;(~ Uw !z Vi w 5'.~----.-.-.--n? ~--._------.--_-.._...__._ '.__. EJ~.~ 1.__.,,_.__.5 g, _~_....._.__..____ ~,,~,__,,__,,_.__ --. .. - ",. C .- o~ ~S~ :: o.! 0:E> - .. ., .. .... ".. - - - - .. - .,., - - ,.. .... .. - ... .. ",. - - - - - .. .. - .. .. - ... - iIl-- --1 - CO ~"C .. 0 CO:EC E . 0 -Co;: ;: C - CO CO:s.... ..J:Ecn o -.t lL.. Ul III 10 t;J q ~ N lL..lL.. UlUl 00 00 qq ~~ CO :s .... c.c (J) tn (.) .- c en o (J) 00 o .... .- .a .- .c: >< W c:; .. ':':0 L5"z-' lrz5::a1 <iso.-, w:::!13~ !::=>OO Ulalu.1- '0 N II Ol Ol "- CO "- t') I i i I I I I !..-1 I i , - (] 'Y'!] ~ -' ~ Ul Ul o 'lr U , ,...........,v. : c .- o~ >aS~ ::: o.~ 0:1> - co ':"::"C .. 0 CO :I C E I 0 -c~;: C "E CO COlli::.... ..J..:;CI) - CO ~ .... c. (I) C () .2> C en o (I) 00 ! ~; i <: I ~! I . I N! I 5: i z: ! <! I g:l -I!. -II <: u; --- w -.... i jcr IW l~ F~ 1IlJ-1- lzilif3 ~~a P<~O:: tr Cl. lJ... o z~ . O<w !_o_~_~~. ! UZI- , 0:):J I_.._~__o~ 0:: 0 0>- Wo:: ~I- Uw --_o_-O:;-~---,--'''_or2 !Z >~u 0:::) 50~ ~Cl. c .... .- .Q .- .c >< W (J .;' \.. :'0". "'. '-. ...) ~.,;,. """.~ '-. ;,..' 0 t?i p... <: u C/) Cl z~ <:~ 2C/) ~~ ~~ ~~ p........:l ~ N <: .....:l p... , ('" . ~ ' , . ..> I \.,. ""l~ ~33H~S OH~SVO ..._._---_.~--- .-.-.---.. - o v I- W W lJ... ) '. o ./ \"' . . ;:1 .~ :~ '",....'It. . iO-;:. ...f ", "~ i ." '-'1 ~ '. :~.. " ) \ C:- 'v..,,_>~ 0 )-. :.. ., ._.......1-. ." ....l~..,- i. 5 lJ... Vl 10 10 q N I..L.I..L. VlVl 00 00 1010 N'N .6 .(( ""'=0 w~Z-I 0:: zii: CD <B~-I w:::!o~ t::J00 VlCDlJ...1- 'Y'!] Cl. o o -I N':' '1 )1 \ "'-" '-- - b N II en en ......... 00 '- I"') - ~ - ~ ~ -I ~ Vl Vl o 0:: U - - .... .~ .... - i. 0) - ~;"t"\. - - .... 1WIiiif ./ . ..J.\..,...._~ .).) i. { ; (' > ""*" o .. iii > < z > ... w > w ~ ,. , . -. 0, I ,,'" i.S -< '0 f~......_o. < I . -, ( " ','::0'71:"., \; .:~ I ...' ~"~-"-Il~~~~'~.~~-,: O\.'~ ~lf~ =* .\:~- ""'" ;,. I, \. .\..........~..... "./ ') ') \.. "\ " - - MIl: - - ',. . \ \'.. ,'\l.....,..r - ....... ! i f ~ f -I . ~" {~ Vl " ~~ -- /y.~-,._- \..0'- """ - 1M ~:;; - >,'. - - - - ". .. ..... .. "... .. - .. ... - - - - ... - - ... .. ". - ... .. ~ - - .. .. .... ... - ". .. ". - .. .. e 1- '02 >-5~ ~ 01_ O:E> - as ~"'C "0 as:E e E I 0 'C.:;:: :;:: e - as <<1::1., ....:ECI) 0 lJ... lJ...lJ...lJ... "It III ll'l III III III 10 000 I- q 000 W "It"ltlX!. W N lfi..:1O lJ... ..0::'-' i5..~09 o::~c::gm a <5a.lJ...-, W::!bO~ N !:::::IOZO II IIlmlJ...NI- = LI 'Y'I] ~ a. -' 0 ~ 0 -' III III 0 '0:: U - as ::I W ., Co e ., CD 1- () C) .c I- I- e en .c 0 CD >< 00 W :.:: U < 0:: l- N I- ::i: Z <( 0:: I- -' ; <! u! 0' e p.. ~ <: ) ~..:,- r/ o II..t~~ " r.. Z Z \:<,./ r .. <( <( .~ C2t:2 ,.,.'\- E- ~ ' "\~ ~ ~~ I p.. .,.....J : ;~ I ,.' ;<: .: .... c '';:';!<-,('' :",--. .... : <( "ot .~, " /' .,..... N : .. - ;", <( \.....J .p.. I <; ..... .~~:/;.> . '. .~'. ..... ., .,<Y l ;'" ...~--.:_:o " ., 'ir ~.. -.......',....\.:: . ..-"'......r;.~ o' I..." .... i~.. >-:~ "', .....,. ( ! ....~ "". ". rr.J.:;\ .' IJ \~::'/" ......\./ ,.1") '. /' > "- I' !..J"'-'.r \"\.r(''''''C ,"',..n.. \ /..: ,,' t........" ( · ':) ~f~~):< -- . . \.. '> '" -:..............:- .~_..... .L33lUS OIUSV:l o , i / ~ l -' , ~, / III "' / . III 'r ,,~ '- }i1-........._.._ ~_.._- ~! lJ...12 I 041 lilt/- I--U z~w ~I<O tsF1f lJ... o z:':: 0:: i Q~w g~ j._....~.~ gj. . ._-~.~.._.._------_..- . 'UZI- >Wu ! 0:)::1 o::a.< ~._..=. lJ... =.?..~_.......h.. o Wo:: ~~ .._-~--- ....-.---.--.---....-.. -- '-- I-a. 01 ~ IX) "- I') I- U W J o 0:: a. 0:: W I- lJ...Z o~ III I- I- - ZIIl wZ 1-< XC:: WI- . . I; ) 'I '; .' t,\ ') / -~ ; " j :' I t , " I ~ ") ': .~ .:1 'j 'j ..( - .... - -, - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - -, - 1999/2004 PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 'M; .. '-, THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY , BLANK .. - .. - .. - .. - ... - ~ - - - IilIfi - - - - - ... .. - .. - ~ c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c \0 . Q Z ~ ./I11III( "C = QJ ~ ~ -< CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW J ~ ~ J J ~ n ~ a ~ ~ J ~ J n 3 J 3 a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - ,. ... ... - - - .. .... - .. - .. - .... .... - ",. .. "". - - .. ... - - - - - "". .. - - "". - - - /Yl1 it.L 5M+al ':'"; ';:: r ~ ~ \J ED. J "-... ~_.-.. '..;1 ....".. .:1 it~R 1 0 'jSfr) PUBLIC WORK~ITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March 4, 1999 TO: Kevin C. Duggan, City Manager FROM: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director SUBJECT: WATER MASTER PLAN QUARTERLY UPDATE-NOVEMBER 1998 THROUGH FEBRUARY 1999 The Water Master Plan is a five-year plan to correct water sys,em deficiencies and ensure an adequate and sustained supply of water in the City. The Water Master Plan projects were authorized by the City Council and incorporated into the 1996-2001 Capital Improvement Program. Fiscal Year 1998-99 is the third year ofthe five-year plan. This memorandum provides updated cost ~stimates, schedules and status. The following three projects have been completed to date: Adobe Tank Removal, segment No. 1 of the Miramonte Water Transmission Main and the Wel1/Reservoir Siting study. In the next three months, emphasis will be on preliminary design of the Miramonte Reservoir including an analysis of optimum storage capacity at the site, preliminary design of the New Telemetry System and construction ofthe Whisman Pump Station Improvements. The optimum storage capacity at the Miramonte site will be analyzed and could result in the deferral of one of the proposed two new wells. Attachment A shows the Master Plan projects, updated estimated cost and the year the project was funded or scheduled to be funded. Attachment B shows Master Plan project schedules. The status of each active Master Plan project is summarized below. Miramonte Reservoir Design, Phase I This phase ofthe project was funded in the amount of $307,000 in Fiscal Year 1997-98 to design a new 2 million gallon reservoir at the Miramonte site. On November 24, 1998, the City Council authorized staff to contract with Montgomery Watson for engineering services. The design ofthe 2 million gallon reservoir expansion at the Miramonte site is scheduled to be completed by July 1999 and construction started by September 1999. The emerging issues that will need to be addressed up front are: (1) analysis to determine optimum storage capacity at the site; (2) environmental, and (3) neighborhood concerns. The design kick offmeeting was held on January 19, 1999. The Public Works Director met with the Public Works Director of Los Altos to discuss community review and coordination issues. A subsequent letter confirming agreement was forwarded to Los Altos. The arborist report, soil borings report, field work and site survey have been completed. - "'it Kevin C. Duggan March 4, 1999 Page 2 - "..u; N\ New Telemetry System - - The design and install phases of this project have been combined and were funded in the amount of$111,OOO in Fiscal Year 1996-97 and $1,089,000 in Fiscal Year 1997-98 for a total project funding of$I,200,OOO. This project will replace the outdated and not fully automated telemetry system with a new state-of-the-art telemetry system to automate operation of pumps and valves and record data to better control and optimize the water system to meet fire flow and system requirements. Design/install kick offmeeting was held on January 5, 1999. The design/install contractor, CMC, has been performing preliminary site analysis at each remote site and is scheduled to submit a report of findings in March 1999. The project is scheduled to be completed by March 2000. ~ - - !IIIII! .... ... - Whisman Pump Station Improvement. Phase II .. This project was funded in the amount of$I,513,000 in Fiscal Year 1996-97 to replace or upgrade the motors, install variable speed drives, provide a new aboveground motor control center, engine generator, pump control center and instrumentation at the Whisman Pump Station to help meet peak demands and fire flows. This phase is for construction of the improvements. Construction commenced in December 1998 and is scheduled to be completed by July 1999. The contractor is completing the underground electrical work, equipment pads and manufacture of the steel platforms and emergency generator. - - - .. .. - Miramonte Reservoir Construction. Phase II .. This project is scheduled to be funded in the amount of $2,428,000 in Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to construct a new 2 million gallon reservoir expansion at the Miramonte site. The CIP proposal has been adjusted to address environmental (additional landscape, etc) and neighborhood concerns. - .. "'" .. Miramonte Water Transmission Main. Segment No.2. Design - - This project is scheduled ~o be funded in the amount of$396,OOO in Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to design the replacement of the existing old 16" transmission water main in Miramonte between the Miramonte Pump Station and Central Expressway. The existing pipe is deteriorating and is undersized. .. - - New Wells Design. Phase I - This project is scheduled to be funded in the amount of$260,000 in Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to design two new wells, one on Shoreline Boulevard (south ofCalifomia Street) and one at the Adobe site. The Miramonte study/design will analyze optimization of the Miramonte reservoir site to determine if the City is better offwith a bigger reservoir instead of additional well(s) at .. - - - III!!! .. - - ". - .. .. - - ... - - .. ".. - .. .. - - - .. ". - - .. - - - .. - - ". .. - - ,.. - - ... Kevin C. Duggan March 4, 1999 Page 3 this time. One well may be deferred ifMiramonte Reservoir study/design leads to change in priority. New Well No.1 Construction This project is scheduled to be funded in the amount of$838,000 in Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to construct one of the two new wells. Miramonte Water Transmission Main. Segment No.2. Construction This project is scheduled to be funded in the amount of $2,987,000 in Fiscal Year 2000-2001 to construct the replacement of the existing old 16" transmission ~ater main in Miramonte between the Miramonte Pump Station and Central Expressway. The existing pipe is deteriorating and is undersized. New Well No.2 Construction This project is scheduled to be funded in the amount of$838,000 in Fiscal Year 2000-2001 to construct the other ofthe two new wells. Attachment B is a chart illustrating the current sequencing of these projects. We will continue to . review and update progress, problems and milestones on a quarterly basis for you and the City Council. Prepared by: #d~ Submitted by: Paul Olmos Principal Civil. Engineer Cathy R. Lazarus Public Works Director Attachments ee: F ASD, AF ASD, APWD-PS, DE, EEM, USM, UOE UPM-Burkett, PCE--Qlmos, F/e < E-< Z ~ ~ ::I: U < E-< E-< < en E-~ z~ -z ~< z..:l ;:l~ o~ ~~ ~en 0< ~:; E-<~ -~ UE-< < ~ 0 0 = 0 0 = 0 q = r..:- OO iii 00 M N 0'1 00 00 N~ El':l ~ El':l El':l * * 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q = 00 'D~ O~ 00 N N 0'\ \0 M N -q- M N 00 Q\ N~ El':l El':l El':l ~ El':l El':l 0 El':l I 0 0 0 0 = I 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = r..:- O'\~ O~ l'-~ ~ 0 00 l'- l'- "i:I" M q El':l - \C El':l - - N El':l El':l 61':1 0 O. = -I< 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = O~ 0 q 0 = = - O~ M O~ ..,; ..,; - - - \0 Q\ 00 - - VI.. El':l r-:, ..... El':l El':l - ..... N~ El':l 61':1 ..... 61':1 ..:l E-< < en E-< 0 0 U E-< Q c = ~ ,9 ;:l E-< t) en < 2 ~ N ...... Sb '" - 0 c E-< '" 0 ~ 'U) U en ..c 0 ~ ~ Cl I ..:l ...... 21 c I C < ,9 ...... 0 c c 8 E-< 0 ...... 0 0 8 u 0 Sb-S 2 8 u E-< 0 0 ~ > ...... 'E. "t;j .a ,~ '" u 8 c ~ 0 o CI) 0.. 0 0.. p:: c Cl b() 8 '" u 0 ,9 ,S Cii 0 I ~ C ...... I - > Cl 'Cii u ...... ..... 8 i:i5 c 0 I '0 c ::E 2 0 ,9 8 ..... o'Cii ...... ...... ..... ...... 0 '0 t o;:S ..... Sb '" '" '0 ~ p:: 0 0 c >. ...... t 8 ...... 0 CI) t CI) '" ..... ~ 'U) U ..... 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0.. '0 ~ ...... 0 '" "ii ~ Cl I '" 8 t 0 ...... 0 ~ 0 E-< 0 .$ S~ :l ...... ...... I ~ 0 c ~ c "ii '" 0 0 0 0 .$ ~ o _ C 0 ...... Z ...... "ii - 0 p:: c ~ c 8 ~~ ~ 0 0 ~ 8 0 8 - 8 E ~ ~ .0 ~ Cii ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ E ~ Z ..... ...... 0 0 "0 ~ '" ~ 0 Z Z < .s z ..... = ....... = = = N = = = N ...... Q\ Q\ Q\ ..... Q\ ~ 00 Q\ Q\ ..... 00 Q\ r::: Q\ Q\ ..... t-- Q\ ...... \C) Q\ Q\ ..... 11- . -j') - ... t :I ~ . ~ :I ~ - i !!~ ..-.-.- ... ......-..-.......--...-.-...-..-.-...-....--.............-.--"-"-"-"'- .--....... .__._---_.....~.- .-....-.. ---- ~ I B ! !l' ~ [ ~ ~ I-t t t :I ~ ! J . :I I II i ~ ~~ .... . .......-.---.....--..--.-.-.........-....-........-......--..-- ---- -- ...- ---..--....--- .-.-...-.-..-.-...----. -.- "--'-"'-'---' ~ I i I ! ~ B I ) - ! ..... ! rl .1 =<> t .. ~ J ~ . ~ ~ ! ". t I I :I ... ~ II . ... :I - ~ - ~ ! I~ t ! .. -- ........... ...... ..._.._~-----_._..._....._-- '-. - .---..-..--..-....--..-- .- ..-- -- .----.....--..-..---- J I ~ ... I I. . ....! B ~ ! ! J J ~ rl Ir J ~ I t :I ~ ,~ ~ - ~ .- ~ .. ~ E z .. i ! i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l: 8 ~ - . g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ li II ~ ~ J I ~ ,. i I ,. D D " ~ 9 ~ g ~ ~ ~ D g g g e !l l ;; ~ .. g ~ u " ~ Ie :I ~ .. .. " ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ;: I e: e: Ie :I ~ z I!! z Ie ~ U g a g ~ it g r g g ~ !2 ~ !2 g z !2 g 11 zi Il' ~ ~ u I!! ~ ~ I ~ .. Il' !i u u u u ! u u ! i u u 8 Ie r z .. z c 0 rJ rn rJ rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn i! l~ 9- ~ ~ . ~ .. ~ .. .. 5! ;: ::! :! ~ :! : :: : :> il N Il I:: :I II: ~ :; ~ ~ M ~ ::l ;l ;II l!l d Q1lII E-4 ~ :s. .. . ~ . - ~ <: - .. ... ... .. .. ".. ..., - .. - "10 .. ., ... .. , .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, - PLANNED 2000/2004 - - - THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - .. - - - - .. .. .. .. ... .. - .. .. - .. .. - - - - .. - ~ c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c t'--- . Q Z ~ .. "e = QJ ~ ~ -< CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK --- 2 ~ ~ J J J J J 8 8 3 11 IJ " U ~ 3 3 ~ J ~ - - ... - ... - ... - ... - ... - ... - - - ... - ... tw ,.. - - .. ".. - - .. ... - ... - - .. - - ... .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March IS, 1999 TO: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director FROM: Tim Ko, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: EVEL YN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS UPDATE Background This project will improve Evelyn Avenue between Castro Street and Bernardo Avenue (City limit) from a two-lane partially improved street to a fully improved street with two travel lanes and a bicycle lane in eacl, direction separated by a raised landscape median between Highway 85 and Bernardo A venue. Between Castro Street and Stevens Creek, Evelyn A venue will be progressively widened to provide two through lanes beginning at Castro Street to four lanes east of Bush Street. The project is divided into 3 phases. Phase I (Castro Street to Stevens Creek) is funded in the 1998-1999 CIP. Phase II (Stevens Creek to Pioneer Avenue) is proposed in the 1999-2000 CIP and Phase III (Pioneer to Bernardo) is proposed in 2002-2003 CIP. The total project cost is about $9.2 million. Funding sources include City funds ($5 million), Measure AIB funds ($3.2 million) and property owner assessments/fees ($1 million). On August 4, 1998, the City Council approved the roadway geometries for Evelyn Avenue improvements and established Evelyn Avenue Underground Utility District No. 37 to place overhead utility lines underground between Castro Street and Stevens Creek. These actions enabled the designs for street improvements by the City and utility undergrounding by PG&E to proceed. Within the limits of Phase I Evelyn Avenue improvements (Castro Street to Stevens Creek), there are four public and one private development projects in various stages of construction. The projects include the VTA Transit Center, City sewer and water main replacement, PG&E utility undergrounding, City street improvements and the TechFarm office development. Coordination of these projects is important to avoid construction and schedule conflicts so that the infrastructure improvements can be completed when Light Rail Transit starts revenue service in mid-December 1999. - Cathy R. Lazarus March 15,1999 Page 2 - -, ..Wd .... Current Status The City sewer and water main replacement, the VT A Transit Center and the TechFarm office development are under construction. PG&E is completing design of the utility undergrounding and will begin construction in May. Evelyn Avenue improvement design is underway and construction will begin in late July. All of the public projects and the street frontage improvements along the office development will be completed by December 1999, with the exception of the overheadutility pole removal, which may occur later. Funding is in place for all of the public and utility projects in progress. City funding sources include utility enterprise, general and Measure A/B pavement funds. - - - - ... <en- ... Evelyn Avenue improvements from Stevens Creek to Pioneer Way (Phase II) will involve the widening of the Steven Creek Bridge and traffic signals at the Route 85 on and off ramps. Funding is proposed in the 1999-2000 CIP. These improvements will require permits from the Santa Clara Valley Water District and Caltrans, respectively. In addition, the Evelyn Avenue utility underground district must be extended beyond Stevens Creek for PG&E to design and construct the work. As the review and permitting process of regulatory agencies, and the process for expanding the utility underground district will take time, Phase II construction will occur independently from Phase I to avoid delaying the completion of Phase I (Castro to Stevens Creek) by the end of this year. - .. - - ... .. .... ci.;{ TimKo Assistant Public Works Director ... ... - - ... ... .... "'" .... ... ... .... ... ... .. ... .. - ~ c c ~ ~ c C t: C C C ~ ~ c c o c c c QO . o z- ~ .- ~ = ~ ~ ~ -< -- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW m J J 3 3 J J ~ J 8 3 J n J J J n a o CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK .. .. ,.. - .... .. JIIIIII - - - - ... .. ... - - .... - - .. - .. .... .. .. .. - .. ,. - ... .. ... ... ". - - - AGENDA: January 26, 1999 7.1 CATEGORY: Unfinished Business DEPT.: Community Development ~;crr)':QF I~"'OUNTA-IN'VIEW' ~f}{/y/y:: ;\:'~_:', .- TITLE: Disposition and Development Agreement and Ground Lease for a Portion of City- Owned Property (San Antonio Loop)- Community School of Music and Arts RECOMMENDATION 1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Disposition And Development Agreement and ground lease with the Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) for a portion of City-owned property (approximately 1.6 acres) cOIl1monly referred to as San Antonio Loop (APN 147-30-080) to permanently locate the school based on the terms and conditions listed below. 2. Direct staff to reconfigure the San Antonio Loop to create two developable parcels that total approximately 3.0 acres (see Attachment A) and to reinstate the left-turning vehicle movement from San Antonio Road to California Street. 3. Appropriate $200,000 from Capital Improvement Reserve funds for design of the San Antonio Loop reconfiguration and left-turn lane from San Antonio Road to California Street ($150,000) and expenses associated with legal, environmental and subdivision costs for the reconfiguration of the property ($50,000). (Five votes required) FISCAL IMPACT It is estimated that by ground leasing a portion of the reconfigured San Antonio Loop to the Community School of Music and Arts, the City will generate approximately $60,000 per year in revenue. In .addition, the second site, if ground leased, would also generate revenue. One- time expenses, estimated at $50,000, will include costs associated with environmental survey of the site, costs to subdivide the reconfigured site and fees for legal and title expenses. Costs for reconfiguration of the San Antonio Loop site, design and construction costs for reinstituting the left-turn lane from San Antonio Road to California Street will be approxi- mately $975,000. One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) is required to begin the design for the reconfiguration of San Antonio Loop in this budget cycle. The balance of the funding for the reconfiguration will be proposed in the 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Plan. These costs would be offset by the revenue generated from the site ground leased to CSMA. Repayment of these costs would occur more quickly if the second site were also leased. AGENDA: January 26, 1999 PAGE: 2 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS On June 30,1998, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a six-month option period with the Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) for a portion of the 1.84-acre, City-owned land located at San Antonio Loop Gune 30, 1998 ~taff Report and Minutes, attached) to permanently relocate the school. Subsequently, on November 17,1998, a study session was held to provide to the City Council a status report on the proposed use by CSMA of City-owned land located at San Antonio Loop and to review two alternative road and site configurations for the site (November 11, 1998 Staff Report and Minutes, attached). The reconfiguration alternative would expand the developable portion of the property to approximately three acres and improve access and integration with the neighborhood. The City Council requested that staff return with a more detailed analysis of the cost, timing and feasibility of the proposed reconfiguration and possible uses for the remainder of the site. The City contracted with CCS Planning and Engineering. They reviewed the proposed reconfiguration and concluded that the left-turn lane at California Street and San Antonio Road is feasible and the loop ramp reconfiguration, with minor modifications, can accom- modate the projected traffic. Attachment B provides more detailed information related to this traffic. City staff also reviewed alternative uses and concluded that Parcel 2, the remaining lA-acre site, has potential to be used as open space or residential! commercial development. Attachment C provides information regarding potential uses for the reconfigured site. The transfer of the property from the City to CSMA will require the City to execute a ground lease and a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with CSMA. The DDA sets forth in detail the terms and conditions pursuant to which the lease is ultimately conveyed to CSMA. The lease is a document governing the use of the site and business agreements over the long term. - City and CSMA staff met and developed proposed terms and conditions of a ground lease and DDA. The main provisions of the lease/DDA are discussed in more detail in Attachment D. The following is a summary of the terms and conditions: 1. Term: 55 years with five 5-year options; total of 80 years. 2. Lease Area: 1.6 acres. 3. Land value: $18 per square foot. Capitalization rate: 7 percent. 4. Base Rent and Rent Commencement: Base rent is approximately $61,000 per year. This includes CSMA paying full fair-market value for 1.1 acres and 10 percent of the fair- market value on the portion of the site, approximately 0.5 acre, that will be retained by "/l'IIIIM! ~, w,~ - - .. ..... - - - - - - - .. .. .. - - .. - - .. ....... - O;;~ii~ - - - - . .. .. .. .. - ... .. AGENDA: January 26, 1999 PAGE: 3 - - .. .. - - - .. - .. -. .. - .... the City as a public access easement. Rent will commence when CSMA occupies the building or no later than 2-1/2 years after execution of the ground lease, whichever occurs sooner. 5. City's Responsibility: The City shall provide all utilities to the site. Utilities are already available to the site. 6. City's Termination Right: City will retain the right to terminate the lease agreement with CSMA if the site is not free and clear of environmental hazards, if building permits are not obtained within 12 months, if construction is not complete within 18 months from receipt of the building permits and if the site ceases to be used as a nonprofit cultural arts education center. ,I .' 7. Financial Benchmark: CSMA shall provide a financing plan to demonstrate their ability to construct the building. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, this plan shall be approved by the City Council. .. .. Conclusion .... .. - - - - ... - - _. -. .. - - - - .. - - ... Staff recommends that the Gity approve the terms and conditions of a ground lease. These lease terms are close to a fair-market ground lease. They also recognize the value and con- tribution that the CSMA art and music programs make to the Mountain View community by offering favorable terms related to delaying rent commencement until the building can be occupied and limiting the land area for which CSMA must pay full rent to 1.1 acres. Should the City Council decide not to reconfigure the loop property, the primary condition that would change is the amount of land CSMA would lease. All other terms and conditions would remain the same. ALTERNATIVES Request that CSMA pay the full fair-market value for the 1.6-acre site, which would equate to an annual rent of approximately $85,000. The advantage to this alternative is that the City will generate additional revenue. The disadvantage is that CSMA may not be able to pay the full fair-market value for this much land and could decide not to pursue development of the site. ,..~ AGENDA: January 26, 1999 PAGE: 4 - - PUBLIC NOTICING-Agenda posting. - - Prepared by: Pre \~l\~ ~~-=~ Approved by: IIIlI\ Ellis M. Berns Economic Development Manager ""'" - - j~ Kevin C. Duggan City M'anager ... - - .. - EMB/2/CAM 815-01-26-99M-D^ - - Attachments: - A San Antonio Circle Alternative B Memo-San Antonio Loop Traffic Study Review and Analysis C Reconfigured San Antonio Loop Site D Description of Business Terms and Conditions of Ground Lease E Letter from CSMA-San Antonio Loop Property Lease Negotiations June 30,1998 City Council Staff Report and Minutes November 17, 1998 Study Session Staff Report and Minutes - lIilII* .. - .. - cc: Ms. Sue Larson Chair, Board of Directors Community School of Music and Arts 253 Martens Avenue Mountain View, CA 94040 .. ~ - - Ms. Andrea S. Temkin Executive Director Community School of Music and Arts 253 Martens Avenue Mountain View, CA 94040 .. - .. .. . PWD, APWD, PP, SP-Melena, ZA, DZA-Fulford, BO (w/a) .. .. - .. - - .. ATTACHMENT A - I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 n ~ ! ~ c:: t; ~ I ~ n n"ll ~ S P.I = 0 r'" 0 "II ... "II 0 ~ ~ ~II ,. I;'l b 2 o ~ - "II ~ ~ ~ ti g B ~ I+- en en I;'l .p ~ - - .. - - ",. .. ... - .. - ,.. .. - ... ..-/ --,..--,- \ Attachment 8 .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22,1999 TO: Ellis M. Berns, Economic Development Manager FROM: Timothy Ko, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: SAN ANTONIO LOOP TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW AND ANALYSIS At the November 11, 1998 City Council study session ,regarding the potential relocation of the Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) to the San Antonio Loop, staff was asked to review and validate the 1994 traffic study to confirm the feasibility of left turns at California Street and reconfiguration of the loop road. City Council also asked if there are other alternative loop road configurations that could be considered and for an estimate of timing to complete the traffic improvements. Responding to this direction, Public Works contracted with CCS Planning and Engineering (CCS) to perform the evaluation. The CCS review concluded the following: a. Traffic volumes and projections in the 1994 DKS study are consistent with the 1998 traffic counts taken in December at the intersection of the San Antonio Road/California Street intersection. The DKS study estimated the number of trips making left turns at California Street versus using the loop ramp. These estimates were based on land uses in the surrounding areas, including east of Showers Drive. This methodology to assign traffic is still valid, and the projections are still reasonable. b. The December 1998 traffic count showed traffic turning left at San Antonio Road into the shopping center entrance at Fayette Drive is about 40 percent higher than the July 1994 DKS counts. However, CCS concluded that the higher count was attributed to the holiday season, and the finding is supported by Institute of Traffic Engineering data. Although peak values are not used for design, if left turns to California Street are allowed, some of this shopping center traffic might turn left at California Street. This potential indicates a need to build in a margin for higher traffic volumes when considering left turns at California Street. The DKS study calculated that a southbound left-turn pocket length of 250' could handle existing average traffic volumes, and a 325' left-turn pocket length could handle future build-out traffic volumes. The length of the pocket is proposed to be - ... lIilJI - - .. - JIll .. .. - - - - - - - - - ... .. - .. .. .. - - ... .. .. - .. - - - .. - - ... .. - - .. ... ... ... .... - - ... w - ... ..... ... - ... Ellis M. Berns January 22,1999 Page 2 375', so some additional capacity will be provided. In addition, the traffic signal will be programmed to optimize the intersection operation, including southbound left-turn movement as demands change during the peak periods. c. CCS Engineering recommends that the loop ramp proposed by DKS be redesigned to provide a standard intersection right-turn entrance to the ramp rather than an "off-ramp" type design to slow the entrance speed. CCS also recommends flatten- ing the curve to improve sight distance. This change reduces the developable area by about 6,000 square feet. By making these changes, there will be sufficient capacity on the loop ramp to accommodate additional traffic from a development on the remainder parcel (see Attachment A). 'I I d. CCS identified another p9tential ramp configuration that is shorter and steeper and may occupy a smaller portion of the developable site as shown on Attachment B. This alternative would impact adjacent businesses and require modification to the San Antonio Road overcrossing structure to extend the deceleration lane. Modification to the structure would be very expensive and time-consuming and would require the approval of the County and the Peninsula Joint Powers Board. Staff concluded that the potential high cost for this alternative would not be offset by any potential gain in leaseable land area. ... - Cost - .. ..... - - ., ,.. ... ..... .. ... .. ..... ., - ... Public Works reviewed earlier cost estimates for the left-turn lane and loop road recon- figuration and determined that the estimated design, construction and project administration costs in 1999 dollars would be approximately $975,000. . Timing We understand that timing is critical to CSMA since they are required to vacate their current location at Huff School by June 2000. If the design effort can begin early this spring, construction documents for the left-turn lane to California Street and reconfiguration of the loop road could be completed by the end of this summer. It is estimated that construction will take approximately nine months, depending on the weather, and could be completed by summer of 2000. We will work with CSMA to accommodate their schedule. ,.. Ellis M. Berns January 22, 1999 Page 3 - .. - .. In conclusion, CCS' traffic and geometric reviews confirmed that reinstating the left turn at San Antonio Road and California Street is feasible and that the loop ramp configuration, with some minor modifications to the DKS geometrics, can accommodate the projected traffic. - .. .. ~~ Assistant Public Works Director - M .. ...... TK/EMB/2/CDD 815-01-21-99M-D-2^ - , I .. .. - - - - - - . .. .. .. - - MiiV - ... ,. ... - - - .. .. .. .. .. , I C, , CI C' :z: n t:I g t'l c: i:i !!i : ~ b ... ~ :z: 0 :z: n ~ 'U (l 'C,~~~~ o 'U a ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n :z: gj ;2j I r I I I I I 1 I J! ] III II ~ II i . P II J I J i! pI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J ,II ~ II III II. J \ ~lD CAlrFORNL{ STREET J II II II II ~ ~ II II ; 0 J :z: II 8 :oJ J J t II I II ..- - -- :::- ~ -. ----- -:::::,:::..... ------ - --.. . ........... ----...... -!!%..... .......~:', ---..- ......,c ...... '...... --- .......... ~, ..7 '..... ,~ - ~~ ,. a> .... ,'~ 1Q:oJ ...... " '\ .'. ~ ~ ~ , ~" ,~':- gll~ I '. ,~,.... It- ~ C'1 I .., \.t.i' '~. tl)g ~ . S \ \ \'~ ~ It-... : t \ \\\' -~.~ I t \ \ \\ -tol ;! \ \ \ ,\ I 0( \ I i '\ I .___ I I~: II I __ I ,J;;f'l -- " g~"ll -.- I 1/,1 , ... ~ ti 1-7.-4. -I :J:! II ~ I ,/ ," -. It-~t" I ~ I Co> ,I. CtlCN /' I' fJlt- / .i I ,. I ~ t-; /X.. /,/ I .:...~ ,,/ " h'~ , / ~ I I ,.' .-- I ~ '/' .--./ ~AJ/~ %. ..> # I ~.<f 1 ~p . ~~, II CII ~ I . ~ Iq~ ~ IIi n IIlR ~ il~"" (:j .t'1 . I ilK ~ I -- .-- Attachment A ATTACHMENT B l!:! ~ t"\I .2l u. Co 0 .! 0 E-J ~ 0"'0 ,+-(1) 5 :=c c: C'O(1) :s O~ c: -'0 :J 0 .- .r: 0 cCl) ~ .." - o .. -h~ 0 1:N ~ <0.. cU>ell!'G 0 tJ 0 )(- c:CU OellC g- 0 COO ",S..:: Vl c1J ~. (f)e ..0 ell 0 ~'G'5] 0 z~ ~"O "8 E ti- [8 E.~>- .- ~ 1:: iB8. ",e ..~c. ~u z~ ~51 , """ .. - ~. ~. I: I: u - l1li .. .. - - .. .., - .. - ..... .. - .. .. - .. - IIoIlII - - .. i" .. r t- ~. .. ~i: u~:: -:>. I I .. .. Attachment C - .. ... CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM - .. .... DATE: January 22,1999 .. TO: Elaine Costello, Community Development Director - FROM: Ellis M. Berns, Economic Development Manager<<~ SUBJECT: RECONFIGURED SAN ANTONIO LOOP SITE .. ... .. - - At the November 17, 1998 study session, staff presente,d to the City Council two different alternatives for the reconfiguration of the loop that would increase the devel- opable portion of the site and provide the potential for a second usable site. There was consensus that staff pursue the possibility of reconfiguring the site to create a 3.0-acre developable site (see Exhibit A). One of the key advantages to the road and site configuration is it better integrates the land into the adjacent Del Medio neighborhood. The site would have a road on only one side and would be connected to the neighbor- hood on the other sides. The reconfigured site improves pedestrian and vehicular access. It also expands the possible uses of the site, making both residential and open space more suitable. (The Precise Plan would need to be amended to allow residential use.) ",. ... - - - - - .. At the study session, the City Council requested that staff provide a general idea of potential uses of the second parcel if the San Antonio Loop is reconfigured. It is proposed thatthe Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) proposes to lease the westerly portion of the parcel, 1.6 acres, and the second parcel, Parcel 2, approximately 1.4 acres, would be available for development. .... ... -- ... - Under the San Antonio Precise Plan, permitted uses include: low-intensity retail, personal service and office use and conditional uses, which include: public and quasi- public buildings and use of recreational, educational, religious, cultural or public service and parking to serve transit. - .. .. - Based on a preliminary review, some additional uses that could be considered for the additional land {Parcel 2) if the site is reconfigured are office/ commercial, residential or open space. Potential uses could be a small, 25,000 square foot office building or a 40- to 80-room hotel (with limited amenities), park and open space which could be used similar to open space at Eagle Park or efficiency studios or other residential uses. The commercial/residential projects could generate an annual ground rent of $80,000 to $100,000 per year revenue from property taxes. If a hotel were built, the City would generate $80,000 to $100,000 from ground rent per year plus property taxes and a transit -- .. - ... - - - ... Elaine Costello January 22,1999 Page 2 ~ - .. occupancy tax (TOT). It is estimated that the TOT could generate approximately $100,000 to $200,000+ per year. - - More detailed economic analysis on alternative uses will be complet'edas part of the Precise Plan amendment when development standards are adopted for the site. "'"' - Please let me know if you have any questions. - .. .. Ellis M. Berns Economic Development Manager .. ,I I .... EMB/2/CDD 815-01-21-99M~3^ .. - .. .. - - .. ... - ~ - - - ~r - ... .. .. . - .. .. .. .. - I aD r/I ~ I .. i ~ I~: , J =s ~ III .- ; r I I fa r~ III li~ I J ~ i! I~! ._j .- I III - ~ I - - - - I I I I ,.. I I I I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I .. ... 3 n t:l g . c: tl ~ ! 6 5! n ~ 0 C1 t"l "Q "Q C'" lI:l ~ 6 o 0 ;g "Q r/I ~ ~ 6 f.l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C1 ~ ~ .. .. .. - .... .. ... - .. - .. - .. - - .. - - - ... ... .. - Exhibit A J ,II \ II III J ~ ~]D" C.4lJJ1 ORNlA. STREi:'r J II ~ II II ~ II II ?l J , 0 / lI:l t II II. --- - -- ... ::::-.:::-.............. --." -::::.- -......... ~..... -... - '-'- - - !!I.';r"..... '::.~, -............... ---"~,:. .....' -':--, -- . ,," - __ "~~','~, --7 ".. ,," g~ ~'" '<'~~,>:. ~~ n~ : [ ,\!t" .:. r/l82l I !! '. \\'i fll+'- ~ ..' \ \\ ...: ~ \ '\ \ \\ "'n I ~ \ ~: ~ \ \ \ P.I ___ I l!l~\ I' : ___ l:il I I Cllt; --_ I '''1'' ~t!~ --..J-I) /',' --/: ~II~ I 1/-i- 1+ t; I V I' -- r/lCDIIl I " fll+ / I > / 'i ;1&l /" /l : -N// V'/ I I ,//'/ --- J ~~\J:' ,/ · -- '.\ ./ ~." ~ ~>: .', ,.' #'. q.~ ~o / . "'C' o~ ." ~') ..../ ~~/ II I l fft,! I I'; II 1 ,,( ./ ,-'" _ _ ........ .............-...J ....~ _.A..JI>J....,.............., A J4,...'-'.,.... v.--.V .A. ..1.'''''. ..L "-J V....J.. .J., ..1.'.1.. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.1 DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND GROUND LEASE FOR A PORTION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY (SAN ANTONIO LOOP)-COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC AND ARTS . The Economic Development Manager stated that staff recently reviewed two alternative road and site configurations for the Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) to relocate to. The preferred configuration alterna-tive tightens the loop and expands the amount of developable area. This reconfiguration does require the City to reinstate the left-turn lane on San Antonio Road to California Street. The primary benefits of this alternative is that it goes from a developable area that increases from 1.84 acres to 3 acres and improves access and integration with the neighborhood. The reconfiguration would cost $975,000; however, the additional land that is created from this reconfiguration offsets the cost. Traffic studies requested by Council have indicated that reinstating a 7 of 14 ... IIIi1II ... .. - ., - - - - ... WI ... 3/18/993:40 I - - ., ... - - .. ... - ... Itii'It .. .' - ~ ,.. .. ... .. - ilIIIf - - ... -, '-'~~'~'-~'~.''-'''''"'";'''''~;''"'"''''"''"''''''''~'~"""''~,"""",,,,,"~'," ,...', ........._.~ - , :ity of Mountain View Minutes for January 26, 1999 - http://www.ci.mtnview.ca.us/mvcouncilmin/mvcm990126.html - left-turn lane at San Antonio Road to California Street is feasible, as is the loop ramp configuration with some minor modifications. The construction would take approximately nine months and be completed by summer 2000. - - .. He added that per the Council's request, they have provided some suggestions for options that might be considered for the development of the second site. He also summarized the terms and conditions presented to CSMA, which included the proposal of a 55-year lease with five 5-year options, that they would lease a total of 1.6 acres, that the land value would be $18 per square foot with a 7 percent cap rate, that the base rent would be approximately $61,000. Finally, he stated that staffis asking the City Council to authorize the City Manager to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement and ground lease with the CSMA for approximately 1.6 acres, to direct to move forward in terms of reconfiguring the San Antonio Loop and to reinstate the left-turn lane at San Antonio Road and to appropriate $200,000 from the Capital Improvement Re~erve for design of the San Antonio Loop configu-ration and for other expenses associated with the subdivision reconfiguration. ,- .. .... -- .... - - - - - - He also noted that the City Clerk received 193 postcards and 9 letters and e-mails in support ofthe lease terms for CSMA as of January 26, 1999, with none opposing the terms outlined in this presentation. A Councilmember asked who would maintain the landscaped area on the public access easement portion of the site. - - - - The Economic Development Manager explained that staff still needs to work this out with the Community School of Music and Arts. - - A Councilmember asked ifthere is pedestrian access on the loop. The Assistant Public Works Director responded that pedestrian circulation is provided at this location with a sidewalk on San Antonio Road on the existing ramp. The new design would also have sidewalks on the new loop ramp and crossing San Antonio Circle with a continuous sidewalk along the frontage road. There would be a traffic signal intersection for safe crossing as well as a crosswalk to the train stop. .. - - - - A Councilmember stated that there has been a lot of public interest in the merits of this site versus a downtown site and wondered what the school's current position is on'the San Antonio Loop site and how that has worked into the negotiations. .. .. - The Economic Development Manager replied that earlier in the process, they looked at some of the downtown sites, particularly the one across from City Hall and concluded that the property had been purchased for redevelopment and that there would be additional cost to CSMA to design and construct a building that was compatible with the Civic Center architecture. ... - - - A Councilmember asked ifthe left-turn lane will be one or two lanes and if it will be completed in the same time frame as the loop. The Assistant Public Works Director responded that they are looking at a .. - .. City of Mountain View Minutes for January 26, 1999 http://www.ci.mtnview.ca.us/mvcounci1min/mvcm990126.hm- .. single left-turn lane that will be 375' long and would be done in conjunction with the reconfiguration ofthe loop. A Councilmember asked how many vehicles will access the site and what the 7 percent cap rate means. The Economic Development Manager answered that vehicles would access the site from San Antonio Circle. He added that the cap rate means that there is a 7 percent return on the investment. - - - - - ~ The item was opened for public input. The following citizens spoke in opposition of this item due to the type of subsidization being proposed for this project and the potential traffic problems: . Dom Deremigio, Mountain View Gregg Perry, Mountain View Roger Bibo, Palo Alto Gary Wesley, Mountain View The following citizens spoke in support of this item: Karen Skold, Mountain View Darryl Thorn, Los Altos, expressed some concern about limited park-ing and access into his place of business at 134 San Antonio Circle Ted Woods; Mountain View Art Takahara, Vice Chair of CSMA Board of Directors, Mountain View Jeff Farmer, Mountain View, suggested that a uniform policy be established to treat private nonprofits equally Susan Plass, Mountain View suggested that the school be located in the downtown area due to safety concerns with this location and ease of access Rose Filicetti, Mountain View, also requested that the site be located in the downtown area Doug Broomfield, Mountain View Community Television, expressed support for the San Antonio site Andrea Temkin, CSMA Executive Director, also addressed the concerns regarding location. She stated that the San Antonio Loop site will give CSMA the ability to have more of a campus setting; to have all the rooms be at one level, on the first floor; an opportunity to have an enclosed courtyard, to have controlled outdoor space for children who attend their camps as well as outside musi-cal performances. She also stated that they do not feel the location is dangerous; that transportation is excellent, both in terms of walking access and access to buses and the CalTrain station. Ellen Winkler, Mountain View, questioned the location of this site due to safety concerns and asked Council ifthere is any land in Mountain View that is not available for development. Seeing no one further wishing to speak, the public input period was closed. - 0.1\1 - - .. ... - - - - .. iWJO' - - - - .. - - ~ .. -- .. -- . - A Councilmember asked for an explanation on the lease terms. The Economic Development Manager responded that the applicant is .. . - .. .. tty of Mountain View Minutes for January 26, 1999 .. . http://www.ci.mtnview.ca.uslmvcouncilminlmvcm990 126.htr:: - leas-ing 1.6 acres, and they would pay the full-market value of 1.1 acres with the balance ofthe .5 acre paid at a reduced rate because it is reserved as a public access easement. .. - - A Councilmember asked ifit would be possible to alleviate some of the parking problems with the lumber company. The Economic Development Manager responded that they could work with property owners along the north side of the loop and possibly put some on-street parking there. - .. - - A Councilmember commented that he has heard repeatedly from citizens via e-mails and phone calls that the nonprofits in the community really add to the quality of life in Mountain View. He added that the focus of . the City for the past few years has been on youth and urged the rest of the Council to support this school. Another Councilmember concurred and added/that the value of having the CSMA in the community makes up for the loss of revenue ifthey were to lease the land to a commercial entity. .. .. ... - - - One Councilmember noted that this is a fair proposal both for the CSMA and the citizens of Mountain View, and he would like to keep this very valuable asset in Mountain View. .., - A Councilmember stated that the CSMA is providing services that might otherwise have to be provided by Parks and Recreation money and ulti-mately save the community money and empowers community resources. - .. - .. Motion: MIS Faravelli/Kasperzak Carried 6-0; Zoglin absent 1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement and ground lease with the Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) for a portion of City-owned property (approximately 1.6 acres) commonly referred to as San Antonio Loop (APN 147-30-080) to permanently locate the school based on the terms and conditions listed below. - .. - - .. 2. Direct staff to reconfigure the San Antonio Loop to create two devel-opable parcels that total approximately 3.0 acres (see Attachment A) and to reinstate the left-turning vehicle movement from San Antonio Road to California Street with direction that parking improvements for the affected properties be considered. - .. - 3. Appropriate $200,000 from Capital Improvement Reserve funds for design of the San Antonio Loop reconfiguration and left-turn lane from San Antonio Road to California Street ($150,000) and expenses associated with legal, environmental and subdivision costs for the reconfiguration of the property ($50,000). - .. .. .. - - - .. - .. - -, .. - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW .. - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, - PLANNED 2000/2004 - - THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - .. - - - - .. .. - - - 11& - ~. - - .. .. .. - - .. .. ... I ~ c ~ m a ~ a c c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a c c D 0\ . 'Q z ~ .~ ~ = (JJ ~ ~ -< CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW J ~ ~ 3 3 D n m I a I J J J n o ~ m I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - .. - - - .. - .. .. .. .. .. - - - .. - - - .. - - - .. - - - .. - - - .. - .. - - - .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 1999 TO: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director Timothy Ko, Assistant Public Works Director FROM: Mark Rogge, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: SENIOR CENTER CAPITAL MAINTENANCE INTRODUCTION The Senior Center at 266 Escuela Avenue is a composite of buildings built from the 1960s to 1991. The City acquired the property and the building from the "Italian Club." Thereafter, several modifications were made to the building. In 1991, a new wing was added with classrooms and a kiln. The 1991 wing is structurally independent of the rest of the Senior Center and has independent mechanical and electrical systems. The focus of this report is, therefore, on the main portion of the Senior Center, which existed prior to the 1991 addition. The Senior Center has high public usership. Usership has increased steadily over the years to its current rate of approximately 350 persons per day. The Senior Center is one of the most densely used buildings operated by the City, with annual usership on par with the Center for the Performing Arts in less than one-third the overall space. Users on average stay for a relatively long time period and occupy the building most days of the year. Therefore, normal wear and tear is accelerated when compared to other facilities. Present spaces appear adequate for the current volume and type of usership. Potential users have been turned away due to occupancy limitations on an infrequent basis. Senior citizens are a fast-growing segment of society. According to the California Department of Finance, the 65+ population in Santa Clara County is expected to double by the year 2020. The 1990 Census revealed that of 11,554 Mountain View residents in the 55+ category, nearly 35 percent, or 4,032, had incomes below $15,000. Cathy R. Lazarus Timothy Ko March 19, 1999 Page 2 - """ ~ I~j Mountain View's Senior Center is generally well maintained and heavily used. Capital improvements are indicated to address three major capital maintenance issues: - ~ 1. Seismic/ structural improvements; 2. Health and safety improvements; and 3. Building preservation and restoration. - While many systems are generally serviceable, well-planned improvements can be effective in risk reduction and cost containment. - - - Current programs include assembly, dancing, dining and food preparation, musical programs, classroom activity, games and other social activities. Parking is generally adequate, requiring regular use of the unimproved lot in addition to the paved parking lot. This memo deals only with the facility and does not cover programming per se, other than how the programs relate to the facility. ,.,.. - ~;) .. SEISMIC/STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS .. Seismic/ structural improvements include upgrading structural strength and integrity, eliminating hazardous materials and related restoration work. Structural work is neces- sary to bring the building into compliance with current seismic standards, relating to the ability of the building to reasonably withstand an earthquake with minimal injury to its occupants. - - - IIiIIl - The 1998 structural investigation by Ahearn & Knox, Inc. was limited to readily visible areas and did not include structural calculations or specific design criteria. The September 1998 report of the investigation indicated structural deficiencies that would be expected of a building of this age and character, including damage due to decay as well as obsolete design that would not satisfy current codes. The estimated cost of structural corrective work based upon the limited investigation was in the $200,000 to $300,000 range. Associated hazardous material abatement and restoration work adds another estimated $120,000. -' .. - - - - The following type of structural work was recommended: addition of a solid roof diaphragm and anchorage of masonry perimeter walls to define a clear load path for transfer of forces to the foundation; additional roof sheathing; strengthening and increasing ductility of masonry infill walls; upgrading reinforced concrete columns for core constraint to eliminate potential buckling during earthquakes; increasing lateral resistance and shear strength to the walls; and additional bracing, anchorage and sheathing and connections of structural elements to each other. ~ - - - - .. ... - - - - JIll! - - - .. - .. 'Ill .. .... - - - ... - - .. .. .. ... ... - - - ... .. .. .. .. .. .. - - - ,.,. ... Cathy R. Lazarus Timothy Ko March 19, 1999 Page 3 It is expected, based on what could be readily seen and inferred, that other structural inadequacies may be revealed. A more rigorous structural inspection and evaluation can be done by removing portions of walls, ceiling and other finish work. Performing this sort of investigation will incur the expense of patching and replacement as well as the professional fees. The additional expense is warranted since well-designed, thorough plans usually result in lower cost than correcting unknown conditions through a contract change order during construction activities. The structural work will also expose other concealed systems that may need to be improved. While the cost to restore finished surfaces after structural renovation is inevitable, it provides an opportunity to perform other work that might otherwise be deferred due to the relatively high cost of demolition and restoration if done separately. Therefore, it is efficient to perform all related and necessary work for any area being renovated as part of the same construction contract. The estimated cost to restore elec- trical and mechanical systems affected by the structural work is approximately $40,000. Work to restore affected finish surfaces such as walls and ceilings is estimated at approximately $50,000. (See Exhibit "A".) Hazardous Materials A 1991 study indicated asbestos-containing building materials (ACBMs) at several locations. The ACBMs were subsequently either removed or covered to prevent general exposure. Even though currently concealed in nonusable areas, ACBMs must be completely removed prior to execution of any structural improvements that impact the affected area. The estimated cost to abate hazardous materials is approximately $30,000 when done in coordination with associated work. Recent changes in regulations also require remediation of paint or other material containing lead. Exposed steel posts in the basement and other steel members are suspect and must be analyzed for lead content. Other areas that may contain restricted hazardous materials also need to be investi- gated. This includes refrigerants in air conditioning, refrigerators and freezers, and Polycarbonated Biphenals (PCBs) in transformers. HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Health and safety issues include improvements to sanitation systems, accessibility and fire and security alarm systems. Sanitation improvements are indicated to keep the facility reasonably free of pests, protected from inundation and suitable for food preparation. Access improvements are necessary to provide better access in areas Cathy R. Lazarus Timothy Ko March 19, 1999 Page 4 ~ ~ - where people are allowed, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and to prevent access where injury could occur. Access also includes appropriate lighting and audio-visual equipment to serve the clientele of the facility. - - '"",,", Sanitation - 'iIiiIfI! Generally sanitary systems appear adequate with two exceptions: clear-water sewage problems (groundwater and storm water) and restroom conditions. Improvement costs are estimated in the $50,000 to $100,000 range. - ... The basement area is served by a sump-pump system to eliminate groundwater and storm water collecting around the building's foundation. Recent improvements have made the pump system more reliable and increased ventilation to reduce dampness, which led to mildew, dry rot and an environment conducive to infestation. The current system still provides an avenue for cockroach infestation, which poses a problem for the adjacent kitchen where food is prepared for the senior nutrition program. The current systemic problem is currently mitigated with regular cleansing and extermination. - ... - - - - More investigation is necessary to see if other preventative measures would be effective. Improvements could include fumigation, providing a better seal for the building envelope and double containment to further eliminate moisture or relocation of the food preparation area. - .. .. .. Storm water and irrigation runoff accumulates in the maintenance yard adjacent to the building, close to wall vents. The area needs to be regraded to direct water away from the building. The area storm drains appear to be inadequate and need to be checked for condition and capacity. - - - - While the number of existing rest rooms meet Building Code requirements, additional rest room stalls are recommended to satisfy actual building occupant needs for this heavily used building. Large congregations for meals and other social events place available rest room facilities at a premium. - ... .. Sanitation improvements are estimated at approximately $100,000. ~:i\'1 Access - .... Major renovation to the building requires adherence to the highest level of care for accessibility principles required in the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). Accessibility improvements are particularly important at the Senior Center and are .. - .. IIiiiil .. ..., - .. .. - - .. - - - - - .. - - - - - ... - - - ... - - - - - .. - .. - .. .. .. - - - - Cathy R. Lazarus Timothy Ko March 19, 1999 Page 5 generally a good practice to reduce risk. Estimated costs for general-access improvements are approximately $110,000. The majority of the handrails in and around the Senior Center are not easily gripable, do not meet ADA standards and create unnecessary risk. All handrails should be replaced or renovated to current standards, especially the broad, barrier-type wood handrails that provide no gripable feature. Guardrails are missing in several locations. One exterior stairwell has no barrier, which would allow a drop for the entire story height of the building. In other locations, hand- rails should be filled in with spaces not exceeding 4" wherever the drop would exceed 18". Ramps that terminate with a short landing (entrance to game room) should also have solid blocking and wheelchair bumpers. Ingress and egress are impeded in some doorways and corridors. While the main entrance has an automated assisted opener, several other exterior doors do not have assisted openers. The doorway and aisle to the small kitchen in the Social Hall limits access and provides poor turnaround area. Thresholds need to be corrected at door- ways where they are loose or worn, creating a potential trip-hazard. Several stairways have steep risers and/ or have short tread lengths. These are particu- larly difficult for people with restricted leg movements to negotiate and may promote tripping. The stairs should either be rebuilt to provide current standard treads and risers suitable for senior citizens or activities in the basement should be relocated to the ground floor. Emergency egress from the basement is difficult for people with disabilities. An elevator provides normal access that may not be useful in a fire, power outage or earthquake. It is recommended that a ramp be built from the basement to the exterior grade or that activities in the basement be relocated to the ground floor. The parking lot in the rear of the building is unimproved. This portion of the parking lot fills regularly, but only after the improved lot at the front of the building is full, despite the fact that it is closer to the entrance. The lack of paving and lighting apparently makes this lot less desirable. Improving the rear parking lot could reduce potential trip, slip and fall risks while providing better service to seniors. Lighting in the social hall appears to be inadequate for normal functions. Lighting should be improved to reading-room standards to facilitate activities such as music classes that require a large space and the ability to read sheet music. Lighting controls ffl':~ Cathy R. Lazarus Timothy Ko March 19, 1999 Page 6 - ~,;~~ - in some areas need to be modified for safety-in order to exit after turning off lights in the basement, one must walk through the dark to find the stairwel1. ~. - Audible programs should be supplemented with hearing devices for people with various levels of hearing ability. Improvements could include wireless headsets that can be tuned to the channel of the audio presentation. - ~fi Signage should be supported in Braille for people with impaired vision. - - Alarm Systems - The Senior Center is generally served with a sprinkler system and a fire alarm system. Heat detectors and smoke detectors should be added in the kitchens and at other locations for a complete comprehensive fire/smoke detection and alarm system. - - .. A security system should be added, including glass breakage detectors, door contacts, motion/infrared detection and closed-circuit cameras at entrance/ exits and parking lots. Currently people may enter and exit at several unattended locations. Although no particular incident is noted, security of occupants could be greatly enhanced. Employees opening and closing the Center would also benefit from a security system. The estimated cost of alarm systems upgrades is approximately $30,000. - .. - . - BUILDING PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION .. - The building envelope keeps rain and moisture out and protects structural and finish building materials from decay and damage. The Senior Center's envelope consists of several discontinuous roofs, wall systems and concealed areas. .... MIl! .. Roof - Interim repairs were done to the roof to prevent the most obvious leaks and eliminate the immediate threats to enjoyment the building's programs. A new roof is needed due to the poor condition of the overall roof system, including structural problems, mechanical and electrical considerations and a configuration, which precludes the ability to perform normal preventative maintenance. Some areas, particularly around the mansard roof, have poor or inadequate access for normal preventative maintenance. ~ - ..... - ... Dry rot and termite damage has led to sags and holidays in the weatherproofing membranes. Lack of proper curbs to support and raise heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HV AC) units above the roof deck promotes conditions of standing water and accumulated debris. Electrical wiring running along the top of the roof accelerates - .... - .. - .. - .. .. - - .. - .. - III - III - ... ... - - .. ... .. - - .... .. - - - .. - .. .. .. - .. - .. - ... Cathy R. Lazarus Timothy Ko March 19, 1999 Page 7 wear due to rubbing and erosion and makes periodic cleaning and resurfacing difficult. Plumbing and electrical penetrations have inadequate or missing roof jacks for proper sealing. Roof drains run on the interior of the building envelope, introducing unneces- sary and damaging moisture to interior walls while concealing the drain from visual inspection or simple repair. The estimated cost to correct the building roof is approximately $300,000. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HV AC) Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HV AC) should be replaced along with the roof repairs since removal of the units is necessary to correct the roof. Adequate HV AC is also an ADA and Building Code requirement. Some rooms in the Senior Center lack adequate HV AC. Several HV AC units are also at the end of their useful life and ready for replacement. HV AC improvements are estimated at approximately $100,000. CONCLUSION The Senior Center is a valuable asset to the City, heavily attended and successfully used. The cost of recommended new capital improvements of $1,120,000, along with ongoing normal maintenance and replenishment of worn surfaces, will support the continued operations of the Senior Center. r--1 -;C ~ ~ Rogge Senior Civil Engineer MR/2/PWK 913-03-16-99M-E^ Attachments: Exhibit "A"-Senior Center Capital Maintenance Cost Estimate Exhibit "B"-Structural Investigation of Mountain View Senior Center cc: APSD, CSD, RM, SRC-Nunez, DCCD/BO, FM, DE, CE, SCE-Rogge, File- Senior Center ~jj CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Exhibit "A" ~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~iieii - Capital Maintenance Cost Estimate J,ij,lt' SENIOR CENTER Project Project ~ Cost Cost Subtotal "","'lit - J#4~ SIESMIC/STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS $ 420,000 - Structural Improvements $ 300,000 - Structural Related Restoration $ 40,000 - Hazardous Material Abatement $ 30,000 "'"" Wall and Ceiling Restoration $ 50,000 - HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS $ 300,000 - Sanitation $ 100,000 - Access $ 110,000 .. Restoration $ 60,000 - Alarm Systems $ 30,000 - BUILDING PRESERVATION IMPROVEMENTS $ 400,000 - Roof replacement $ 300,000 - HV AC renovation, Phase II $ 100,000 - - TOTAL $ 1,120,000 $ 1,120,000 - ..... ... ~ - - - .. - - - .. .. .. .. . lit -.... i :. ill. .. .. .. .. .. .. - - .. .. - - - .. .. MIl ~ .. .. .. .... III .. .. .. MIl ... .. - .. I'" ... '. ".AHEARN & KNOX,INC. , ',' . STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS . ,:'~.:': 1505 MERIDIAN AVE. STE. B " - TEL: 408/978-1970 ~::.;;\/YSAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95125 . '. :. . FAX: 408/267-7919 Report on Structural Investigation of MOUNTAIN VIEW SENIOR CENTER 266 Escuela Ave. Mountain View, California September, 1998 ., EXHIBIT "B" DENNIS B. AHEARN, S.E. PRESIDENT WILLIAM S.KNOX, S.E. VICE PRESIDENT TIM D. HYDE, S.E. ASSOCIATE ~ Report on Structural Investigation of MOUNTAIN VIEW SENIOR CENTER 266 Escuela Ave. Mountain View, California September, 1998 ., by AHEARN & KNOX, inc. Structural Engineers 1505 Meridian Avenue, Ste. B San Jose, California 95125 A&K Job No. 98063 ""I!!I!f - .. - - - WM - - - - .- '1iM - - .. .. - .. 'III! .. "";f .. - -.. - .. .. - - - - ... - - .. - .. .. .. .. - INDEX .. ... Introduction and Scope Seismic and Building Code History Facility History Key Floor Plan Facility Section Descriptions Findings and Deficiencies Miscellaneous Findings Magnitude of Costs Conclusion 1 2 3 4 5 9 14 15 16 .. - .. - .. - - - - .. - .. - .. ... ... - .. - ill .r .. .. III .. .. .. iii .. .. .. ~,,. .. - it<,~ - INTRODUCTION and SCOPE - This report presents the results of a structural investigation of the Mountain View Senior Center facility located at 266 Escuela Avenue, in Mountain View, California. The investigation was performed at the request of the City of Mountain View Facilities Maintenance Division. - iiiiM - ~ The purpose of performing this investigation is to determine what primary deficiencies may exist in the building's structural framing systems regarding their abilities to resist loads that are currently exerted on the structure, as well as loading that the building may experience in the future. Specifically, resistance to lateral seismic (earthquake) loads is the primary focus of this investigation. - .. - IIIIIli - The investigation of the Senior Center consisted primarily of several limited visual inspections of the building, along with examinations of original construction drawings for various portions of the facility, constructed at different times. Drawings were available, however, for only two of the primary portions of the facility. constructed in 1976 and 1991. Records (microfiche) available at the Mountain View City Hall were also reviewed to help establish the history of the various building portions that make up the current facility. - - .. .. l1li - This investigation was conceptual in nature. Structural calculations were not prepared, and actual design forces according tc? the building code were not evaluated. The primary focus, with regard to the existing structure, was on determining the structural systems used, probable load paths, and the m~ans used to effect the connections between the different structural elements. .. .. .. - It has been assumed that the building presently does not show, or has ever exhibited significant structural distress or damage. This is based on information we have received from the City of Mountain View, aria on the inspections of the facility, 'wbich do not appear to show evidence of such distress. Also, since the investigation does not include any destructive testing or removal of existing finishes, structural conditions hidden from view courd not be verified. Therefore, as directed, we have performed the investigation based on conditions shown on the drawings (where available), when not apparently different from the visible conditions. ~ - - ..... ... - Where deficiencies became apparent, general concepts were developed for how the -' deficiencies could be mitigated through additions or strengthening of certain structural - elements. Order-of-magnitude costs were then developed for these upgrades, based on ... recent experiences with similar upgrade projects. - - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 1 of 16 .. ." .. - - .. .. SEISMIC and BUILDING CODE HISTORY jIIIIO . The San Francisco Bay region includes three major and seven minor earthquake faults. Past history shows that five violent and nUl1,lerous smaller, but damaging, earthquakes have occurred on these faults before the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. The San Francisco Bay area is considered one of the most earthquake prone urbanized areas of the United States. Of the major faults, Mountain View is bordered on the west by the well-known San Andreas Fault, approximately 10 miles from the Senior Center, and to the east are the Hayward and Calaveras faults, approximately 9 and 15 miles distant, respectively. .. ,. .. .. .. .. .. The vertical loading requirements and the strengths of materials recognized by the Uniform Building Code have not changed substantially since the original portions of this building was designed, with the notable exception of concrete design. The 1976 Uniform Building Code changed the requirements for concrete shear stress, which is carried through to the current Code. This change reduced the shear stresses allowed in structural concrete elements substaOntially. .. - - ... .. The seismic design requirements of the Uniform Building Code have undergone several revisions and refinements since the mid- to late-1950's. As a result, the seismic design loads have increased for all types of buildings. Design loads for certain types of concrete shear-wall structures have increased approximately 40 percent. This would apply to the original concrete and masonry auditorium building. Design loads for conventional wood-framed structures have increased approximately five percent. This would apply to the wood-framed, bearing-wall areas that adjoin the original auditorium structure. iIllIIl - - .. .. - .. The seismic design provisions of the building code are intended to effect certain levels of structure durability according to varying magnitudes of ground shaking. The three primary levels can be described as inaicated below (RM = Richter Magnitudel .. WIoI - 1. No damage should occur in minor earthquakes (RM less than 5.5). 2. No significant structural damage should occur, but some non-structural damage may occur in moderate earthquakes (RM of 5.5-7.0). 3. Minor structural damage as well as considerable non-structural damage may occur jn major earthquakes (RM of 7.0-7.7). 4. Major structural damage may occur, but no collapse should occur in a great earthquake (RM of 7.8 & larger), allowing evacuation of all persons within. .. .. .. .. .... ... ... .. Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 2 of 16 - .. - ... I!III! FACILITY HISTORY - The Mountain View Senior Center is a composite of several building sections built at different times. It is believed that the original structure was constructed before 1960. The facility was built at that time as the Sunnyview Italian Club. Two small restroom/storage additions were apparently added in 1967, near the northwest and northeast corners of the original structure. Sometime before 1976, two additions were made: one along the south side adjacent to the game area and one along the west side of the building, apparently for office and restroom areas. In 1976. some interior remodeling was performed, along with the addition of a mansard roof and continuous fascia all around the facility, plus several sections of free-standing trellises at the north side of the site and a walkway cover to the south. A small entry lobby along the north side was also added at that time. In 1991 a new structure was added, providing a multipurpose room and arts & craft room, with associated storage and corridor areas. This structure was placed at the northwest corner of the existing structure. It was built - adjacent to the existing building, but was made structurally separate. - - .. .. - - .. - - - - It should be noted that the indicated dates of construction indicated herein are approximate, as substantiating documents were not available to verify the dates or .. actual scope of all of the various portions of the facility. Some of the facility history was ... determined by examination of the available construction drawings, either' by direct ... information thereon, by interpolation from the demolition plans or elements indicated as - "existing" on particular drawings. In addition, some records at the Mountain View City Hall indicated the issuance of permits for modifications such as tenant improvements, re- "'- roofing, etc. ... Each building Section is described in detail on the following pages. Please refer to the .. Key Floor Plan on page 4. - .. .r - - - - - - .... - - - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September. 1998 Page 3 of 16 .. .. - I I I I A-2,l I II I hi! II I II H ~G-1 & II M-2 II II II II I II IX' ( ) ENTRY I IL lL ~ WNJ<JIAY (I' \!y= FACILITY SECTIONS. PG. 5 I L..= - - - - ~ COVER~ X-1 = OISCREPENCY IN SECTION X. (PG~ 9~ _ Jt1 ~ _ _ G_ _ _ E_ _ _8-2 _ _ _ J REF. NORTH KEY FLOOR PLAN SCALE: ," = .30' - - - r-Y-r-l L_~_ " _-(--~ lREWS~ :G-1& M-2 I ~I I r- J ~ G-1 ~ M-2~_.J @ ----t -- ---~ /, '= A-2 - - - @ ... .. .. .. .. .. .... -- - - F .... - - - - - """ - ... .. .. BLDG. wi BASEMENT - A 1960:1: G 1976 WOOD ROOF SCREEN CONC. &. MASONRY WALLS ON EXISTING ROOF, ARCHED WOOD ROOF THREE SIDES OF BUILDING B 1960:1: WOOD &. MASONRY WALLS H 1976 WOOD WALKWAY COVER wi WOOD TRUSS ROOF &. ROOF SCREEN, C 1967 WOOD WALLS WITH EAST SIDE OF BUILDING WOOD FLAT ROOF 1976 WOOD WALLS WITH 0 1967 WOOD WALLS WITH WOOD FLAT ROOF WOOD FLAT ROOF J 1976 TRELLIS &. WALKWAY COVER E,F PRE-1976 WOOD WALLS WITH K 1991 WOOD WALLS WITH WOOD WOOD FLAT ROOF FLAT &. (2) PYRAMID ROOFS SEISMICALLY ISOLATED .. .. .. .. JIll lilt .. .. SECTION HISTORY & DESCRIPTIONS - .. Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 - .. 1 I i I i I I ! ! ; ; I- o .-J ~ ~ <: o z 52 ~ <l: CL L:- =- c (/". ~ T Page 4 of 16 .. ... .. SPECIFIC DESCRIPTIONS of FACILITY SECTIONS - - Section A Approx. 1960 Original Sunnyview Italian Club Facility - Built in or before 1960, the original facility was comprised of two sections. On the north side is Section A, an auditorium with a full basement. This portion measures approximately 98 feet by 60 feet in plan. The walls are of concrete masonry and poured- in-place concrete. Concrete bond-beams just below the roof span across concrete pilasters at 14 feet on center. The masonry is used as infill walls between these elements and as the parapet wall above the bond-beam. The floor at grade level, above the basement, is a concrete slab and beam system. The roof is of wood construction, utilizing a lattice framework of short 2x8 sections in a diamond pattern, covered with straight 1 x sheathing. This framework forms a vaulted arch spanning across the building's short dimension. Steel tie-rods extend across the short dimension as well, resisting the thrust at the sides generated by the arched roof. These rods occur at 14 feet on center, and connect to concrete pilasters in the wall spanning from floor to roof. The concrete bond-beams span between the pilasters providing vertical support for the roof, and transferring the roof thrust forces to the pilasters. Steel tie rods extend in the transverse at each of the pilasters, resisting the thrust of the arched roof. - ..... - - .. .. ... '- ... - - .. - Section 8 Approx. 1960 Original Sunnyview Italian Club Facility ... ... Section B has a flat wood roof covering an area measuring approximately 98 feet by 47 feet, adjacent to and south of the auditorium; A concrete or masonry wall appears to .. have originally existed- along the east end of this area. However, it was apparently All replaced with a wood stud wall in 1976 along with the interior improvements and _ mansard roof additions (see Sections G and H below). It could not be determined whether this wall was sheathed on either side with plywood at that time. It is also not .. clear whether solid perimeter walls e~isted on the west or south sides of thfs .area, as the ..... roof might have provided only a cover for a bocce ball court and an adjacent viewing - area to the west of the courts. It is not known what type of framing system was originally provided to resist lateral loads along the west and south sides of this area. The roof in .. this area is supported on bolted, warren-type wood trusses spanning 14 feet across .. wood posts. These posts align with the pilasters of Section A. Three trusses run in the .. east-west direction, spaced 20 feet on center, starting approximately five feet from the auditorium's south wall. Wood 2x10 joists span across the trusses, covered with .. diagonal 1x sheathing. This roof, approximately 16 feet above the floor, intersects the - concrete wall of the auditorium approximately one to two feet above the edge of the _ arched auditorium roof, occurring on the opposite side of the wall. The floor was originally of concrete in selected areas and of a compacted shell base for the bocce ball .. courts, about three feet lower than the auditorium floor. .. .. Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 5 of 16 .. ~ - .. filii Section C Approx. 1967 Restroom Addition .. .. This addition is comprised of a flat wood roof and wood stud walls, and occurs at the northwest corner of the original auditorium building (Section A). It measures approximately 21 feet by 17 feet in plan, and was apparently built against the north wall of the auditorium, without any separation therefrom. -- .. .. .. Section D Approx. 1967 Restroom and Storage Addition .. .. This addition is of flat wood roof and stud walls similar to Section C. It is located at the northeast corner of the original auditorium, and apparently was also built against the auditorium north wall, without separation therefrom. ... .... .. - Sections E & F 1967 to (?) 1976 Gallery, Office & Restroom Additions .. .. It is expected that these two areas were added at the same time, however no verification of this could be made. The addition along the south, E, was likely added as a gallery or viewing area for the game area. It measures approximately 78 feet by 8 feet, and has a concrete slab floor and a flat, wood-framed roof. The roof appears to use straight sheathing. The floor is approximately two feet above the original game court floor, while the roof is approximately six feet below the original flat roof over the adjacent game area. A wood-framed wall was provided along the south side of this addition. As part of the 1976 modifications (see Sections G & H below), some lengths of wall wer~ added along the south wall between the windows. The drawings did not show plywood sheathing being used on these walls. - ... - - .. .. .. . Section F, to the west of the two original sections (A & 8), was also framed with a flat wood roof and wood stud walls along the south and west sides. It is expected that the roof uses straight sheathing. This section has a raised wood floor. It measures approximately 15 feet by 107 feet in plan. This section was built adjacent to the original sections, without any separation between them. ,... - .. ... It is not clear whether either of these wood-framed additions utilized plywood wall sheathing as shear walls along the interior or perimeter walls, as drawings for these areas were not available for review. The details for the subsequent modifications to these areas also do not indicate any "existing" plywood on any of the walls in these areas. Therefore, it is possible that these additions were not provided with in-plane wall bracing other than gypsum board interior sheathing and/or plaster on the exterior. .. .. .. .. .. - - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 6 of 16 .. - - .. - Section G 1976 Mansard Roof & Fascia Additions, North, West & South Sides - .. Wood framed mansard roofs were added on top of the existing flat roofs around three sides of the facility. Along the north and west sides of the auditorium (Section A), the interior vertical leg of the mansard was bolted to the concrete masonry parapet. Where the vertical leg occurred adjacent to the wood walls, it was connected to blocking between the studs with bolts and framing clips. Along the south wall, the mansard was formed as an "A-frame", sitting atop and connected to the wood framed roofs. - - - - - - Section H 1976 Mansard Roof & Walkway Canopy, East Side - This section added a mansard roof, similar to those of Section G, but on a new horizontal plane of spaced wood framing extending east from the exterior walls of Sections A and B. The canopy extends approximately 10 feet from the exterior walls, and is framed of spaced 1 x sheathing over 2x joists. The joists span perpendicular from the walls to a glue-laminated beam at the east edge, supported by pairs of wood posts. The posts are bolted to steel stub columns extending up from spread footings. The fixity of the stub columns apparently provides the lateral stability for the canopy in the north- south direction. ... ., .. - - .. .. In general, these mansard roofs and the other exterior modifications made in 1976 successfully produce an effect that makes the facility appear as a homogeneous building that was constructed at one time. . .. - - Section I 1976 Entry Lobby Addition, North Side -- This addition is comprised of a flat wood roof and wood-framed stud walls, and occurs at - the north side of the original auditorium building (Section A), adjacent to S~ction C. It measures approximately 19 feet by 8 feet in plan, and was apparently built against the walls of the auditorium and Section C, without any separation between them. - - - """ Section J 1976 Walkway Cover From parking Lot to Main Entry - These wood-framed trellises and walkway cover are free-standing. They derive their - vertical and lateral support at the base of the wood columns through steel tube stub - columns extending up from the footing, similar to Section G. - _I - .. Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 7 of 16 . .. - - .... - Section K 1991 Multipurpose & Arts/Crafts Room Additions - .. This most recent addition is comprised of two primary rooms with ancillary corridors and storage areas. The total floor area of this addition is approximately 3,750 sq. ft. It is entirely of wood-frame construction, with conventional stud walls and one truncated pyramid roof over each of the two primary rooms. Plywood sheathing is used significantly throughout the structure for shear walls and roof diaphragms. According to the drawings on hand for this addition, it appears well constructed, with holdowns at ends of the shear walls, and tie-straps at re-entrant corners and for load path continuity where appropriate. This addition was constructed entirely separate of the previously existing structure, with a seismic isolation joint between them. - .. ... - ,.. ... "... - - - - - - - - - - .. - .r - - - - .. .. ... .- - ... - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 8 of 16 - ... - - ... FINDINGS AND DEFICIENCIES .... .. Section A A-1 The roof of this section does not have a solid diaphragm such as plywood sheathing. The straight sheathing and lattice framing would likely provide some nominal amount of in-plane rigidity. However, with the discontinuities of the members that make up the lattice, and the use of straight sheathing above, there is no definitive load-path for the transfer of significant loading to and from the diaphragm, either parallel or perpendicular to the concrete and masonry walls. For this reason, the roof diaphragm would be overstressed in transferring seismic loads from the roof into the perimeter shear walls. In addition, the heavy concrete and masonry perimeter walls are not anchored to the roof diaphragm adequately. Although the tie rods provide some measure of anchorage, they are spaced too far apart to provide an adequate and continuous connection between the walls and diaphragm. A-2 .. - - - IJIIiIf - .. .. 'IIiIIt - .... The most practical means of mitigating this deficiency would be the addition of a plywood diaphragm over the majority or all of the arched roof. However, with the lack of existing framing elements perpendicular to the side (north and south) walls, additional members, such as blocking, would have to be cut and fit between the latticed framing, in line with new anchorage brackets affixed to the walls. Steel straps could then be connected to the brackets, and nailed through the plywood into the blocking. Along the end (east and west) walls, the existing rafters could be utilized as tie members, with new anchorage brackets affixed thereto, and connected to the walls. In addition to the new brackets and blocking, the installation of new plywood sheathing would require the removal and replacement of the roofing, and the roof-top mechanical equipment. . - '.. - - - - - - The concrete pilaster and bond-beam system used around the perimeter is obviously adequate to support itself and the tributary weight of the roofs thereon, as it has done for over 25 years. The structural masonry infill walls, however may be under-reinforced per modern standards. Due to the estimated construction date, it is expected that the masonry walls are reinforced. However, it could not be determined whether the walls were partially or fully grouted, or the amount of reinforcing within them. Given the lengths of masonry wall existing in the structure, it is believed that the walls may be able to provide adequate shear resistance for seismic loads at current code force levels. However, it is doubtful whether many of the current code reinforcing requirements that contribute to added ductility would be found in these walls. In a moderate or major earthquake, the walls and pilasters could be expected to sustain some level of distress in certain areas. In addition, the shear and bending forces induced in the pilasters .. - - .. - - - .. - .. September, 1998 Page 9 of 16 - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation . - .. - - - .. - .. .. .. .. .. - - - ... ... - - - .. - - .. ,.. - .. .. ... .. .. - - .. - i" - - ,,,"::,.t~ - ~~ from the steel tie rods may also contribute to an overstress condition in a significant earthquake. It has also been shown that the reinforcing in concrete pilasters and columns of this age were not provided with transverse reinforcing (ties) adequate to constrain the core of the column, thus often resulting in buckling of the vertical reinforcin~ therein under extreme loading. A more extensive investigation of these elements would be necessary to adequately assess their capacities with regard to their resisting seismic loads. It is expected that significant capacity could be attributed to these elements, but that some amount of local reinforcing could be required, depending on the level of performance desired from the structure, and the expected level of compliance to current code requirements. Please note that no costs were assigned to this possible deficiency due to the extent of unknown aspects about them. Section 8 8-1 The roof of this section is sheathed with diagonal sheathing. Although this type of sheathing does have a significant shear capacity, this capacity may not be adequate to resist forces at a level consistent with the current building code. The addition of new plywood sheathing over all or part of this area would likely be warranted. This would require the removal and replacement of the existing roofing and roof-top mechanical equipment. 8-2 The lateral resistance along the south wall of this area appears deficient. The roof steps down along the wall between Sections Band E. According to the 1976 drawings, only "stucco" and gypsum board was provided along this wall as a connection between the two roofs. Also, the amount of solid wall provided along the south-most wall appears minimal. It is expected that these walis-do are not sheathed with plywood, and do not have "holdown" brackets at their ends to the foundations. New steel X-bracing added along the line between Sections Band E could provide lateral support for both of these Sections. The bracing could be placed in the three bays between the posts supporting the high trusses. The existing foundations and stem wall at the base of the posts are expected to be adequate for the loading from these braces. In addition, the connection between the two roofs along the step between Sections 8 and E would need to be strengthened, likely with new plywood sheathing. Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 10 of 16 - ..... - 8-3 The lateral resistance along the west side of this area is suspect. The 1976 drawings do not indicate what type of connection was made between the roof diaphragms of Sections 8 and F. Here also, there is a vertical step between the roof diaphragms. Some minor modifications were made in 1976 to the interior and exterior walls in Sections Band F to the west. None of these modifications appeared to include the addition of plywood shear walls, and it is doubtful whether any of the original walls were sheathed with plywood either. - - .. - ... - More extensive investigation would be required to determine the actual conditions at the step between the roofs of Sections Band"F. It is expected that some work would be required to effect a direct connection between the roofs. Also, the addition of plywood sheathing and holdowns would likely be warranted on several of the interior and exterior walls in Section F and the west portion of Section B. Since a raised wood floor is used in Section F, modifications to the existing footings and new footings would likely be necessary along the walls with added sheathing, - - ... - - - .... 8-4 It is expected that plywood sheathing was not used on the east wall of Section B. Since this wall provides significant resistance to north-south lateral loads in Sections Band E, some amount of strengthening would likely be warranted. - .. - Either new plywood sheathing could be added to portions of this wall, or the wall could conceivably be connected to the east wall of the auditorium (Section A) to the north, depending on the actual construction of the wall. - ... ..... - Sections C and D .~ There are no apparent deficiencies in these areas that would require significant _. remedial work. Their size is 'Such that their connections to the au'ditorium, and ...., ""' stiffness provided by their interior and exterior wall finishes would be adequate to resist lateral loads equivalent to the levels in the current building code. ~ ~ Section E ~ See Section B above for deficiencies that occur in Sections E and F due to their - continuity with Section B. '* .. .. - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 11 of 16 .. - .. - - ,. .. - .., ... .. .. .. ",. ... - .. - - ... - ... - .. .. - ., ... - ~,_""'_"~",""'...,~,-=_""...",,,,,,~~..."~.~,,,",,,,,.~~'"~'~'~..c;_ Section F F-1 The connection of the low roof in area F to the original auditorium building is not known, and could not be determined. It is likely adequate for lateral loads in the north-south direction. The connection would require examination to determine what magnitude of forces could be transferred between the lower roof of Section F and the masonry auditorium wall in the vertical and east-west lateral directions. This capacity could be compared to the tributary weight and loading from the adjacent portion of Section F. It would be expected that additional lateral ties would be required from the auditorium wall to the roof framing, in order to provide a connection adequate for current design forces. As an alternate, several of the interior east-west walls in this area could be sheathed with plywood to act as shear walls. Sections G and H G-1 There does not appear to be any specific deficiency with regard to the framing or connections of the mansard roofs. However, due to the extensive amount of mansard that was added, including the horizontal roof that supports it along the east side, the additional seismic load that results from this feature is significant. Whatever lateral analysis is performed on this facility must include the effects of this added weight. See also item M-2 below regarding deterioration of the exposed wood framing in these elements. Section I As with Sections C and D. the size and conventional construction of this section results in no significant structural deficiencies or .... - ... Section J ... .. ... .. .. - - - ... - There are no apparent deficiencies in these free-standing trellis structures. However. a complete survey of the integrity of the exposed wood members that make up these elements should be conducted in the future. See item M-2 below. Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 12 of 16 .. Section K - As indicated in the description of this section above, this structure is seismically. isolated from the remainder of the facility, and is of modern construction utilizing appropriate shear walls and building ties. There are no apparent deficiencies in the section. - - - .. - _! .. .. .. - - - - - - - . lilt - .. .. or - ..... - - - .~~ - .. - - - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 13 of 16 . . - - ... .. ... MISCELLANEOUS FINDINGS: .. M-1 In the areas of flat roof, numerous gutters and downspouts appear to be clogged with trash, dead vegetation and other debris, likely causing areas of standing water and roof leaks when raining. In addition, several screens over the roof drains are loose, displaced or missing, allowing blockage of the drains. There are also large quantities of accumulated debris throughout the flat roof areas. !^'~f.uoe..... ..... - .. - - .... M-2 Significant portions of the exposed wood framing (fascias, joists beams and posts) that comprise the roof screens and fascia .added in 1976 appear to have experienced fungal decay and dry-rot. This is especially true in the exposed elements that are not visible from ground level, since many of these members were apparently not painted. Much of the lumber is not pressure treated, and does not appear to be of decay-resistant wood (redwood or cedar). In addition, the end-grain of many members is not sealed, especially vertical members such as posts and blocking elements. This allows easy intrusion of moisture, and causes premature decay of the members. A comprehensive survey of these wood members should be performed by a lumber inspection agency to determine the extent of damage. .. ... - .. - ... - .. M-3 Several of the trees on all sides of the building currently overhang or touch the building, and should be trimmed. In addition, a large portion of the east wall is covered with ivy, which can induce insect and fungal de~y in the wall. .. - .. M-4 Several of the nuts on the exposed bolts, which connect the wood fascia and roof screen members, are loose. This is likely due to shrinkage of the wood members over time. All nuts should be checked and tightened. . ... - .. M-5 Several of the roof-top mechanical units appear to have minimal anchorage to the roof structure and/or walls, especially on the arched auditorium roof. A further review of all units would be warranted, and reinforcement of connections made where necessary. 0' . cUdJJ.. <fJUt t~ MD1 CI P - ~CL ~ up 5c.f".u~v. G~tt ~ ~I 1Y 4 ... A;-:cv'I\ ~ ~'~', & ~ Y~' ... - .. - .. .... ... - ... - - .. Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 14 of 16 - - ~ .... - MAGNITUDE OF COSTS - An approximation has been developed of costs that would be required for the mitigation of the deficiencies described in this report. We believe that the cost for this work would be approximately $200,000. .. .. - ...., This estimate was derived using reasonable unit costs for the various remedial tasks, based on our recent experience with similar projects. .. - As mentioned in the Introduction and Scope of this report, this investigation was conceptual in nature, and was limited to visual inspection of the facility without invasive scrutiny or testing. The investigation also did not involve specific analyses of the particular building sections or structural elements that make up the facility. In order to discover all significant deficiencies within the facility and develop specific remedial criteria, a more specific and detailed investigation would be required. Only with such an investigation could a more accurate estimate of actual construction costs be provided, and it is certainly possible that additional deficienCies would be discovered in the course of such a comprehensive investigation. Therefore, the approximate cost as indicated herein would be subject to an increase or decrease based on other conditions that may be discovered in a future detailed investigation, and from the design of the associated remedial work. - - - .. .. - .. .. .. - Another aspect that \yould directly affect the cost is the targeted level of performance and acceptable level of damage resulting from a moderate or major seismic event. Since the type of occupancy in this facility has not changed, there are no requirements that mandate compliance of these existing buildings with the current building code. The costs developed herein are based on remedial work that would improve the deficient conditions to provide a safe level of performance, but not necessarily require compliance with all current code requirements. Certain conditions would lend themselves to being easily strengthened to code-complian~e level, while others may require 'illJ.Practical revisions to inaccessible elements. - ,.. - .. - .. - - ... - - - .. .. - Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 15 of 16 . - - - ... .. - .. - .. - .. - .. ... ""'" - - - - - - - - - .. - .. - .. - .. "". - - .. .. - - - CONCLUSION The older structures in this facility appear to posses deficiencies that would not be uncommon or unexpected in buildings of a similar age and construction type. The construction details used in this building were not significantly different from those used in many other buildings designed in the same era. The high-mass construction of the original auditorium structure has proven over time, however, that such construction requires an increased level of attention with regard to the connections of these heavy elements, especially when combined with wood elements. Certainly, the evolution of building codes, structural design and construction practices since these structures were designed have resulted in more stringent design requirements, especially with regard to the resistance of lateral seismic loads. Virtually any structure can be upgraded to provide a higher level of lateral load resistance, thus resulting in a real and perceived increase in the buildings' safety it affords its occupants. The degree to which any facility is improved must always be weighed against its type of use and the associated costs required to attain a specified level of "performance". This facility appears to experience a high level of use, with many occupants for a significant time of each day. There appears to be a significant number of structural aspects that should be addressed within a finite amount of time, in order to provide an increased level of bUilding performance and protection that could realistically be expected by the users and owners of the Senior Center. Given the magnitude of work and associated costs described herein, it would appear that there is an acceptable cost- benefit ratio for some level of a structural upgrade of this facility. ., Mountain View Senior Center Structural Investigation September, 1998 Page 16 of 16 - ~~if' l1li '- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW .. .... l1li - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, .. PLANNED 2000/2004 .. - 'THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - "* .. .. - .. *' - - 'iiIlIIII .. .. l1li - .. - l1li - l1li - - - . . a c c ~ c c Ie c ~ c c c c c c ~ c c ~ Q ~ . o Z ~ .~ "e = QJ ~ ~ < -- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ a 2 ~ J D o o o ~ J 8 J 8 CAP IT AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ,., u J ~ n I .. .. .. .. - .. - .. - .. .. .. .. - - .. .. .. - .. .... - - .. .. .. - .. .. .. .. - .. .. .... - .... - ~ p.. 0 0 t: m Q) "t:l @ S 0 m 0 <) .- m ~ m .- _+_r s::: ~ rI} Q) .- .... 0 m 8 = ~ .- Q)~ ~ ~ e <) > > "t:l Q) 0 8 e ......~ 0 ...... <) s::: s::: m 8 0 .- Q) m~ 0/) U ro I-< s::: s::: p.. s::: Q) .- Q) ~ ...... oS ...s::: .- ...s::: ...s::: ...s::: m ...... "t:l s::: Q) ...... s::: m m m m .- .- .- .- Q) '8 .- .- .- ...... s::: ro ~ s::: "t:l s::: ~ s::: Q) ;:l a t+=: ;:l t+=: t+=: t+=: > Q) <) .- .- S I-< .- I-< I-< I-< ...... 0/) 0 C,) 0 0 Q) 0 C,) Q) s::: .- '1:: s::: '1:: '1:: C,) '1:: e C,) .- i:: .- ro CI:S 0 Q) ...... Q) Q) .- Q) ...... .- 0/) ...... 0 ...... ...... fr ...... m fr 0 :><: s::: :><: :><: :><: Q) s::: U Q) Q) Q) I-< Q) "t:l I-< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rI} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o~ o~ o~ o~ 0 0 o~ 0 ....: o~ o~ o~ II') II') ('.l 00 o~ II') II') 0 rI} II') II') II') ...... ...... M ...... -.:t ...... ...... 0 ~ ~ {;A {;A {;A {;A {;A {;A {;A {;A {;A {;A {;A "" 0 ~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q CZl CZl Q rI} = CZl CZl CZl CZl CZl CZl CZl Q Q CZl 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p.. CZl == = 11"""II ~ rI} 8 ...... Q) CJ .~ .- u ~ == 0 Q) 0/) s::: "" 0 ~ C,) s::: = 8 0/) .- .- ...... == "Cl ...... s::: C,) ~ s::: s::: t+=: <I) .- p.. Q) rI} Q) ro 0 I-< .- g i:: p.. 0 Q) m ...... 8 '1:: "t:l 0/) s::: == .- "t:l .- 0 CI:S 8 u 0/) Q) 0 s::: .- .- "" ~ ...... a .- CI:S s::: :><: ...... = ~ ~ s::: I-< 0/) .- Q) Q) ;:l u .... ~ Q) 0/) o:l i:: I-< .- s::: rI} 0 0/) CI:S ...... <:: > s::: s::: p.. C,) t+=: 0 10 .- .- <::~ .- .5 e > CJ i:: .- CI:S Q) 0 0 CI:S p.. ...... ...s::: Q) 8 "Cl ~ M <I) m s::: m ...... ::r: Q) C,) ;:l m ~ Q) I > m 0/) ...... .- ...... .... 0'\ Q) <:: s::: ::j:t: ro .- 0 I-< I-< I-< ~ .- p.. ~ ...s::: Q) Q) Q) 0'\ I-< .- s::: ...... ...... ...... e ...... 0'\ ~ ~ "t:l Q) Q) ~ s::: s::: s::: .- -- .- 0 I-< I-< Q) Q) Q) .... 11"""II - .- .- .- .- .- .- I-< .... .- .- ;:l ~ u u u .- CI:S ro ~ ~ 0 rI} eJ ::r: ::r: ..0 ...... ...... I-< I-< I-< ~ CZl Q) Q) m - = u C,) C,) 0/) 0 0 0 ~ >. >. 0 Q) .- .- s::: .- .- .- ~ ...... ...... I-< .- .- s::: s::: s::: .... .- .- ::E .- 0 0 Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 u u ~ ~ ~ ~ r:/) CZl CZl ~ ...... ('.l M -.:t II') \0 r--- 00 0\ 0 ...... ""1"", ~ w~ - -- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, .. PLANNED 2000/2004 - .. THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - .. - .. .. - .. - .. - .. .. .. - - .. - ... - - .. .. .. . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . I 0 0 z ~ ~ .~ 0 ~ = QJ ~ ~ I ~ ,e < n .. ~ c c .~ ~ ~ U I~ C I '~ CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW J J J J J J J J J o J J o J J J J o o CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK .. .. .. .. - .. - - .. ... - .. - .. - - - - - - - - - .. .. .. - .. .. .. .. .. - - - - - - ~.~ - .1.-1 CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11,1999 TO: Kevin C. Duggan, City Manager FROM: Robert F. Locke, Finance and Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: FY 1999-2000-FY 2003-03 INFORMATION SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT Attached to this memo is a status report on current Inforplation Services (IS) capital improvement projects and a description of the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 and outer years capital improvement requests for technology projects. Over the past year, IS has completed a number of important projects, including implementation of the new Financial system, significant improvements to the City's data communications network, replacement of hundreds of Mac computers with Windows/Intel-based desktop computers, completion of the Geographic Information System (GIS) aerial photography of the whole City to be used as the City's base map, and the completion of the electronic records management system in the City Clerk's office. Overall, it has been a very busy and productive year. Several themes continue to guide the projects requested in the coming year's capital improvement program budget. These themes are: development of a shared information resource accessible to all departments and the public; continuous enhancements to the data communications network, enabling the sharing of information; replacing and improving our core business and public safety applications; and containing the future operating costs of our technology infrastructure. Funding is requested in Fiscal Year 1999-2000 for projects supporting these themes. The GIS project continues to be identified as a high-priority project and is continually moving toward a production system capable of providing data and mapping services for all departments. The continued focus is now of the joint Public Works Department and Public Services Division needs. With the completion of the base map, the City will begin the process of adding all of the City's utilities to the GIS system in order to replace the aging Public Works Department paper maps and to begin a pilot maintenance management system to improve the department's ability to manage and direct the day- to-day maintenance of the City's utilities, streets, buildings and other elements of infrastructure. Funding is requested at $100,000 for this effort. """ Kevin C. Duggan March 11,1999 Page 2 -~ .. .. - The building inspection system is currently in the process of being replaced as it is not Year 2000 compliant. In addition to this project, which is being completed in a joint effort with the City of Sunnyvale, both Cities, with the assistance of Microsoft, are planning the implementation of a web enabled e-commerce simple permitting project. The goal of this new project is to allow the public to obtain simple building permits over the internet, thereby eliminating the need for the public to have to come in person to City Hall. Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) of new funding is requested to be combined with the $160,000 budgeted in FY 1998-99 for a total project cost of $210,000. .. .. .. .. - .. Although the Library system was installed in October of 1998 and the new Financial system in January of 1999, these software systems and others like the Utility Billing system need additional modules to make them more functional. It is estimated that I between all of these currently implemented systems, ongoing enhancements will be required. Funding for these additional modules to existing systems is requested at $100,000. ... .. .. - - The new planned e-commerce project for the Community Development Department's Building Inspection system leads City staff to the possibility of other e-commerce applications for business licenses, utility bills, recreation classes and possibly theater tickets. A feasibility project to determine appropriate applications is recommended. Funding for this project is requested at $50,000. - .. - .. .. The City has, .over a year, seriously undertaken the responsibility to ensure the uninteruption of City services due to the Year 2000 computer issue by.reviewing, replacing and upgrading many of the City's software and hardware components. Although staff feels confident that all systems have been inventoried and required changes have been planned and are in the process of being implemented, a contingency for unknown problems is recommended. Funding for these contingencies is requested at $100,000. - .. .. .. - Total IS requested funding for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is $400,000. - Future Year Projects .. Building on the themes of shared information resources, enhancements to the data communications network and replacing core business and public safety applications, future year systems focus on the replacement of the payroll/personnel, utility billing and Fire records management systems. Funding is also requested to keep pace with ongoing technology developments. - .. .. .. .' - - .. .. .. ... "'"" .. - .. - ... - .. - .. ... ... - ... ... - - ... - - - .. ... .. - .. ... ... ... .. - ... ,.... - - - Kevin C. Duggan March 11, 1999 Page 3 The number and size of projects requested in future years is paced to avoid continually adding technical support staff in IS. The City has a substantial investment in _ technology and a relatively small support staff. It is the objective of City management to recap the benefits of technology but within the financial limits of our operating budget. ' Rob r F. Locke Finance and Administrative Services Director RFL/JW /6/ ASD SOS-03-11-99M- E^ Attachment .. ... .. STATUS OF ACTIVE INFORMATION SERVICES CAPITAL PROJECTS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF FISCAL YEARS 1999-2000 THROUGH 2003-04 REQUESTS .. - - 1. Fiscal Year 1991-92 Information Services Capital Projects .. Budget: $672,000 Balance: $44,526 (as of 12/31/98)1 - .. Current Status: This project included Network improvements, FAMIS (accounting system) upgrade, Small Systems, Library Systems and other miscellaneous projects which have been completed. Only the Employee Services System enhancements of providing an automated EE04 report, applicant tracking, position control, benefit statement, transition to NT operating system and completion of the original HR project by entering employee history to the ADP system needs to be completed. f - .. .. .. .. This project was to have been completed in 1997, but do to the illness of a City employee the project has been delayed. - - Next Steps: Develop a revised project plan for the Employee Services ADP project, updated budget and time line to complete this project. - - Time Line: Project completion - 12/31/99 - ... 2. Fiscal Year 1995-96 Information Services Capital Projects - - Budget: $341,000 Balance $32,862 (as of 12/31/98) .. .. Current Status: This project included the RFP for the new financial management system, the Pilot Records Management-Imaging system for the Community Development department, selection assistance in choosing the new Library System, funding for upgrading PC memory and conversions of Mac desktops to Windows machines with associated training costs. The finance system RFP was completed, the imaging system is near completion, the Library System is completed and the PC upgrades, conversions and training are continuing. - - - - .. Next Steps: Some problems have been discovered in the CDD Imaging System database and some re- scanning of documents will be required. The city will continue to convert desktop computers from Mac's to PC's in FY 1998/99 & 1999/2000 and so the training of employees for the new platform will continue. - .. - - - I Budget balances are shown as of this date as capital project reporting was not fully developed in the new financial system when this memo was prepared. .. - . . - - - .. - .. - - - .. .. .. .... .. - .. - ... - .. .... - ,.. .. .. - .. .. - .. .. .. ,.. - - - - - Time Line: Complete Training- 6/3012000 Complete Project- 6/30/2000 3. Fiscal Year 1996.97 Information Services Capital Projects Budget: $1,061,000 Balance $153,001 (as of 12/31/98) Current Status: This following elements of this project, their status and budget balance as of 12/31/98 follows. Library System - completed Community Development Department Imaging System -project complete except for minor enhancements and rescanning of documents. GIS base map - Contract for base map issued to Hammon, Jensen & Wallen and photometric flight is complete. Public Access - (bal. $63,000) web page and full Internet connectivity project is continuing. Police Positive J.D. System - (bal. $90,000) an off-the-shelf mug shot and fingerprint computerized file system compatible with surrounding jurisdictions and the new/or enhanced Police RMS system, has been delayed due to market technology changes. Next Steps: Continue to improve the City's web page; and develop the specifications for the purchase of the Police Positive J.D. system. Time Line: - Complete Police J.D. Sys - 6/3012000 Complete Project- 6/30/2000 2 - - - .. 4. Fiscal Year 1997.98 Information Services Capital Projects .. Budget: $2,055,000 Balance $526,954 (as of 12/31/98) - .. Current Status: This following elements of this project, their status and budget balance as of 12/31/98 follows. - - .. The City Clerks Electronic Records Imaging System has been installed and is operational (bal. $294,900). .. - The new Financial System is live and Phase II modules are being planned (bal. $182,332). I I - - The consultant assisting the Fire department with the RFP for the new/or upgraded CADIRMSIMDS (computer aided dispatch/records management system/mobile data system) system is reviewing the responses to the Mobile Data System RFP. .. .' The Community Center, City Hall, MOC, Fire Sta. #4 and the PolicelFire Administration building data wiring conversion from AppleTalk to Ethernet are complete. The installation of an INET(institutional network) connection at the Community Center has been completed. The Fire Stations 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5, Senior Center, Golf Pro Shop; Golf Maintenance facility; and Rengstorff House will be completed by July 99, assuming TCI keeps to the agreed upon schedule. (bal. $33,857) - .. - .. - .. Next Steps: Fully implement the City Clerk's IntralInternet document imaging system by June 1999. Develop information for management to determine priority for extending the document imaging hardware/software used for the City Clerk's records to other departments. .. - .. Implement Phase II (Inventory, Fixed Assets & Account Receivable) of the new financial system. .. Complete the network enhancements at Fire Stations 1,2,3,4, & 5; Senior Center; Golf Pro Shop; Golf Maintenance facility; and Rengstorff House by July 1999 (date dependent on TCI). .. """ - Time Line: Complete City Clerk Image Sys. - 6/30/99 Complete Phase 11 of Financial Management System - 6/30/99 Complete Network Enhancements - 7/30/99 - - .. - .. .. - 3 .. .. - - "",. - - - - - ... .. ... .. - - - - - - - - - - - ... ... .. - .. ... - ,. .. - - ... - - - 5. Fiscal Year 1998-99 Information Services Capital Projects Budget: $1,360,000 Balance of $1,350,300 (as of 12/31/98) Current Status: This project consists of supplemental funding for the GIS and Network Enhancements efforts, implementation of a maintenance management system for the Public Services Division of the Public Works department with integration to GIS, additional funding for the CAD /RMS /MDT project in the Police and Fire departments and funding for the Building Inspection SMART Permitting project. To date, staff has spent considerable time planning for these projects but few expenditures have been incurred. The GIS and Network Enhancements components of the project build on prior year projects which must be completed before the phases budgeted in this project can commence. As described below, the slow pace of expenditures does not indicate a lack of progress on major projects. GIS - Maintenance Mgmt System - Implement a maintenance management system to allow the Public Services Division to manage and direct day to day maintenance work projects and to have that same information update the GIS system. Enhance the GIS base map layers adding the City's water, sewer, storm drain and traffic signal data. This project is in the early planning stages and will commence more rapidly upon completion of the GIS base map scheduled to be completed in May, 1999. (Budget = $400,00) Network Enhancements - To eliminate all AppleTalk wiring in City facilities and provide high speed Ethernet connectivity to all desktop computers. Coordinate with TCI for the fiber optic conversion and extension of the INET to all major City facilities. Funding for the INET conversion and extension is provided in the franchise agreement with TCL Staff has prepared the network design and provided it to TCL TCI was scheduled to complete the INET build out by March, 1999. They are now scheduled to complete the build out by July, 1999. Staff has installed ISDN lines to remote locations for network connectivity due to this delay which will be paid by TCL Installation of network switching equipment in the facilities covered by this budget is delayed until the completion of the INET build out. (Budget = $300,000) CADIRMSIMDT's - To install an upgraded computer aided dispatch system, police records management system and mobile data terminals in police and fire vehicles. Funding from the Equipment Replacement fund ($595,000), law enforcement grant ($395,000) and General fund CIP Reserve ($400,000) for total funding of $1,390,000. At this time, it appears current funding will be sufficient for MDT acquisition and less ambitious upgrade of CAD system than was anticipated. However, due to rapidly changing technology, it is felt preferable to implement upgrade, extend CAD system life and budget CAD replacement in a future year. 4 - ~ - Building Inspection System - This system will replace current building pennit issuance system that is not Y2K compliant. Funding is to cover acquisition and modification of Sunnyvale building pennit system for implementation in the City. Funding is also to cover the Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Joint Venture Silicon Valley, Microsoft development of the online pennitting system to be known as Smart Pennitting. At this time, consultants have been retained to prepare designs and assist with transfer of building system from Sunnyvale. Microsoft is preparing Smart Permitting design and integrated project is moving ahead on schedule'for completion in September, 1999. (Budget =$160,000) .. - - .. .... - Fleet Maintenance Management System - Acquisition of a fleet maintenance management system for the City's fleet operations. At this time, a consultant has been selected and is working on system specifications with the goal of selecting and installing the system by September, 1999. (Budget = $66,000) - - .. .. Next Steps: ." Maintenance Management System - Working with Public Services Division, develop system requirements, prepare RFP, select and install system. Timeline: Initial installation 6/30/00 - .. - GIS - Complete base map, incorporate compatibility requirements into RFP specifications for maintenance management system. Timeline: Integration with maintenance system 9/30/00 Network Enhancements - Monitor TCI progress on !NET, install equipment. Timeline: Complete Enhancements - 6/30/00 - - - .. CAD/RMS/MDT's - Acquire mobile data terminals for safety vehicles, implement CAD system upgrades. Timeline: Complete CAD upgrades - 12/31/99 - - - Building Inspection System - Assist consultant in completing system modifications for Sunnyvale building inspection system, complete contracts with Sunnyvale and Microsoft. Timeline: Complete building and online systems - 12/31/99 .. .. Fleet Maintenance Management System - Finalize system specifications, prepare and distribute RFP to potential vendors. Timeline: System implementation -12/31/99 - - ~ - - ~<i. .. .... - - 5 . - .. - ,... - INFORMATION SERVICES REQUESTED CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 1999/2000 - 2003/04 - - 99/2000 Information Services Computer Projects .. .. Requested Budget: $400,000 - GIS-Public WorkslPublic Services - $100,000 - Continuation ofFY 1998/99 GIS project. - - Build. Inspection Permit System - $50,000 - To supplement Fiscal Years 1998/99 building permit project due to cost increases necessary to tailer system to City's needs. - .. Library, Finance, & Utility Billing Software Upgrades - $100,000 - To acquire and install additional modules from original system vendor to increase functionality. - - Other E-Commerce Applications - $50,000 - Implementation of small e-commerce applications such as buisiness license, online utility bill payments and other City services through the City's web site. - - - Year 2000 Contingency - $100,000 - Contingency funds to deal with unanticipated Y2K technology related issues. - - 2000-01 Information Services Computer Projects - - Requested Budget: $550,000 - Utility Billing System - $150,000 Replace billing system - - Payroll and Personnel System - $200,000 - Replace payroll and personnel system - Office Automation - $200,000 - Various technology enhancements - - 2001-02 Information Services Computer Projects .. Requested Budget: $800,000 - Fire RMS - $400,000 - Replace Fire/Police Records Management System .. _ Network Enhancements - $400,000 - Extension of network connectivity to fire stations and equipment enhancements. - .. - .. - 6 - - - - -" .' .. 2002-03 Information Services Projects - Requested Budget: $800,000 """' Future IS Projects - Placeholder funding for public access, network enhancements, office automation and future technology projects. . .. .. - 2003-04 Information Services Projects - - Requested Budget: $800,000 - Future IS Projects - Placeholder funding for public acce~, network enhancements, office automation and future technology projects. ! - .. - - .. .. - .. . .. .. .. .. .. - - - - - .. .. .... - .. 7. .. . I C C m ~ a c c ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ m I D ~ ~ M ~ . o Z ~ .- ~ = (JJ ~ ~ -< CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW J J ~ a ~ ~ 3 o o a 3 ~ J J 3 n o a I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ... - - - - .. - - - .. - .... - .... - .. - - - - - - ~' n ~'''P _ 1_ " .:'\' CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March 12, 1999 TO: David A. Muela, Community Services Director David L. Collins, Golf Course Manager ~ CIP Priorities and Scheduling - Shoreline Golf Links FROM: SUBJECT: Renovation/replacement of the irrigation system and restoration of drainage at Shoreline Golf Links is scheduled to be accomplished in two separate capital projects. The project for the back nine (CIP 99-24) is expected to be bid out and awarded this spring. The project for the front nine (Clr 00-22) is currently scheduled for design in FY 99-00 and should proceed to construction in the spring of 2000. This memorandum will address recommended priorities and scheduling of other capital projects, most of which have not yet been scheduled in the five-year CIP. The following are capital projects that merit consideration for future approval: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Construct irrigation well (scheduled as 00-52) Construct new bridge over Permanente Creek Design and construct new pro shop building Design and construct golf car storage facilities Design and construct additional maintenance facilities .... - Construct irrigation well <00-52) .. - - .. - - .. .. - - .. - - - Staff has reviewed the issue of future water resources for the North Bayshore Area and Shoreline Golf Links. A recommendation will be coming forward proposing that a deep:aquifer well be drilled to supply high-quality, non-potable water to the golf course. The proposal would also make provision for supplemental use of tertiary effluent water for certain non-landfill landscaped areas which currently receive irrigation water from the Irrigation Pump Station. The availability of ground water from the well would eliminate the current use of potable water for irrigation, which is not considered to be the highest use of this water resource. The payback on this well is considered to be excellent. This project should get the earliest possible attention for funding. Since the Shoreline Golf Links Fund has a reasonably healthy balance, this project could be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. The actual construction of the well would take less time than would be used for design and bidding, and it is possible, but not probable, that the well could be installed by the fall of 1999. 1 - ... Construct new bridge over Permanente Creek - This is a new project, but one which has been discussed for several years. Access to the practice range and the back nine is via a 70' long and 6' wide steel bridge, which was installed in 1981. Traffic across this 6' wide pedestrian/golf car bridge, which only permits one-way travel in a golf car, has increased significantly. The higher volume of play at the golf course, the installation of night lighting at the range and increased use of the trails along Permanente Creek have contributed to this increase. A new bridge (10' in width) would provide adequate capacity and two-way golf car access across Permanente Creek. The existing bridge would be relocated (and upgraded to current safety railing standards at modest cost) and placed at a location to provide one-way exiting from the 18th hole back to the clubhouse area. This project could be funded from the Shoreline Golf Links Fund on a pay-as-you-go " basis and would be an excellent long-term investment in the course's infrastructure. .. - .. - NIl' - - - .. Design and construct new pro shop building Design and construct golf car storage facilities - - A pro shop building was approved for construction in 1993 but was deferred due to litigation that was not settled until late 1995. Revisiting the design of the pro shop building (and golf car storage facilities) was authorized in CIP 97-27. That design effort has been put on hold due to other more pressing capital projects at the course, i. e. front and back nine drainage and irrigation, etc. - .. - .. .. The justification for a new or expanded pro shop facility has the following major elements: (1) The existing retail area in the pro shop is undersized by current standards, and limits customer services, retail sales and profits; (2) A typical 18-hole golf course will have a retail sales area of 1500 square feet as compared to the less than 800 squa"re feet in the existing facility; (3) Rest room facilities are tired (18 years old) and inadequately-sized; (4) Office space, while a small component of a pro shop, is inadequate and limits utilization of computer technology; (5) Storage space is also small, and a portion of the cart storage area is used for storage; (6) The course . management office functions in a converted snack bar area, and there is no meeting room avail.able at the course. Further, the existing pro shop building is of much lesser design quality than the Michaels at Shoreline facility, an issue compounded by their close proximity to one another. .; - .. - ... - .. - - Golf car storage facilities must be considered concurrently with the design of the pro shop facilities. The pro shop and management offices are currently located in the . same building as the golf car storage area. That latter area is inadequate in size and is capable of storing about 50 gas-powered golf cars. The remaining 25 must therefore be stored outdoors where they have been subjected to vandalism from time-to-time. The Air Resources Board has adopted regulations that preclude the importing of gasoline-powered golf cars into California after March 2000. The current gas-powered fleet is three years old, and probably has a remaining life span of two to maybe three years. As such it appears that it will be necessary to construct a facility that can accommodate electric-powered golf cars, each of which must be re- " - - - .. - .. .. ., 2 . . - .. - - - .. - .. - .. -- .. - .. - .... - ... - .. - - - .. .. .. - .. .. .. .. .. - - - - - - charged at night, cannot thus be stored out-of-doors and which require more expansive spacing than gas-powered golf cars. The existing site of the pro shop building may be somewhat constrained in area to accommodate an adequately sized golf car storage facility. Consideration could be given to splitting the pro shop facilities from the golf car facilities, achieving some economies in capital costs by housing the latter in a pre-engineered (Butler-type) building at a less prominent location, notwithstanding that there would be some additional operational costs involved in the back-and-forth transport of such golf cars. This and other options would be studied in the updating of the pro shop design. Design and construct additional maintenance facilities The existing maintenance facility is a Butler building (70' x 40') that was constructed in 1981 for a maintenance operation that was smaller than is now required at Shoreline Golf Links. A small chemical storage buildmg (about 50 square feet) was added to the site in 1996, and a C-van is rented to store irrigation and similar supplies. Outside storage of fertilizer and similar materials on pallets has had to be. employed, with certain attendant risks of theft or vandalism. Only a small fraction of the fleet of golf course maintenance equipment that is needed for daily operations is able to be stored indoors at night, so that outside storage involves similar risks, plus a higher rate of depreciation. Study of a potential golf course maintenance facility will be folded into the Shoreline Maintenance Facility Site and Program Study (01-23) currently scheduled for 1999-2000. . Scheduling Relationships From a priority standpoint the irrigation well project which is scheduled for 1999- 2000 can proceed on its own and at as fast a pace as possible because of its excellent payback. The upgrading of the access bridge to the back nine and practice range can also proceed on its own schedule. The design efforts for the pro shop and cart facilities should proceed concurrently because of their interrelationships. .3 - "i .' - - .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - - - ..." CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, .. PLANNED 2000/2004 .-' - THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - .. - .. - .. .. .... .. - - - ~ - ~ - .' - .. - .. . .. m ~ ~ c ~ ~ c c c ~ ~ ~ ~ C I I ~ D ~ ~ ~ . Q Z ~ .~ "e = QJ ~ ~ -< CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ ~ ~ J 8 D o o ~ 8 ~ J ~ ~ o o I ~ n CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - - ... - .. - - - - - ... .- - - ... - - - - - .... - - .. - - - - - .. - - - - - - - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: March 18, 1999 TO: Kevin C. Duggan, City Manager FROM: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director David A. Muela, Community Services Director SUBJECT: IRRIGATION WATER RESOURCES FOR THE NORTH BA YSHORE AREA AND SHORELINE GOLF LINKS Attached is a report proposing a long-range strategy for water resources in the North Bayshore Area. The Irrigation Pump Station (IPS) at Shoreline pumps and distributes water from the golf course lakes into the golf course irrigation system (90 percent to 95 percent of total use) and also to Shoreline at Mountain View, Sun Microsystems and the Shoreline Amphitheatre for landscape irrigation uses. Historically, this water has been a blend of potable water and reclaimed water-tertiary effluent water (TEW) from the Palo Alto Regional Water Pollution Control Plant. However, since June 1997, significant amounts of TEW have not been blended with potable water at the IPS. The nonuse of TEW has been due to two principal factors: the City's turf grass renovation efforts at Shoreline Golf Links and the imprecision of manual valving at the IPS blend well. The high sodium content of the TEW available is injurious to turf grasses, and the clay cap over the underlying landfill prevents leaching such salts out, with the result that salt builds up in the root zone and will eventually kill the turf grass. The use of TEW to serve the nonlandfill irrigation needs of other users is infeasible due to the need for unreasonable effort and difficult scheduling that the present manual valving system imposes. The report recommends a dual strategy: 1. Installation of an irrigation well to produce agricultural-quality water for the golf course at an economic cost; and 2. Exploration of continued use of TEW with separate distribution lines and development of more precise blending capacities. - Kevin C. Duggan March 18,1999 Page 2 ., - .. .. The irrigation well is considered highly feasible by a consulting hydrogeologist who has been working with the Public Works Department on landfill and related matters. A test well drilled in 1989 near the 10th tee at the golf course produced an excellent yield of water. The risk of not locating an adequate supply of groundwater in the deep aquifer is considered nominal. Cross-contamination of aquifers (upper- level contamination being drawn down into the lower aquifer) is minimized by providing a 150' sleeve for the well and a monitoring well to detect any problems. The risk that water resources in the deep aquifer would be rationed in a drought exists, although probably smaller than the risk of Hetch-Hetchy water rationing in such a drought. The Santa Clara Valley Water District has a program to recharge the deep aquifer, which also tends to reduce such risk. In the worst-case scenario, Shoreline Golf Links would have to use full-strength TEW with tolerable risk if the drought was not a multi-year episode. ' - .. .. - - - - .. - - The recommendations in the report, if carried out, would achieve a dependable, long-term and economic supply of irrigation-quality water for the North Bayshore Area. In doing so, the inefficient use of large quantities of potable water for irriga- tion purposes would be eliminated, and higher and better use could be made of existing potable water resources. .. . . - We would be happy to provide you with any additional information you or the City Council require. If you concur with this strategy, we recommend proposing a capital improvement project (ClP) for the well in the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Capital Budget for City Council consideration. .. - - .. - Cathy R. Lazar Public Works Director - - \s-- - i~_k-'- David A. Muela Community Services Director - ~ CRL-DAM/DLC/5/CSD 206-12-04-98M-E^ - _$ Attachment - OlIO> - ., .. .. - - - - - - - - - - - ... - - - - - - - - - - - .. - - - .. - .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW. MEMORANDUM DATE: February 5, 1999 TO: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director David A. Muela, Community Services Director FROM: North Bayshore Area Water Policy Task Force Committee SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR WATER RESOURCES IN THE NORTH BA YSHORE AREA In October 1997, you formed a committee of staff members to address long-range water policy issues for the North Bayshore Area. The committee was chaired by Paul Olmos, Principal Civil Engineer, and included the Shoreline Manager, Golf Operations Manager, Utilities Services Manager and Environmental Engineering Manager. The committee also received technical support from several departments in the City. This report presents the committee's findings and recommendations. COMMITTEE FINDINGS . Use of and dependence upon potable water for irrigation purposes is both costly and an inefficient use of a scarce resource. . In acting as retention ponds for irrigation supply purposes, the lakes within Shoreline Golf Links give up significant evaporative losses of potable water to the environment. . Studies have shown that use of tertiary effluent water (TEW) on Shoreline Golf Links adversely stresses turfgrasses at the course. . Significant amounts of TEW have not been used on Shoreline Golf Links since June 1997 due in part to the imprecision of manual valving at the irrigation pump station (IPS) and the City's turfgrass renovation efforts at the course. - .. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS - - - - .. - . Install an irrigation well to produce an on-going supply of agricultural-quality water for golf course and other irrigation purposes at an economic cost. ... Cathy R. Lazarus David A. Muela February 5,1999 Page 2 - - - - . - Explore continued use of TEWi more precise blending and/ or separate distribution lines are potential strategies for its use. This report addresses water supply, water quality and costs of water issues for the North Bayshore Area (Shoreline). It recommends the installation of an irrigation well to improve the quantity and quality of irrigation water in the Shoreline area, including nongolf course uses. - - - - - WATER SUPPLY RESOURCES - The basic source for irrigation water for the Shoreline ar~a is municipal water (potable). Potable water (consisting of Hetch-Hetchy system water'supplemented by municipal well water) is released into the golf course lakes for storage and subsequent distribution (pumping). - - - - A secondary source of irrigation water for the Shoreline area is TEW. Wastewater is treated and reclaimed at the Palo Alto Water Pollution Control Plant and piped back to the City of Mountain View. ... .. - TEW was initially stored in the golf course lakes, but offensive odors and algae blooms occurred. To rectify this problem, in 1989, a TEW line was extended to a blend well at the IPS. The TEW can be blended with potable water drawn from the golf course's lakes. The lakes serve as retention ponds for potable water and, in the winter months, collect rainfall to blend with the potable water. Both potable water and rainfall are subject to evaporation losses (to the atmosphere) over the 16 acres of lake surface. - ... - - ..... To distribute irrigation water, the IPS was constructed in 1981 to 1983. Water from the golf course storage ponds flows to the IPS, is blended with TEW in the blend well and pumped into main irrigation lines. These lines run generally around the perimeter of Shoreline Golf Links and the Sailing Lake. Lateral lines tap into the main irrigation lines and also serve the landscaping needs of Shoreline at Mountain View park, the Shoreline Amphitheatre, Sun Microsystems and other private uses. ... .. - ~ ~ The IPS was designed to serve the golf course, which requires large volumes of water at 100 psi during the late spring, summer and early fall. The annual quantity of water pumped from the IPS is estimated at 250,000 hundred cubic feet (cd) (187,000,000 gallons) with Shoreline Golf Links accounting for approximately 234,000 cd (over 90 percent). ~ ~ ..... - ~ ..., ~i .. - - ... - - - ... .. .. - .. - ... - .. ... .. - .. ... .. .. .. .... - .. .. JIIII - .. iIIIIl .. .. .. - -.. .. - - Cathy R. Lazarus David A. Muela February 5,1999 Page 3 WATER QUALITY The Shoreline area water quality requirements consist of high-quality irriga,tion water for the closely mown turfgrasses of Shoreline Golf Links and acceptable':'quality irriga- tion water for all other irrigated landscape areas (Amphitheatre landscaping, Shoreline area landscaping, golf course rough areas, etc.). The quality of municipal (potable) water supplied to the system is excellent. That level of quality exceeds what would be required for irrigation purposes. The quality of TEW, however, is currently substandard fpr irrigating a golf course developed over a landfill. The landfill is constructed with a clay cap of about 2' to 4' to prevent water from saturating the landfill and accelerating decomposition. As such, the salts in the TEW cannot leach out, accumulate above the clay cap and build up toward the root zone of turfgrasses not protected by an underlying drainage system. The 15 acres of putting greens and tees have underlying drainage and are not likely to experience salt buildup. However, the remainder of the course's 155 acres, particularly 45 acres of closely mown fairways, are experiencing (as shown by soil tests) salt buildup in the root zone over the years since TEW was first used. High levels of salts stress and eventually kill turfgrasses in normal soils, and a landfill golf course's soils would be especially vulnerable to salt buildup and stress. To achieve a less costly irrigation water supply, municipal water was, in the past, blended with TEW. This was done by opening a valve (manually) which released TEW into the blend well where it mixed with potable water from the golf course lakes. The blended (potable and TEW) water was subsequently pumped into the irrigation system. Conversion of this manual valve to an automatic control device is being considered as part of the improvements to the IPS contained in CIP 96-41. The manual blending of these two different quality water resources remains much less precise than it should be. A recommended blend of one part TEW and two parts municipal water has generally not worked out for the closely mown areas (mostly the 45 acres of fairways) of the golf course. Soils reports (1992-1994) have documented the extent of stress caused by high levels of salt in the irrigation water at Shoreline Golf Links or the buildup of those salts because they do not leach into the clay cap covering the landfill. A soil analysis per- formed in March 1997 showed "very high" and "high" levels of sodium on the four fairways sampled. - Cathy R. Lazarus David A. Muela February 5,1999 Page 4 wi; - ,.,. .. The 1992-1994 reports recommended leaching (flushing out) salts from the soil. However, the landfill clay caps limit the leaching that would occur in normal soil. In addition, the application of excessive amoUIlts of municipal water to the soil is expensive and not the highest use for our potable water supply. . .. - lIP. - COSTS OF WATER .. Most of the City's water supply is obtained from the Hetch-Hetchy (San Francisco) system at a rate of $0.60 ccf. The wholesale cost of TEW from the Palo Alto treatment plant is $0.15 ccf. - .. - I Costs for the City's maintenance, depreciation and operations of its distribution system are added to the acquisition cost to derive the "retail" cost of water. The City has a tiered rate structure (large-volume users pay a higher rate to encourage conservation). A monthly meter charge is also added to the unit cost based on usage. The current residential rate is $1.80 ccf, but there are $1.93 ccf and $3.58 ccf tiers for large-volume users and varying meter sizes and related charges. It is against this backdrop that water rates for the North Bayshore Area uses need to be examined. .. ., .. .. .. - IRRIGATION COSTS FOR OTHER LOCAL GOLF COURSES - The committee explored how other local golf courses obtain their irrigation water and how such costs are allocated. A wide range of resources and costs exist at other courses. - - .... Crystal Springs Golf Course pumps its irrigation water from Upper Crystal Springs Lake, which is part of the Hetch-Hetchy water system. Sunnyvale is going to supple- ment its current source with a high-quality tertiary effluent, but is currently using water from the Hetch-Hetchy system, which runs through the course. - - - Santa Clara (a landfill course) uses high-quality (without significant dissolved salts) reclaimed water at a cost of $0.88 ccf. ... - Palo Alto (which is not a landfill course) is undergoing major improvements and is planning to use a higher-percentage of TEW from the Palo Alto Water Pollution Control Plant, which is located only a short distance from the course. Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course currently uses a blend of TEW ($0.23 ccf) and potable water ($2.06 cd). ... - ... - ... - - .. .. .. - - - - - .. - .. .... .. - .. - .. - - - - .... .. - ... - .. .. Cathy R. Lazarus David A. Muela February 5,1999 Page 5 The following total irrigation water costs are (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) for the courses surveyed (Fiscal Year 1996-1997 data, which is more representative of probable costs than the El Nino year of FY 1997-1998): Crystal Springs Golf Course Sunnyvale Golf Course Santa Clara Golf Course DeLaveaga Golf Course Palo Alto Golf Course Shoreline Golf Links $ 35,000 $102,000 $145,000 $151,000 $180/000 $234/000 I It is apparent from the above that it would be prudent for Shoreline Golf Links to reduce its irrigation costs if financially and economically feasible. ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES, QUALITY AND RATES Using large quantities of potable water for irrigation is an inefficient use of the drinking water supply. Irrigation water does not need to be the same quality as potable water, and nonpotable irrigation water could be obtained at cheaper cost because it does not require treatment and testing. A test well drilled near the 10th tee at Shoreline Golf Links in 1989 showed that a deep aquifer well could produce ample quantities of acceptable agricultural (nonpotable) water. The development of this alternative source would conserve potable water, providing an agricultural water resource of higher quality than TEW for golf course and landscaping irrigation purposes and keep TEW as a reserve resource to use wherever feasible. - With the above factors in mind, the committee recommends the following: .... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... - 1. Retain the IPS and manage it as a separate and independent enterprise fund with user water rates funding all expenses (to the extent consistent with City policies for such funds); 2. Proceed with the development of a deep aquifer well to deliver an adequate supply of high-quality, agricultural-quality water (not purified to drinking water standards) at a reasonable cost; 3. Make improvements to the IPS (some of which have been identified in CIP 96-41); and .. Cathy R. Lazarus David A. Muela February 5, 1999 Page 6 ... - l1li .. 4. Evaluate the feasibility and cost of improving the quality of TEW for irrigation use, particularly in areas not affected by landfill restraints. .. .. PROPOSAL FOR AN IRRIGATION WELL AT SHORELINE .. .. Ulrick & Associates, consulting hydrogeologist, was engaged to assist the City in its review of groundwater issues relating to landfill and the North Bayshore Area. The firm was also engaged to review the results of a test well drilled in 1989 on Shoreline Golf Links and, if feasible, to update the previous design for a well to comply with newer design methods and knowledge of the aquifers and landfill areas in the Shoreline area. - .. l1li - l1li The consultant found the proposed well to be highly feasible. Subsequent contacts by City staff members with other agencies affirmed the benefits and environmental feasi- bility of a well drilled 800' into the deep aquifer. The well would be designed to current standards with a protective sleeve to protect the deep aquifer from upper aquifer contamination. .. l1li .. .. The capital cost for the well project is $400,000. This estimate is based on a preliminary Engineer's Estimate of construction costs of $265,400 to $359,000 plus other project costs. The well is estimated to produce up to 900,000 gallons of agricultural-quality irrigation water per day during the seven summer months of heavy irrigation usage at Shoreline/ Shoreline Golf Links. This quantity represents about 6 percent of the City's total water usage in those summer months, thereby reducing the City's potable water usage by almost that much. .. ... .. l1li .. - The only "acquisition cost" for this water, other than the estimated capital cost, is a pumping tax of $0.55 cd payable to the Santa Clara Valley Water District. The agricul- tural-quality water produced by the well would be of excellent quality for turf irrigation purposes. - - - iIliIl As shown in Attachment I, the total annual cost (acquisition cost of water operations and maintenance costs and depreciation) for golf course/Shoreline irrigation water from the proposed well would be $286,814. This annual cost would be $350,686 less than the $637,500 annual (retail) cost of municipal water (No.2). This would yield a payback of 1.1 years, which is considered excellent. - iIliIl - ... - - .. .. - .. .. ... - ". - .. - ... .. .. ,. .. - - - - ... ... .. .. .. .. - .. .. .. - .. .. 11M .. III ",. .. .. .. - . ~ Cathy R. Lazarus David A. Muela February 5, 1999 Page 7 IMPACT OF AN IR~IGATION WELL UPON WATER SUPPLY, QUALITY AND. RATES A potential concern that the availability of well water would diminish the City's commitment to use TEW should be addressed. The drilling of a well would place well water into the golf course's lakes instead of potable water. It would not make TEW use any less feasible than it is now. It may be feasible, in designing the new irrigation system for Shoreline Golf Links, to separate the closely mown areas from all other areas of the system and provide the former with agricultural (or, if no well, potable) water while permitting some blending of potable/ agricultural water with TEW at the blend well to serve the remaining areas. In short, the potential for using TEW in nonlandfill areas of the system and, in limited amounts on rough areas of the course, can be retained. The installation of a well to yield agricultural-quality irrigation water will have no direct or indirect impact on the use of TEW at Shoreline. OTHER WATER RESOURCES The only other partial solution is to continue exploring the feasibility of using treated contaminated ground water (TCG) from Teledyne/Spectra-Physics to supplement well water supplies. This water source is essentially TCE-contaminated groundwater which is treated by extracting it from the ground and "stripping" it (air fractionation) of contaminants so that it meets environmentally acceptable quality levels. This source would also be of agricultural quality (not purified for drinking purposes). This water should come at a reasonably low cost although adding distribution and pumping costs might make it noncompetitive with other sources. While this solution does not appear to be as attractive as the proposed well, staff recommends that the City continue to explore it by continuing discussions with Teledyne/Spectra-Physics. The quantity of water from this source is estimated to be only one-third of the proposed irrigation well, so this solution will not stand entirely on its 'own but would have to supplement other water resources. Attachment 1 compares the wholesale and retail costs of municipal water with several water resource options available for the Shoreline area and Shoreline Golf Links. The use of well water (No.3) yields the lowest cost per unit (hundred cubic feet, or cd) except for the (subsidized) wholesale rate available from the San Francisco PUC, a rate that is going to increase in the next several years. - Cathy R. Lazarus David A. Muela February 5, 1999 Page 8 - .. IIIIIIl - . The options to blend municipal water with TEW at 5:1 and 2:1 ratios (No.4 and No.5) are presented for comparison purposes only. The 5:1 ratio is probably not appropriate at current levels of sodium in the TEW, and the 2:1 ratio would be wO,rkable only in situations with much higher-quality reclaimed water than is available. The annual costs associated with each of these options are much higher than the recommended option (No.3) or its alternative (No.6). - .. - - It would still be possible to use TEW in various blending ratios or, perhaps, with separate piping for median strips, parking lot islands and other land uses that do not traverse a landfill or require high levels of care such as golf course turfgrasses. This blending option is presented as No.6 in the attached tab~e. I - . .. - In summary, we recommend the following: - ... 1. That authorization to begin design of the proposed irrigation well be obtained at an early date. Early funding of the design work would expedite the project so that its benefits could be more quickly realized. .. .. 2. That continued study be given to upgrading the IPS, consistent with approved capital projects, and to upgrading its distribution network to increase the number of potential users of TEW. - .. - 3. That negotiations continue with Teledyne/Spectra-Physics for the potential acquisition of its TCG as a water resource for the Shoreline area. - .. - .. NORTHBAYSHOREAREA WATER POLICY TASK FORCE COMMITIEE - IIIIJlIt DLC/5/CSD 206-12-04-98M-E-l^ - - Attachment-Water Resource Options for Shoreline Area/Shoreline Golf Links ... - cc: ACM, AFASD, SM, EEM, USM, PWS(A), PCE-Olmos, DPWD, GOM - ... - .. - - . - - - - - 9" - - rJ) ~ Z I-C ....:l ~ ....:l o ~ ~ Z I-C ....:l ~ ~ o ~ rJ) < ~ ~ -< ~ Z I-C ....:l ~ ~ o :z:: rJ) ~ o ~ rJ) z o I-C ~ ~ o ~ u ~ ~ o en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .- - .- - ... - - - ... .. -- .. ... iIII .. .. .. .. - .. ... .. .. .. ,- .. .. .. - - I '1:l~ ..... -1 tl ..... Q) '"' u 0 '1:l Q) 0 u 0 0'<tl0 '<tI ..... 1::..... 0 ......... ~ 0...-10 ...-I U ~~ 0 C"l 0Cf:l0 00 ~ 00 !r.l"; .. .. 0 d ...-I ...-I ~ ('.I 1:",1/)0 \0 N ~ ~ ~~~ Cf:l ,..j ~ ~ ..... '1:l~ tl ..... Q) '"' u 0 '1:l Q) 0 u 0 0 0 ..... ......... I/) 0 0 u 1::..... 0 Cf:l ('.I" 0 I/) ~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ t--:' 0 00 ~ ...-I Cf:l ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ,..j (17 ..... '1:l~ u ..... Q) '"' u u 0 '1:l Q) 0 u 0 0 0 ..... ......... 0 0 0 u 1::..... 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~~ 0 0 ~ .~ 0 0 ~ ...-I ~ I/) N ~ ~ I/) &l ~ 6: ....... '"' ..... ..... >< ~ u u U lIS 0 lI:l 0 uE-< 0 ~ 0 .........0 I/) 0 IA~ 1:'-... ...... 0 Cf:l ...... ~ I/) ~u ...-I C"l ~ CJ) ........ ...... ..... lI:la tl ..... .~'"' u....... 0 0 ~r;::1 0 .~ ~ 0 ~.l!! I/) 0 .& N ~~ 0 \0 ~ C"l ........ I/) ~ ~ O'<tlO 0...-10 OCf:lO ~..;o ~~~ '<tI ...-I 00 \!3 00 C"l ~ ..... u u iI5 t""I ~ (17 o o o ~ ~ o o I/) 1:'-... Cf:l \0 ~ ..... u ~ 10 10 N (17 , I ...... ..... lI:l~ U 'tJ]' o..C u 0 ..... '"' 0 U lIS 0 0 0 ..... j~ 0 .........Ul 0 0 0 u 0 o"s:! 0 0 0 ~ 0 g~ I/) ~ ~ 0 ~ ...-I 0\ ~ ~ C"l c::i ........ ~ (17 '"' .... .... Q) '"' Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ '"' ..... lI:l .....'"'~..2 'S ~ 0 ~ CJ) Ci1 I:: ::> CJ) CJ) ..... ..... ..... u~~s '"' 0 lI:l lI:l Q) ~ ..... ..... .... '"' '"' lI:l 0.. Ul t/) ~ ..2 ..2 ..... .... .... 001 ',lj 0 0 o u t/) t/) u u 0 0 6 I:: ',lj 00 ~ u U lI:l .... ...... ..... ~ ~ 0.. ::l 'S lI:l :g~~c .... .... ..... .lS .lS 0 ::> ~ <('-"''-'"'-''' '0 ~ ZI ~ IU-- ',Ii-if ~ -5i !l Ul o u CO .S ~ 0.. -ci Q) "0 "0 lIS !l Ul o u a :jj G Q) ..... 0.. Ul 0-0 "0 U c:....(O ;.::. Cd (/) (/) ~ CJ) Q) 000 ~ uUU:jj ........ lacaca;a a caa"O :jj ~:jj:jjllS .l!! .s ;a;a :g CJ) lIS "0 "0"'" ~p.. SllSlIS~ ~:g:gu J,:::l..............u ll.. 0.. 0.. "- "0 I.l) a ~la]]d :jj "O::::l"-"-~ ~ '1iJ Q) I.l) I.l) ~ .... ..0 ~ '"""! '"""! ". II ;:j ...~ 0 > UlCJ)"'~;::" fo o~ iij iij ~ g U S2:2:.....~ !:l UlO~~ 'tl .2:! J:a... E-< ] .~.~.~ .~ ~ 6 ];:jQ)Q)c ~ Q):9t:;l::id 0.. '::'boo...... "0 ~ .~ "0 "0 ~ la u~lala~ Ul r;::1o'tj........... "0 .l!!~u~.....; c . 2:l"O"-"-~ &~ iij a ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... "0 o..~ ~ .2:! .....OQ)Q)........ltl ;:jt:;e.o~lISltl~ 8:8ltl;:J~"S:!::::l ~G'58~~~ oQ)....~........;> coo..;:jooo...... S 0..0 co 0.. 0.. 0 . "O~o!l!l!l ] la :s .s .~ .~ .~ ....~Ul"OQ)OO ~ la ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Q)t:;Q) ........................ iijQ)iij ............... ~.s ~ 0..~~.2:! callSca~~~~ .9- S . e. iij "0 "0 "0 .~ tl.~ ~ ~ Q) Q) s......s::::lv"O"O ~~~~~~~ ....... c ff~~~~ ~ -5i .... Ul 8 ~ lIS Ul Q) ..... o ~ < ~ o~ CJ)OO uO\ .........~ I/) I .........('.1 u~ .....:1\0 o~ .. .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM .. - .. DATE: March 18, 1999 ..' - TO: Kevin C. Duggan, City Manager .. FROM: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director Jim Russell, Assistant Public Works Director-Public Services 11III\ - SUBJECT: USE OF TERTIARY EFFLUENT WATER (TEW) ~ .. This memorandum provides information regarding the efforts - both past and present - to use TEW (reclaimed water) in the North Bayshore area, specifically for irrigation purposes at Shoreline Golf Links (SGL). .. .. .. TEW or reclaimed water is the end product from the tertiary sewage treatment at the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant (R WQCP). The reclaimed water is then" sold" to various users including the City of Mountain View and piped back to the Irrigation Pump Station (IPS) in a pipeline through the Baylands. The TEW water is typically used for irrigation, but has other uses including use in industrial cooling towers and, in some cases, is provided (through dual plumbing) to homes to flush toilets. .. .. . - - Generally, use ofTEW for irrigation is acceptable. However, circumstances unique to SGL and the Palo Alto Regional Water Treatment Plant have made its use difficult. .. - BACKGROUND - - The use ofTEW for irrigation purposes in the North Bayshore area has decreased over the last six years. During Fiscal Year 1993-94, almost 44% of the total irrigation water produced through the IPS was TEW. During Fiscal Year 1997-98, no TEW was used (see attachment A). The high levels of residual sodium in the soil and the inadequate drainage of some of the SGL turfgrass led to the decision to suspend the use ofTEW. - .. .. - In the 1991 Reclaimed Water Use Feasibility Study, and later in a 1992 Water Reclamation Master Plan Report for the Regional Water Quality Control Plant, the use of reclaimed water was discussed. Several key issues that impact the use of reclaimed water on the Mountain View Shoreline Golf Links were offered. In summary, both reports recognized the high salt concentration and very poor native soils. The soil exhibits very slow surface and subsoil permeability, moderately shallow root penetration and general occurrences of high water table and alkali. (The term "alkali" is used in a broad sense to mean soils with high soluble salt concentrations.) High salinity water requires forced leaching (excess irrigation water) by using .. IilIIII - - -, .. .. .. .. . ,.. - Kevin Duggan Memorandum March 18, 1999 Page 2 - - - potable or TEW to prevent salt buildup. About 94% of SGL was constructed over landfill and the existence of the impermeable landfill cap makes it extremely difficult for irrigation water to leach away from the plant root zone. .. ... RECENT FINDINGS - ~ In an effort to research TEW use history, Public Services staff recently met with the manager of the Palo Alto RWQCP to discuss methods to improve the quality of the TEW. Staff discovered the City of Mountain View generates levels of chlorides (used to gauge levels of sodium) in the sewer system twice as high as Palo Alto and four times higher than Los Altos or Stanford University. - ,- ... - Over the past six-months, Public Services staff has tested various sections of the City sewer infrastructure to determine specific areas that may have either saltwater intrusion potential, or dischargers that are generating the high-levels of sodium in the system. Household water softeners have potential as high-level generators. This testing is ongoing and the results will be critical in eliminating the high-level sodium discharges. Since the City of Mountain View generates 35%-40% of the total flow into the RWQCP, a reduction in our sodium discharge would greatly increase overall TEW quality. We expect to complete testing by July of this year. - ,.. .. - - ".., Since 1991, the quality of the TEW has been slowly improving (see attachment B). This improvement in TEW quality is attributed to recent Sewer Main Line Replacement Programs in the City of Mountain View and Palo Alto. .. .. - IRRIGATION PUMP STATION - The IPS is currently in the engineering design phase for construction of improvements to be built this calendar year. These improvements will provide an automated system that will economically blend TEW and well water and provide a consistent, quality product for SGL and other North Bayshore irrigation water customers (see attachment C). - ,.. .. RECOMMENDATIONS ,,,.. - . Public Services staff recommends the use of TEW in conjunction with the development of an irrigation well, to provide a blended irrigation water source. The City will continue to improve the quality of sewer discharge to the Regional Water Quality Control Plant. As the TEW quality improves, we can begin use of TEW and over time, a higher ratio of TEW can be blended with well water for irrigation purposes. .. - .. .. . After discontinuing use ofTEW in SGL irrigation water, and two years of higher than ""'" average rainfall, extensive soil sampling should be done in the next several months to provide .. a baseline for monitoring the impact of future use of blended irrigation water after it is reintroduced in the Shoreline area. - - - - l' rK ~.. " . .. Kevin Duggan Memorandum March 18, 1999 Page 3 .. - - CONCLUSION - .. Public Services Division staff support the construction of a SOL irrigation well. With the IPS improvements in place later this year, coupled with steady quality improvement ofTEW, we are confident the product produced for irrigation purposes will meet the demands of our customers. .. ... IIIIIit The use of TEW blended with well water for irrigation of SOL will also benefit the City of Mountain View water system operations by reducing potable water demand by 1.2 million gallons per day (peak summer) and reducing operational costs associated with providing irrigation water to SOL (see attachment D). - .. .. We will work closely with the Community Services Department and SOL to address the common goal of increasing the use ofTEW, reducing operating costs and providing a quality product. - .. .. We will keep you informed of progress we make with reclaimed water use. We are available to answer questions you may have regarding this issue. .. - .... Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director - .. ~~~~ - .. Jim Russell, Assistant Public Works Director-Public Services - ... Attachments .. .. Cc: EEM, USM, file - ..... - - - .. - - .. .. .. .. - - .. - - .. .- - - .. Attachment "A" Tertiary Effluent Water Useage at Irrigation Pump Station ;/fI1IIf .. - 50% 45% 44% ~ 40% e.... 'C QI 35% VI :J ... ~ ~ 30% .. c: QI :::I it: 25% w ~ III 1:: 20% QI I- ... 0 .. 15% c: CI) u ... QI ll.. 10% 5% 0% 1993-1994 1994-1995 1995-1996 - IJTertiary Effluent Water Useage - 0% .. - .. - .. .. .. - .. ... - - 1996-1997 1998-1999 - Fiscal Year - - .. - - lIII .. .. - .. ~.~~' iiI~l'tT. J 1300 1100 ::r 900 0, S I: 0 :;:; ~ .. I: Gl 700 0 I: 0 () .. I: Gl ::l .. :;:; II) I: 500 0 () Attachment "B" Palo Alto Tertiary Effluent Water Quality Improvement o Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) ! - '11 - Sodium (Na) - '~iIM, ... - ... - -. .. .. .... .. - ,. - 300 6-.... --f1----6, .....1i.-- ..... .. "6- - . - ~ - - - ~ - - 100 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Palo Alto Reclaimed Water Analysis (year) Note: Reduction in concentrations in total dissolved solids and sodium highlight water quality improvements in TEW from 1991 to 1998. . .. .. .. - .. - .. - .. - -'"/). .. 1998 - - - - - .. - - ... .. .. .. - -' .... Attachment "C" - North Bayshore Blended Water Customers - - - - . Sun Micro Systems . Shoreline Amphitheater - - ,- . #E Parking Lot ,.. . Shoreline Blvd. Landscape Medians . Crittenden Closed Landfill Site Landscaping . Shoreline Golf Links - - - ... - - ... .. - .. - .. .... - - - - - .... - - .. _. .. - .. ~. '1:"j;lI,I..~~f" .. Jl~ .. ... - Attachment "D" Operational Costs - .. Municipal Water Municipal Water Water Well3 Blended Well Description (Wholesale) 1 (Retail)2 WaterfTEW Quantity of Water 250,000 ccf 250,000 ccf 250,000 ccf 275,00OSccf Unit Cost at Source $ 0.78/ccf $ 2.25/ccf $ 0.60/ccf $ 0.52/ccf (Wholesale) (Retail) (SCVWD Pump Tax) Total Cost at Source $195,114 $562,500 $149,205 $144,105 Additional Cost6 (O&M for IPS) $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 (O&M for Well) $54,314 $54,314 (Depreciation for Well) $20,000 $20,000 Total Cost $270,114 $637,500 $298,519 $293,419 Total Cost Per Unit $ 1.08/ccf $ 2.55/ccf $ 1 .19/ccf $ 1.07/ccf Cost Savings versus SFWD Retail Water Costs $338,981 $344,081 Future Recycled Water Savings from SCVWD7 $9,784 - - ... .... ... .. .. ." .. ., .. .. - - - .. ~ - 1 Wholesale SFWD costs shown at $340/acre-ft. 2 Retail SFWD costs estimated at $960/acre-ft. 3 Irrigation Well Water with SCVWD Pump Tax of $260/acre-ft. 4 Blended water with 5 units well water to 1 unit TEW at $0.16/ccf. 5 Estimated 110% water use for leaching (flushing out) salts from soils. 6 Estimated additional costs per Strategic Planning for Water Resources in the North Bayshore Area (Dated 05Feb99) 7 SCVWD has agreement with City of Sunnyvale to pay $93/acre-ft that reduces Sunnyvale's demand on SCVWD supplies. City of Mountain can evaluate feasibility after development of a more substantial recycled water system and after SFWD switches to chlormines. .. - - iIl'J.'t - - .. - .. .. .. - .. .. c " L. ~ p ~ .. e 0 C Z I ~ eJIIIIII ~ ~ = Q) n ~ .., ~ c < ., u C C ~ " 1M ., ~ ~ c c c c - ------ I a " .. CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ n a o a n a ~ D Q ~ 3 n o 3 ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - .. - - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM - - .-. DATE: May 18, 1999 .. TO: City Council - .. FROM: David A. Muela, Community Services Director ifM SUBJECT: Prioritization of Open Space Development - - BACKGROUND - ... With each review of the Park and Open Space Plan, the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council have sought to address balancing the distribution of open space throughout the City. Beginning with the 1991-92 review, the Commission identified purchase of the property at Mercy-Bush in the Central planning area as a priority that would be of great value to the neighborhood as a possible mini-park. In the 1992-93 review, the Commission began to list neighborhoods deficient in open space as a part of the Plan. Since that time, there has been much progress made toward purchasing land in deficient neighborhoods. In addition to the purchase of the property at Mercy/Bush Streets, the City, in Fiscal Year 1997-98, purchased two additional properties, one located on Sierra Vista Avenue in the North Middlefield/Rengstorff neighborhood and the other on Devonshire A venue in the Tyrella/Evandale neighborhood. - .. - - - .. .... .... - The current Plan lists the development of the property on Sierra Vista as a Tier One priority with both the Mercy-Bush and Devonshire properties listed in Tier Two. Items in Tier 1 have been determined to be of the highest priority citywide and, as such, it is anticipated that they would have priority to receive funding. Items within the tiers are not prioritized. Although the Parks and Open Space Plan is generally accepted as the reference document for determining the priority for open space development, it is understood that factors such as the availability of park land dedication in-lieu fees, would allow certain neighborhood projects to take precedence over other park and recreational facilities regardless of their ranking in the plan. The Parks and Open Space Plan is intentionally flexible so that actions may be implemented as opportunities arise. .. - .. - .. .. - COMMISSION ACTIONS - - Earlier this year the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed and discussed the development priority of the Sierra Vista, Devonshire and Mercy-Bush sites including the timing of these parcels for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program. As a result of ... .. - - .. .. City Council May 18, 1999 Page 2 of 3 - - .. this discussion the Commission voted 4-0 (Commissioner Bryant abstaining) to prioritize development of these sites as follows - - 1. Mercy-Bush 2. Sierra Vista 3. Devonshire ... - - In addition, the Commission indicated that development of the Mercy-Bush site should begin in 1999-2000. No timing recommendations were made by the Commission for the other two sites, other than to note that the development of the sites should be timely. A discussion of each site and the Commissions actions is provided below: - .... - Mercy-Bush (Central Plannin2 Area) .. .. The Mercy-Bush property is located in the Central Planning Area, which is bounded by Central Expressway, Highway 85, El Camino Real and Escuela Avenue. Shoreline Boulevard is a major arterial. The planning area is large with a mixture of neighborhoods. The planning area includes six parks: Castro, Dana, Pioneer, Eagle, Landels and Fairmont, in addition to four City-owned parcels on South Shoreline Boulevard that have been zoned as visual open space. Development of the property is currently listed as a Tier 2 priority in the Parks and Open Space Plan and is scheduled for design in 1999-2000 and construction in 2000-2001 in the proposed 1999-2004 CIP. - - - .. .. .. The Commission at the time of its review indicated that perh.aps the most compelling reason for identifying Mercy-Bush as the top priority was the opportunity to fund both its design and construction through the use of park land dedication in-lieu fees. They also felt that with the successful development and acquisition of parks and open space in other more critical areas of the City since 1992 (the year Mercy-Bush was acquired), that it's timing for the neighborhood seemed appropriate. .... ... - - .. Sierra Vista (Ren2storff Plannin2 Area) - The Sierra Vista property (second priority) is located in the Rengstorff Planning Area which is bounded by Highway 101, Permanente Creek, Central Expressway, Middlefield Road and the Palo Alto city border. It is a mix of new and old housing as well as industrial uses. The majority of the residences are located in the southern portion of the planning area and have access to Crittenden and Stevenson Parks which are located in the adjacent planning area (Stierlin). There are currently no developed public parks or open spaces in the planning area. - - - - .. - The Sierra Vista property is referenced as a Tier 1 priority in the Parks and Open Space Plan and is listed as an Unscheduled Project in the proposed 1999-2004 CIP. To date, no in-lieu fees have been collected or designated for the development of a park at this location. - .. - .. .. .. - - ",. - - - - .. - .. - - - - - ,- - - - .. .. - ... .. - .. ,- .. .. .. JIIII .. .. .. - .. - .. City Council May 18, 1999 Page 3 of 3 While not referenced in the Parks and Open Space Plan, development of the city-owned Wyandotte-Reinert parcel (also located in the Rengstorff Planning Area) is included in the current 1998-99 CIP. The project, funded entirely from parkland dedication in-lieu fees, will allow for limited landscaping improvements to the site. The design (and bid authorization) for this project was reviewed and approved by the Council on April 27,1999. Construction is scheduled to begin later this month and be completed by the end of June. Devonshire (Whisman Planning Area) The Devonshire property (third priority) is located in the Whisman Planning Area, which is bounded by Highway 101, Highway 85 and Highway 237/Sunnyvale. The Planning Area is characterized by both residential and industrial development. Whisman and Middlefield Roads are major thoroughfares that have an impact on the accessibility of available recreation facilities. The Stevens Creek park trail will provide recreation opportunities for local residents and serve as a link to the southern portion of Mountain View. The planning area currently includes open space at Whisman and Slater Schools and at Creekside Park, which was completed in October 1998. One recent park (Chetwood) has also been added and a second (Magnolia) is being completed as part of the development of the former GTE site also within the planning area. Development of the Devonshire property is currently listed in the Parks and Open Space Plan as a Tier 2 priority and is listed as an Unscheduled Project in the proposed 1999- 2004 CIP. In the upcoming months, the Council will consider a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission to designate approximately $274,000 of parkland dedication in-lieu fees to this project. While the proposed in-lieu fees would be insufficient to fund both the design and construction of a park at this location, it could affect its status on the Unscheduled List. Prepared by: Approved by: David A. Muela Community Services Director etJ JkJJ~ Kevin C. Duggan City Manager ~ cc: Parks & Recreation Commission, CPM-Sartor, PM-Gibson, SAA-Topley .. .. - .. - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW .. - - - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - - - THIS P AGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - .. .. .. - - .. - - - - - .... - Wm - - .. .... - .. .. .. .. .. c c w ~ c c c c c c c c c c c ~. c c c In ~ . o Z ~ . ,..,. "e = QJ ~ ~ < ---- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ I m o J n n n n ~ J J J J J ~ ~ n n CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - ... ... .... .. - - - .. - - - - ... - - .. - .. ... -- .... - .. ... - - - .. - .. - ... - ... - ... CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: May 18, 1999 TO: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director FROM: Alison Turner, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: MIRAMONTE RESERVOIR EXP ANSION UPDATE, PROJECT 97-45 The Miramonte Reservoir Expansion, Project 97-45, is a major component of the Water Master Plan Improvements. The 1992 Master Plan identified an immediate short-term storage deficit of 2 million gallons and recommended the construction of a 2 million gallon reservoir adjacent to the existing 1 million gallon reservoir located at the . Miramonte site. On June 30, 1998, the City Council adopted a Well and Reservoir Water Storage Strategy that included installation of a 2 million gallon reservoir at the Miramonte Reservoir site and construction of two new potable water wells. A critical element of the recom- mended storage strategy is to identify potential reservoir sites for the City's long-term needs. The report indicated that there are limited areas in which to install additional storage. The mid-range storage deficit is 4 million gallons in addition to the proposed 2 million gallon reservoir at Miramonte. Since the future plans of Mountain View's water purveyors, San Francisco Water Department and Santa Clara Valley Water District, are unknown at this time, the long-range storage deficit for the ultimate build- out condition is unclear. As part of the predesign, the reservoir design consultant reviewed reservoir expansion alternativ.e?_. The consultant presented a range of storage capacity from 2 million. gallons to over 3 million gallons. The alternatives compared construction costs, capacity and dimensions; water quality constraints and buffer distance from the neighboring residential properties. A 3 million gallon reservoir is determined feasible on the Miramonte site and is recommended to balance the need for increased storage and maintain an adequate buffer. Reservoirs larger than 3 million gallons were considered, but due to site constraints and impacts to the adjacent properties, those alternatives were eliminated. The consultant cost estimates revealed that the proposed reservoir could be expanded from 2 million gallons to 3 million gallons at an incremental cost of $400,000. The previous estimate for a 2 million gallon reservoir was $2,400,000 and the current estimate for a 3 million gallon reservoir is approximately $2,800,000. The unit cost per - Cathy R. Lazarus May 18, 1999 Page 2 J4r,.ikj .. - .. gallon of storage reduces as the size of the reservoir is increased. In addition, increasing the reservoir size by 1 million gallons at the Miramonte site will bring the City closer to meeting its mid-range storage needs. Because of the advantages to be gained by building a larger reservoir, the City's Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 now shows the funding for and construction of a 3 million gallon reservoir at the Miramonte site. - .. ., - ~~ Alison Turner Associate Engineer - ... - .. - AT/4/PWK 923-05-17-99M-E^ .. - cc: APWD-Ko, PCE-Olmos, DE, F / c - .. .. .. - - - - - .. .. - - .. - iIIiIIII - .. - .. .. .. - - - ... - - - - - - - - - - ".,. - - - - - - - - - .. - - '- .. - - ... - -- - - - ... . CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW MEMORANDUM DATE: April 14, 1999 TO: Kevin C. Duggan, City Manager FROM: Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director SUBJECT: WATER SUPPLY/STORAGE STATUS REPORT In response to a City Council request, this report reviews the status of efforts to meet City water supply/storage goals and describes the effect scheduled projects will have on achieving those goals. Current Water Stora!!e Enhancements In June 1998, the City Council adopted a Well and Reservoir Water Storage Strategy (copy of staff report attached). The basis for that strategy is the adopted Water Master Plan, an $11.2- million capital program to implement priority water system enhancements. The Water Master Plan is scheduled for review and update on a five-year cycle, with the next update to occur during Fiscal Year 2002-03. The planned water supply/storage capacity increases include: · 2-million gallon expansion of the Miramonte Reservoir: The Miramonte Reservoir Expansion Project is in design. Design is scheduled for completion by winter of 1999, with construction to begin by spring of2000. · Construction of two groundwater supply wells - one on City-owned property along Shoreline Boulevard and one on the City-owned Adobe site (Moffett Boulevard at Central Expressway). The design of both wells is scheduled in Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Construction ofthe first well is scheduled for funding in the amount of $838,000 in Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Construction of the second well is planned for Fiscal Year 2000-2001. The Miramonte Reservoir Expansion Project will analyze the option of maximizing reservoir capacity at that site and may eliminate one of the planned wells. Water Storage Goals Water storage is needed for emergency supply, operational use and fire protection. Water Master Plan criteria recommends water supply/storage at 70% of maximum day demand, plus fire protection. The current supply/storage requirement for the City of Mountain View is 18-million gallons. The expansion of the Miramonte Reservoir and construction of two wells (or the variation noted above) will meet that goal. Short-Term Goals (Five Years) · Increase the reservoir storage capacity to 9-million gallons. · Increase well production capabilities by 2.8-million gallons per day. .. Kevin C. Duggan Memorandum April 19, 1999 Page 2 - .. .. The City of Mountain View currently has 7.1-million gallons of water storage: Bryant Tank- 100,000 gallons (the Bryant Tank is scheduled to be removed this summer after improvements to the Miramonte Pump Station are complete); Miramonte Reservoir - I-million gallons; Whisman Reservoir - 6-million gallons. The City also has six groundwater wells (one monitoring) to meet peak demand. This supply was considered in developing recommended storage requirements. (Attachment-2) - .. - - ,-. A shortage of emergency water storage is one ofthe most critical needs in the current Water Master Plan. Engineering studies over' the past decade identified an immediate shortage of 2- million gallons, with the most critical deficiency being south of Cuesta Drive. .. .. - The Water Master Plan addresses the short-term (five-year) water storage requirements with the proposed 2-million gallon reservoir expansion and construction of two new groundwater wells with emergency generators, adding a total projected supply capacity of2.8-million gallons of water per day. II1II .. - The two new wells will reduce operational water storage requirements and supplement emergency and fire protection. In addition, these wells are a cost effective supplemental water supply source, as San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (Hetch-Hetchy) rates are projected to substantially increase over the next several years. The short-term projects balance the need for additional well capacity and reservoir storage. - .. .. - Mid-Range Goals (10 to 15 vears) - Mid-range storage needs to meet future growth and increases in demand call for an additional 4- million gallons of storage by 2005. Staff recommends meeting the mid-range target by increasing reservoir storage. Mid-range needs will be confirmed and refined in the next update to the Water Master Plan in Fiscal Year 2002-03. .. .. II1II - Long-Range Storage (15 Years +) - Long-term storage requirements are less clear and depend upon water usage policies ofthe City's major water suppliers: Santa Clara Valley Water District and San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. Operational changes dictated by these suppliers prohibiting our ability to "peak" off these systems (use over our daily water allotment during times of peak demand without significant penalty), may further increase our storage requirements substantially. - II1II IIIili II1II Potential New Reservoir Sites - .. Perhaps the most critical component of the overall strategy is identifying sites for long-term reservoir storage. While we have the short-term plan in place, the long-term will require tough decisions and foreword thinking and planning. .. .. The four highest-ranked sites in the January 1998 "New Well and Reservoir Siting Study-Final Report" are the Miramonte Reservoir, San Antonio Loop, Municipal Operations Center, and Cuesta Park Annex. .. .. .. . .. -' - - - - - ,8'ItJ ... - - - .. . ... - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - ... .. - - .. - - - - - - Kevin C. Duggan Memorandum April 14, 1999 Page 3 . The Miramonte Reservoir site has sufficient undeveloped area to construct up to a 3-million gallon partially buried, below ground reservoir behind the existing reservoir. A reservoir constructed at this site could meet or exceed the storage needs in Zone 3. The Miramonte ~eservoir site is currently in the design phase. · The San Antonio Loop site has a high water table, making it unsuitable for reservoir storage. · The existing Whisman Reservoir at the Municipal Operations Center could be replaced by a new buried reservoir with a capacity up to 10-million gallons. However, it presently provides most of the available storage capacity in the City and could not be taken out of service prior to equivalent capacity in place elsewhere. · The Cuesta ParkAnnex could provide more than 20-million gallons of capacity in above ground construction or up to 20-million gallons in a buried reservoir. The reservoir would require about one quarter of the site, leaving over nine acres of the undeveloped parcel undisturbed. Bryant Water Tank Site: Although ranked eighth in the evaluation for potential reservoir sites, the Bryant Tank Site ranks fifth when considering only City-owned property. If above ground reservoirs are constructed the capacity for the site is 15 MG. The site elevation could accommodate a reservoir that theoretically could provide gravity service to parts of Pressure Zones 1,2, and 4 within the City. Summary As the City Council is well aware, there are many competing interests for each of the most optimal reservoir sites. In the near-term, plans are well underway to meet storage requirements. Meeting long-term objectives is more challenging because of the difficulty in identifying and protecting future reservoir locations. One option the Council may wish to consider is moving more aggressively to identify the desired reservoir locations and initiating preliminary feasibility, engineering and environmental work now, while deferring actual construction to the next Water Master Plan cycle. Please contact me should you have any questions or require follow-up on this issue. Cathy R. Lazarus, Public Works Director Attachments Cc: APWD-Russell, USM, EEM, PCE-Olmos, file AGENDA: June 30, 1998 ATTACHMENT 1 8.2 _ ... CATEGORY: New Business - DEPT.: Public Services """, - CIT\' OF \IOU"lT,\IN VIEW TITLE: Well and Reservoir Water Storage Strategy - - - RECOMMENDATION .. 1. Authorize staff to proceed, on a conceptual basis, with preliminary consultant studies, environmental review, design, neighborhood discussions and other actions necessary to implement short-term water storage capacity increases outlined in the adopted Water Master Plan including: - - .. - . A 2 million gallon expansion of Miramonte Reservoir; - . One groundwater well on City-owned property along Shoreline Boulevard; and - - . One groundwater well on the City-owned Adobe site (Moffett Boulevard at Central Expressway). - - 2. Adopt a mid- and long-range strategy to increase reservoir storage by: - - · Seeking opportunities to develop joint uses of potential reservoir sites; and - . Updating the Water Master Plan periodically to ensure municipal water storage capacity meets current requirements. - - FISCAL IMPACT - - Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) have been prepared for the following projects: . Miramonte Reservoir CIP 97-45, $307,000 for design (already funded) CIP 99-33, $2,192,000 for construction ~ ~-- ""'" . Wells CIP 99-30, $174,000 for design of two wells CIP 99-31, $838,000 for construction of one well elP 00-26, $838,000 for construction of one well -- .. ..... .. .. - .. ,- .. AGENDA: June 3D, 1998 - PAGE: 2 - - The Finance and Administrative Services Department is monitoring the financial status of the - Water Fund to determine if these projects can be funded with existing reserves or will require - bonding. Financing recommendations will be made to City Council after site selection is . .. finalized and preliminary engineering cost estimates are available. - BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS - Status of Mountain View Water Storage Capacity - - Over the past decade, the City commissioned several engineering studies to evaluate the _ adequacy of the City's water supply and storage system. These studies culminated in the adoption of the Water Master Plan in Fiscal Year 1996-97, an $11.2 million capital program to - implement priority water system enhancements. The recommended actions before Council - are to authorize staff to proceed with the water storage projects contained in the Water _ Master Plan and to establish a long-term (15-20 year) strategy for pursuing future water storage needs beyond the existing Master Plan horizon. .... - The City of Mountain View currently has 7.1 million gallons of water storage: 100,000 gallons _ in the Bryant Tank, 1 million gallons in Miramonte Reservoir and 6 million gallons in Whisman Reservoir. The City also has the capability to operate its existing groundwater - wells to meet peak demands and this supply was considered in developing the recommended _ storage increases. .. A shortage of emergency water storage is one of the most critical needs addressed in the - existing five-year Water Master Plan planning horizon. Engineering studies over the past .., decade identified an immediate shortage of 2 million gallons, the most critical deficiency being south of Cuesta Drive. .. "" The Water Master Plan addresses these short-term (5-year) water storage requirements by proposing an additional 2 million gallons of reservoir storage and constructing two new groundwater wells with emergency generators adding a total projected capacity of 2.8 million gallons of water a day. These projects will increase total storage in the City's network of wells and reservoirs to approximately 11.8 million gallons. This approach is consistent with the City's historical strategy to use the groundwater aquifer as an underground reservoir supplemented by engineered storage in tanks and reservoirs. The capacity increases will provide storage roughly equivalent to one day's average water demand. In the event of a major disaster, conservation measures would be implemented potentially extending this supply. . - - - - - .. - - Mid-range (10-15 year) storage requirements to accommodate projected growth and anticipated increases in demand call for an additional 4 million gallons of storage to be available in approximately 2015, achieving a total storage of 15.8 million gallons. Staff recommends meeting the mid-range target by increasing reservoir storage rather than - .. ... - AGENDA: June 30,1998 PAGE: 3 increasing future dependence on groundwater wells. Mid-range needs will be confirmed and refined in the next update to the Water Master Plan scheduled in 2002. Long-term storage requirements are less clear and depend upon water usage policies of the City's major water suppliers: the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the San Francisco Water Department. The issue is whether the suppliers will continue to allow their customers to "peak" off their systems without paying a significant penalty. Peaking is the term used in the water industry to describe the varying demand for water in urban areas where water usage is highest in the morning and evening hours. Currently, the City of Mountain View and other water retailers use the San Francisco and Santa Clara Valley Water District pipe- lines as reservoirs to store water. If and when peaking is disallowed, local storage capacity must increase to store the water supplied during nonpeak hours for use during peak times. If peaking were prohibited, Mountain's View's storage needs would increase by another 13.2 million gallons, bringing total storage requirements to 29 million gallons. At this point, neither of the City's wholesale providers is planning to change current practices about "peaking" off their pipelines. New Well and Reservoir Siting Study As the first step toward implementing the capacity enhancements outlined in the Master Plan, the City retained the engineering firm of Dames & Moore in 1997 to conduct a well and reservoir siting study. The purpose of the study was to develop an inventory of viable sites for short- and long-term reservoir and well expansion in the City. The analysis used a variety of factors to ass~ss the viability of various sites including City ownership, proximity to a San Francisco or Santa Clara Valley water connection, hydraulics, proximity to known ground- water contamination and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Based on the analysis the following lists of priority sites for future wells and reservoirs were developed. The following lists of sites reflect an initial engineering assessment of their suitability for water storage or wells. For each site, there are policy, neighborhood, interagency, engineering, planning, operational and environmental issues to be addressed before proceeding with a well or reservoir. Detailed study may indicate that some sites are ultimately not viable for water storage. iI"I.!I iftlii\J' ., - .. - .. .. .. .. .. - .. .. .. - ., .. .. .. ., - .. - - .. .. - - .. .. ... !II!JI'!I ';ijMj.i" !III'! .. - - - " .. AGENDA: June 30, 1998 .... PAGE: 4 - ,- Potential Future Reservoir Sites - .. Maximum Storage Maximum Storage Location Capacity (MG)' (Me') Capacity (Aboveground) (Below Ground) Miramonte Reservoir Site 5 3 (30' high tank) San Antonio Loop Site 10 Limited-High (35' high tank) Groundwater MOC Site NA 10 Cuesta Park Annex >20 20 Bryant Tank Site 15 2 (three 30' high tanks) (two 25' deep tanks) Graham Middle SchooP NA 10 Temporary Library Sitel 20 10 Rengstorff Park NA 5 - - - .., - ... - - - .. - - - ... ... - .. - 'Million Gallons. lNot City-owned. ... .... - .. .. .. .. ... .. ... .. - - AGENDA: June 3D, 1998 PAGE: 5 Potential Future Well Sites Location Owner South Shoreline Boulevard (south of California City of Mountain View Street) Graham Middle School Mountain View Elementary School . District Adobe Site (Moffett Boulevard at Central City of Mountain View Expressway) Caltrans Site (Sylvan Avenue at Moorpark) State of California Landels School Site (City-owned parcel near City of Mountain View Stevens Creek) Temporary Library Site (Moffett Boulevard) Federal Government Mercy-Bush Site City of Mountain View With the rapid pace of development and increasing land values in Mountain View, viable sites for water storage are becoming very limited. It is possible, though not preferred by State regulators, to design buried reservoirs with parking, tennis courts, playing fields and other open space uses on top of them. Joint-use reservoir construction is more expensive but may be the most realistic strategy considering the competing demands for vacant land in the community. By identifying sites today, directing staff to seek opportunities for joint uses and developing a flexible approach to future reservoir development, the City can meet the community's future water supply needs. Short-Term Strategy All of the recent water system engineering studies confirm the need for 2 million gallons of additional storage in the area south of Cuesta Drive. Expansion of the existing Miramonte Reservoir remains the prime location for this expansion because the Miramonte Pump Station and large water distribution mains to distribute the water are all in place. Any other location in the area will require a new pump station and bigger water mains increasing costs substantially. If the Council authorizes staff to proceed with this project, preliminary engineering and environmental studies will be initiated. Staff will also coordinate with the - - - - - . - - - .. .. .. .. .. - - .. . - .. .. \lilt - - - ... - - - - .. - .. - . .. . .. - AGENDA: June 30, 1998 .... PAGE: 6 ... - City of Los Altos (whose jurisdiction surrounds the site) to address any potential concerns .. from a city or neighborhood perspective. - ... For the two new wells staff recommends finding suitable locations on City-owned property to avoid the cost of property acquisition. Based on the Well and Reservoir Siting Study, the - prime locations are City-owned property on Shoreline Boulevard (south of California Street) ... and the Adobe site at Central Expressway and Moffett Boulevard. Only one well can be constructed on Shoreline Boulevard to avoid overdrafting the water table. Staff will work - with Community Development, Community Services and the adjoining property owners to ..... choose the best location and develop an aesthetic design and landscaping plan. Many years _ ago there was a City well on the Adobe site that was abandoned because it was deteriorating and not constructed to current standards. If authorized to proceed with conceptual planning - for a well, staff will coordinate with Public Works and others who are working on the - restoration of the Adobe Building to determine the feasibility and best location for a well. In ... addition, staff will determine the proportionate share of Adobe site landscaping and rehabilitation costs to be charged to the Water Fund. If either of these sites are unsuitable, - staff recommends negotiating with Caltrans to place a well at the corner of Sylvan Avenue IiIIlIl and Moorpark Avenue. .. - Mid-Range Strategy ... Engineering studies indicate Mountain View will need another 4 million gallons of water storage in the next 20 years, assuming the existing practice of "peaking" is continued. Four .. million gallons could be accommodated in a single reservoir at a large site or in smaller - increments at joint-use locations. Potential aboveground or below ground sites for mid-range ... storage requirements include: - . - . - . .. . .. - . .. . .. .. San Antonio Loop (aboveground due to high groundwater at this site) Cuesta Park Annex (below ground) Bryant Tank Site (aboveground due to site configuration) Graham Middle School Site (below ground) Temporary Library Site (above or below ground) Rengstorff Park Site (below ground) Long-Range Strategy ... As discussed earlier, long-range storage needs are speculative depending on future water consumption in the City and the peaking policies of the City's water suppliers. Future .... requirements could be an additional 13.2 million gallons above mid-range targets. While .. future capacity projections may vary over time, it is certain that additional storage will be - - .. AGENDA: June 30, 1998 PAGE: 7 ... .. ... required. Given future uncertainties, staff believes it is prudent to identify sites for future storage as long-range planning studies for the Cuesta Annex, Bryant Avenue and other City- owned sites are initiated. In addition, reconstruction of the existing Whisman Reservoir should be planned for, increasing capacity from the existing 6 million gallons to 10 million gallons. Several hypothetical long-range storage scenarios are illustrated below: .. .. .. .. . 9 MG at Cuesta Park Annex and 4 MG at MaC 8 MG at Cuesta Park Annex and 5 MG at Rengstorff Park 13 MG at Cuesta Park Annex 9 MG aboveground at Bryant Tank Site and 4 MG at MaC 9 MG at Graham School Site and 4 MG at MaC 9 MG at Temporary Library Site and 4 MG at MaC -- . .. . .. . .. . . .. . .. ALTERN A TIVES . - .. Authorize short-term strategy but schedule study session to discuss longer term storage strategies. .. .. - .. - .. - .... - - ~df';;- - .- - .... .. - .. lIIllI .. .. ..... - AGENDA: June 30, 1998 - PAGE: 8 - - PUBLIC NOTICING - - Agenda posting. - Prepared by: (' l iDE' ~J i:~\~,~~~\J~.~~"7 'J . Paul Olmos ~z,"\.r Principal Civil Engineer - - - - - - - - - PO/4/CAM 735-06-30-98M - E ^ - - cc: Dr. Trish Bubenik, Superintendent Mountain View Elementary School District 220 View Street Mountain View, CA 94041 - - ... - Mr. Mike Groethe, President Shoreline West Association of Neighbors 607 Palo Alto Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94041 .., .. ... Approved by: CiLle.~~~'\-,,'\' . ~ Ca thy R. Lazarus Public Services Director i~ Kevin C. Duggan City Manager .. USM, EEM, SPW, EA-Burkett, DE Site Advisory Group (PM, BC-Fetz, SP-Lauzze, SCE-Tejeda, RPM, EDM), File .. - - .. - .. - - - - - .. l1li N . co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ o < ~ z o ~ E- ~ ~ ;::J o ~ ~ Z o U ~ o < ~ o E- rJ1 ~ ~ ... > Z ~ < E- Z ~ o ~ Q Z ~ E- rJ1 ~ ~ ~ l1li ~ ..... o ... .. ~ ~ .- ~ Cd ~ ~ r:/1 8 ~~ 8 ~ ~'"d ~ C 0) Cd ~ ~ ~ ...... o 0 8 C Cd 0) ~ rf.J .- 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... 0) 0) <:t::: 0) ro Z 0\ 0) O\...D 0\ "-" .- c .- ~ro ~~ 0) C C 0 - .- . rf.J ""0 rf.J 0) ...... :> ~ . o (jj ""0 8 ~ 0) - ~ Cd 0) 0) ~ ...- ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) Cl) c: ..n ~ 0 ~ o ..... () ~ 0 0) u E ~ Cl) Cd C\S -;.....~ ~...... C '"2 ~ .:2 ...c'"O~ () C ~ r:/1 ro rf.J * .. - - .. - .. - - .- u ~ \0 v ~ o ~ .. o ~ - .. . o . r-- .. - - Cl) b.O ro ~ 0 ~ * (/) ~ ...- ~ r-' ro - .- ;..... ro ~ 0 .- ~ 0 c 0 ~ > "U 0) ;..... rf.J Cl) Cl) ~ Cl) rf.J C\S ~ 0) > Cl) ~ Cl) ...- ~ c: ~ r-' - C\S 0 r-' ~ ~ r- C - - rf.J ro Cd .- ~ ;..... ~ ...--4 ;..... .- ~ co ~ . . . - .. - - .. .. - \t!w - '* .. - - .. - .. .. - '"_"_,<",~"--=_~""""'~''-''''''';'""'_',c.~'"",,,,,,,",,~"~"....'.""",,,;",,",~~,j~,,,,,,,,,,,,,",",,,,,,,,,~___' '''.'' - - - - ~ ~ d - d ~ ~ - ~ tJ tJ ~ 0 - ~ 0 ~ - ~ 00 0 (/) . (/) ~ ~ ~ - ~ (/) ~ ~ - > ~ II ~ 0 ~ 0 ,.-.... ~ > - > (/) 0 ~ ~ - E- ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (/) - (/) ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ (/) ~ E- ~ . 00 ~ tJ 0\ - 0 ~ 0\ - ~ ~ ~ 0 0\ ~ Z ("-l ~ ~ . ~ - ~ N M ("-l ...- ~ + '-" ~ ~ ~ - ro 0 0 tJ + 0 + (l) - d ~ ~ tJ ~ E- ~ d tJ .- - 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 ~ ~ * . . (l) ... ...--1 0 ("-l 00 If) 00 0\ ;> . . + , - . ("-l 0 - ~ r- r- ~ ,If) II II ~ ...... ...--1 ........ c: - ;;> (l) ~ .. Z (l) ~ ,.-..., ,.-.... ..D .- ~ en Vl 0 ~ - E- ro ro ....... .. (l) (l) ~ Z ,.-..., ~ ~ en (l) - ::J ~ ...- ro If) 0 ~ - 0 (l) ~ ("-l ~ ,.-..., ~ I I (l) ~ 00 0 If) ...r:: .. 0\ If) ~ ...--1 () 0\ '-" '--' '-" .. en ...--1 :=: (l) ~ ~ '--' ~ - b1) - .. ~ , c: OJ) c: - (l) (l) ro ~ ~ ro ~ - - I I ~ ,- ~ ~ ~ .1 b1) en ~ ""d ~ ~ .. ,- 0 - ~ >< ,- 0 - 4""" ~ ro - .. c.r..J (/) ,.....J ~ ~ - 04 - . . . . * - - Potential Future Reservoir Sites MaxinllUilil St-(i)tI'.~:e MaX~I~~J1lil $~a.g.e u~ tMG:);J: ~~}<i;:~.E~ Location (Ahe.vegr~ (lE:e1Iew .Gt;Ol]JTO~ Miramonte Reservoir Site 5 3 (30' high tank) .. San Antonio Loop Site 10 Limited-High (35' high tank) Groundwater - MOC Site NA 10 . . Cuesta Park Annex >20 20 Bryant Tank Site 15 2 (three 30' high tanks) (two 25' deep tams) Graham Middle School2 NA 10 Temporary Library Site2 20 10 I ! Rengstorff Park NA 5 lMillion Gallons. 2Not City-owned. .. ... - .... - .. - - .. ... - .. .. - - - .. - - - .. ,. .. - - .. - - - - i;_ - .... .. .. . .. ... - 11ft - - .. - .. - .. - ... - - - - - - - .. - - - .. .. .. .. ... .. - .. .. - - - .. - - Potential Future Well Sites . ......-.. -.... Location Ow,n.er South Shoreline Boulevard (south of City .of Mo~tain Vie-w California Street). Graham Middle School Mountain View Elementary School District Adobe Site (Moffett Boulevard at Central City of MOUf:l..tain View Expressway) . Caltrans Site (Sylvan A venue at Moorpark) Stat€ of Camornia Landels School Site (City-owned parcel City of Mountain View near Stevens Creek) Temporary Library Site (Moffett Federal Government Boulevard) Mercy-Bush Site City of Mountain View ... ... ~ - .-- C'ij .. c: 0 - .- ~ C'ij - ~ (l.) - ~ 0 .. (l.) . - - C'\:S C/'J .. ~. c: - (l.) >- ~ - - C-' (l.) > - ~ 0 E-i ~ .. ~ ~ ;..... ~ . ~ -- - 0 -- to- e r-" .. ,.... - (JJ (l.) . .. 0 - en (l.) ~ (l.) ~ ~ I .. ~ ~ ~ ;..... (l.) 00 0 - ~ . r-" ~ N .-- E- c: C/'J .. I 0 0 ;..... r . ~ ~ (l.) - t- - 0... ~ ~ C'ij - C'ij ;..... .-J .. 0 -- ~ b1) (l.) - ~ r-" b1) - ;.;. ~ .- C'ij rJJ. 0 V ;..... - v 0 r-" C'\:S ~ - - C/'J 0 C/'J - -- C/'J .-- ro - .-- ::: (l.) ~ w ~ 0 ..... f"""I ~ - :>< ~ - ~ 0 (l.) ~ - U r-" - ::E 0 00 - ~ - ....... ... N .r-- ....... .. ... . . . - iIiiii - iiiiiiIrh. ..... - - ~ - ~ - C-' < ... ~ ~ 00 00 00 ["- MIlt 0 Q)C ~ >-. >-. >-. 0\ E--. bl).- Cl ~ C'd C'd C'd I - C'd C,) Cl ~ Cl Cl Cl \0 rJJ ~ C'd 0\ Ill"'" C-' o ~< \0 ~ 00 ..- 0\ ~ C\S - . . ..- Z UJU+ 0 ..- 0 ..- - ~ ~ t\1 - E-- Q) rJJ ~ - ~ ..- ~ t\1 ... ~.I C,) ~ N V) 00 C\S C,) ~ V) .- - rJJ ~ C\S - . . . ~ t'- \0 0 r- ... ~ .8 C\SI ..- ..- N ,-.. ..... UJU ~ ~ E-- 0 ~ - U ~ - 0 ~ ,-.. ~ Z Cl - --- ~ Cl c - ~ < 0 0 --- .- ~ - CQ Q) C\S bl) >-.~ ..- \0 ~ .- - ..... . . . C,) ~ C'd ..- ~ ~ N ~ , .- ~ 0 0 - C'd C\S ~ ..- ..- N 00 .. Q) Q E ..... > 00 - ~ < Q) ~ Z Cl 00 .. ~ Q Q) - 00 Z 0 - < ~ Q) . 00 .. ~ ~ ~ ~ C\S ..- ~ ~ .. ~ ~ 00 -- Q) ~ ;;> .. ;;> ro , - Q) Q) >-. ~ ~ - - Z -- 0 .--. ~ Q) ~ 00 ~ C\S ~ .. .... ...... C\S - > < ~ ~ < >-. >-. ~ - .- C\S E-- - ~ c 00 - """ 0 ~ 0 ........ r-' ........ Z .- - - C\S C\S ...... - ~ ~ ,...J r-' ::J ~ UJ C ~ - 0 0 ~ ~ c .. ~ ~ C\S . . . . * .. - - z --H~f=H~m~f 1/11 ~~'";u iT-\'~~!~iJ I L li I ll~,~ :=Durn rn l I ~[I n I -l .... SIJOKY / fiT \ ii - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii I I I I I I I I I A~I I 1 L.I I I fil' Ti1 ] ::---J I cJE~Tl I I I J I lOR I/"_ CUESTA iIIr _ = I I , , I I II I I I 11 ~t~'~3~" L ~\ III ~= [ - ~r~"" - - r-- - ~' - - ---l..lllltW. r= PARK" - -- -:;! ~-- ~ I I I-- - SPRINGER SCHOOl - __ _:;; e! _-~ _ _ lOS ALTOS \ :> -'" ~_~~ - I =, '--- - SCHOOl DiSTRICT _ ~~ - X Q. - '$ ~ , .3 - ~~'l( = ~;;;;Q --~r-- "j- ':..." < ~ II ~= - n -n- II T ~ ~ANnh WY = I _ I ~ //1 / 111 - TENNISCOU =: @fl~ EE =E == It I I I I I A~ -1- '-- -'- - - -f-- r--... I I I o I IZII- -r-- Z - - -r-- -I "- '" --- ~f--- -- =-:a:r:::i ~~ ST -- -- -'- r--- -r-- -- c---<m I -- -- -~ r---- -,- -_ I--_~ '" I ~ __ 0 ST FRANQS _ -- -- >--- -- -- 1--- NIGN SCHOOl '--- - - - -- - - f-- _ _ I-- ---I I FOOTBAll ~'. ' l .- - - - - - f--r-- BUREN FIElO ~ -: '" - f--'- := = - / I I IT"", I ~ : 3'--- f-- - l I I I I I I I ~ PARKING BASEBAll!-L n ~--;-- '--- GEST OR ~ FlELO 1_ ~~L: I ::-~~ i::,~~~~;~;mi~:~1 =C! ':LJ.! ;"';'" I I I ~ I I H'T'TfP~ HiRJ~~\ '''I'~'" r t; 11 ~~ ~ ~ ~ d \ v I ~ I~~ \, I \Jj Gd ~ ~ 'II I ~~, ::","m~~ '" 15 l.) ',-- ro""",~ .~ I .~ .. .. .. - .. - - - - - PRAcnCE FlELO .. .. .. - - - .. - .,; .. .. COVINGTON RO - .. STANl.Ey A~ - - - - iiiJitif BERRy A~ . - II - - ... D48 MIRAMONTE RESERVOIR SITE .. ..riff - s.... CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW .... , . . . . . -. '" "~.' . . - .... . .- . - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - ,... - - - - - - .. - - - - ... .. .. .. .. - ... .. - .. - - ... .. r.,,]!i 'j hi' . I . .....j.. '/' " I I D50 CAL TRANS SITE -..... CITY OF .MOUNTAIN VIEW . _" ~., .... ~: z ......... -" at' _ ". ~ ..... , , - .. .. .. - - - - - . - - .. .. .. - .. .. - - - PIONEER PARK .. CITY HALL - .. IIIIiI - - - . - - .. - D28 - D29 - D30 SOUTH SHORELINE .. .. .. ~ CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW .. . III .. - - - - - .., - - .... - - - - - - - - - .. - - - .. .. lilt - .. .. .. .. ... - .. .. .. - .. D27 ADOBE SITE -..... CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ,~.,'" ,~..... T.4.:_.... t..... ....."'.:...._...~~: ~--.;.....-..\-~........_..::\,;..:"lI:~. ::)..'~ {,":'. ......-:-~..u.....:.::.;~,~.".. '=....... ....~...:........~-: r.... ~-_..~- - M r- z c.:: :2; - - w <:: """ ;- <: = - = Q 00 0\ 0\ - = "" o - 00 "" ~ - = ~ .- -Ie "0 bJl E '-' ~ E = - o :> .-.- ~ ~ -c -c Q) Q) ...... ...... . t:: . i: C/) u u l: c:: c:: ""'" Q) ~ ~ OJ) - - s.... ro 0.. 0.. 0 '"" '"" '""t.=. 0 ~ ~ * CI5 ~ ~ E __ E E 5t 6 -5-5g~ .~ .~ V) Q) ~...... M J,..., c:: c:: ~ ~~@'"O .~ .~ Q) c:: tIl tIl c:: ~ S S 0 ~ u U '"0 c:: '-" '-" c:: 0 '"0 '"0 ~ Cii a a tIl '"" E E 1: & Q) Q)V)O 00 >.>.'"" ~ ~ t2 00 E E :::l :::l E E 'x 'x ~ C'O ~~ to- to- o 0 '$.'$. o 0 V) N t"- t"- o o -.::t >. u c:: * Q) r"" OJ) r"" '"" 0.. Q) OJ) E oCJJ o '-" o to- v) 0 @] o o ...... > .D ~ ;:I t-OO -.::t 00 00 0 M 00 tIl - c:: ~ Q) 5 ~ OJ) ~ ~ ~ Q) "" '"" '"" OJ) .- 0 .8 e ~ CI5 00 .9 ~ >.-00 c::: u 2 ::: ~ E 0 0 ~e.oCii~_ "" Q) t Q) ~ .s E 00...: '0 OOCJJ ~t- '"0 Q) '"" .- :::l 0" Q) ~ Q) OJ) C'O '"" o ...... 00 o .- ~ -- = ~ c:.....c:: = ""'" UN ot :: > .... o. ~ '-" = tIl ~ C Q) .5: ~ - OJ) ~ c:: "0 Vi f 'x ~CJJ .D C'O ,... "ii ~ t"- -- o '"0 Q) Zc _ .C Q) Q) ~ > Q) '"O.D ~ 0 u ...... Q) Q) .~ Cii '"" '"" c... ::: o(!~ >. '-" '"O~ :::l _ ...... Q) C/) ::: OJ) c:: * '';:: E C/) 0.. OJ) '"" o g C: o~ Q) - tIl Q) ~ '"0 c:: ~ o ::: ~ ~ > o u ::: C/) ...... E "ii tIl :::l ~ E E ~ 00 = .~ ...... 0"1 tIl ~ -9 0"I~~r.i3 M N 0"1 0"1 00 \0 OOOO~ M N N -- tIl '"" ...c:: ""'" N '"" Q) > o '-" tIl - - Q) ~ '"0 Q) c:: r"" c:: 0 ~ Q '';:: 0.. ~ g 0>'"0 ::: u 8 t-C/)o.. c:: o .- ...... ::: e o ;:I t+:::'"O OJ) ~ c:: :::l 0.. ...... r"" g ::: $..... .:= C :- o ,... u. ""'" N tIl Q) E :::l tIl tIl ~ >. ...... .- u C'O 0.. C'O U Q) c:: o ~N .D Q) ~ '"" tIl :::l ::s ~ tIl Q) c:: '"" o c... - - '"" b'ht2 c:: Q) o ~ '"" ._ 0 E Vi V) >. ...... .r:: . ;; ...... ~ ::: So .b ...... c:: Q) '"" 1-0 :::l u c:: o ~ o > '"" Q) tIl Q) '"" c:: o ~ OJ) c:: o c:: o .- .-::: - E o 1-0 E ~ - Q) Q) b'h '"0 '"0 '"" 0 S t2 ...... -- :-: ~ E E ce \0 C/) 000 00- V) 0 o .- ~ = c:.. = U "" Q) .- c:: ~ o ~ .... > E 0 "" tIl E ~ .- e ~ ...c:: ._ c:::~~ c:: o .- tIl >. c:: ...... ~ 'u 0.. ~ X 0.. t.r.J ~ Q) U ...... 1-0 c:: .- o 0 c E c; ~ ~ Q) Q.: ~ o:l~~ Q) .~ ...... t\l c:: 1-0 Q) .:::: ~ c:: o - t\l OJ) c:: c:: o ._ -- ~ ...... o ...... .- - '"0 .- Q) E '"0 :::l M - to- u o .S 00 :-: c :-e .: tIl 0 ~ ~ Q) tIl c:: ~ ...... c:: t\l >. 1-0 o:l '-" c:: .s OJ) 0 -Vi 15 Q) :::l OC/) o 0 00 N 00 -Ie "0 bJl 5 - .. .. - .. .. - - - .. .. .. .. - >. ~ '"0 1-0 Q) Q) ...... 0.. :::l tIl c:: c:: r"" o c:: '"" t\l Q) OJ) 0.. c:: tIl o c:: =..:2 -- ca E OJ) .. - - - - .. .. "0 5 bJlc:.. 5 bJl .. II) 00 Q * .. - - -- - Mif - - - ~ bJl = "" o - 00 - ... ~ - = c o .- - .- "0 "0 -< .. "'" - .. c c c ~ ~ [ c c c c c c ~ I g ~ c ~ ~ \0 ~ . Q Z ~ .~ ~ = QJ ~ ~ < . -- - -- - -----..---- CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ~ a ~ o a o a I o o ~ J ~ J J J ~ 3 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 199912000, PLANNED 2000/2004 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - - - - - - ... - - - ... - - - .. - - - - - - - - .. .. .. - .. .. .. .. - - - - - ~- /' /" \' , , ,/ ("' \\ 1999-2000 SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS <D COMMUNITY CENTER CONSTRUCTION (g) MIRAMONTE RESERVOIR CONSTRUCTION-PHASE 2 <ID ADOBE BUILDING RENOVATION CONSTRUCTION-PHASE 1 @ EVELYN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION, SEGMENT 2 ~ SHORELINE GOLF IJNKS RENOVATIONS/FRONT NINE @) CUBE SITE DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION <?> SAN ANTONIO LOOP CONSTRUCTION @) MERCY-BUSH PARK DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION @) WELL SITE 22 CONSTRUCTION @ MlRAMONTE AVENUE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT .t ., e , -""->"~"t'f<-"-.~~<_,, CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ,',' --';-;'~"~~'i""-";"~~'0;~;~~-r~'-:~'-_~E~_,,:,'j~-~::":'f->'?:~-f'-_,,::-,,:-;-_-':~l,~'--_:'_' "'" iloI! .. - - CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW - - - .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADOPTED 1999/2000, PLANNED 2000/2004 - - - .. THIS P AGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - - .. - . - - .. .. - - - - .... - - - - .. - .. .. .. .